Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 17, 2005
By: Leon Fuerth

Some commenters think that Republicans cant be far-sighted, and they didnt like it when I said that far-sightedness is a bipartisan issue. Fair enough, up to a point. But only up to a point. I dont like much of what the Republican Party wants to do, but I think were smarter to look for allies than to assume they arent there. The stakes are too high.

koreyel asked some questions the other day that Id like to pick up on. Are all governments short-sighted, and are there examples of government that are not? Are democracies especially prone to myopia, and are lobbyists the heart of the problem?

My take: not all governments are short-sighted all the time or about all the issues. FDRs plans for the United Nations were very long-range. Democracies definitely have a bias towards the short term because thats the way political incentives are set up. But democracies are much more likely to permit and even encourage farsighted insights and policies than are other systems, which lock error in place without hope of change.

The problem is less with lobbyists than with public attitudes. This is good news: lobbyists never change their message but the public sometimes changes its mind. And this is the other message that seems to be coming from the commenters to my earlier posts. Were not going to get longer range action until the general public starts telling politicians to pay attention to the longer term.

Leon Fuerth 10:20 AM Permalink | Trackbacks

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly