August 23, 2006
CLUELESS....A House committee report says we don't know squat about Iran:
Noting "significant gaps in our knowledge and understanding of the various areas of concern about Iran," the House Intelligence Committee staff report questioned whether the United States could even effectively engage in talks with Tehran on ways to diffuse tensions.
Got that? It's not just that we don't really know anything about their nuclear, biological, etc. programs. We don't even know enough to talk to them intelligently.
This despite the fact that Iran was declared part of the Axis of Evil more than four years ago. In response to the House report, the White House says reassuringly that they are "taking steps" to do better. Hopefully that doesn't include firing any gay Persian speakers.
—Kevin Drum 7:20 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (81)
Farsi, not Persian.
Posted by: Daryl Cobranchi on August 23, 2006 at 7:26 PM | PERMALINK
Hopefully that doesn't include firing any gay Persian speakers.
Hey, that's funny. I remember well the gay Arabic speakers who had to be fired in spite of the fact they were in desperate demand.
Also, it's pretty obvious that Bush and the people he has hired are aggressively ignorant in the ways of foreign cultures.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 7:26 PM | PERMALINK
And really Kevin, that axis of evit stuff was just a speech writer having fun, remember? Just because GWB incorporated it into the State of the Union address is no reason to dog him about it.
It was just sort of a frat joke.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 7:31 PM | PERMALINK
Daryl: I think Persian is a more general term that includes Farsi. Though I could be wrong. Knowledgable explanations are welcome.
Posted by: Kevin Drum on August 23, 2006 at 7:31 PM | PERMALINK
diffuse - to pour out and spread, as a fluid
defuse - to make less dangerous, tense, or embarrassing
We can assume that the Post people have been to college. Spent all their time playing Nintendo and not learning to speak the probably one language they know.
Sad.
Posted by: thrashbluegrass on August 23, 2006 at 7:35 PM | PERMALINK
I'm hoping against hope it is a disinformation campaign to lull Iraninans into believing that we know very little about them.
Posted by: bt on August 23, 2006 at 7:39 PM | PERMALINK
I think Persian is a more general term that includes Farsi
Wait, now we have to learn two new languages?! Babblefish don't fail me now.
Posted by: enozinho on August 23, 2006 at 7:42 PM | PERMALINK
As someone wrote here a few months ago, having someone in charge who actually knew anything would just be soooooooo elitist.
Posted by: batavicus on August 23, 2006 at 7:43 PM | PERMALINK
A House committee report says we don't know squat about Iran:
Nonsense. We know a lot about Iran. For example we know Iran is funding and arming Islamofacists trying to stop the advance of democracy in Iraq.
Link
"A senior US military official said there is "clear evidence" that Iran is funding, training and arming Shiite extremists to destabilize Iraq.
"I think it is irrefutable that Iran is responsible for training, funding and equipping some of these Shia extremist groups, and also providing advanced IED technology," said Brigadier General Michael Barbero, using the acronym for "improvised explosive devices."
"And there is clear evidence of that," he added at a Pentagon press conference."
That in itself is sufficient reason to liberate the Iranian people from the Islamofascist Ayatollahs.
Posted by: Al on August 23, 2006 at 7:45 PM | PERMALINK
It was just sort of a frat joke.
You misspelled "fart".
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 7:45 PM | PERMALINK
"the House Intelligence Committee staff report questioned whether the United States could even effectively engage in talks with Tehran on ways to diffuse tensions."
I question whether anybody in White House even wants to engage in talks with Tehran.
Posted by: Quaker in a Basement on August 23, 2006 at 7:46 PM | PERMALINK
Daryl: I think Persian is a more general term that includes Farsi. Though I could be wrong. Knowledgable explanations are welcome.
A bit of poking around at linguistic sources suggests that "Modern Persian" or simply "Persian" and "Farsi" (and also "Parsi") are synonyms when referring to the modern langauge. Occasionally, more specific terms ("Western Farse" vs. "Eastern Farsi", or "Irani vs. Dari") are used to distinguish the form used in Iran vs. that used in Afghanistan. There seem to be a number of different classification schemes that don't line up perfectly, but none of them that I can find use "Persian" as a more general form and and "Farsi" as a more specific one.
"Persian" seems to be preferred over "Farsi" as the English name of the language.
Posted by: cmdicely on August 23, 2006 at 7:49 PM | PERMALINK
I think Persian is a more general term that includes Farsi. Though I could be wrong. Knowledgable explanations are welcome.
