December 16, 2005
Uh-Oh....The Abramoff scandal has hit the op-ed pages. But Shakespeares Sister, you may be thinking, the Abramoff scandal has been in the op-ed pages for awhile now, you dim ninny. Ahh, yes, but not quite in this way:
A senior fellow at the Cato Institute resigned from the libertarian think tank on Dec. 15 after admitting that he had accepted payments from indicted Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff for writing op-ed articles favorable to the positions of some of Abramoff's clients. Doug Bandow, who writes a syndicated column for Copley News Service, told BusinessWeek Online that he had accepted money from Abramoff for writing between 12 and 24 articles over a period of years, beginning in the mid '90s.
"It was a lapse of judgment on my part, and I take full responsibility for it," Bandow said from a California hospital, where he's recovering from recent knee surgery.
A ten-year lapse in judgment, huh? Zany. Its amazing how such long-term lapses in judgment always seem to come to a screeching halt as soon as some judgment-impaired knob gets busted, and never a moment before.
—Shakespeare's Sister 3:50 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (16)
An incredible story bringing more shame upon American journalism.
Posted by: Hostile on December 16, 2005 at 3:58 PM | PERMALINK
Forget journalism, it couldn't have happened to a nicer think tank :)
Hey ... aren't Cato libertarians supposed to argue that the marketplace always produces the fairest results for society?
ROTFLMFAO !
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on December 16, 2005 at 4:03 PM | PERMALINK
Aww jeez. I remember the preGannon/Guckert days, when 'media whore' was a metaphore...
And given the Cato Institute's rigid free market stance, it stands to reason that they have vendable editorial whores, er, writers standing by to blovate on payment...
Posted by: Mr. Bill on December 16, 2005 at 4:11 PM | PERMALINK
At the Lack of Principles Office:
"Oh, yes, everything is rosy in America! Why? [years of nonesense ignored-ed] And, because I get paid to say that! Just didn't want you to know that last bit. Sorry. Can I go now?"
Posted by: parrot on December 16, 2005 at 4:15 PM | PERMALINK
Hey ... aren't Cato libertarians supposed to argue that the marketplace always produces the fairest results for society?
Cato libertarians have consistently argued that there is nothing wrong with prostitution.
Posted by: Constantine on December 16, 2005 at 4:16 PM | PERMALINK
Yeh, but are prostitutes paying the Cato Institute to take that position? Er, something like that...
Posted by: parrot on December 16, 2005 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
Was the knee surgery because he just got knee-capped for admitting this?
Posted by: craigie on December 16, 2005 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK
Damn, parrot, you win.
Posted by: Constantine on December 16, 2005 at 4:40 PM | PERMALINK
I think as long as the payments go to Cato directly, this business is quite all right in their view. Can't have the underlings stealing from the big boss.
Posted by: ecosharp on December 16, 2005 at 5:20 PM | PERMALINK
BTW - This whole scandal is just a more direct way of doing what the right wing has been doing for the last 20 years. Buying opinion and shoving it into the media as somehow credible.
Lots of really rich right-wingers pour millions into Cato, AEI, Heritage, Manhattan Institute, etc. All these don't do much real research, but house lots of writers who write up lots of treatises coming up with pretty good sounding arguments about why rich guys should keep more of their money.
And because they work for alleged think-tanks, they get published in the Post, Times and lots of other media.
How we have examples of some of the donors cutting out the middle man and just paying these writers themselves. Seems to me that a lot of them wouldn't see what the big difference was.
Plus they subsidize conservative campus publications like the Dartmouth Review to train all these wise-asses in training wheels.
Posted by: Samuel Knight on December 16, 2005 at 5:58 PM | PERMALINK
These republicans are making me a big fan of Capital Punishment. Don't end it, mend it (to include this kind of unamerican crap).
Posted by: osama_been_forgotten on December 16, 2005 at 6:16 PM | PERMALINK
Good points Mr. Knight. I would only add the 'conservative' organizations have also cleverly utilized C-SPAN to spread their message/lies via cable television. The so-called liberal orgs, like the Brookings Institute, which is really based on pragmatism not liberalism, have been squeezed out by these other disingenuous orgs. I hope Cato is completely smeared by this revelation.
Posted by: Hostile on December 16, 2005 at 6:19 PM | PERMALINK
What a lovely holiday present it would be, if Stephen Moore was next.
Brian Lamb has far more from the right tanks than Brookings.
Not only are they on C-Span more, but speeches at AEI are on regularly.
Posted by: thethirdPaul on December 16, 2005 at 8:56 PM | PERMALINK
Bandow's tripe has been appearing here in The Japan Times for years. I always thought he was a shill. But apparently not just metaphorically.
Posted by: snicker-snack on December 16, 2005 at 10:01 PM | PERMALINK
Well said. I totally agree with you. The point you are making here does make sense.
Posted by: candace on December 17, 2005 at 6:55 AM | PERMALINK
This "ten year lapse in judgment" reminds me of the Henry Hyde's excuse after a story about a years-long affair he'd had was exposed during the Clinton impeachment. Hyde was a tireless persecutor of Clinton, but was rather embarrassed when news came out that he'd had a five or six year long affair while he was married. Hyde, who was in his 70s at the time, blamed it all on a "youthful indiscretion" -- a youthful indiscretion that occurred for six years while he was in his 40s.
Posted by: Stefan on December 17, 2005 at 10:44 AM | PERMALINK