Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

July 14, 2006
By: Kevin Drum

KATHERINE HARRIS, FRUIT LOOP....Say what? Did Katherine Harris who lost her entire campaign staff again this week actually call Republican donors last year and warn them not to support a possible Senate run by Joe Scarborough because he might have been involved with the death of an intern who worked for him in 2001? Apparently so.

"Insane" is probably too kind a word. The full story is here.

Kevin Drum 1:29 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (116)
 
Comments

Yeah -- I'm not sure Katherine Harris is going to win that election -- Ralph Reed, here in Georgia, however . . .

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 1:33 PM | PERMALINK

And to think that c@nt helped orchestrate the chimps 2000 selection.

Posted by: def mf on July 14, 2006 at 1:42 PM | PERMALINK

so, the question is: was katherine harris always this deranged (meaning, even in november, 2000) and no one in all the reportage bothered to tell us?

or has she become more deranged over time?

inquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: howard on July 14, 2006 at 1:42 PM | PERMALINK

Dorothy Mantooth is a Saint! A Saint!

Posted by: Al on July 14, 2006 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M.: Glad to hear you're part of the great political tradition that includes Richard Nixon, Marion Berry, Dan Rostenkowski, Tom DeLay and Bob Ney: He may be a crook, but he's our crook.

Congatulations on your principled stand.

Posted by: zeeeej on July 14, 2006 at 1:50 PM | PERMALINK

Well she might be crazy but there is something fishy about that dead intern.

Posted by: msampie on July 14, 2006 at 1:51 PM | PERMALINK

I don't understand what's supposed to be insane about this, unless you think that Republican smears of opponents are insane in general. If Scarborough were a Democrat running against Harris, no one would have suggested she was insane for bringing up the issue.

Posted by: KCinDC on July 14, 2006 at 1:53 PM | PERMALINK

I think that should be "Marion Barry." Haven't heard about any corruption surrouding Berry.

Posted by: Nikki on July 14, 2006 at 1:54 PM | PERMALINK

"Insane" is probably too kind a word.

But she sure did have the tools for the 2000 'election.'

Posted by: obscure on July 14, 2006 at 1:55 PM | PERMALINK

I think that, if she was going to do it, she should've at least waited until he was actually going to run. Now she's turned off donors and GOPers who might have been willing to help her.

Posted by: Nikki on July 14, 2006 at 1:57 PM | PERMALINK

Ralph Reed, here in Georgia, however . .

We know where you live, Charlie, and it ain't Georgia.

And Reed is going nowhere, which is where corrupt, lying imposters like him belong.

Posted by: obscure on July 14, 2006 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINK

I'm waiting for her to flash on the Colbert Report.

Posted by: Randy Paul on July 14, 2006 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINK

What difference is there between what she did and what most other Republicans (Ok, and plenty of Dems) would do? Since Scar actually did have an intern die in his congressional office there seems to plenty of opportunity to blow the type of smoke that fuels campaigns nowadays. I guess she's crazy because she did it personally instead of having Karl Rove or Scooter Libby do it for you.

Posted by: LowLife on July 14, 2006 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINK

Well, judging from Scarborough's logic during the Clinton era, the fact that a medical examiner found the death to be natural means it must have been foul play.

But yeah, Harris is insane. It's actually amazing how many House Members are stone cold nuts (and yes, I am counting Cynthia McKinney and other crazy liberals in that group too). I mean, you don't get "the people's House" without getting into the fact that the people are occasionally quite gullible.

Posted by: mmy on July 14, 2006 at 1:59 PM | PERMALINK

I think that should be "Marion Barry." Haven't heard about any corruption surrouding Berry.

Absolutely right. Whoops!

Posted by: zeeeej on July 14, 2006 at 2:04 PM | PERMALINK

tick, tick, tick . . .

What still no post on the Plame lawsuit? Waiting for reliable source to discuss the implications . . . discovery, time frame, funding, likely outcome, chance of back firing? Your bias toward cautious journalism and punditry is showing like a fat woman's breasts at the Oregon Country fair.

Posted by: notquiteallthere on July 14, 2006 at 2:11 PM | PERMALINK

why is the notion of Ralph Reed as lt. governor of some redneck state considered such a big deal? I can assure you that neither the DNC nor the vast majority of dems give too shits either way--nor will they waste vast time and resources defeating him.
Reed will hang himself with his own words and misdeeds.

And Katherine Harris, truly a gift from God to the Democrats. Praise jeebus!

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 2:11 PM | PERMALINK

Is that the best you can do, zeeeej (although didn't Halle Barry have a run-in with the law recently)? Yesterday, my prediction about Reed got me labeled an "ignorant neo-Confederate cracker", a "gullible rube", a "retarded Kevin Drum doppelgnger wannabe" and (my personal favorite) either "so emotionally vested in these political lampreys that truth and fact no longer mean anything" to me, or, a catch-all "just plain stupid."

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 2:12 PM | PERMALINK

There are a lot of reasons to consider her a mentally deficient person, but bringing up the dead intern episode against her opponent is not one of them. She is just following the Republican Handbook on How To Smear Your Opponent for Personal Profit and Gain.

Posted by: nut on July 14, 2006 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK

to be fair, Harris actually isn't all that insane, for a repub. Senator Inhoffe actually told Fox"news" that global warming was a hoax.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 2:16 PM | PERMALINK

I wonder if SCOTUS considers it constitutional to have the certifiably insane certifying presidential election results?

Posted by: Disputo on July 14, 2006 at 2:18 PM | PERMALINK

I'm sorry, but I don't see how this makes the Lizard Queen any more nuts than Rove on behalf of Bush spreading the "batshit-insane-from-VC-torture" or "fathered-an-illegit-black-daughter" stories about McCain in SC.

Her staff and fellow GOPers are ONLY turning on her and revealing this stuff because (a) she bucked the Bush machine by refusing to drop out, and (b) she's obviously going to lose.

Posted by: The Confidence Man on July 14, 2006 at 2:27 PM | PERMALINK

How, exactly, does slandering someone qualify one as being nutty?

Posted by: Yancey Ward on July 14, 2006 at 2:28 PM | PERMALINK

haha:

The Democrats are indeed going to waste precious resources in Georgia; as for Harris (like Nixon), I guess you won't have her to kick around anymore. Oh, wait . . .

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK

mmy--

The people are "gullible"? I don't know about that. I'd be more willing to say that the "people" are in general far more crazy than the people they elect. Just listen to 90% of the callers on C-Span Washington Journal. Crazy people=crazy representatives.

I mean, has anyone walked around an average US city and actually talked to these "people"? People are very, very strange. If the actual views of the American people were really represented in congress, we would be living in a nation that would be unrecognizable. It has little to do with traditional political labels--our pundit class would not know how to label these views. David Brooks would be flabbergasted with this weirdness. They focus too much on what the "people" think about what this or that politician is doing (by this point, hardly anyone cares about politicians anymore). The real important question, though, is what these "people" themselves would do if they actually held power. Then you really get to see the ants come out of the woodwork.

Posted by: kokblok on July 14, 2006 at 2:31 PM | PERMALINK

Who is replacing Harris in her House Seat? Is it up for grabs?

Posted by: Robert on July 14, 2006 at 2:33 PM | PERMALINK

Watching the loathsome Harris go down in flames will be one of the pleasures of this election season. Heck, it already has been.

Howard: I think we may safely assume she was like this six years ago. Just remember what she looked like back then.

Posted by: Alek Hidell on July 14, 2006 at 2:34 PM | PERMALINK

Am I the only one who thinks Harris will lose the Republican primary?

Posted by: Anonymous on July 14, 2006 at 2:34 PM | PERMALINK

Great tits, though.

Posted by: Charlie on July 14, 2006 at 2:43 PM | PERMALINK

The Democrats are indeed going to waste precious resources in Georgia

and your proof of this is...?

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 2:52 PM | PERMALINK

remember the SNL character of the crazy lady who took every prescription medication ever created, at the same time? I'd say her makeup application was still better than Harris.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 2:54 PM | PERMALINK

No, not insane - just ahead of the curve. As the Usurper's empire sinks slowly into opprobrium, the true believers get hysterical, launching ever more frantic and ridiculous efforts to cling to power. Pull up a chair and pass the popcorn - this is going to be fun.

Posted by: Yellow Dog on July 14, 2006 at 2:58 PM | PERMALINK

or, a catch-all "just plain stupid."

That's about the size of it, Doug M.

Posted by: Foonspittle on July 14, 2006 at 2:59 PM | PERMALINK

What are the ubermensch at the Corner saying about this?

Posted by: nut on July 14, 2006 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

kokblok, people are often strange but very few are as dumb and irrational as you. fricking lunatic.

Posted by: Gregory on July 14, 2006 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

I've come to the conclusion that Doug M. is Ralph Reed -- that's the only possible explanation for his wide-eyed, fawning enthusiasm. My folks live down in Columbus and from what I've been able to observe, not even the blinkered die-hard conservatives are all that excited about Reed's candidacy -- they're only tolerating him because they don't want to see a Democrat in the lieutenant governor's office.

Posted by: Doug (not M.) on July 14, 2006 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

I hereby reaffirm my call for an IQ test with a mental health component for anyone seeking a seat in either house of Congress.

BTW, has Busrty McStupid been on Hannity's TV show lately, or has she been blacklisted from there as well.

Sean's probably sad - I know how much he appreciated Harris' talents - both of them.

Posted by: Stranger on July 14, 2006 at 3:17 PM | PERMALINK

I am not Ralph Reed either. While Cagle is closer than I'd like for comfort, there's still plenty of us "crackerjack" voters left to push Reed over the top. Given the amount of money and nation-wide attention already paid to this LIEUTENANT Governor race (quick: who is running for Lt. Governor in California and New York), there's no doubt more resources will pour in once Reed wins the primary. Otherwise, the Democrats would risk losing their Abramoff-momemtum (just like they did with Ken Lay).

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 3:24 PM | PERMALINK

I still don't get it--the lt. gov. position in my state is completely worthless, and I'd be surprised if even the governor knows the person's name.
The notion that the DNC would waste one penny on the repub candidate is even more insane than anything Katherine Harris has ever said or done.

Although watching Harris lose in a landslide will be enjoyable, watching Rick the Dick Santorum lose will be even more satisfying. That's the kind of race where the DNC will be spending its money--even Ricky is more than capable of beating himself. Maybe him and Harris can form some sort of conservatard PAC after they both lose.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 3:26 PM | PERMALINK

See you later, Katherine. See how getting Bush elected helped you out, huh? Karma

Posted by: Boorring on July 14, 2006 at 3:27 PM | PERMALINK

media attention does not equate to DNC money. But I don't expect Doug M/Charlie to grasp that considering his logical skills displayed above.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 3:29 PM | PERMALINK

That's interesting...my doppleganger has been hijacking my handle here, and I hadn't even commented yet! But only once, it seems. The post at 3:10 PM was not me.

Someone is impersonating me, no doubt because they can not argue with me convincingly or honestly. I take great pride in comfort in knowing that he or she is going to such lengths to shut me down.

Kevin, if you're here, and speaking as someone who always deplored the fake tbrozes, it's high time you did something about this problem. This shit does not add value to the threads at all.

Posted by: Gregory on July 14, 2006 at 3:38 PM | PERMALINK

I never said that media attention equated DNC money -- but if you seriously believe after all this attention, that Hecht (I presume, or whomever wins for the Dems -- Lotson, Martin, Miles, Terrill) will not get at least SOME help from the national organization to defeat Reed, you're smoking something. Even indirectly, if resources that would have otherwise gone to some other race, instead go to this Lt. Governor race, so much the better for us overall. And, considering how much the Dems have spent so far, it will be more than one penny, that's for sure.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 3:46 PM | PERMALINK

haha:

How much did it already cost for the DNC to disseminate these 36 attacks against Reed?

http://www.democrats.org/cgi-bin/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=%22ralph+reed%22

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 3:52 PM | PERMALINK

I don't know, Doug. How many extra donations did they get by making Reed an issue? If it's a net positive, or even break-even, it's fine by me.

Posted by: KCinDC on July 14, 2006 at 4:11 PM | PERMALINK

Oh, how I love to watch Katherine Harris in action. What a human train wreck.

Posted by: shortstop on July 14, 2006 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK

I dunno. I always wanted some more light on that incident involving Scarbourough. Recall this was at the time that we had Chandra Levy 24/7.

The medical examiner was rushed in from out of state, had problems with his qualifications, and be body was disposed of with unseemly haste. No second opinion allowed.

Had this been a Democrat, you would have had several congressional investigations by now.

Posted by: Alan on July 14, 2006 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK

And, what do you want to bet that Harris knows something about it that only people in touch with the Republican insiders know?

They don't like her now, but they did at least some point after 2001 when Lori Klausutis died.

Posted by: Alan on July 14, 2006 at 4:20 PM | PERMALINK

"Yesterday, my prediction about Reed got me labeled an "ignorant neo-Confederate cracker", a "gullible rube", a "retarded Kevin Drum doppelgnger wannabe" and (my personal favorite) either "so emotionally vested in these political lampreys that truth and fact no longer mean anything" to me, or, a catch-all "just plain stupid.""

They forgot "Ralph "Moral Majority" Reed's cocksucker-in-chief". And you know that fucker Reed's queer as a three-dollar-bill.

Posted by: brewmn on July 14, 2006 at 4:24 PM | PERMALINK

All I can say is that a lot of people comprehended how foolish, not to mention unethical, she is way back in the 2004 when she tried to justify her orders from Karl Rove and company.

With the help of SCOTUS, she utimately got away with it.

Republicans, are you still proud of her? Is she still representative of your party? I'd say so, what do you say? Tell me I'm wrong, I'd love to believe it.

Posted by: little ole jim from red country on July 14, 2006 at 4:25 PM | PERMALINK

Well, obviously if I suck Ralph Reed's dick, then I know he is queer as a three-dollar-bill, or at the very least, bi-sexual considering all those children he has. But, back on the topic of Katherine Harris, especially considering she got the majority of the Supreme Court to agree with her, I don't fault her at all for certifying the Florida ballot -- the GOP-controlled State and federal legislature would have "selected" Bush anyways -- this way at least prevented any bloodshed.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 4:29 PM | PERMALINK

will not get at least SOME help from the national organization to defeat Reed, you're smoking something.

I didn't say that they won't get "some" help, only that the DNC won't be wasting "precious resources", or any amount that will hurt them at all in any other race--such as the one where Rick Santorum will lose.

People such as Santorum, Harris, and Reed all do just fine at undermining themselves without much help from the DNC anyway. And if Reed does win, then all the better--he'll be stuck in a second banana job in a hick state and irrelevant to the rest of us.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 4:47 PM | PERMALINK

Too bad that the conservative-controlled mainstream media wont publicize the fact that Katherine Harris has a drinking problem or the fact that she was having an extramarital affair with Jeb Bush. Then she would really be in trouble!

Of course, these things would be front-page news if they were about Bill or Hillary Clinton. But, I guess, the Democrats just have to live with this right-wing media bias.

Posted by: Joe Bob Briggs on July 14, 2006 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK

haha:

No, what you ACTUALLY said, at 3:26 PM in fact: "The notion that the DNC would waste one penny on the repub candidate is even more insane than anything Katherine Harris has ever said or done."

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK

and "some" help doesn't have to involve spending money.

How much did it already cost for the DNC to disseminate these 36 attacks against Reed?

probably as much as it costs you to post here and fluff Ralph Reed.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 4:51 PM | PERMALINK

I wouldn't personally consider this a mark against Harris, since it is a reasonable suspicion to voice in the Scarborough dead intern matter. Inarguably, it is among the first things a police investigation would consider.

While the incident was oddly given very little attention in the media iirc (no scandal associated to Joe), still he resigned from Congress abruptly, shortly after the incident, amid rampant rumors of marital difficulties.

The medical examiner oddly immediately claimed he could rule out foul play, only to have to admit that massive blunt trauma to the head was the cause of death. Seems the otherwise apparently healthy young lady marathon runner in her 20s had a hidden heart condition that caused her to faint, thus falling into a piece of furniture or fixture hard enough to kill her. Then it turned out that the medical examiner had been dismissed from his prior job in a bordering state for falsifying the cause of death in another case.

Corruption in the office of the medical examiner is often the key to covering up a murder, and this guy appeared to be picked for that role out of general casting.

No, rather than illustrate the supposed mental issues of Ms. Harris, for whom I hold no brief or any feelings but contempt and anger at her corrupt actions in '00, I think this is better taken as an insider's look at (or under) the storyline with which the national media dismissed this incident (the local Pensacola paper did far better coverage of the issues). Or, if indeed Joe was entirely innocent of anything in this matter, it still provides us an insider's view of what normally goes on (even if it didn't in this case), which insider's would automatically assume to be the case in any given situation.

Posted by: sofla on July 14, 2006 at 4:51 PM | PERMALINK

keep on suckin' Doug.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 4:53 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M, as usual, has it back asswards.

Those of us outside of GA *want* Ralph Reed to be your next LtG. That's your punishment.

Posted by: Disputo on July 14, 2006 at 4:54 PM | PERMALINK

haha:

More than ONE PENNY at least.

Joe Bob:

Put down the Kitty Kelly book, and move slowly away from the ledge.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 4:54 PM | PERMALINK

KC in DC: "I don't understand what's supposed to be insane about this, unless you think that Republican smears of opponents are insane in general. If Scarborough were a Democrat running against Harris, no one would have suggested she was insane for bringing up the issue."

Yeah, I don't get what is insane about this. It seems to be SOP for Republicans, except that it is usually brought to bear on Democrats.

Posted by: EmmaAnne on July 14, 2006 at 4:57 PM | PERMALINK

Disrputo:

Those of us who are going to vote for Reed on Tuesday also want him to be the Governor of Atlanta and then the 2nd President of the United States from Georgia, to atone for the 1st.

EmmaAnne:

There also is Reagan's 11th Commandment.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:00 PM | PERMALINK

EmmaAnne says (along with several others):

Yeah, I don't get what is insane about this. It seems to be SOP for Republicans, except that it is usually brought to bear on Democrats.

What's insane is that she broke the 11th commandment as articulated by Ronnie Raygun, "Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican."

It's one thing for Rove's minions to break the commandment via a whisper campaign to voters in SC; it is quite another for Harris herself to break the commandment on the phone with deep pocket GOP donors. That is what is insane.

Posted by: Disputo on July 14, 2006 at 5:02 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M: you make me smile.

For decades, Secretaries of State all over the United States indulged in doing their jobs, a large part of which is to provide assistance to local election boards. Technical assistance, legal assistance, you name it; whatever it took to HELP the folks get the votes counted. Some of the local boards will be late in every single statewide and national election, you can count on it.

Harris suddenly redefined the job. She STOPPED/PREVENTED/HINDERED the local election boards from finishing their counts. What she did was outrageous.

You say she prevented bloodshed? Gee, where have I heard that before? Oh! I remember now. From folks who were threatening violence if the election were not given to Bush. Their little minds got completely distracted from the idea counting votes and letting the people who had always counted them count them.

Posted by: little ole jim from red country on July 14, 2006 at 5:05 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M jumped into the booby hatch with Harris when he uttered:

Those of us who are going to vote for Reed on Tuesday also want him to be the Governor of Atlanta and then the 2nd President of the United States from Georgia, to atone for the 1st.

LMAO. Good luck on that....

Posted by: Disputo on July 14, 2006 at 5:05 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M: yeah, cause that Reed, unlike Jimmy Carter, is a REAL Christian.

Posted by: little ole jim from red country on July 14, 2006 at 5:07 PM | PERMALINK

Sorry, Disputo -- I got your name wrong too -- I meant Governor of GEORGIA first, of course.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:08 PM | PERMALINK

Disputo: "It's one thing for Rove's minions to break the commandment via a whisper campaign to voters in SC; it is quite another for Harris herself to break the commandment on the phone with deep pocket GOP donors. That is what is insane."

Ah, I see. It is the lack of plausible deniability that is the problem, not the attack itself.

Posted by: EmmaAnne on July 14, 2006 at 5:11 PM | PERMALINK

From your lips to God's ear, little ole jim from red country.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:11 PM | PERMALINK

Here's an article that you might find interesting:

Reed was chairman of the Georgia Republican Party in 2002-03, when the party pulled off upset victories to elect the state's first Republican governor since Reconstruction, Sonny Perdue.

"One thing the media doesn't understand is, we have worked with him for many, many years and we trust him," said Kay Godwin, a Republican activist in the southeast Georgia town of Blackshear.

Reed faces a lone opponent for the Republican nomination _ state Sen. Casey Cagle of Gainesville. The winner of the Republican primary in July 2006 will be favored to win in November because of the state's recent tilt toward the GOP.

Cagle's campaign has said it's a stretch for people to believe Reed didn't know gambling money was helping fund his antigambling work in Texas and Alabama.

"Only an Enron accountant would believe Ralph's claim that he accepted millions in fees without bothering to learn where they came from," his campaign argued in a recent e-mail.

In the Texas case, where Reed helped rally support for closing a casino operated by the Tigua tribe, investigators in Washington have been told the effort was secretly funded with money from rival Indian casinos. Reed's fight against the lottery in Alabama was funded in part with money from a Choctaw band in Mississippi, which has casino interests.

Reed does not dispute receiving money from the Choctaw band, but says he's been assured it came from the tribe's other business interests, not from gambling. In the Texas effort, Reed says he was a subcontractor and "did not know who the client of the firm was and did not find out until some years later."

When asked why he is running for a state post that pays considerably less than what he has made as a consultant, Reed responds: "I want to restore the office to effectiveness, and I believe I can make it a platform for bold, conservative reform."

Others believe there is another reason.

Marshall Wittmann, who worked with Reed at the Christian Coalition but now works for the Democratic Leadership Council, thinks Reed wants to be President.

"He knew he couldn't go from the Christian Coalition, so he became a political consultant, then Georgia GOP chairman, then coordinator for the Bush campaign. The next logical step is to win a political office. This is what's available, but it's clearly a stepping stone to higher office," Wittmann said.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:15 PM | PERMALINK

Shorter Doug M: I approve of Reed's corruption, hypocrisy, and dishonesty because I like his politics. He hates all the same people I hate.

Posted by: little ole jim from red country on July 14, 2006 at 5:21 PM | PERMALINK

Not at all -- Jesus calls us to love even our enemies -- I approve of Reed's politics AND do not believe he is corrupt, hypocritical, or dishonest.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:25 PM | PERMALINK

It's time for Katherine Harris to cash in her last fame check and write a tell-all book about what really went on behind the 2000 election. After all, if the GOP is totally abandoning her then she might as well kiss them off in a big, dramatic way!

Posted by: zoe kentucky on July 14, 2006 at 5:28 PM | PERMALINK

"LOVE YOUR ENEMIES,
BLESS those who curse you,
DO GOOD to those you hate you, and

PRAY for those who despitefully use you, and persecute you

THAT YOU MAY BE THE CHILDREN OF YOUR FATHER WHO IS IN HEAVEN."

Matthew 5:44-45

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:28 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M.--

I'm sorry, but your zealotry has made you an idiot. I don't care how much you used to love Ralph Reed's politics or his past accomplishments but there is PLENTY of evidence that he is not what he pretends to be. Your loyalty to him is wildly misplaced. Reed is not a choirboy or even an idealogue-- he's a craven businessman, nothing more, nothing less.

The next thing you'll tell us is that Pat Robertson is a mensch.

Posted by: zoe kentucky on July 14, 2006 at 5:32 PM | PERMALINK

I'll pray for you too, zoe kentucky.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:35 PM | PERMALINK

Don't waste your time, from what you've written I think it's highly likely that that you pray to a paternalistic version of god that was clearly created by humans, not the other way around.

Posted by: zoe kentucky on July 14, 2006 at 5:40 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M., by the way, if you don't know this already, responding to someone who is saying something you don't like with "I'll pray for you" makes you the worst kind of condescending, arrogant asshole? You are the the kind of person of faith that gives the rest of us a bad name.

Posted by: zoe kentucky on July 14, 2006 at 5:45 PM | PERMALINK

Sorry, zoe.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:47 PM | PERMALINK

Dow's 2006 gain all but gone

Supply-side economics, tax cuts, and conservative economic policy at their finest.

Insanity runs in the GOP family and Bush has clearly not being a victim of this mental disability.

Posted by: Advocate for God on July 14, 2006 at 5:47 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M: Sorry, zoe.

Don't worry, Doug M, we true believers will pray for you.

Posted by: Advocate for God on July 14, 2006 at 5:49 PM | PERMALINK

Thanks, but you have to pray to the God who outlawed homosexuality though.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 5:57 PM | PERMALINK

Here's a good article on the death of Lori Klaustis
A Death in the Congressman's Office Does Anybody in the Press Care About Lori Klausutis?
By Denis Wright and Chris George August 8, 2001 (APJP)
In reality, there is indeed a news story percolating out there. The story bears remarkable and ironic similarities to the Condit/Levy story. Both involve Congressmen, rumors of infidelity, and the fate of a younger female subordinate. The details are so similar as to remind one of two alternate universes. The difference between the two stories? First, in the Klausutis case as not in the Levy case, there is a real body, very dead. Second, the Klausutis case involves a Republican....
[From the same article on the Medical Examiner Joe likes to say proves him innocent:]
Michael Berkland, it turns out, has a very interesting background himself. Recently relocated to Florida, it is a matter of public record that Dr. Berkland's medical license in the state of Missouri was revoked in 1998 as a result of Berkland reporting false information regarding brain tissue samples in a 1996 autopsy report. Berkland does not deny the charges.
It's also a matter of public record that he was suspended from his position as Medical Examiner in the State of Florida in July, 1999.

Jesus calls us to love even our enemies do not believe he is corrupt, hypocritical, or dishonest.Doug M. 5:25 PM
That is true of Jesus, Charlie, but you personally worship partisanship, not God. The evidence against Reed is under oath and overwhelming. He's a crook and a religious hypocrite, so you two have something in common. Posted by: Mike on July 14, 2006 at 6:07 PM | PERMALINK

I worship nothing and no one but Jesus Christ. Only God knows for sure if Reed is a Christian, and no crimes have been proven to me. But, I will note that the evidence against Jesus was under oath too.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:10 PM | PERMALINK

Charlie, posting as "Doug M.", wrote: ... no crimes have been proven to me.

That's because you are willfully, diligently and assiduously ignorant.

Ralph Reed thinks of you as a sucker, a rube, a mark to be taken.

And, sad to say, he's right.

Posted by: SecularAnimist on July 14, 2006 at 6:29 PM | PERMALINK

Really? I would assume out of everyone posting on this thread, I know the most about the allegation against Reed, so I'm not sure how that makes ME "willfully, diligently and assiduously ignorant" or "a sucker, a rube, a mark to be taken." I will add those to the list though.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:31 PM | PERMALINK
I would assume out of everyone posting on this thread, I know the most about the allegation against Reed

Why would you assume that?

Posted by: cmdicely on July 14, 2006 at 6:37 PM | PERMALINK

Charlie posting as "Doug M." wrote: I would assume out of everyone posting on this thread, I know the most about the allegation against Reed ...

Your posted comments do not support that assumption.

