May 18, 2006
IS AL-JAZEERA DUCKING THE NEWS?....Marc Lynch reports that democracy advocates in Egypt are feeling sold out on all sides:
Al-Jazeera reported, and everyone has picked up, Gamal Mubarak's casual meeting with Bush, Cheney, and various worthies — which rather undermines the State Department's strong statements. The restoration of diplomatic relations with Libya, whatever the strategic justification, have been taken by many Arab democracy advocates as a clear message that the United States can not be counted on to support democratic change — that the US will abandon them the second it sees some slight advantage in doing so.
As for satellite TV, I had heard many complaints from Egyptian activists that al-Jazeera had sold them out, presumably in exchange for the release of their correspondent who had been arrested over his coverage of the Sinai bombings. I had seen some coverage on al-Jazeera of the protests, and thought that this might be changing. Evidently not. Having learned well the lessons of the potential power granted by Arab satellite TV, Egyptian security forces have been engaging in rather savage repression of television cameras attempting to cover the protests, attacks on journalists, and intimidation of others.
As Marc says, effective attacks on the Egyptian regime depend on "satellite TV again intersecting with popular protest and some signs of American / external pressure. Now two of the three legs seem wobbly." Not a single episode of al-Jazeera's key nightly prime time news/interview program Behind the News, he says, has been devoted to Egypt.
I happen to agree with Marc that satellite TV stations like al-Jazeera are probably far more important drivers of democracy than anything the United States does in its official capacity. If they're taking a dive, that's bad news for the region.
—Kevin Drum 12:52 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (17)
Why am I not surprised that Kevin Drum considers a news station with strong terrorist links an "important driver of democracy", but criticizes attempts by the administration to actually BE an important driver of democracy? The most prominent example would, of course, be Iraq.
Posted by: American Hawk on May 18, 2006 at 12:57 PM | PERMALINK
This is what happens when you let a bunch of hysterical nincompoops run foreign policy. We don't know what the hell our strategy is in the Middle East, so nobody else does.
Strongest nation on earth acting unpredictably and incoherently in a vital region? Yeah, that's gonna help make the world more peaceful, stable, and democratic.
Idiots.
Posted by: theorajones on May 18, 2006 at 1:13 PM | PERMALINK
Why am I not surprised that Kevin Drum considers a news station with strong terrorist links an "important driver of democracy", but criticizes attempts by the administration to actually BE an important driver of democracy?
Actually, Kevin Drum seems to be noting both the US government and al-Jazeera going wobbly on promoting democracy, and saying the latter failure is more significant than the latter because the US government has less capacity even if it wasn't wobbly.
Posted by: cmdicely on May 18, 2006 at 1:14 PM | PERMALINK
Not to worry, Al-Jazeera will learn to use indepedents and contractors to gather the video it needs. The Egyptian democracy movement is reasonably big news in the Middle East, and Al Jazeera wants to make a buck.
Posted by: Matt on May 18, 2006 at 1:15 PM | PERMALINK
speaking of "the region", here's a good one about Iraq.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Production/files/Taheri_0606.htm
Posted by: republicrat on May 18, 2006 at 1:15 PM | PERMALINK
What's the US-sponsored Alhurra network doing? If the US wants to encourage democracy in region it could have Alhurra cover it.
Posted by: Jim Lund on May 18, 2006 at 1:26 PM | PERMALINK
Another piece for the "Bush tax cuts are working!" trolls:
Leading indicators dip; jobless claims up
MAY. 18 11:11 A.M. ET A barometer of America's economic activity slipped in April, while the number of people signing up for jobless benefits rose sharply last week, according to reports released Thursday.
The big jump in filings for jobless benefits was mainly due to the lingering effects of a partial government shutdown in Puerto Rico. But the dip in the Conference Board's Index of Leading Indicators more clearly pointed to slowing economic activity ahead.
----------
So, trolls, did the tax cut magic stop working all of a sudden? What happened?
Posted by: BB on May 18, 2006 at 1:33 PM | PERMALINK
A full day after taxes are cut and the economy doesn't improve. We are in serious trouble now.
Posted by: Mario on May 18, 2006 at 2:10 PM | PERMALINK
Why am I not surprised that Kevin Drum considers a news station with strong terrorist links an "important driver of democracy", but criticizes attempts by the administration to actually BE an important driver of democracy? The most prominent example would, of course, be Iraq.
Actually Kevin Drum supported the war in the early going, catching much grief from the commentariat.
I'd think it's something we could all agree on that the light of day needs to shine on Egypt right now. Al Jazeera needs to get a pair and push this stuff to the front. It is the top headline on thier English hweb page at the moment, but not 5the Arabic version (based on pictures they use).
http://english.aljazeera.net
http://www.aljazeera.net
Posted by: Red State Mike on May 18, 2006 at 2:28 PM | PERMALINK
The Libya point is, IMHO, even more important.
Pretty much every commentator on the Middle East who actually knows something about the subject, even heavy duty conservatives like Bernard Lewis, agree that the major driver of radical Islam is not religion or some sort of clash of civilizations; it is that
(1) these countries offer no political outlet and no organized non-state actors except religion and
(2) the US is the prime supporter of these dictatorships, hence whatever anger and frustration arises from the local situation is directed at the US.
Clearly GWB, in spite of his claims of having studied the subject (including reading at least one of Lewis' books) has learned absolutely nothing from history.
Posted by: Maynard Handley on May 18, 2006 at 2:52 PM | PERMALINK
Well if the US government had put pressure on Egypt to get the Al-Jazeera journalist released themselves then Al-Jazeera might not be in this position. And the US government would have a lot of leverage to get this done. They do give Egypt a billion dollars a year or so.
It could be done quietly behind the scenes so that the Egyptian government can be seen as wisely opening up to democracy rather than caving in to US pressure and the US government does not have to explain why its supporting a TV station it disagrees with. This is the kind of quiet behind the scenes democracy support that should be going on.
Or even better, it could be done publicly so that the US could demonstrate by actions rather than words that it believes in freedom of speech and democracy by helping someone it disagrees with and getting a genuine result that Arabs can actually see.
Posted by: still working it out on May 18, 2006 at 6:24 PM | PERMALINK
Jim Lund--
I know one thing Al-Hurra is doing. Not getting watched.
Oh wait, here's another one: wasting our taxes.
Posted by: kokblok on May 18, 2006 at 7:28 PM | PERMALINK
american hawk: please go and do some research. when you find any solid evidence (and i mean solid, dude), about al jazeera's "strong terrorist links", then post them up. if you ever do decide to actually examine the issue, you'll find that al jazeera has been instrumental in promoting democratic dialogue and free speech in the arab world.
Posted by: jaz on May 18, 2006 at 10:19 PM | PERMALINK
Marc Lynch writes "have been taken by many Arab democracy advocates as a clear message"
Care to give at least 1 name to represent these "many" advocates?
Probably not. More opinion masquerading as journalism. Yawn.
Posted by: Moqui on May 19, 2006 at 1:31 PM | PERMALINK