Persian and Farsi are different names for the same language. "Persian" is the English name; "Farsi" is the Arabic name.
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 7:50 PM | PERMALINK
I should have said that "Farsi" is the English transliteration of the Arabic name.
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 7:51 PM | PERMALINK
Isn't Farsi also the Farsi name for Farsi?
Posted by: enozinho on August 23, 2006 at 7:53 PM | PERMALINK
We don't even know enough to talk to them intelligently.
Fortunately, Bush doesn't view that as impediment or a problem that needs to be addressed.
In fact, when you plan to rule by force, getting to know your victims can often lead to unwelcome pangs of conscience.
*cough*
I nominate Charlie for Secretary of Ignorance.
Posted by: obscure on August 23, 2006 at 7:55 PM | PERMALINK
Has fucking ignorance stopped these dirty motherfuckers before?
Shit, the revel in their fucking stupidity.
Unfortunately we're paying for it.
Posted by: angryspittle on August 23, 2006 at 7:57 PM | PERMALINK
A lady who works 10 feet from me at the office majored in Farsi. Think that qualifies me for a job in the Bush White House?
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 7:59 PM | PERMALINK
OOPS, I know ignorance and stupidity are two separate issues, but these assholes are both, and damned proud of it.
Posted by: angryspittle on August 23, 2006 at 8:01 PM | PERMALINK
Isn't Farsi also the Farsi name for Farsi?
I thought that was "Parsi".
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 8:02 PM | PERMALINK
A lady who works 10 feet from me at the office majored in Farsi.
Unless you give her unsolicited backrubs too, you're still suspect.
Posted by: enozinho on August 23, 2006 at 8:03 PM | PERMALINK
But she's pregnant already, otherwise she'd be in for big bucks, um, big paychecks.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 8:05 PM | PERMALINK
sufficient reason to liberate the Iranian people
But, do they have oil reserves for Texans to liberate, and
fresh water for Haliburton to Liberate?
Can't have one without t'other.
Posted by: Pierre Asciutto on August 23, 2006 at 8:06 PM | PERMALINK
Here's a stupid question: doesn't it seem like we've heard a lot -- more than one instance, at least -- about gay linguists in the Army? Why are there so many in the first place? I realize this sounds like a, uh, straight line, but is there some stereotype there I need to be aware of?
"Between 1998 and 2004, the military discharged 20 Arabic and six Farsi speakers, according to Department of Defense data obtained by the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military under a Freedom of Information Act request."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6824206
Posted by: DonBoy on August 23, 2006 at 8:10 PM | PERMALINK
Persian=Farsi=Parsi
In languages using the arabic alphabet (and also the Hebrew alphabet or any other semitic alphabet, going all the way back to the phoenician script), the p and f sounds are represented by the same letter, so there is some ambiguity in how to say certain words. (Another well-known such pairing would be Philistine and Palestine.)
I have on my books, a copy of "Speak Modern Persian." Most of my neighbors refer to the language as Farsi. I've never heard "Parsi" used, but could see how it would arise.
Posted by: don Hosek on August 23, 2006 at 8:21 PM | PERMALINK
You got me there DonBoy, I don't know.
But keep your eye on the ball. The important thing is to keep the moral zealots happy. Competency, success, life, and good health are secondary.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 8:24 PM | PERMALINK
the p and f sounds are represented by the same letter
Actually, in Arabic, there is no P sound. Arabs tend to replace the "P" with a "B" when speaking english. I too have never heard "Parsi" in conversation.
Posted by: enozinho on August 23, 2006 at 8:24 PM | PERMALINK
"Here's a stupid question: doesn't it seem like we've heard a lot -- more than one instance, at least -- about gay linguists in the Army? Why are there so many in the first place? I realize this sounds like a, uh, straight line, but is there some stereotype there I need to be aware of??"
In the '60s and '70s, the graduates of the Army's language school in Monterey, CA, were collectively referred to as "Monterey Marys". Selection for the school and successful completion, especially in the more demanding languages, required intelligence, dedication, and attention to detail. Sound familiar?
The same standards apply today. Army linguists (most of whom are trained as communication intercept operators, not translators or interrogaters) are better educated and more intelligence than the average soldier.
In the draft era, college educated draftees were offered language training and assignment to the Army Security Agency (http://www.nasaa-home.org/) as a way of avoiding being assigned to one of the combat arms. ASA had its own recruiters at the reception depots to identify likely candidates. The desire to avoid direct combat helped earned linguists the reputation of being "not real men".
Posted by: arkie on August 23, 2006 at 8:25 PM | PERMALINK
doesn't it seem like we've heard a lot -- more than one instance, at least -- about gay linguists in the Army? Why are there so many in the first place? I realize this sounds like a, uh, straight line, but is there some stereotype there I need to be aware of?
It's because communication is *so* gay.
Butch up and kill someone instead.
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK
Let's see. Bush announced Iran was part of the Axis of Evil four years ago. Since that time, Iran's leader has announced Israel "should be wiped off the map." Iran's government has thumbed its nose at UN demands it stop its nuclear program. And ominously, many believe Iran was behind Hezbollah's attacks on Israel several weeks ago.
Looks like Bush was right.
Posted by: Frequency Kenneth on August 23, 2006 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK
little ole jim from red country: "And really Kevin, that axis of evit stuff was just a speech writer having fun, remember? Just because GWB incorporated it into the State of the Union address is no reason to dog him about it. It was just sort of a frat joke."
And if you think that's a knee-slapper, little ole jim, here's more hilarious White House hijinks from the "Washington Whispers" column in U.S. News and World Report. So go ahead, pull my finger!:
"Animal House in the West Wing -- He loves to cuss, gets a jolly when a mountain biker wipes out trying to keep up with him, and now we're learning that the first frat boy loves flatulence jokes. A top insider let that slip when explaining why President Bush is paranoid around women, always worried about his behavior. But he's still a funny, earthy guy who, for example, can't get enough of fart jokes. He's also known to cut a few for laughs, especially when greeting new young aides, but forget about getting people to gas about that."
Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on August 23, 2006 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK
The desire to avoid direct combat helped earned linguists the reputation of being "not real men".
Just like TANG.
...although with that acronym, you're just asking for trouble.
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 8:31 PM | PERMALINK
Well I remember playing Parcheesee when I was little. Does that qualify me to work in the White House?
Posted by: bigcat on August 23, 2006 at 8:33 PM | PERMALINK
Frequency Kenneth: "Looks like Bush was right."
You mistakenly left the "-wing" off your last word.
Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on August 23, 2006 at 8:35 PM | PERMALINK
Donald: right, the man has no class. Me, myself, I've merely taken pride in teaching all my children and nephews to arm-fart, a rather useful skill I think.
I would never actually fart at somebody intentionally or encourage others to do so. That would obviate years of arm-fart training.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 8:38 PM | PERMALINK
We don't even know enough to talk to them intelligently.
We know the President has identified Iran as our enemy. That's all we have to understand about Iran. Now our job is to make them wish they had understood our resolve better.
Posted by: Al on August 23, 2006 at 8:38 PM | PERMALINK
"I thought Iraqis were Muslims?"
We need a foreign policy equivalent of the Prime Directive: Don't mess with cultures you don't know squat about.
Posted by: Brian Link on August 23, 2006 at 8:42 PM | PERMALINK
Reading the article, it doesn't sound to me like the intelligence community is 'clueless'. It sounds like House Republicans would like to dismiss whatever accumulated knowledge they do have, in favor of new intelligence.
The idea that the House couldn't find enough accurate information about Iran for dialogue is simply not credible.
Posted by: Saam Barrager on August 23, 2006 at 8:49 PM | PERMALINK
the report questioned whether the United States could even effectively engage in talks with Tehran on ways to diffuse tensions.
I am not buying it. This just gives the administration cover for their refusal to engage Iran diplomatically.
Posted by: neil on August 23, 2006 at 8:53 PM | PERMALINK
Years ago, my wife was a grad student at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, pretty much the top civilian translation and interpretation school in the US. She says the student body was almost entirely female, and many of the male students were gay (there were lots of men at the Defense Language Institute which is also in Monterey, but many of those students were assigned to learn a language, they weren't choosing translation as a career). I don't know why linguistics overwhelmingly attracts women and gay men; it's kind of the flip side of overwhelmingly male engineering schools.
That's just to say that it shouldn't be a surprise that purging gays from the military is going to take out a lot of gay men.
Posted by: Joe Buck on August 23, 2006 at 8:53 PM | PERMALINK
"We don't even know enough to talk to them intelligently."
With this Administration, that is true about every topic.
Posted by: arkie on August 23, 2006 at 8:55 PM | PERMALINK
"I don't know why linguistics overwhelmingly attracts women and gay men; it's kind of the flip side of overwhelmingly male engineering schools."
Real men don't talk. They do.
Posted by: arkie on August 23, 2006 at 8:56 PM | PERMALINK
The idea that the House couldn't find enough accurate information about Iran for dialogue is simply not credible.
I disagree. At least I find it very believable that, when it comes down to reliable information, we have little with regard to Iran's nuclear capabilities and potential. Probably a lot of speculation.
Look at what happened with Iraq. Whenever the Bush administration tried to present hard evidence (aluminum tubes, uranium from Africa), knowledgeable folks would immediately discredit them. Of course, a lot of Americans believed Bush anyway. We need to be smarter this time.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 8:59 PM | PERMALINK
now we just need to figure out if they're willing to serve for the Bush administration
You got it backwards. The question is whether the administration would let them serve.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 9:07 PM | PERMALINK
Americans are an ignorant lot - but that doesn't stop us from trying to ram our lifestyle down everyone in the world's throat. And we will pay and pay and pay for our ignorance....
Posted by: A Cynic's Cynic on August 23, 2006 at 9:11 PM | PERMALINK
That's just to say that it shouldn't be a surprise that purging gays from the military is going to take out a lot of gay men.
Which just shows how ridiculously counter-productive is the GWB admin's obsession with purging gays from the military.
If the GWB admin goal is to get rid of gays in the military, the better way is not to dishonorably discharge them, but instead to convert them.
The military should stop coddling gays in the linguistic corpes (talking is for chicks), and instead assign them to frontline duty -- they'd lose their gayness after their combination tenth kill, fifth rape....
Posted by: Disputo on August 23, 2006 at 9:12 PM | PERMALINK
Isn't Persian English for Farsi, like German is English for Deutsch?
Posted by: Laney on August 23, 2006 at 9:13 PM | PERMALINK
Oh, duh.
I meant to say, in my comment above, that purging gays from the military is going to take out a lot of skilled linguists.
Posted by: Joe Buck on August 23, 2006 at 9:19 PM | PERMALINK
Ok, I'll stoop low enough to say I've had enough of this farcical discussion.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 9:26 PM | PERMALINK
"Nonsense. We know a lot about Iran. For example we know Iran is funding and arming Islamofacists trying to stop the advance of democracy in Iraq."
As usual, Al, you present an eloquent case for knowing less, thinking less, and even doing less. Oh, right, labeling people and sneering is plenty for you, isn't it. What, nap time already? Well, your brain must be hurting by now.
By the way, would you like to take some time out from hating everybody to advance the cause of democracy in the USA? No, I didn't think so.
Posted by: Kenji on August 23, 2006 at 9:32 PM | PERMALINK
Noting "significant gaps in our knowledge and understanding of the various areas of concern about Iran...
For many years, the phrase "significant gaps"--notably in close proximity to "knowledge" or "data"--seems to occur with depressing frequency when it comes to intelligence and Iran.
Someone finally noticed. Again. I have my doubts that much will change.
Posted by: has407 on August 23, 2006 at 9:35 PM | PERMALINK
One thing we know for certain about Iran: George Bush will drop bombs there if he thinks he can get away with it.
Posted by: Ross Best on August 23, 2006 at 9:40 PM | PERMALINK
I think Persian is a more general term that includes Farsi.
The language selection tags on Ahmadinejad's blog shows it as "Farsi".
Posted by: has407 on August 23, 2006 at 9:43 PM | PERMALINK
Persian is the English word for the language of Persia. Iran has for devious reasons of its own adopted an alias and decided not to answer to the name Persia. What gives Iranian Islamofascists the right to name their own language?
Posted by: Ross Best on August 23, 2006 at 9:46 PM | PERMALINK
The wingnut reaction shouldn't suprise anyone. Same thing happened after I painfully explained the ideology of Fascism to rdw multiple times -- and his response was, well, you might be technically correct but you're a pencil-neck for saying it. And besides which, Islamofascism is *great term* to rile up the general public.
It's not even so much the blatantly contemptuous anti-intellectualism ... it's the idea that partial explanations are *better* than full explanations, because they make better propaganda.
This, my friends, is the slippery slope towards our very own American brand of Fascism.
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 9:47 PM | PERMALINK
Ross Best:
Is that, like, a *sincere* question?
Iran became Iran when it was a monarchy -- long before the Iranian Revolution.
"Persia" is also inaccurate, because territorially Iran encompasses regions in which the majority populations are not Persian.
Persian, properly speaking, is an ethnicity, not a language. As someone mentioned above, it is to Farsi as German is to Deutsch.
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 9:51 PM | PERMALINK
> Is that, like, a *sincere* question?
A sincere ironic question.
Posted by: Ross Best on August 23, 2006 at 9:54 PM | PERMALINK
Had GWB asked the question, it would have been an ironic sincere question.
Posted by: little ole jim from red country on August 23, 2006 at 9:56 PM | PERMALINK
Ross Best:
Oh, okay. Whew.
*kicking sarcasameter*
There, that's better ...
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 9:58 PM | PERMALINK
> *kicking sarcasameter*
Sorry. I guess it would have been less ambiguous in Siamese.
Posted by: Ross Best on August 23, 2006 at 10:03 PM | PERMALINK
Ross Best:
Or Farsi, for that matter ...
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 10:05 PM | PERMALINK
Ross Best:
And that's Thai to you, brother :)
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 10:06 PM | PERMALINK
little ole jim from red country-
I think we disagree less than it would seem.
I think we had ample information to pursue a policy course with Iraq - and we did, until we didn't. Muscling weapons inspectors back into Iraq to pursue leads was a wise approach. Our best information suggested that strategy, and it turned out that we were running some false positives in the intelligence community. (At which point we did the damn fool thing and attacked anyway.)
I think we have ample information to pursue a policy with Iran. By saying that we lack information to begin dialogue, we suggest that we can't evaluate the risk. By being unable to evaluate risk, the perception of risk is magnified.
In any event, we have ample information to dialogue. We make lack information to come to optimal terms with a percieved opponent, but we have ample information to dialogue.
Posted by: Saam Barrager on August 23, 2006 at 10:55 PM | PERMALINK
Thomas1, I am what you would call a 'fag'. You are what I would call an ass, one that holds no attraction for me.
Posted by: Keith G on August 23, 2006 at 11:26 PM | PERMALINK
Keith G:
I think that was a parody Thomas, considering how the next 'fag' message trumpeted his own cowardice.
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 11:30 PM | PERMALINK
A tasteless parody then, a product of a small mind.
Posted by: Keith G on August 23, 2006 at 11:34 PM | PERMALINK
syd + sydf = Iranian agents at work
Posted by: Keith G on August 23, 2006 at 11:55 PM | PERMALINK
Keigh G:
No argument there.
Bob
Posted by: rmck1 on August 23, 2006 at 11:58 PM | PERMALINK
On a personal note, I find it amazing that we cant find out more about whats going on inside of Iran given:
1) How divided Iranian politics is. Surely there are people there who understand that the likelihood of this situation being blown sky high is greatly increased because of inadequate information. Many there hate the decisions made by the current regime.
2) The large Iranian ex-pat community here who maintain close ties to their home. I dated a guy whose family moved here in 1979. They wanted no part of the mullahs. Before 9/11, his parents, both doctors, frequently traveled back home. BTW they were not impressed by the axis of evil mentality. Anyway, I gather that as far as sources of information is concerned, it is a target rich environment.
Posted by: Keith G on August 24, 2006 at 12:13 AM | PERMALINK
W has a long history of making bad to stupid judgment calls. Iran will be no different. Look at how he blew the cover of our CIA operative re Iran WMD's to assuage his ego over yet another bad decision. He isn't qualified to even be on the world stage let alone be a major player. W is a major fucktard, and we will get into yet another boondoggle with needless death. The problem is, unlike when he was merely incompetent in the oil industry, there is no one who can bail him out (bail us out) of the giant mess.
Posted by: jcricket on August 24, 2006 at 12:52 AM | PERMALINK
"That's just to say that it shouldn't be a surprise that purging gays from the military is going to take out a lot of gay men."
That would work for American Hawk, since his endless posturing can only mean one thing: he would secretly like to take out a lot of gay men.
Posted by: Kenji on August 24, 2006 at 12:57 AM | PERMALINK
I'm thinking Hawk would make a workable bear cub, probably on a leash.
Posted by: Keith G on August 24, 2006 at 1:39 AM | PERMALINK
Purging gay Arabic/Farsi translators from the military is certainly a data point demonstrating how unserious this administration is about the War on Terra.
If you actually thought this was a "fight to the death", wouldn't you marshal all your resources against the threat of "Islamo-whatever"? Of course you would. The fact that they feel that these translators are expendable just shows that they're still willing to engage in electoral base-pandering over actual terror-combating.
Posted by: Irony Man on August 24, 2006 at 3:37 AM | PERMALINK
We don't even know enough to talk to them intelligently.
Lets see, Condi Rice is Secretary of State, Donald Rumsfeld is Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney is Vice President, and,of course, GWB is President. They are loyal devotees of the know nothing neo-cons. Hummm.
I am not sure those guys know enough to talk to anyone about anything intelligently.
Posted by: Ron Byers on August 24, 2006 at 9:11 AM | PERMALINK
I've been wondering about the purging of gay translators from the military. I recall that one we recently outed, anonymously.
Given our need for reliable and timely intelligence, is it not possible that by outing such people, the outers are in fact providing aid and comfort to US enemies? (Assuming of course that Al Qaeda, Iran, and various Islamist extremist organizations can be defined as US enemies.)
So we've apparently got a lot of people who hate gays more than they love their country?
What's up with that?
Or is it maybe deliberate? Perhaps the outing of V. Plame and Brewster-Jennings(not for gay reasons of course) was NOT a politically motivated hit-by-proxy, but rather a deliberated step to diminish our intelligence gatehring and analysis abilities vis-a-vis Iran and violent Islamist organizations.
I mean, how is it possible to fuck up that badly, accidentally?
Posted by: kenga on August 24, 2006 at 9:41 AM | PERMALINK
The State Department has it's own Iran desk. They may know what they're doing now that Plame and Johson are gone.
Posted by: Chauffer on August 24, 2006 at 10:33 AM | PERMALINK
手机mp3铃声免费手机铃声彩信铃声下载免费手机铃声下载手机和弦铃声手机铃声 铃声下载 手机搞笑铃声下载 免费手机铃声 手机待机图片 流行手机铃声特效铃声图片下载刘德华林俊杰亚州交友免费点歌交友手机动画图片 手机铃声下载手机铃声下载铃声下载 电影下载 手机图片 电视剧 电影手机铃声下载手机铃声免费下载免费手机铃声移动手机铃声移动手机铃声下载移动手机铃声免费下载联通手机铃声联通手机铃免费下载小灵通铃声下载小灵通铃声免费下载诺基亚手机铃声诺基亚手机铃声下载诺基亚手机铃声免费下载三星手机铃声下载三星手机铃声免费下载mp3铃声下载mp3铃声免费下载彩信铃声下载彩信铃声免费下载真人铃声下载真人铃声免费下载铃声图片免费铃声图片美女手机图片手机铃声论坛搞笑手机铃声搞笑铃声下载搞笑mp3铃声搞笑手机铃声下载搞笑短信铃声个性铃声个性铃声免费下载mmf手机铃声下载
铃声下载免费铃声下载手机铃声下载免费手机铃声下载手机铃声免费下载和弦铃声下载特效铃声手机图片mmf手机铃声诺基亚铃声下载三星手机铃声下载摩托罗拉手机铃声LG手机铃声下载索尼爱立信铃声联想手机铃声飞利浦铃声波导手机铃声西门子铃声下载美女手机图片手机铃声手机壁纸下载免费图铃下载摩托罗拉手机铃声下载手机java游戏下载手机彩图下载联通彩铃业务三星铃声免费下载免费下载和弦铃声联通手机彩铃手机短片下载铃声图片下载手机待机图片手机动画真人铃声下载手机铃音下载手机铃声图片和铉铃声手机铃声网波导手机铃声下载lg手机铃声免费铃声手机铃声免费下载mp3铃声搞笑铃免费手机铃声小灵通铃声下载mp3铃声下载短信铃声小灵通铃声mmf铃声mmf铃声下载特效铃声手机铃声论坛midi铃声mp3手机铃声联通铃声下载mid铃声诺基亚铃声诺基亚手机铃声下载搞笑手机铃声三星手机铃声mid铃声下载mp3铃声免费下载qq铃声个性铃声midi铃声下载诺基亚手机铃声mp3手机铃声下载搞笑铃声下载移动铃声下载dj铃声amr铃声和弦铃声下载三星铃声下载三星铃声小灵通铃声免费下载搞怪铃声免费mp3铃声迪比特铃声mmf格式铃声amr铃声下载联通手机铃声经典铃声来电铃声
Posted by: DSDFS on August 26, 2006 at 5:16 AM | PERMALINK