On the contrary, what they show is someone who, whenever someone starts talking about Ralph Reed's well-documented wrongdoing, covers his ears and repeats loudly "I can't hear you! I can't hear you!"

Posted by: SecularAnimist on July 14, 2006 at 6:39 PM | PERMALINK

Because no one else has has said they are from Georgia or posted all of the particulars -- I've been watching Reed since his Christian Coalition days -- have you even met the man, cmdicely?

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:39 PM | PERMALINK

It's so funny to see you libs continue to beat down on others misfortunes. So much for liberal compassion...


LOL!

Posted by: Big Daddy on July 14, 2006 at 6:44 PM | PERMALINK

So far, I am an "ignorant neo-Confederate cracker", a "gullible rube", a "retarded Kevin Drum doppelgnger wannabe" and (my personal favorite) either "so emotionally vested in these political lampreys that truth and fact no longer mean anything" to me, or, a catch-all "just plain stupid." Also "willfully, diligently and assiduously ignorant" or "a sucker, a rube (gullible again, or some other variety?), a mark to be taken." Someone who covers his ears and repeats loudly "I can't hear you! I can't hear you!" By own Christianty has been questioned. Next personal attack?

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:44 PM | PERMALINK

Katherine Harris rides a horse,

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3897/kh5wv.jpg

Posted by: cld on July 14, 2006 at 6:47 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M: Thanks, but you have to pray to the God who outlawed homosexuality though.

That's your interpretation.

It's wrong.

So, thanks, but I'll pray to the God who doesn't care whether someone is black or white, homosexual or heterosexual, man or woman, hindu or christian.

You know, the real God.

Posted by: Advocate for God on July 14, 2006 at 6:47 PM | PERMALINK

Big Daddy: It's so funny to see you libs continue to beat down on others misfortunes. So much for liberal compassion...

I am not a "liberal" and I have no compassion for corrupt public officials who conspire to disenfranchise tens of thousands of eligible voters so they can steal an election. Katherine Harris is a criminal and an un-American traitor, and should be serving a life sentence in federal prison for her role in stealing the 2000 presidential election in Florida.

Posted by: SecularAnimist on July 14, 2006 at 6:49 PM | PERMALINK
will note that the evidence against Jesus was under oath too. Doug M.6:10 PM
You have never shown by any criterion, that you are, in fact, Christian; and only a non-Christian would compare the likes of Ralph Reed to Christ. Posted by: Mike on July 14, 2006 at 6:50 PM | PERMALINK

AOG:

My God who doesn't care whether someone is black or white, man or woman.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:50 PM | PERMALINK

Charlie posting as "Doug M." wrote: So far, I am [...] "a sucker, a rube, a mark to be taken."

For the record, I wrote "Ralph Reed thinks of you as a sucker, a rube, a mark to be taken." That's a statement about Ralph Reed, not about you.

Posted by: SecularAnimist on July 14, 2006 at 6:52 PM | PERMALINK

Mike:

In God's eyes, if Reed is a Christian, he is as pure and innocent as His Son, Jesus.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:53 PM | PERMALINK

John:

Thanks for the clarification -- someone else already covered "rube" though.

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 6:54 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M,

Add to your list that you are a blasphemer who compares Reed to Jesus.

Posted by: Disputo on July 14, 2006 at 6:59 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M. (Charlie, is that really you?): "Yeah -- I'm not sure Katherine Harris is going to win that election -- Ralph Reed, here in Georgia, however ..."

At least pretty-boy Ralph will make all sorts of new friends at the "Big House", while Katherine can share her make-up secrets with her lesbian cell-block matron.

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on July 14, 2006 at 7:03 PM | PERMALINK

Oh boy, Kevin called it correctly

A Fruit Loop thread indeed

"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." - Galileo Galilei

Posted by: daCascadian on July 14, 2006 at 7:03 PM | PERMALINK

SecularAnimist

Well, it was only a matter of time before you brought int that 2000 election stolen theory. And I thought libs were all "forward-looking"...

LOL!!!

Posted by: Big Daddy on July 14, 2006 at 7:04 PM | PERMALINK

msampie: "... but there is something fishy about that dead intern."

Sorry, but that dog ain't gonna hunt, any more than she is. Her own family has publicly expressed satisfaction with the coroner's report -- so let's please not go there, and leave them be.

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on July 14, 2006 at 7:08 PM | PERMALINK

Doud M. Why have you not said You love Hiliary Clinton ?

Posted by: Mann Coulter on July 14, 2006 at 7:09 PM | PERMALINK

John is NOT a "liberal", Big Daddy. I wish I could stay and play with you guys, but I've got a town meeting tonight and a busy weekend going door to door for Reed -- see y'all!

Posted by: Doug M. on July 14, 2006 at 7:11 PM | PERMALINK

Doug M./Charlie: "I am an 'ignorant neo-Confederate cracker', a 'gullible rube', a 'retarded Kevin Drum doppelgnger wannabe' and (my personal favorite) either 'so emotionally vested in these political lampreys that truth and fact no longer mean anything' to me, or, a catch-all 'just plain stupid.'"

Yep -- couldn't've said it any better.

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on July 14, 2006 at 7:12 PM | PERMALINK

SecularAnimist >"...her role in stealing the 2000 presidential election in Florida."

Well, the record shows she had plenty of help; that is if she actually had any clue what was going on which, IMO, is open to question

seldom, if ever, are the puppets told the whole scenario

"The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion." - Edmund Burke

Posted by: daCascadian on July 14, 2006 at 7:13 PM | PERMALINK

Hey, Doug M./Charlie, is that you?, I'd really love to stay and keep hitting out of the park these slow-pitch softballs you're tossing, but it's Friday afternoon and the surf's up on Oahu's South Shore.

One last bit of trivia before I go -- what was the name of Atlanta's minor league baseball team prior to the Braves' 1966 relocation from Milwaukee?

The Crackers!

See ya!

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on July 14, 2006 at 7:23 PM | PERMALINK

I thought it was common knowledge that Scarborough killed his intern. IOKIYAR.

Posted by: Pocket Rocket on July 14, 2006 at 7:55 PM | PERMALINK

I leave for an hour for my weekly anal exam and i see you libs still can't get over the fact that bush won. Talk about sore losers...

LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Big Daddy on July 14, 2006 at 8:01 PM | PERMALINK

Doug isn't really from Georgia(or did you suddenly relocate there from California?), nor is he a Christian.
His life is just one big lie. He can't even tell the truth about the most basic facts, such as his identity and various screen names--thus violating one of the most basic commandments.

p.s. Jesus was gay.

Posted by: haha on July 14, 2006 at 8:01 PM | PERMALINK

daCascadian wrote: Well, the record shows she had plenty of help; that is if she actually had any clue what was going on which, IMO, is open to question

The article you linked to is great, but it focuses on the election itself and the recount. It does not address the deliberate purge of tens of thousands of eligible African-American Democratic voters from Florida's voter rolls, by falsely identifying them as felons ineligible to vote, which was done before the election, under the direction of Katherine Harris in her capacity as Florida's Secretary of State.

If those voters had been able to exercise their right to vote, then Gore would have won Florida by a theft-proof margin of tens of thousands, and there would have been no recount. (And of course, as that article explains, even so, if every legally-cast ballot had been counted in accord with Florida's well-established election laws, then Gore would still have won.)

Posted by: SecularAnimist on July 14, 2006 at 8:02 PM | PERMALINK

我向大家推荐:您想要了解 租车 吗?请到中国租车网来寻找租车。您想要了解 上海租车 吗?请到中国上海租车网来寻找上海租车。中国 租车 网,打造租车领域专业搜索平台,提供全球租车品牌公司及产品展示。上海 租车 公司专业生产租车产品,欢迎选择租车。要想寻找上海租车信息请访问 上海租车 网,各种上海租车应有尽有。您想要了解 上海租车 吗?请到中国上海租车网来寻找上海租车。租车 网上批发市场,为您提供优质低价的租车,丰富租车行业资讯助您成交。要想寻找上海租车信息请访问 上海租车 网,各种上海租车应有尽有。中国 上海汽车租赁 网,打造上海汽车租赁领域专业搜索平台,提供全球上海汽车租赁品牌公司及产品展示。

Too bad that the conservative-controlled mainstream media wont publicize the fact that Katherine Harris has a drinking problem or the fact that she was having an extramarital affair with Jeb Bush. Then she would really be in trouble!

Of course, these things would be front-page news if they were about Bill or Hillary Clinton. But, I guess, the Democrats just have to live with this right-wing media bias.


Posted by: sam on July 14, 2006 at 9:48 PM | PERMALINK

So, nobody here thinks that there is any possibility that Scarborogh was involved in that death?

Posted by: higtaper on July 14, 2006 at 11:27 PM | PERMALINK

Where did Harris get the idea for the slander?

From the article:

Scarborough said he was shocked Harris would cite ''a bunch of hateful left-wing websites'' and that she would repeat ``the slanderous attacks of the same people who attacked her for years.''

Posted by: Dee on July 15, 2006 at 1:27 AM | PERMALINK

We should give poor Kathy the Judith Miller award.

The "do whatever the Bush administrition wants, and windup in total ruin" award.

Posted by: Cheryl on July 15, 2006 at 12:07 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals