Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

May 25, 2006
By: Kevin Drum

THE LAST TAX CUT?....The IRS has finally sent up the white flag in a long running legal battle over whether the 3% excise tax on long distance phone calls applies to calls that are billed at a flat rate (as opposed to calls that are billed based on "distance and elapsed transmission time"). The answer is no, so now the tax goes away and a bunch of (mostly corporate) customers will get several billion dollars in refunds.

I don't actually care one way or the other about this tax, but I couldn't resist posting this sentence from the Bloomberg summary:

The courts' involvement may deliver a victory to tax-cutting Republicans in Washington who are running out of taxes to cut and are facing a projected $300 billion budget deficit for this year.

"Running out of taxes to cut." It's funny cause it's true! And since the entire domestic policy apparatus of the modern Republican Party is based on tax cuts for their campaign contributors, what will they do now?

Kevin Drum 2:49 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (147)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

Running out of taxes to cut? Ha! WHat about the AMT which whacks more Americans than this bullshit.

Posted by: Marcus Wellby on May 25, 2006 at 2:55 PM | PERMALINK

I'm not sure I care about this either, Kevin. However, I don't quite understand. The tax-cutting Republicans are running out of taxes to cut and presumably are leaving no stone unturned looking for more. Yet, they are faced with a $300 billion dollar budget deficit. How does this "tax cut" and the coincidental refund of billions reduce this deficit?

Posted by: bigcat on May 25, 2006 at 2:55 PM | PERMALINK

bigcat, here's how it works: You cut taxes and then the supply-side economics fairy comes and magically causes tax revenue to increase. If they could cut taxes to 0, then tax revenue would magically shoot to infinity and then there would be no more deficit!

Posted by: don Hosek on May 25, 2006 at 2:59 PM | PERMALINK

The GOP proved long ago that you can never fall below the right edge-point of the Laffer curve, right? :)

Posted by: K on May 25, 2006 at 3:01 PM | PERMALINK

Kevin, Hugh Hewitt puts it something like this: "Win the war, cut the taxes, confirm the judges, control the spending, secure the border."

Posted by: Frequency Kenneth on May 25, 2006 at 3:03 PM | PERMALINK

What did the GOP do in the early 1990's? Oh yea, pray that the Democrats take over and solve the fiscal crisis. Yes, the GOP strategy might just be to pray that these lose and some politicians will the courage to do the right thing raise taxes - which of course, they'll vote against.

Posted by: pgl on May 25, 2006 at 3:05 PM | PERMALINK

There are always Social Security Taxes to cut, of course to paraphrase Bush's HUD Secretary:

"Why should I reward someone who doesn't like the president, so they can use funds to try to campaign against the president? Logic says they don't get the [tax cuts]. That's the way I believe."

Posted by: Catch22 on May 25, 2006 at 3:05 PM | PERMALINK

Cut the employer side of the payroll tax. Why should my employer fund my social security?
/snark

Posted by: Heron on May 25, 2006 at 3:07 PM | PERMALINK

1. Borrow lots of money to bribe wealthy contributors into bribing you back for more tax cuts and givaways.
2. Drive up interest rates to the disasterous late-1980's levels.
3. Start a war in the middle-east (funded with borrowed money, using china-manufactured hardware).
4. Watch inflation go sky high, thus erasing any personal debts (and corporate debts).
5. Watch oil and gold commodity prices go sky high (increasing profits for those who borrowed tons of money to invest while prices were low, knowing they were going to go up, because they knew what their man in the white house was planning to do).
6. Leave office and get cushy "consulting" job.
7. Rest easy knowing that the eviscerated middle class, now paying for elevated oil prices with de-valued dollars, will never be able to fund a serious opponent for election to public office.
8. PROFIT!!!

Posted by: Osama_Been_Forgotten on May 25, 2006 at 3:08 PM | PERMALINK

"Win the war, cut the taxes, confirm the judges, control the spending, secure the border."

He forgot the pony!!!

Posted by: ckelly on May 25, 2006 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

We're hardly 'running out of texas' to cut. Americans pay more than a third of their income in taxes; tax freedom day was April 26th this year.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday/


It's also interesting to note that the federal government profits more off of each gallon of gas sold than the oil companies do...

Posted by: American Hawk on May 25, 2006 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

We're hardly 'running out of texas' to cut.

I've been arguing to cut Texas for years.

Posted by: ckelly on May 25, 2006 at 3:11 PM | PERMALINK

The most interesting part of this story to me is that the tax was a luxury tax made in 1898 as a tax on wealthy Americans with phones... and it was still around.

It's a good lesson on why you should fight all taxes because they tend to stick around.

Posted by: Frank J. on May 25, 2006 at 3:14 PM | PERMALINK

Kevin - what will the Democrats do if they win Congress? Here's the Demo plan: "Lose the war, raise the taxes, bash the judges, increase the spending, open the borders."

Posted by: Down goes Frazier on May 25, 2006 at 3:14 PM | PERMALINK

American Hawk - both your statements are completely untrue.

Posted by: keptsimple on May 25, 2006 at 3:14 PM | PERMALINK

BTW, how did the war with Spain turn out and did the tax help?

Posted by: Frank J. on May 25, 2006 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK

oh cmon,

lets get back to talking about how the war in iraq was really about oil, shall we??

Posted by: christAlmighty on May 25, 2006 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK

The democrats want to take your guns.

Posted by: Al on May 25, 2006 at 3:18 PM | PERMALINK

I don't see a problem for the GOP if there are no more taxes to cut. The solution couldn't be more plain: Break out the public credit card, and start issuing oodles of sweet, fat federal contracts. Why, our new Wacht am Rio Grande policies oughta be good for tens of billions -- for the right people, natch.....

Posted by: sglover on May 25, 2006 at 3:19 PM | PERMALINK

And since the entire domestic policy apparatus of the modern Republican Party is based on tax cuts for their campaign contributors, what will they do now?


Since they have no policy but torture, overt or covert, I guess it's Guantanamo for the lot us.

Posted by: cld on May 25, 2006 at 3:23 PM | PERMALINK

Unemployment during April, 2006 was 4.7%. 138,000 new payroll jobs were added to the economy.

OK, Dems, now explain how increasing taxes will help the economy.

Any answer, Pelosi/Reid/Kennedy/Dean ??

Posted by: Afro Thunder on May 25, 2006 at 3:26 PM | PERMALINK

It's also interesting to note that the federal government profits more off of each gallon of gas sold than the oil companies do...
Posted by: American Hawk on May 25, 2006 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

The Federal Government doesn't "Profit" off of anything. When the Federal Government brings in revenue, that pays for services. If nothing else, it's only fair that when we spend $300 Billion to take over some middle-eastern shithole that happens to be the second largest supply of oil in the world, that some of the money from selling the oil go to pay for what's essentially a private mercenary action.

(gee, I wish the government would pay $300 Billion to secure land and resources for MY line of business.)

Posted by: Osama_Been_Forgotten on May 25, 2006 at 3:29 PM | PERMALINK

OK, Dems, now explain how increasing taxes will help the economy.

Clinton passed a more progressive tax plan at the beginning of his first term--followed by the largest economic expansion in history. Even disregarding the internet boom, the economy grew--despite the dire predictions from the idiots on the right.

Game, set, match.

Posted by: haha on May 25, 2006 at 3:33 PM | PERMALINK

Kevin Drum: "And since the entire domestic policy apparatus of the modern Republican Party is based on tax cuts for their campaign contributors, what will they do now?"

They could go beyond tax cuts to income subsidies. They are doing that for a special few right now, with their Halliburtons and oil buddies. But they could give every Republican contributor a big bonus. These are, after all, the people who do the most for the economy.

And it is all just stolen from the future anyway.

Posted by: PTate in MN on May 25, 2006 at 3:33 PM | PERMALINK

explain how increasing taxes will help the economy.


Universal Health Care.

Posted by: cld on May 25, 2006 at 3:35 PM | PERMALINK

How could Democrats possibly lose the war, increase the spending, bash the judges, or open the borders any worse than the Republicans already have?

Posted by: Doug on May 25, 2006 at 3:37 PM | PERMALINK

$300 Billion deficit?!? Not when you include aWol's bogus war and several other so-called "emergency" items not in the budget.

Posted by: Hedley Lamarr on May 25, 2006 at 3:40 PM | PERMALINK

Afro Thunder, I think it takes 150,000 new jobs just to keep up with population growth.

Posted by: Hedley Lamarr on May 25, 2006 at 3:44 PM | PERMALINK

These days, the argument for "cutting taxes" is mostly so completely detached from both actual reality and the basic concept of why we would need to actually tax anything in the first place that its not really worth posting about.

I put "cutting taxes" in scare quotes because, of course, reducing tax rates while borrowing to fund current expenditures is hardly a "cut" but why should anyone bother dicussing that particular detail? Talk about "an inconvenient truth" . . ha! It would be hilarious if it were not serious.

Apparently, most voters don't really have any rational concept of what the Federal and State budgets actually are, and really believe that there is a giant couch, somewhere in the general vicinity of Washington D.C., and that their tax dollars simply fall into the cracks of that couch, never to be seen again.

You can see from the average social security and Medicare discussions around this board, conducted by a set of the electorate which can harldy be labled average.

So, its clear the the general "anti-tax" position is marketed, sold, and based upon fundamental ignorance and basic cheapness.

I mean, for those Hawks out there, isn't there even the slightest twinge, perhaps lasting only a millisecond, where your brain lodges the folllowing thought: that "wait a minute, how is it that I can be so in favor of advocating voluntary death in a foreign country for the greater good of this country and yet not be in favor of actually funding the country's government with my money, which of course is nothing compared to actual life?"

I mean, don't allow yourself to think about that one too much, it might lead to a stroke.

Posted by: hank on May 25, 2006 at 3:46 PM | PERMALINK

It's also interesting to note that the federal government profits more off of each gallon of gas sold than the oil companies do...

Let's see . . .

January 2000:

Gas price $1.28, refinery cut 10 cents, crude oil cut 60 cents, federal gas tax 18.4 cents

April 2006:

Gas price 2.74, refinery cut 71 cents, crude oil cut 148 cents, federal gas tax 18.4 cents

hmmm . . . would I rather own a refinery, own crude oil reserves, or be a bureaucrat for the federal highway administration, hmmmmm. . . .

Posted by: toast on May 25, 2006 at 3:53 PM | PERMALINK

explain how increasing taxes will help the economy.

Subsidize some of the startup costs for alternative energy sources.

Posted by: Tripp on May 25, 2006 at 3:57 PM | PERMALINK

Kevin:

you should discuss that number of $300 billion in the quote that you cite: the deficit in 2006 will be $550 billion. It is only $300 billion if you include the SocSecurity surplus. The social security surplus *is* federal budget debt, unless you don't intend to repay it.

Posted by: cedichou on May 25, 2006 at 4:09 PM | PERMALINK

OK, Dems, now explain how increasing taxes will help the economy.

explain how they won't. don't forget to show your work.

Posted by: cleek on May 25, 2006 at 4:10 PM | PERMALINK

Frank J. - you suck at reading legislative history. I'd go back and read the five court cases and actually note the real arguments, and then go to the legislative history actually cited by the cases, before you make baseless assertions.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 25, 2006 at 4:17 PM | PERMALINK

Anonymous,
Are you saying this tax wasn't enacted in 1898 to help fight the Spaniards?

And you could put a gun to my head and I wouldn't read all that. Did you?

And were the Spaniards defeated? Anyone know?

Posted by: Frank J. on May 25, 2006 at 4:21 PM | PERMALINK

Bloomberg seems to be collectively smoking something:

The courts' involvement may deliver a victory to tax-cutting Republicans in Washington who are running out of taxes to cut and are facing a projected $300 billion budget deficit for this year.

How does this help "tax-cutting Republicans"? I mean, when the courts deliver a tax cut, its pretty hard for the Republicans in Congress or the White House to claim credit for it, plus it increases the deficit, making it that much harder for them to make political hay with new tax cuts of their own.

Posted by: cmdicely on May 25, 2006 at 4:24 PM | PERMALINK

The courts' involvement ...

ACTIVIST JUDICIARY !! LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH !! WILL OF THE PEOPLE !!

Posted by: cleek on May 25, 2006 at 4:27 PM | PERMALINK

Where is tbrosz who always posts this gem of economic wisdom on this subject: Neither its shape nor the number of maxima it has are known, but the Laffer curve is real?

Posted by: lib on May 25, 2006 at 4:31 PM | PERMALINK

Yeah, I think PTate hits the nail on the head answering Kevin's question. To go beyond tax cuts, you simply move into income subsidies. Whether it's payment to grow ethanol, sugar tariffs or lucrative defense contracts, government money for something close to nothing is the way to go.

Posted by: S Ra on May 25, 2006 at 4:34 PM | PERMALINK

federal land give aways?

Posted by: B on May 25, 2006 at 4:44 PM | PERMALINK

ckelly: I've been arguing to cut Texas for years.

And give it back to Mexico. Then build the Big Fence. If we're generous, we could give 'em OC(sorry Kevin), OK & KS.

Posted by: natural cynic on May 25, 2006 at 4:47 PM | PERMALINK

Yeah, I think PTate hits the nail on the head answering Kevin's question. To go beyond tax cuts, you simply move into income subsidies. Whether it's payment to grow ethanol, sugar tariffs or lucrative defense contracts, government money for something close to nothing is the way to go.

It's called the EITC, a program we should cut to pay for tax cuts.

Posted by: American Hawk on May 25, 2006 at 4:48 PM | PERMALINK

i say we cap federal payments to states at a level equal to what their citizens pay in taxes.

Posted by: cleek on May 25, 2006 at 5:08 PM | PERMALINK

And since the entire domestic policy apparatus of the modern Republican Party is based on tax cuts for their campaign contributors, what will they do now?

1. work to make the tax cuts permanent;

2. warn that Democrats will raise the taxes if permitted to take control of Congress;

3. emphasize the progress on Iraq and paint the Democrats as weak on defense -- do this with veterans of Iraq;

4. claim that the prescription drug benefit is better than the alternatives;

5. point to all the new construction projects in their own districts and say "I helped to make sure that our district got its fair share of federal spending."

6. claim that the energy bill could have been passed sooner, and be reducing fuel bills now, if it hadn't been for Democratic obstructionism (e.g., H. Clinton's opposition to bio-ethanol, since reversed);

7. highlight the improvements since the passage of the tort reform and bankruptcy reform;

8. take credit for the fact that the US economy is growing at 2 - 3 times the rate of the economy of the EU;

9. emphasize how hard they worked on the immigration reform bill to protect the rights of natural born citizens and legal immigrants;

10. mock and criticize nationally prominent Democrats and well-known prominent Democrats;

11. take credit for putting Skillings and Lay behind bars.

Those are the main things.

That reminds me. The energy bill contained subsidies for new thermal depolymerization plants, like the Conagra plant in Carthage, MO. does anybody know if any new plants are planned/under construction in consequence of the bill. When I search, I mostly get old news releases about the Carthage plant -- it seems to be doing fine with oil at $70 per barrel, but the details are proprietary.

Posted by: republicrat on May 25, 2006 at 5:11 PM | PERMALINK

oops, I forgot to mention: take credit for the Supreme Court and lower court judges.

Posted by: republicrat on May 25, 2006 at 5:15 PM | PERMALINK

Last tax cut? But Kevin, there should be lots more to cut! Don't you know that most of our taxes go to welfare, foreign aid, and big grants to scientists to study the effects of beer on houseplants?

Posted by: Alek Hidell on May 25, 2006 at 5:24 PM | PERMALINK

tripp: explain how increasing taxes will help the economy.
...
Subsidize some of the startup costs for alternative energy sources.

That's good, if the revenue were targeted, and if everybody believed it would remain targeted. Tax increases might also decrease the deficit and thereby lower interest rates.

I don't mean to imply that the GOP points I listed are all wise, merely that they are available to the GOP, and are probably sufficient to keep them in the majority in the 2006 elections. People continue to tell pollsters that although they disrespect Congress they respect their own congressfolks.

Posted by: republicrat on May 25, 2006 at 5:25 PM | PERMALINK

"It's also interesting to note that the federal government profits more off of each gallon of gas sold than the oil companies do...

Let's see . . .

January 2000:

Gas price $1.28, refinery cut 10 cents, crude oil cut 60 cents, federal gas tax 18.4 cents

April 2006:

Gas price 2.74, refinery cut 71 cents, crude oil cut 148 cents, federal gas tax 18.4 cents

hmmm . . . would I rather own a refinery, own crude oil reserves, or be a bureaucrat for the federal highway administration, hmmmmm. . . .
Posted by: toast on May 25, 2006 at 3:53 PM"

could you please include the costs incurred by the businesses that got their "cuts?"

Posted by: Brian on May 25, 2006 at 5:27 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago? that's the only question that matters

Posted by: ronald reagan on May 25, 2006 at 5:31 PM | PERMALINK

Tom,

Thermal depolymerization is booming in this country. It is back up to over a 100 barrels a day since they reopened after the odor complaint brouhaha. They might reach 500 barrels/day around Thanksgiving.

Posted by: B on May 25, 2006 at 5:34 PM | PERMALINK

How does this help "tax-cutting Republicans"?

Because it cuts taxes, which is what they want.

I mean, when the courts deliver a tax cut, its pretty hard for the Republicans in Congress or the White House to claim credit for it,

Getting a tax cut and claiming credit for it are not the same thing.

plus it increases the deficit,

We don't know what effect it will have on the deficit.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 5:37 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Yes.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 5:38 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Not really.

Posted by: Dead US Soldiers on May 25, 2006 at 5:46 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

You betcha.

Posted by: OsamaBL on May 25, 2006 at 5:48 PM | PERMALINK

^

The above commenter heavily implies that dead US soldiers don't go to heaven, which I think is insulting to the troops.

Posted by: American Hawk on May 25, 2006 at 5:48 PM | PERMALINK

could you please include the costs incurred by the businesses that got their "cuts?"

Do it yourself asshole. I'll guarantee you that refinery costs have not gone up seven fold in 6 years. The profits reported this year by major petroleum companies should help you connect the dots.

It's simple economics. Refinery capacity in this country has gone down over the last 30 years by about 10% and during the same period gasoline consumption has risen by more than 40%.

Try googling supply and demand.

No one is building more refinery capacity because they either believe in peak oil or free trade has made foreign refineries without polution controls too competitive.

Posted by: toast on May 25, 2006 at 5:52 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Yes.

Posted by: iraqis on May 25, 2006 at 5:56 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

I am since they invented the brainwave-controlled XBox controller! Did a Republican do that?

Posted by: Limbless US soldier on May 25, 2006 at 5:59 PM | PERMALINK

Absolutely, I am better off than I was 4 years ago.

Posted by: Afro Thunder on May 25, 2006 at 6:00 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Business is booming.

No pun intended.

Posted by: Iranian bomb-builder on May 25, 2006 at 6:03 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Yeah baby!

Posted by: Exxon on May 25, 2006 at 6:03 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Yes. Demand for my services has been absolutely exploding.

Posted by: Iraqi IED-builder on May 25, 2006 at 6:04 PM | PERMALINK

"could you please include the costs incurred by the businesses that got their "cuts?"

Do it yourself asshole. I'll guarantee you that refinery costs have not gone up seven fold in 6 years. The profits reported this year by major petroleum companies should help you connect the dots.

It's simple economics. Refinery capacity in this country has gone down over the last 30 years by about 10% and during the same period gasoline consumption has risen by more than 40%.

Try googling supply and demand.

No one is building more refinery capacity because they either believe in peak oil or free trade has made foreign refineries without polution controls too competitive.
Posted by: toast on May 25, 2006 at 5:52 PM"

now that's what i call substantive reply.

energy companies tend to have profit margins in the 8-10 percent range, are you saying that is excessive or maybe obscene?

i suppose opposition to new refineries by "enviromentalists," general nimbyism and government ruegulations couldn't play a role in our lacking refining capacity.

Posted by: Brian on May 25, 2006 at 6:07 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Thanks to America, yes.

Posted by: The World in General on May 25, 2006 at 6:10 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Yes.

Posted by: The World on May 25, 2006 at 6:10 PM | PERMALINK

are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?

Financially - no
Physiologically - yes
Psychologically - yes
Am I happy - yes

Oh, and I almost forgot.....
George W Bush - Worst President ForEver...

Posted by: Tank man on May 25, 2006 at 6:14 PM | PERMALINK

It's a good lesson on why you should fight all taxes because they tend to stick around.

I would rather fight assholes who want their brothers to cut heads off of Iraqis and then send them home as trophies.

Posted by: Hosile on May 25, 2006 at 6:17 PM | PERMALINK

Perhaps Hastert can engineer a negative tax rate for the uuper income so they may better improve the economy.

Posted by: Matt on May 25, 2006 at 6:32 PM | PERMALINK

No one is building more refinery capacity because they either believe in peak oil or free trade has made foreign refineries without polution controls too competitive.

Shell and another company are expanding their refineries in the Houston area. According to the report I read, they are doing the permitting now and expect to start construction in early summer. Apparently they made their decisions immediatly after Katrina passed.

Posted by: republicrat on May 25, 2006 at 6:37 PM | PERMALINK

are you saying that is excessive or maybe obscene?

No asshole, I'm saying they're making a shitload of money because they control or own a limited resource that is in high demand. The same was true of tulips for a short time. The same would be true if I found a car sized gold nugget in my backyard. I expressed no value judgement other than to say you were an asshole. I work for an oil company for christ's sake.

i suppose opposition to new refineries by "enviromentalists," general nimbyism and government ruegulations couldn't play a role in our lacking refining capacity.

Didn't I just say that clean air act (along with labor costs) are encouraging us to utilize foreign refineries in places like Chavez's Venezuela?

Posted by: toast on May 25, 2006 at 6:45 PM | PERMALINK

True republicrat. Profits are high enough to encourage a bit of this. A refinery is in the finance/planning stages in Arizona too. As far as I know no one has started construction yet.

Posted by: toast on May 25, 2006 at 6:49 PM | PERMALINK

...what will they do now?

Cut tax rates on interest income. Just in time for the rise in interest rates. Sure to be a hit with the non-earned-income crowd.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 6:55 PM | PERMALINK

Didn't I just say that clean air act (along with labor costs) are encouraging us to utilize foreign refineries in places like Chavez's Venezuela?

actually, you did not say that, cocksucker.

Posted by: The World in General on May 25, 2006 at 6:57 PM | PERMALINK

Didn't I just say that clean air act (along with labor costs) are encouraging us to utilize foreign refineries in places like Chavez's Venezuela?

actually, you did not say that, cocksucker.

Posted by: Brian on May 25, 2006 at 6:58 PM | PERMALINK

Sorry, "unearned income" not "non-earned-income".

I'm surprised the tax-bashers haven't tried to get the IRS to change that.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 6:59 PM | PERMALINK

Cut tax rates on interest income.

Hopefully, yes.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 6:59 PM | PERMALINK

Hmmm... now there's a pandering thought... bring back the interest expense deduction for credit cards. Heck, make it for any interest expense. With negative savings and increasing household debt, it's sure to be a big hit.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 7:06 PM | PERMALINK

Well, here is what I said:

free trade has made foreign refineries without polution (sic) controls too competitive.

Simple logic would suggest the problem could be addressed by removing our pollution controls, forcing them to match ours, or placing a tariff on their refined gasoline to protest their unfair trade practices. A little reading comprehension is necessary here, asshole.

Posted by: cocksucker on May 25, 2006 at 7:07 PM | PERMALINK

After all the taxes are cut, they need to build a wall around America to keep that pesky foreign money out. Or do I mean, in? Well, something involving a wall, dammit. And Jesus. Maybe a wall around Jesus will be the 2008 platform.

Posted by: craigie on May 25, 2006 at 7:08 PM | PERMALINK

Hmmm... now there's a pandering thought... bring back the interest expense deduction for credit cards.

Very bad idea. But your suggestion to cut taxes on interest income was a good one.


Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 7:11 PM | PERMALINK

toast, at least you're now correctly identifying yourself.

Posted by: butter on May 25, 2006 at 7:13 PM | PERMALINK

A wall on which we cricufy illegal immigrants. Or maybe just mount their heads.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 7:15 PM | PERMALINK

Illegal immigrants should be deported, not murdered.

Posted by: Yank on May 25, 2006 at 7:18 PM | PERMALINK

Shell and another company are expanding their refineries in the Houston area.
Posted by: republicrat on May 25, 2006 at 6:37 PM | PERMALINK

Wow. Oil and Gasoline prices have been ramping steadily for 6 years (Initially due to Enron's market manipulation, moreso after 9/11, moreso after Iraq). What took them so long?

A: The FTP only just now started sniffing around for evidence of collusion and price gouging.

Posted by: Osama_Been_Forgotten on May 25, 2006 at 7:30 PM | PERMALINK

They'll just try again. Besides, it was cragie's idea for a "Jesus wall". Although after devoting another nanosecond of thought to it, maybe something like out of the last scene from Spartacus would be more appropriate, only more high tech.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 7:34 PM | PERMALINK

GOP: Very bad idea. But your suggestion to cut taxes on interest income was a good one.

Hah! It fits GOP pandering, vote-buying and lack of fiscal responsibility perfectly. I'm sure Grover Norquist et. al. would approve. Or are you one of those half-measure or policy wonk weenies?

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 7:45 PM | PERMALINK

Hah! It fits GOP pandering, vote-buying and lack of fiscal responsibility perfectly.

Assuming "it" refers to your proposal for a tax deduction for credit card interest, no; it fits liberal fiscal irresponsibility perfectly. Encourage people to rack up more and more personal debt on their credit cards by subsidizing their interest payments with other people's money

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 8:01 PM | PERMALINK

They'll just try again.

Then we'll try deporting them again. But if you think they should be murdered instead, you're perfectly free to push that idea.

Posted by: Yank on May 25, 2006 at 8:04 PM | PERMALINK

GOP -- Right. Like the federal deficit; it fits with the conservative idea of fiscal rresponsibility perfectly. Encourage a pandering vote-buying group of politicians in Washington to rack up more and more debt by subsidizing their spending with other countries' money.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 8:11 PM | PERMALINK

My children and grandchildren will pay you Tuesday, for a tax cut today.

Posted by: Wimpy on May 25, 2006 at 8:12 PM | PERMALINK

Yank -- See here.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 8:14 PM | PERMALINK

GOP describes tax breaks for cc interest as follows:

Encourage people to rack up more and more personal debt on their credit cards by subsidizing their interest payments with other people's money

Finally a wingnut admits that he believes that the taxes that the middle class pay are "other people's money".

Posted by: Disputo on May 25, 2006 at 8:21 PM | PERMALINK

I do not understand how the flat taxers still claim that reduced taxes can lead to smaller goverment when their own Cato founder proved that wrong. It is as if they were simply dumb and deaf for the four weeks this concept was discussed right here on this blog.

It is a small government conservative, libertarian discovery. It is not the progressive taxers who increase the size of government, cause illegal immigration, and rob the private sector. It is the big government conservatives who have always done that.

It is te Reagans and Bushes who are behind the largest growth in government, both in relative and absolute terms. It is these two bozoz with their big government approach who have caused the greatest migration from south of the border.

It is the Freepers, the core of the Republican party who has grown government for the last 40 years. The one exception to that was JKF, who flattened taxes and caused the third largest increase in government in modern times (LBJ). Only Reagan and lil George have increased government and robbed the private sector to a greater amount.

Like Frequently Ken, the policies he espouses are nothing short of Stalinism, communism in its worst form.


Posted by: Matt on May 25, 2006 at 8:22 PM | PERMALINK

has407 -- See here.

Posted by: Yank on May 25, 2006 at 8:23 PM | PERMALINK

GOP -- Right. Like the federal deficit; it fits with the conservative idea of fiscal rresponsibility perfectly.

No, the federal deficit fits with the liberal idea of fiscal responsibility perfectly. Democratic congresses passed deficit budgets virtually every year they were in power over the past half century or more. Liberals just love spending money they don't have.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK

Disputo,

You're not much for reading, are you, wingnut?

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 8:28 PM | PERMALINK

I officially declare GOP a clueless troll for the following:

No, the federal deficit fits with the liberal idea of fiscal responsibility perfectly. Democratic congresses passed deficit budgets virtually every year they were in power over the past half century or more. Liberals just love spending money they don't have.

If GOP was not a troll, he would understand that half of the federal debt was acquired during the last 5 GWB and GOP-controlled-congress years.

Posted by: Disputo on May 25, 2006 at 8:31 PM | PERMALINK

GOP says:

You're not much for reading, are you, wingnut?

LOL. I'm not much for parsing the insane rantings of a wingnut. Please, try to unpack your gibberish and enlighten us, or leave us all knowing what a retard you are.

Posted by: Disputo on May 25, 2006 at 8:35 PM | PERMALINK

It is te Reagans and Bushes who are behind the largest growth in government, both in relative and absolute terms.

Er, federal spending decreased by 1% of GDP under Reagan.

But don't let facts get in the way of your ideology.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 8:40 PM | PERMALINK

... would understand that half of the federal debt was acquired during the last 5 GWB and GOP-controlled-congress years.

If Disputo were not a clueless troll, he might understand that this claim has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with my observation of the utterly appalling record of fiscal irresponsibility that the Democrats have demonstrated for at least half a century.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 8:44 PM | PERMALINK

I'm not much for parsing the insane rantings of a wingnut.

You're not much of anything, except insane.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 8:45 PM | PERMALINK

GOP -- The deficits since the GOP has controlled congress for the last decade are worse than any Democratic congress for any period in memory.

So by your own admission, the GOP has managed to be more fiscally irresponsible--and accomplish that irresponsibility much faster--than the Democrats ever have. Wow!

Now there's a resounding affirmation of the GOP's can-do attitude. Keep it up!

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 9:01 PM | PERMALINK

GOP wrote: "Er, federal spending decreased by 1% of GDP under Reagan."

Um, no, not really. See this post for a debunking of that myth.

Posted by: PaulB on May 25, 2006 at 9:05 PM | PERMALINK

One more attempt at playing whack-a-mole with GOP's increasingly blantant lies:

federal spending decreased by 1% of GDP under Reagan.

1) The original poster was addressing federal spending levels. They did not "decrease" as you say. Federal spending as a %age of GDP decreased, which is a different measure.

2) Of course, this decrease only occured after Reagan first *increased* federal spending as a % of GDP by 1.5 %age pts his first year in office.

3) The subsequent 1%age pt decrease didn't occur by decreasing the nominator (which Reagan had control over), but by increasing the denominator (which Reagan had no control over).

Well, that's all the debunking time I have for tonight.

Posted by: Disputo on May 25, 2006 at 9:07 PM | PERMALINK

Al: "The democrats want to take your guns."

And that's not all. The democrats want mandatory attendance at gay lifestyle classes in the public schools!!!

Al -- Midwestern Div. (a wholly-owned subsidiary)

Posted by: shystr on May 25, 2006 at 9:10 PM | PERMALINK

"... since the entire domestic policy apparatus of the modern Republican Party is based on tax cuts for their campaign contributors, what will they do now?"

Are you kidding? How about campaigning on the threat of Democrats raising taxes? A trap which Democrats are all too happy to fall into!

Geez, no wonder Democrats keep losing elections. Looks like another ten years of Republican majority rule are in store.

Posted by: Brad on May 25, 2006 at 9:11 PM | PERMALINK

Yank -- Sorry; not sure what's happened to my sense of... whatever... a noun I can deal with , but a transitive verb just seems so... ummm... effette.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 9:14 PM | PERMALINK

has407,

GOP -- The deficits since the GOP has controlled congress for the last decade are worse than any Democratic congress for any period in memory.

Er, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives ran a deficit of 6% of GDP in 1983, 4.8% in 1984, 5.1% in 1985 and 5% in 1986. These exceed any deficit under GWB. And they weren't fighting a war.

So by your own admission, the GOP has managed to be more fiscally irresponsible

No, by your own admission, the Democrats have managed to be more fiscally irresponsible. The Democrats have a 50-year record of gross fiscal incompetence and irresponsibility.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 9:20 PM | PERMALINK

PaulB,

Um, no, not really. See this post for a debunking of that myth.

Er, not only does that post not "debunk" my factual claim, it confirms it, quoting the OMB budget numbers showing the 1% decline in spending under Reagan.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 9:28 PM | PERMALINK

Disputo:

1) The original poster was addressing federal spending levels. They did not "decrease" as you say.

Yes they did.

Federal spending as a %age of GDP decreased, which is a different measure.

Federal spending as a percentage of GDP is "federal spending levels."

2) Of course, this decrease only occured after Reagan first *increased* federal spending as a % of GDP by 1.5 %age pts his first year in office.

So what? The point is that spending decreased under Reagan. Matt's claim that "the Reagans and Bushes who are behind the largest growth in government" is utter nonsense.

3) The subsequent 1%age pt decrease didn't occur by decreasing the nominator (which Reagan had control over), but by increasing the denominator (which Reagan had no control over).

Another claim that would be utterly irrelevant even if it were true (It's not; presidents obviously have some influence over GDP).

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 9:36 PM | PERMALINK

GOP - Cherry pick four out of the "50-year record". Not to mention trying to change the subject from Congress to Reagan. Go fish.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 9:37 PM | PERMALINK

Once all the taxes are cut that's when Republicans heat up the culture wars in earnest -- you know, protests at family planning clinics, anti-gay marriage amendments, flag burning amendments, prayer in the schools, school vouchers, "activist" judges, unions -- don't forget unions.

Then there's Iran, North Korea and the Global War on Terror.

Republicans are never without a bogeyman to turn into the next polarizing, get-out-the-vote cause, even after they have proven for the last six years they can't govern.

Posted by: pj in jesusland on May 25, 2006 at 9:54 PM | PERMALINK

has407,

GOP - Cherry pick four out of the "50-year record".

Considering that I only need one to refute your false claim that "the deficits since the GOP has controlled congress for the last decade are worse than any Democratic congress for any period in memory," the other three are just gravy. And in fact those four are just examples, not a complete list. You obviously don't know what you're talking about and just threw out that made-up claim in the vain hope that it's true and wouldn't be challenged. I see this kind of thing from liberals all the time.

And the relevance of the 50-year record is that the Democrats have run a deficit virtually every year during that period. They are hopelessly irresponsible.

Not to mention trying to change the subject from Congress to Reagan. Go fish.

More nonsense. I didn't "change the subject" to Reagan. I mentioned Reagan in response to another false claim, the false claim that "It is the Reagans and Bushes who are behind the largest growth in government, both in relative and absolute terms."

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 10:09 PM | PERMALINK

GOP, you smell awful.

Deep down inside your soul.

Posted by: Reality on May 25, 2006 at 10:30 PM | PERMALINK

Have I mentioned I'm gay?

Pass my anal tickler, honey.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 10:31 PM | PERMALINK

I have taken severe beatings on this topic many times before, but as I'm a lonely old troll, I can't help but butting in yet again and making a total fool of myself with my shabby, fact-deficient arguments.

But I don't really care. As long as I can waste everyone's time and get attention (even negative) it keeps me from the terror of my loneliness.

Signed,
Don/Al/GOP/whatever said pathetic name I make up to not die of boredom

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 10:33 PM | PERMALINK

Shut up, jerkoff.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 10:34 PM | PERMALINK

That wasn't me. You libtards can't handle the truth.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 10:36 PM | PERMALINK

Yeah I didn't think so. Your arguments all suck - pure emotion, no facts.

Your days are through.

Posted by: GOP on May 25, 2006 at 10:37 PM | PERMALINK

GOP -- Integrate deficits as a percentage of GDP. Correlate with Republican control of the White House or Congress, as you wish. Then correlate with GDP growh and deficits during and after those periods (hint: use a 1-2 year lag). If you can't manage that, then find someone who can. Bottom line--you're taking out your ass, not your head. Go fish.

Posted by: has407 on May 25, 2006 at 10:46 PM | PERMALINK

Once all the taxes are cut that's when Republicans heat up the culture wars in earnest -- you know, protests at family planning clinics, anti-gay marriage amendments, flag burning amendments, prayer in the schools, school vouchers, "activist" judges, unions -- don't forget unions.

This reminds me of something I've thought about for a while now: GOP apologists rationalized the Iraq War by arguing, "Granted, a lot of innocent folks will surely die, but it's all good because the survivors will be better off in the long run."

Does this not sound like the exact same rationalization that pro-choicers use to defend abortion rights?

Anyway, food for thought...

Posted by: Moonlight on May 25, 2006 at 11:02 PM | PERMALINK

I see the bonehead troll still hasn't learned the difference between on-budget and unified.

What a moron.

Posted by: BB on May 25, 2006 at 11:15 PM | PERMALINK

OT

I have a better appreciation of this blog after having my comments on the new NYTimes blog unceremoniusly rejected for no apprent reason.

Seems like the bloggers do not understand this web thing very well.

This blog is the best in terms of the comments section.

Posted by: lib on May 25, 2006 at 11:22 PM | PERMALINK

Er, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives ran a deficit of 6% of GDP in 1983, 4.8% in 1984, 5.1% in 1985 and 5% in 1986. These exceed any deficit under GWB. And they weren't fighting a war.

But they were able to strong-arm Reagan into signing what they passed.
Reagan, he always was a pussy.

Posted by: haha on May 25, 2006 at 11:36 PM | PERMALINK

Wait till the Russian OIL Bourse opens on the 8th...I hear say.

Oy.

RIA Novosti - Russia - Putin proposes creation of ruble ...
RTS bourse to start trading oil, oil products, gold on June 8 ... To this end, we need to open a stock exchange in Russia to trade in oil, gas, ...
en.rian.ru/russia/20060510/47915635.html


Posted by: Heil Heir Hawke on May 26, 2006 at 12:04 AM | PERMALINK

Clinton takes office - deficit
Clinton leaves office - surplus
Bush takes office - surplus
Bush takes office - deficit
GOP in control of House for all but 2 of those 14 years.

Now, was there some point you were trying to make? Were peace and prosperity so intolerable that the GOP, in control of the entire government, had to abandon both?

Posted by: craigie on May 26, 2006 at 12:09 AM | PERMALINK

Posted by: Matt on May 25, 2006 at 8:22 PM | PERMALINK

Pretty much said it.

I came late and cannot read it all. Apologies.

Science, evidence, truth has nothing to do with the Republican Party. They have totally lost sight of society and practical application of politics. It is now politics and only politics. People don't matter.

I see GOP has turned up again. Unless he/she puts proposals/reason on the line, I don't see any need to debate with him/her. (S)he's beyond it.

Posted by: notthere on May 26, 2006 at 12:09 AM | PERMALINK

Hang onto that post craigie...

It's a vintage slap to the face of every republican in America.

Posted by: koreyel on May 26, 2006 at 12:15 AM | PERMALINK

Win the elections in 2006?

What's my prize?

Posted by: Birkel on May 26, 2006 at 12:15 AM | PERMALINK

Read Juan Cole now...

Talk about pissing in Condi's mouth...

Posted by: koreyel on May 26, 2006 at 12:25 AM | PERMALINK

this is quite something

Great Apes Found to Be Able to Plan for Future

Posted by: nello on May 26, 2006 at 1:03 AM | PERMALINK

nello - if that's true, then clearly Republicans did not evolve from apes.

Posted by: craigie on May 26, 2006 at 1:28 AM | PERMALINK

和弦铃声下载 手机铃声免费下载 手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 mp3铃声下载 下载手机铃声 三星手机铃声 手机铃声 免费铃声下载 铃声下载免费 搞笑铃声下载 搞笑免费铃声 铃声下载免费 搞笑下载铃声 下载铃声 三星铃声 免费铃声下载 MP3铃声下载 手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 手机铃声 MP3铃声下载 手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 免费铃声下载 搞笑免费铃声 免费铃声下载 手机铃声 mp3铃声下载 免费铃声下载 下载铃声 mp3手机铃声 三星铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 搞笑手机铃声 手机铃声免费下载免费铃声下载 铃声下载免费 手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 免费铃声下载 手机铃声 手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 和弦特效铃声下载 文秘写作 竞聘演讲稿 个人工作总结 八荣八耻演讲稿 中国文秘网 治疗牛皮癣,阴虱特效药 免费歌曲铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 mp3铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 mp3手机铃声 免费手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 免费铃声 手机铃声下载 手机铃声下载 免费铃声下载 搞笑铃声 免费手机铃声 免费铃声免费铃声下载 mp3手机铃声 mp3铃声下载 免费铃声 手机铃声免费下载 mp3铃声 免费手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 手机铃声 手机铃声 免费铃声下载 手机mmf铃声下载mp3手机铃声 手机铃声 手机铃声免费下载 铃声下载 免费铃声 手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声免费铃声 免费手机铃声 mp3铃声 mp3铃声下载 免费铃声

Posted by: biu991 on May 26, 2006 at 2:11 AM | PERMALINK

Science, evidence, truth has nothing to do with the Republican Party.

Who needs science, evidence and truth when you have Fox News.

Posted by: Stephen on May 26, 2006 at 10:33 AM | PERMALINK
Were peace and prosperity so intolerable that the GOP, in control of the entire government, had to abandon both?

Well, yeah. Peace and prosperity lead the masses to demand freedom and progress; war and financial uncertainty make them more willing to accept sacrifice of those for the illusion of security -- totalitarianism rides on the back of fear.

Posted by: cmdicely on May 26, 2006 at 10:40 AM | PERMALINK

For all you head in the sand liberals and democrats, we do not live in a totalitiarian country, as cm would like for you to believe. What did you say about fear. It sounds like you are the one doing all the fear mongering cmdicely.

5.3 GDP growth is prosperity. 4.7% unemployement is prosperity. There are many economic indicators which say we are prospering. We are helping free the middle east of totalitarian rule like what was happening in Afghanistan and Iraq or do you liken those states to freedom loving, propserous nations.

Posted by: Clinton Era on May 26, 2006 at 12:55 PM | PERMALINK

craigie,

It is clear that you have evolved from the shit that lies under rocks.

Posted by: Clinton Era on May 26, 2006 at 12:57 PM | PERMALINK

AM HAWK could you explain how you are better off?

Posted by: Now on May 26, 2006 at 2:19 PM | PERMALINK

Now take the fed debt and put it against the GDP and run them numbers then come back and tell us all who has there head in the sand.Clinton raised taxes to pay off Dear Ronnies tax cuts(You remember them, the ones the repugs wanted so badly to take credit for)We had the largest expansion in History.Both times the repugs have tried tax cuts we have had to live off borrowed money.9 trillion now and climbing.

Posted by: Now on May 26, 2006 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK

has407,

GOP -- Integrate deficits as a percentage of GDP. Correlate with Republican control of the White House or Congress, as you wish. Then correlate with GDP growh and deficits during and after those periods (hint: use a 1-2 year lag). If you can't manage that, then find someone who can. Bottom line--you're taking out your ass, not your head.

I'm not sure what "integrating deficits as a percentage of GDP" is even supposed to mean, still less why you think doing that would have any relevance to anything I've said. I caught you making an obviously false claim, a claim that you yourself would have realized was nonsense if you had bothered checking the actual budget data, and now you're just flailing around trying to divert attention from your error.

Posted by: GOP on May 26, 2006 at 2:42 PM | PERMALINK

I am insane.

Posted by: BB on May 26, 2006 at 2:44 PM | PERMALINK

Me too.

My soul is also profoundly corrupt.

Posted by: Reality on May 26, 2006 at 2:46 PM | PERMALINK

Notice how I insist on speaking last? It shows how strong my argument is.

What's an on-budget deficit? Oh, who cares. Libbies sux! Pass the soap!

Posted by: GOP on May 26, 2006 at 3:02 PM | PERMALINK

Hah Heh GOP mocked himself,what a dweeb.

Posted by: Now on May 26, 2006 at 3:50 PM | PERMALINK

No new taxes?!? I thought all this time my Poppy was for no nude Texans!

Posted by: George W. Bush on May 26, 2006 at 4:19 PM | PERMALINK

GOP -- Yes, that's definitely flailing around; I don't dispute the figures you quote. (A spoof or I drank a helluva lot more than I thought last night.)

Posted by: has407 on May 26, 2006 at 9:12 PM | PERMALINK

Discount online pharmacy- no prescription!

Cheap meridia cheap meridia

Buy meridia buy meridia

Discount meridia discount meridia

Buy meridia online buy meridia online

Generic meridia generic meridia

Cheap propecia cheap propecia

Buy propecia buy propecia

Discount propecia discount propecia

buy propecia online buy propecia online

Generic propecia generic propecia

Cheap proscar cheap proscar

buy proscar buy proscar

Discount proscar discount proscar

Buy proscar online buy proscar online

Generic proscar generic proscar

order proscar order proscar

Cheap finasteride cheap finasteride

Buy finasteride Buy finasteride

Discount finasteride Discount finasteride

Hair loss pills hair loss pills

Weight loss pills weight loss pills

Cheap Rogaine cheap rogaine

Buy Rogaine buy rogaine

Discount Rogaine discount rogaine

Generic Rogaine generic rogaine

Discount minoxidil discount minoxidil

Buy minoxidil buy minoxidil

Cheap cialis cheap cialis

Discount cialis discount cialis

Buy cialis buy cialis

Buy cialis online buy cialis online

Generic cialis generic cialis

Cheap tadalafil cheap tadalafil

Buy tadalafil buy tadalafil

Discount tadalafil order tadalafil

Cheap hytrin cheap hytrin

Discount hytrin discount hytrin

Generic Hytrin generic hytrin

Buy hytrin buy hytrin

Buy hytrin online buy hytrin online

Cheap terazosin cheap terazosin

Discount terazosin discount terazosin

Buy terazosin buy terazosin

Cheap viagra cheap viagra

Generic viagra generic viagra

Discount viagra discount viagra

Buy viagra buy viagra

Buy viagra online buy viagra online

Cheap sildenafil cheap sildenafil

Buy sildenafil buy sildenafil

discount sildenafil discount sildenafil

discount anafranil discount anafranil

buy anafranil buy anafranil

cheap anafranil cheap anafranil

generic anafranil generic anafranil

buy anafranil online buy anafranil online

discount asendin discount sendin

buy asendin buy asendin

cheap asendin cheap asendin

buy asendin online buy asendin online

generic asendin generic asendin

cheap celexa cheap celexa

buy celexa buy celexa

discount celexa discount celexa

buy celexa online buy celexa online

generic celexa generic celexa

cheap effexor cheap effexor

buy effexor buy effexor

discount effexor discount effexor

buy effexor online buy effexor online

generic effexor generic effexor

cheap elavil cheap elavil

discount elavil discount elavil

buy elavil buy elavil

buy elavil online buy elavil online

generic elavil generic elavil

buy endep buy endep

cheap endep cheap endep

discount endep discount endep

cheap luvox cheap luvox

discount luvox discount luvox

buy luvox buy luvox

generic luvox generic luvox

buy luvox online buy luvox online

cheap pamelor cheap pamelor

discount pamelor discount pamelor

buy pamelor buy pamelor

generic pamelor generic pamelor

buy pamelor online buy pamelor online

Cheap paxil cheap paxil

discount paxil discount paxil

generic paxil generic paxil

buy paxil buy paxil

buy paxil online buy paxil online

cheap prozac cheap prozac

generic prozac generic prozac

discount prozac discount prozac

buy prozac buy prozac online

buy prozac online buy prozac

cheap
sinequan
cheap sinequan

buy sinequan buy sinequan

generic sinequan generic sinequan

discount sinequan discount sinequan

buy sinequan online buy sinequan online

cheap
tofranil
cheap tofranil

buy tofranil buy tofranil

discount tofranil discount tofranil

generic tofranil generic tofranil

buy tofranil online buy tofranil online

cheap
wellbutrin
cheap wellbutrin

generic wellbutrin generic wellbutrin

discount wellbutrin discount wellbutrin

buy wellbutrin buy wellbutrin

buy wellbutrin online buy wellbutrin online

cheap bupropion cheap bupropion

buy bupropion buy bupropion

cheap zoloft cheap zoloft

generic zoloft generic zoloft

buy zoloft buy zoloft

discount zoloft discount zoloft

buy zoloft Online buy zoloft online

cheap
vermox
cheap vermox

discount vermox discount vermox

buy vermox buy vermox

buy vermox online buy vermox online

generic vermox generic vermox

cheap aralen cheap aralen

discount aralen discount aralen

generic aralen generic aralen

buy aralen buy aralen

buy aralen online buy aralen online

cheap sporanox cheap sporanox

buy sporanox buy sporanox

generic sporanox generic sporanox

discount sporanox discount sporanox

buy sporanox online buy sporanox online

cheap zyprexa cheap zyprexa

discount zyprexa discount zyprexa

buy zyprexa buy zyprexa

generic zyprexa generic zyprexa

buy zyprexa online buy zyprexa online

cheap compazine cheap compazine

generic compazine generic compazine

buy compazine buy compazine

discount compazine discount compazine

buy compazine online buy compazine online

cheap
claritin
cheap claritin

discount claritin discount claritin

generic claritin generic claritin

buy claritin buy claritin

buy claritin online buy claritin online

cheap
allegra
cheap allegra

discount allegra discount allegra

buy allegra buy allegra

generic allegra generic allegra

buy allegra Online buy allegra online

cheap benadryl cheap benadryn

discount benadryl discount benadryl

generic benadryl generic benadryl

buy benadryl buy benadryl

buy benadryl online buy benadryl online

cheap periactin cheap periactin

discount periactin discount periactin

buy periactin buy periactin

generic periactin generic periactin

buy periactin online buy periactin online

cheap advair cheap advair

discount advair discount advair

generic advair generic advair

buy advair buy advair

buy advair online buy advair online

cheap albuterol cheap albuterol

generic albuterol generic albuterol

buy albuterol buy albuterol

discount albuterol discount albuterol

buy albuterol online buy albuterol online

cheap salbutamol cheap salbutamol

buy salbutamol buy salbutamol

buy theophylline buy theophylline

generic salbutamol generic sabutamol

cheap singulair cheap singulair

discount singulair discount singulair

buy singulair buy singulair

generic singulair generic singulair

buy singulair online buy singulair online

cheap aceon cheap aceon

buy aceon buy aceon

generic aceon generic aceon

discount aceon discount aceon

buy aceon online buy aceon online

cheap altace cheap altace

buy altace generic altace

generic altace generic altace

discount altace discount altace

buy altace online buy altace online

cheap avapro cheap avapro

buy avapro buy avapro

generic avapro generic avapro

discount avapro discount avapro

buy avapro online buy avapro online

cheap capoten cheap capoten

discount capoten discount capoten

buy capoten buy capoten

generic capoten generic capoten

buy capoten online buy capoten online

cheap diamox cheap diamox

discount diamox discount diamox

buy diamox buy diamox

generic diamox generic diamox

buy diamox online buy diamox online

cheap lipitor cheap lipitor

buy lipitor buy lipitor

discount lipitor discount lipitor

generic lipitor generic lipitor

buy lipitor online buy lipitor online

cheap zocor cheap zocor

buy zocor buy zovor

discount zocor discount zocor

buy zocor online buy zocor online

generic zocor generic zocor

cheap lopid cheap lopid

discount lopid discount lopid

generic lopid generic lopid

buy lopid online buy lopid online

buy lopid buy lopid

cheap mevacor cheap mevacor

generic mevacor generic mevacor

discount mevacor discount mevacor

buy mevacor buy mevacor

buy mevacor online buy mevacor online

cheap pravachol cheap pravachol

discount pravachol discount pravachol

generic pravachol generic pravachol

buy pravachol buy pravachol

buy pravachol online buy pravachol online

cheap actos cheap actos

discount actos discount actos

generic actos generic actos

buy actos online buy actos online

buy actos buy actos

cheap
avandia
cheap avandia

generic avandia generic avandia

buy avandia buy avandia

discount avandia discount avandia

buy avandia online buy avandia online

cheap precose cheap precose

discount precose discount precose

generic precose generic precose

buy
precose
buy precose

buy precose online buy precose online

cheap micronase cheap micronase

discount micronase discount micronase

generic micronase generic micronase

buy micronase buy micronase

cheap glucovance cheap glucovance

discount glucovance discount glucovance

generic glucovance generic glucovance

buy glucovance buy glocovance

buy glucovance online buy glucovance online

cheap lamictal cheap lamictal

discount lamictal discount lamictal

buy lamictal buy lamictal

generic lamictal generic lamictal

buy lamictal online buy lamictal online

cheap mysoline cheap mysoline

discount mysoline discount mysoline

buy mysoline buy mysoline

generic mysoline generic mysoline

buy mysoline online buy mysoline online

cheap neurontin cheap neurontin

generic neurontin generic neurontin

buy neurontin buy neurontin

discount neurontin discount neurontin

buy neurontin online buy neurontin online

Cheap sodium valproate cheap sodium

Generic sodium valproate generic sodium

Buy sodium valproate buy sodium

discount sodium Valproate discount sodium

buy sodium valproate online buy sodium online

cheap tegretol cheap tegretol

discount tegretol discount tegretol

buy tegretol buy tegretol

generic tegretol generic tegretol

buy tegretol online buy tegretol online

cheap dilantin cheap dilantin

discount dilantin discount dilantin

buy dilantin buy dilantin

generic dilantin generic dilantin

buy dilantin online buy dilantin online

cheap aciphex cheap aciphex

discount aciphex discount aciphex

buy aciphex buy aciphex

generic aciphex generic aciphex

buy aciphex online buy aciphex online

cheap bentyl cheap bentyl

discount bentyl discount bentyl

buy bentyl buy bentyl

generic bentyl generic bentyl

buy bentyl online buy bentyl online

Cheap carafate cheap carafate

discount carafate discount carafate

buy carafate buy carafate

buy carafate online buy carafare online

generic carafate generic carafate

cheap cephulac cheap cephulac

generic cephulac generic cephulac

discount cephulac discount cephulac

buy cephulac buy cephulac

buy cephulac online buy cephulac online

cheap colace cheap colace

generic colace generic colace

buy colace buy colace

discount colace discount colace

buy colace online buy colace online

cheap dulcolax cheap dulcolax

discount dulcolax discount dulcolax

buy dulcolax buy dulcolax

generic dulcolax generic dulcolax

buy dulcolax online buy dulcolax online

cheap imodium cheap imodium

discount imodium discount imodium

buy imodium buy imodium

generic imodium generic imodium

buy imodium online buy imodium online

cheap nexium cheap nexium

discount nexium discount nexium

buy nexium buy nexium

generic nexium generic nexium

buy nexium online buy nexium online

cheap prevacid cheap prevacid

discount prevacid discount prevacid

buy prevacid buy prevacid

generic prevacid generic prevacid

buy prevacid online buy prevacid online

cheap prilosec cheap prilosec

discount prilosec discount prilosec

buy prilosec buy prilosec

generic prilosec generic prilosec

buy prilosec online buy prilosec online

cheap protonix cheap protonix

discount protonix discount protonix

buy protonix buy protonix

generic protonix generic protonix

order protonix order protonix

cheap reglan cheap reglan

buy reglan buy reglan

discount reglan discount reglan

generic reglan generic reglan

order reglan order reglan

cheap zantac cheap zantac

buy zantac buy zantac

discount zantac discount zantac

generic zantac generic zantac

order zantac order zantac

cheap zofran cheap zofran

discount zofran discount zofran

buy zofran buy zofran

generic zofran generic zofran

order zofran order zofran

cheap rebetol cheap rebetol

discount rebetol discount rebetol

buy rebetol buy rebetol

generic rebetol generic rebetol

order rebetol order rebetol

cheap ribavirin cheap ribavirin

buy ribavirin buy ribavirin

order ribavirin order ribavirin

cheap zovirax cheap zovirax

discount zovirax discount zovirax

order zovirax order zovirax

buy zovirax buy zovirax

generic zovirax generic zovirax

cheap epivir cheap epivir

discount epivir discount epivir

buy epivir buy epivir

order epivir order epivir

generic epivir generic epivir

cheap pyrazinamide cheap pyrazinamide

discount pyrazinamide discount pyrazinamide

order pyrazinamide order pyrazinamide

buy pyrazinamide buy pyrazinamide

generic pyrazinamide generic pyrazinamide

cheap retrovir cheap retrovir

discount retrovir discount retrovir

buy retrovir buy retrovir

order retrovir order retrovir

generic retrovir generic retrovir

cheap viramune cheap viramune

discount viramune discount viramune

order viramune order viramune

buy viramune buy viramune

generic viramune generic viramune

cheap zerit cheap zerit

discount zerit discount zerit

buy zerit buy zerit

order zerit order zerit

generic zerit generic zerit

cheap aldactone cheap aldactone

discount aldactone discount aldactone

buy aldactone buy aldactone

order aldactone order aldactone

generic aldactone generic aldactone

cheap calciferol cheap calciferol

discount calciferol discount calciferol

buy calciferol buy calciferol

order calciferol order calciferol

generic calciferol generic calciferol

alfa calcidol alfa calcidol

order alfa calcidol order alfa calcidol

buy alfa calcidol buy alfa calcidol

cheap danocrine cheap danocrine

discount danocrine discount danocrine

order danocrine order danocrine

buy danocrine buy danocrine

generic danocrine generic danocrine

cheap decadron cheap decadron

discount decadron discount decadron

order decadron order decadron

buy decadron buy decadron

generic decadron generic decadron

cheap deltasone cheap deltasone

discount deltasone discount deltasone

buy deltasone buy deltasone

order deltasone order deltasone

generic deltasone generic deltasone

cheap provera cheap provera

discount provera discount provera

buy provera buy provera

order provera order provera

generic provera generic provera

cheap cycrin cheap cycrin

cheap synthroid cheap synthroid

discount synthroid discount synthroid

buy synthroid buy synthroid

order synthroid order synthroid

generic levothroid generic levithroid

cheap levothroid cheap levithroid

cheap robaxin cheap robaxin

discount robaxin discount robaxin

buy robaxin buy robaxin

order robaxin order robaxin

generic robaxin generic robaxin

cheap soma cheap soma

discount soma discount soma

buy soma buy soma

order soma order soma

generic soma generic soma

cheap zanaflex cheap zanaflex

discount zanaflex discount zanaflex

buy zanaflex buy zanaflex

order zanaflex order zanaflex

generic zanaflex generic zanaflex

cheap alphagan cheap alphagan

discount alphagan discount alphagan

buy alphagan buy alphagan

order alphagan order alphagan

generic alphagan generic alphagan

cheap betagan cheap betagan

discount betagan discount betagan

order betagan order betagan

buy betagan buy betagan

generic betagan generic betagan

cheap mydriacyl cheap mydriacyl

discount mydriacyl discount mydriacyl

buy mydriacyl buy mydriacyl

order mydriacyl order mydriacyl

generic mydriacyl generic mydriacyl

cheap propine cheap propine

discount propine discount propine

buy propine buy propine

order propine order propine

generic propine generic propine

discount tobramycin discount tobramycin

buy tobramycin buy tobramycin

cheap tobramycin cheap tobramycin

order tobramycin order tobramycin

buy flour-op buy flour-op

order flour-op order flour-op

cheap flour-op cheap flour-op

discount flour-op discount flour-op

cheap advil cheap advil

generic advil generic advil

order advil order advil

buy advil buy advil

discount advil discount advil

cheap celebrex cheap celebrex

discount celebrex discount celebrex

buy celebrex buy celebrex

order celebrex order celebrex

generic celebrex generic celebrex

cheap imitrex cheap imitrex

discount imitrex discount imitrex

buy imitrex buy imitrex

order imitrex order imitrex

generic imitrex generic imitrex

cheap ponstel cheap ponstel

discount ponstel discount ponstel

order ponstel order ponstel

buy ponstel buy ponstel

generic ponstel generic ponstel

cheap timoptic cheap timoptic

discount timoptic discount timoptic

buy timoptic buy timoptic

order timoptic order timoptic

generic timoptic generic timoptic

cheap tylenol cheap tylenol

discount tylenol discount tylenol

order tylenol order tylenol

buy tylenol buy tylenol

generic tylenol generic tylenol

cheap anacin cheap anacin

buy anacin buy anacin

cheap ultram cheap ultram

discount ultram discount ultram

buy ultram buy ultram

order ultram order ultram

generic ultram generic ultram

cheap benadryl cheap benadryl

order benadryl order benadryl

discount benadryl discount benadryl

buy benadryl buy benadryl

generic benadryl generic benadryl

cheap ditropan cheap ditropan

discount ditropan discount ditropan

order ditropan order ditropan

buy ditropan buy ditropan

generic ditropan generic ditropan

cheap eldepryl cheap eldepryl

discount eldepryl discount eldepryl

buy eldepryl buy eldepryl

order eldepryl order eldepryl

generic eldepryl generic eldepryl

cheap arava cheap arava

discount arava discount arava

order arava order arava

buy arava buy arava

generic arava generic arava

cheap feldene cheap feldene

discount feldene discount feldene

order feldene order feldene

buy feldene buy feldene

generic

Posted by: best deal on May 28, 2006 at 6:16 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs