Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

August 23, 2004
By: Paul Glastris

Offense vs defense... So where are we in this swift boat controversy, whats likely to happen next, and what ought to happen next?

The answer to the first question is pretty obvious: The Kerry camp, though damaged by the allegations, has all but won on the merits. In the last couple of days, several mainstream press investigationssee here, here, and herehave (despite a certain conventional even-handedness) undermined most of the key charges made by the anti-Kerry Swift Boat Veterans For Truth that John Kerry didnt deserve his medals. The SBVFT argument has been further damaged by new testimony from previously silent eyewitnesses who back up Kerrys version of the events that led to his first Purple Heart and his Silver Star. A series of suspicious-if-not-quite direct connections, and one spot-on one, have been established between SBVFT and the Bush campaign. And Kerry seems finally to be hitting back.

If that were the end of it, one could argue that this whole controversy might ultimately rebound to Kerrys benefit. It could become, in the minds of voters, yet another example of the president aligning himself with a pack of politically convenient untruths. And if that happens, Kerry ought to be able to turn the tablesfor instance, by asking all decorated war veterans in America what theyd feel like if someone started publicly asserting that they didnt deserve their medals. (In fact, the Boston Globe makes this point in its Sunday editorial.)

But of course thats not the end of it. Starting this week, SBVFT begins airing commercials attacking Kerrys 1971 Senate testimonya line presaged on the Sunday shows by former Sen. Bob Dole. It has long been understood that Kerrys greatest potential Vietnam-related vulnerability is his leadership of an anti-war veterans group. In Karl Roves playbook, the attack on Kerrys medals was just a softening-up exercise prior to the real assault. As Maureen Down puts it: The White House must tear down [Kerrys] heroism before it can tear down his patriotism.

What I find infuriating about all this is that Kerrys willingness to protest the war is an essential part of what, to my mind, makes him one of the great heroesindeed, perhaps the greatest hero--of that era. Heres a guy who, as a college student, understood and expressed publicly serious and well-founded doubts about the wisdom of Americas Vietnam strategy. Then, unlike many others of his generation, he put his doubts aside and his life on the line in order to do what he could to make his countrys policy a success. Then, having seen first hand that his initial suspicions were correct, and that the line coming out of Washingtonthat victory was just around the corner, that the Vietnamization strategy was workingwas a lie, he stood up and told the public the unvarnished truth. In my book, thats three morally courageous acts in a row. And thats not counting the thankless but vital roles he played in investigating and ending the POW/MIA controversy, opening relations with Vietnam, and improving federal services for veterans. Name me one person in public life today who negotiated the moral minefield of Vietnam with greater courage and sure-footedness.

And yet, a couple weeks ago, when I asked with a friend working on the Kerry campaign why they werent framing Kerrys protests in this way, my friend said that the polling suggested that Americans just werent prepared to hear that argument; that too many voters still think that protesting the war was a dubious act; and therefore the less said about Kerrys role in those protests the better.

I could sympathize with this line of reasoning, even if I didnt like it. But it seemed to me questionable then, given the predictable trajectory of GOP attacks. And now its clearly a dead letter. The campaign has a simple choice: on the issue of Kerrys role as a Vietnam War protest leader, they can play defense or offense. The choice is as obvious as the argument the Kerry camp should be making. We are currently involved in a war in Iraq that is failing because policymakers in Washington have miscalculated and liedto themselves and to the American people. In November, do we choose a president who has approved these miscalculations and trafficked in these lies, or one who, throughout most of his career, has calculated correctly and spoken the truth?

Paul Glastris 12:34 AM Permalink | Trackbacks

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly