Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 25, 2006
By: Kevin Drum

THE NEW 60 MINUTES....Laura Rozen was unimpressed with Katie Couric's profile of Condoleezza Rice on 60 Minutes last night:

I've never seen another serving official get such softball treatment from a serious news show. Rice was almost beaming with the Nerf-ball questions. How much of a true believer are you? Wonderful. So, you're really a true believer, aren't you? Tell me again how your life story has made you a true believer. ... Iraq is hard, but your life story is about overcoming hardship, isn't it? .... Would you like to get married? Agh!

Excellent. The world now has another Larry King, someone to go to when politicians need a pleasant way to demonstrate they aren't ducking the press but don't want to risk being asked anything embarrassing. I actually like Larry King. But one is enough.

Kevin Drum 1:51 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (67)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

Didn't see the whole segment, only the intro at the top of the show. I asked myself, would I be as upset at such softballs if the administration were doing a better job? I mean, there was a time that a comparable Colin Powell puff piece would've been appropriate -- like, back in 2001 when we didn't care about anything else. Since then, ice skating and piano playing don't matter as much.

Posted by: Grumpy on September 25, 2006 at 1:59 PM | PERMALINK

Right up there with Glenn Beck of CNN, dumbing down the news so any kindergartner can see our way of thinking is the right way.

Posted by: vampire77666 on September 25, 2006 at 2:01 PM | PERMALINK

Think she used to be more aggressive during old Today Show segments. Now to get these high-profile subjects for the new evening news gig, she's going all soft. Funny, you might assume it would be the other way around.

Posted by: nandrews3 on September 25, 2006 at 2:02 PM | PERMALINK

im suprised that katie didnt give rice a tongue kiss to show her sex appeal or offer to share her husband if she has one with rice until that lovely woman get one of her own

actually rice thinks she is a white woman in blk skin who is a houseslave of bush nd the neocons.

too bad the press fawn on this murderous woman who is on a power trip . full of lies nd a foolish compliant woman

Posted by: ray on September 25, 2006 at 2:04 PM | PERMALINK

Condalingus RIIIIICCCCEEEE!!!!

Posted by: Albert Schitzler on September 25, 2006 at 2:05 PM | PERMALINK

An unfortunately predictible over rection to the 60 Min Dan Rather fiasco.

Posted by: Keith G on September 25, 2006 at 2:06 PM | PERMALINK

I saw more of her then I ever wanted to when she did the on air colonoscopy that was enough for me.

Posted by: vampire77666 on September 25, 2006 at 2:08 PM | PERMALINK

Mike Wallace and Dan Rather had to be appalled that their show has turned into something that would run this fluff. And I had been impressed with Couric's 1st story on her 1st day as anchorwoman. She did harder edged interview on NBC's The Today Show.

Posted by: pgl on September 25, 2006 at 2:08 PM | PERMALINK

Katy Couric is a morning host and it shows.

Think maybe after their ratings tank they will hire a real journalist? Nah, Matt Lauer will get the gig.

Posted by: Ron Byers on September 25, 2006 at 2:09 PM | PERMALINK

Kevin,

Thanks for the 'heads up' on Katie. I do not watch Larry King for exactly that reason (no hard questions). I haven't watched Katie Couric b/c I do not consider her a "newsperson." This only solidifies my reasons for never watching her.

Posted by: Chief on September 25, 2006 at 2:09 PM | PERMALINK

Oh, be nice to Condi. She has a hard time protecting her husba ... President Bush.

And, of course, the media is LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL!

Posted by: Al's Mommy on September 25, 2006 at 2:10 PM | PERMALINK

Maybe what you consider softball questions are really hard, hard questions to answer for anyone in this administration.

Posted by: Qwerty on September 25, 2006 at 2:10 PM | PERMALINK

Actually, she is more like Ahmad Rashaad than Larry King.

When Michael Jordan "retired" from the Bulls, there were rumors that he had been asked to sit out a year by the Commish - The reason was that the Commish was worried about possible gambling charges being brought to bear against Michael.

Ahmad Rashaad was granted the only interview with Michael. The sports world waited for Ahmad to ask probing questions. When the interview began, Ahmad asked Michael, "Did you gamble on sports?"; Michael stared intently at Ahmad and said, "No". To which Ahmad replied, "Well, how's your golf game?" And they were off, laughing and schmoozing the rest of the hour.

Posted by: thethirdPaul on September 25, 2006 at 2:11 PM | PERMALINK

And, look at how she has only liberals on the "Free Speech" segment of the news!

Posted by: Al's Mommy on September 25, 2006 at 2:12 PM | PERMALINK

The show certainly isn't as hard-hitting any more.

They need Dan Rather to get on and make up some more stuff about the Bush Administration.

Posted by: sportsfan79 on September 25, 2006 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK

And don't forget what a consummate squash player Rumsfeld is (New York Times, September 24).

Posted by: Ross Best on September 25, 2006 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK

What a proud tradition. Murrow. Cronkite. Couric. wait a minute Couric? Couric?!? WTF?

Posted by: Global Citizen on September 25, 2006 at 2:19 PM | PERMALINK

Barf is what I thought watching that kissy kissy interview on 60 minutes. Would Madline Albright or Henry Kissinger get the same treatment? Would scallups fly out my pants? Condi is a strange bird. Obviously technically brilliant, but its like the lights are on but nobody is home. Not sure how to read her, but certainly not a Sec of State benchmark. Wow, maybe she would be moved to Fema.

Posted by: The fake fake al on September 25, 2006 at 2:21 PM | PERMALINK

Geez, and they could have brought in Nancy Grace.

Posted by: stupid git on September 25, 2006 at 2:23 PM | PERMALINK

On the local radio someone brought up the Ceaser's Bread and Circus strategy. I don't know if he was historically accurate, but sounds about just right for the current situation.

Posted by: gregor on September 25, 2006 at 2:24 PM | PERMALINK

If you're watching TV broadcast news at all, you're already an idiot.

Posted by: hisser on September 25, 2006 at 2:25 PM | PERMALINK

I was appalled that she didn't do a profile of Katie's shoe collection. Whazzupwitdat?

Posted by: Osama_Been_Forgotten on September 25, 2006 at 2:29 PM | PERMALINK

Democrats, fighting on the issues.

October is going to be desperation month.

Posted by: randolph on September 25, 2006 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK

I thought it was embarrassing for Condi that she compared the civil rights struggle of the 60s to Iraq's "struggle for democracy" today.

Unfortunately, Condi misses the point; African-Americans in the 60's wanted rights and opportunities equal to those of whites. Iraqis may have wanted something besides Saddam, but their desires are far more fractious. There were no multiple "tribes" of African Americans fighting amongst themselves as Iraqis do today.

She's a master of public relations, but her ideas don't stand up to scrutiny. Send her back to Stanford, where she can be properly ostracized.

Posted by: F'in Librul on September 25, 2006 at 2:31 PM | PERMALINK

i saw the promos and gagged. larry king can throw a fastball every now and then. he'll groove it, of course, sort of like batting practice. but the sense i got was the interview was a total embarrassment to anyone at the network with any sense of what journalism ought to be. this kind of treatment might have been acceptable five years ago. but not now. not after thousands of killed and wounded in iraq, not after that disaster in lebanon. oh, and fake fake al, i think henry k or madeline albright would have gotten the same soft treatment. i've always thought couric was a very strange choice for the anchor job.

Posted by: mudwall jackson on September 25, 2006 at 2:31 PM | PERMALINK

I noticed, with some amusement, that CBS shot themselves in the foot, and managed to totally zero out Couric's ratings.

I've watched the CBS Evening News for decades, and it was one of my first TiVo subscriptions. When Couric started, they changed the listings so the name was "CBS Evening News with Katie Couric." Immediately my TiVo stopped recording the show, since the old subscription to the "CBS Evening News" was for a show that no longer existed. Immediately, every TiVo subscription to that show was invalid.
The next day, an urgent message was pushed to all TiVo subscribers via daily updates, reminding them that the news had changed the name of the show, and to resubscribe. I guess that CBS's TiVo ratings watchers had noticed the instant zero rating and demanded action.
Well, this weekend I noticed one more backlash. The CBS weekend news still calls itself the "CBS Evening News" so now I had to add back the subscription to that show.

But ultimately, I just can't take it anymore. Couric is the worst goddam news presenter I ever watched. It is just horrid how they use her onscreen. Watch her doing an interview, they keep cutting back to Couric's face as a reaction shot, so we can see her batting her eyes and nodding at the interviewee. They never did that with Bob Schieffer or Dan Rather. Couric is a goddam newsbarbie, they have her sit on top of the news desk so viewers can see her legs. The news anchor is supposed to GET OUT OF THE WAY of the news. I still prefer the CBS reporters to those of other networks, but Couric is so goddam annoying that I spend all my time watching this show thinking of how much more can I take before I switch networks.
Personally, I liked Schieffer, and vastly prefer the fill-in anchors like Thalia Assuras and Russ Mitchell. Why oh why can't we have a REAL reporter doing the news, instead of a newsbarbie?

Posted by: charlie don't surf on September 25, 2006 at 2:34 PM | PERMALINK

Global Citizen


That's what happens when you let women call the shots.:)

Posted by: gregor on September 25, 2006 at 2:35 PM | PERMALINK

Speaking of Wallace, did anyone else see Clinton's meltdown on Fox News Sunday?
Posted by: Thomas1 on September 25, 2006 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK

Why, yes I did, Thomas!
That craaaaazzzy crazy crazy Bill Clinton. What a nutjob. He needs mental help, maybe some anger management, maybe some prozac. Maybe some viagra, seeing as how only 24 year old interns get him up anymore. Probably another source of his anger. I mean, he totally blindsided Chris Wallace. And the totally WEIRD thing about it, was how he sociopathically manipulated Chris Wallace into asking that perfectly natural question about how Clinton totally set us up for 9/11 by treating terrorism as a police issue, so he could ignore the problem, and work on getting blowjobs from fat white house interns.

Gawd that Clinton guy is insane. I mean, he was practically foaming at the mouth. That guy so totally deserved to be impeached. Thank God we got rid of him and have an effective Leader in the White House now.

Posted by: (fake)Jay on September 25, 2006 at 2:37 PM | PERMALINK

Hear hear Thomas1!

These idiots just want to bash Katie Couric, the only pure, good, and wholesome thing CBS has ever tried to do, and avoid the serious issues like what a threat to our modern decent Judeo-Christian culture that Bill Clinton represents.

I fear that by even giving Bill Clinton another 15 minutes of fame on TV, having to answer the obvious question that's on all Americans' minds, that we may have set ourselves up for the next 9/11. God I hope not!

Posted by: (fake)rdw on September 25, 2006 at 2:43 PM | PERMALINK

They should have called the segment When Perky met Prissy.

Contrast Couric's giggly high school airhead demeanor with Rice to the condescending, chiding, schoolmarm talking to a delinquent demeanor she used interviewing John Kerry. She maintained this look of incredulity like "I can't believe a thing this man says". Ms. Perky seemed downright perturbed.

Really brings to mind the study mentioned in Malcolm Gladwell's 'The Tipping Point' which showed the expression and demeanor on a journalist's face has a strong influence on voters. Watching the msm, there clearly seems to be a bias towards the right evidenced by the reverential and friendly way reporters and journalists treat republicans and condescend to democrats.

Posted by: Chrissy on September 25, 2006 at 2:45 PM | PERMALINK

Speaking of Wallace, did anyone else see Clinton's meltdown on Fox News Sunday?

No. The clip I saw of Clinton's response to Wallace on Fox news showed an outstanding response from a fighter to a right-wing talking points snowjob. You must be referring to some other show.

Posted by: Edo on September 25, 2006 at 2:46 PM | PERMALINK

The corporate-owned American mass media: obsequious, servile courtiers to right-wing power.

Posted by: SecularAnimist on September 25, 2006 at 2:48 PM | PERMALINK

Speaking of Wallace, did anyone else see Clinton's meltdown on Fox News Sunday?
Posted by: Thomas1 on September 25, 2006 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK


Meltdown??? I thought bill just proved he took the democratic balls with him when he left office.

Posted by: vampire77666 on September 25, 2006 at 2:50 PM | PERMALINK

Charlie, posting as "Thomas1", wrote: "Speaking of Wallace, did anyone else see Clinton's meltdown on Fox News Sunday?"

Clinton gave the finger to the right-wing extremist propaganda machine of Fox News, and the ignorant dumbass Bush-bootlicking neo-brownshirt mental slaves like Charlie are having a "meltdown" as a result.

Posted by: SecularAnimist on September 25, 2006 at 2:51 PM | PERMALINK

Sorry I had to step away for part of the Rice interview, because I was really hoping for some cooking tips.

Seriously, I don't have a problem with an occasional fluff piece. Murrow did them too. And if you're interviewing a celebrity, or some character like a Richard Branson, why not?

But doing a personality profile on Condi Rice is a contradiction in terms. She is a woman with no personality. How the hell do you profile it?

It is very strange to have a profile of one of the top political figures in the country, during a time of great controvery (torture amendment, war, etc.), six weeks before an election, on the hardest-hitting news show in the country, and waste the time entirely. Zero news value.

Re Couric, I thought she did a decent job on the Today show. Trouble is, though, she's not a news reader. She is better at banter and interviews. Having her read from a TelePrompTer is not playing to her strength. The evening news format is better suited for the Peter Jennings type, who might not have been the quickest on his feet, but knew how to deliver the news.

Re Rice, if they want to run her for president, I say bring her on. She'll get creamed.

Posted by: JJF on September 25, 2006 at 2:53 PM | PERMALINK

I could really care less about this story. I stopped watching any mainstream news media in the run-up to the Iraq War. Katie & company are a key component of the right-wing military industrial complex and an opiate to the brain-dead Bushbot neo-fascist right-wing masses.

Wouldn't want to anger anyone in the Chimp House...

Posted by: Brian on September 25, 2006 at 2:55 PM | PERMALINK

mhr,

I thought Jimmy Carter was the worst president I ever voted for but I'm rethinking that position.

We knew you'd come around to regret your votes for George W. Bush eventually. Good to hear you are starting down the long long path to rationality now that you realize George W. Bush is the worst president ever.

Posted by: Edo on September 25, 2006 at 3:03 PM | PERMALINK

The only thing little katie knows about hard questions is if she started asking them she'd be out of her phony baloney $15 miilion a year gig.

Any progressives or liberals been on her free speech segment yet?

Posted by: klyde on September 25, 2006 at 3:14 PM | PERMALINK

I thought Jimmy Carter was the worst president I ever voted for but I'm rethinking that position.

I thought Ronald Reagan was the worst president in American history, but I rethought that position when Little Bush took office.

Posted by: Winda Warren Terra on September 25, 2006 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK

What did you expect, actual questions?

Posted by: RM on September 25, 2006 at 3:16 PM | PERMALINK

I don't watch 60 Minutes, not being a fan of sit coms, so I have no opinion on the Rice interview. However, you mauy be amused to know that a right wing site complained that Katie was too hard on Condoleezza. The full review is at http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2006/cyb20060925.asp#1

Here's their summary;

1. Couric Cites Daughter to Rice: 'Who Made Us the Boss of Them?'

In a profile of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice which led Sunday's 60 Minutes, Katie Couric explained how Rice "rejects the notion that the U.S. is a bully, imposing its values on the world." CBS then ran a soundbite from Rice as she sat a few feet in front of Couric: "What's wrong with assistance so that people can have their full and complete right to the very liberties and freedoms that we enjoy?" To which, Couric retorted by inserting one of her kids into the story: "To quote my daughter, 'Who made us the boss of them?'" (Couric has two daughters, one a teen and the other a tween, I believe.)

Couric followed up: "You have said that your goal was, quote, 'To leave the world not just safer but better.' Right now Iraq doesn't seem safer, Iran and North Korea have not fallen into line. Do you honestly believe that the world is safer now?"

Earlier in the segment, Rice asserted about the Iraq war that "the idea that somehow because the intelligence was wrong, we were misleading the American people, I really resent that." Rice's lack of guilt seemingly astonished Couric: "Really? Because that's what so many people think." At least "so many" in Couric's Manhattan news media orbit.

Posted by: ex-liberal on September 25, 2006 at 3:25 PM | PERMALINK

I didn't see the interview. Who flashed more thigh?

Posted by: CJColucci on September 25, 2006 at 3:37 PM | PERMALINK

Kevin: I actually like Larry King. But one is enough.

Right. What we need is more moderate bloggers. Can't get enough centrism.

Posted by: Pointingatyou on September 25, 2006 at 3:52 PM | PERMALINK

I almost clicked away entirely, did for awhile since the Condi interview was so treacly--so I missed some of the Musharraf interview.

Who has decided to make 60 Minutes into infotainment?

Losing me big time.

Posted by: jawbone on September 25, 2006 at 4:00 PM | PERMALINK

Charlie don't surf @ 2:34PM--My thoughts almost exactly about the way they're focusing on Couric, the sitting on little tiny chairs for an interview, placing her on top of a desk or table so we get the leg shots.

STOP IT, CBS! You're driving me crazy and far away from your news broadcast.

Posted by: jawbone on September 25, 2006 at 4:05 PM | PERMALINK

Thomas1, Clinton handed Wallace's ass to him. You would call that a meltdown, the same way you'd call Bush a leader.

Posted by: ocontrair on September 25, 2006 at 4:06 PM | PERMALINK

I think what is happening at CBS is fairly inevitable, if unfortunate.

Couric was a bad choice for the nightly news job, if it had to be a women, a dozen of women journalist out there are much better suited. Tiara Hernandez does a better job on ABC in the early morning and she's twenty years less experienced.

Unable to hold an audience she will quickly move very hard and very far to the right. That way she can pick up right wing viewers whose demand for right wing bias reporting is inelastic and very loyal.

I put odds down that Couric becomes the Fox of the network evening news segment, and that CBS News ends up following her into the abyss. She'll be just above Jerry Springer on the credibility meter.

Posted by: Bubbles on September 25, 2006 at 4:35 PM | PERMALINK

I just sent an email to 60 Minutes telling them what a puff piece that was, and how dismally the program has declined from its once hard-hitting investigative journalism, and how I would soon stop watching if Katie continued to do her thing in present Barbie mode.

Or words to that effect.

Posted by: Delia on September 25, 2006 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK

How about asking Condoleezza Rice the hard hitting questions, Katie? Why isn't the US a major leader in the international development community?

Annual cost of meeting the UN Millenium Goals:
$19 billion: Eliminates starvation and malnutrition globally.
$12 billion: Provides education for every kid on earth.
$15 billion: Provides access to water and sanitation.
$23 billion: Reverses the spread of AIDS and Malaria.

The Cost in Perspective
$420 billion: U.S. Military budget this year.
$300 billion: Cost of Iraq War thus far.

www.borgenproject.org

Posted by: Amy1022 on September 25, 2006 at 4:54 PM | PERMALINK

F-k Larry King, he's an idiot. Try watching him attempt to interview a subject expert on a topic you are familiar with. He'll be completly clueless, and make asinine cracks in place of informed comment. And if you can't see that, well I pity you. Or maybe not.

Posted by: Jizm in King's Mouth on September 25, 2006 at 5:21 PM | PERMALINK

I didn't hear. Does Condi wear Prada?

Posted by: Ron Byers on September 25, 2006 at 5:44 PM | PERMALINK

Pretty sure she does, Ron. I also heard her perfume was sulphur-based.

Posted by: Global Citizen on September 25, 2006 at 6:17 PM | PERMALINK

I'm glad you liberals all enjoyed Clinton's hysterical performance. But then a lot of you thought Chavez was cool, too. No doubt it's going to help the Democrats as much as Dean's shrieking did. Clinton has the emotional maturity of a teenager.

That's not even taking into account that not just the blogosphere, but parts of the mainstream media, are documenting that most of what Clinton said was utter crap.

Posted by: rnc on September 25, 2006 at 6:21 PM | PERMALINK

One hack interviews amother hack. BFD.

Posted by: The Conservative Deflator on September 25, 2006 at 6:29 PM | PERMALINK

Unable to hold an audience she will quickly move very hard and very far to the right. That way she can pick up right wing viewers whose demand for right wing bias reporting is inelastic and very loyal.

Bubbles, from your mouth to God's ear!

Seriously, I doubt this. Couric is pretty liberal in her belief's. CBS News is pretty liberal. They are not going to become right wing.

Posted by: ex-liberal on September 25, 2006 at 6:35 PM | PERMALINK

Dishonest right wing hack mhr failed to notice that these dixiecrats and their followers are now proud, accepted members of the GOP. Democrats cut off their cancerous racist wing and are still paying the political price.

Posted by: DiscoStu on September 25, 2006 at 6:48 PM | PERMALINK

The Big Dog didn't have a "meltdown" but he did take a chunk out of Chris Wallace's ass. I saw it too; and remembered fondly why I liked him so damned much.

(For the record, Chavez doesn't make my heart go pitter-pat, and I have spent more time avoiding reading Noam Chomsky than it would have taken to just read the damn books, so please don't ascribe those motives to me.)

Posted by: Global Citizen on September 25, 2006 at 6:56 PM | PERMALINK

Well I've always considered Katie Couric an air-headed trend-following idiot so color me bored on this one.

Posted by: MNPundit on September 25, 2006 at 7:07 PM | PERMALINK

someone to go to when politicians need a pleasant way to demonstrate they aren't ducking the press but don't want to risk being asked anything embarrassing.

I think you mean Republicans have somewhere to go...

Posted by: justmy2 on September 25, 2006 at 9:18 PM | PERMALINK

Larry King. The guy who asked, "If evolution is true, why are there still monkeys?" You like him?

Posted by: SqueakyRat on September 25, 2006 at 10:07 PM | PERMALINK

I remember Chris Matthews' show "Marshmallow" was where Kerry huddled for comfort after he had gotten beaten up by Charlie Gibson on Good Morning America.

Posted by: minion of rove on September 25, 2006 at 10:28 PM | PERMALINK

Perky Katie stunk, but it wasn't any worse than the one episode of CBS (what passes for) News that we watched last week. There was no news on CBS (what passes for) News.

It should be embarrassing for CBS, but I'm sure it isn't. The only thing that American media exists for is to sell advertising. Nexium, the purple pill, anyone?

Posted by: raj on September 26, 2006 at 3:59 AM | PERMALINK

宝贝计划下载 性爱图片 台湾18电影网 美腿图片 强奸图片 祼体写真 美女写真 性感美女图片 做爱小电影 美少女自拍 日本av电影 明星裸照 黄色电影下载 免费色情电影 两性健康图片 性教育电影 激情电影 免费黄色电影 成人性爱电影 性电影下载 成人电影下载 性爱视频 偷拍图片 泳装美女 性感内衣 性爱贴图 性生活图片 作爱图片 性交视频 做爱电影 性福 人体摄影 裸女图片 乱伦图片 强暴电影 轮奸视频 迷奸图片 免费小电影 免费电影在线下载 免费影片 最新大片 免费电影下载 免费在线电影 看免费电影 电影夜宴网站 情色电影 激情视频下载 明星露点图片 激情写真 阴部图片 乳房图片 全裸美女 淫荡小说 淫乱小说 美女脱衣视频 裸体女人 女性手淫图片 波霸美女 淫水美女鲍鱼 阴户阴毛图片 美女图库 美女口交图片 美女乳房 性爱小说 美眉写真 激情贴图 两性性生活 作爱电影 性交图片 做爱图片 人体艺术摄影 美女裸照 全裸女 黄色小说 成人小说 强暴图片 轮奸美女 泳装图片 韩国电影 性知识图片 最新电影 宽带电影 经典电影 恐怖电影 人体艺术 美女图片 美女走光 A片下载 毛片 偷窥图片 裸体视频聊天室 成人网站 成人论坛 性爱论坛 变态日本女生 淫女 女大学生 美女下阴图 女性生殖器 操逼操比操屄 激情论坛 免费黄色电影 最新电影 成人性爱电影 免费小电影 免费性电影 免费成人电影 免费电影在线观看 宽带电影 经典电影 恐怖电影 免费影片 免费影院 最新大片 十八电影网 美女写真 免费电影下载 两性生活 性教育片 两性知识 性爱图片 激情电影 免费电影下载 免费在线电影 看免费电影 免费电影网站 韩国电影 美少女图片 日本av女优 情色电影 同志电影 激情视频下载 明星露点图片 写真电影 阴部图片 乳房图片 明星裸照 性爱视频 偷拍图片 美眉图片 泳装美女 美女内衣内裤 人体艺术 美女图片 美女走光 美腿图片 三级片 强奸电影 美女祼体图片 美女自拍 黄色电影下载 免费色情电影 激情图片 激情小电影 性感美女图片 漂亮妹妹图片 做爱图片 性爱贴图 情趣内衣图片 性生活图片 作爱图片 艳情小说 性交姿势 做爱电影 性福联盟 人体摄影 明星裸照 裸女图片 黄色小说 成人小说 乱伦小说 强暴电影 轮奸视频 性虐待电影 迷奸图片 妓女日记 写真集 全裸美女 淫荡小说 淫乱小说 淫书 舒淇写真 美女脱衣图片 裸体女人图片 人体写真 女性手淫图片 波霸美女 淫水美女鲍鱼 阴户阴道臀部阴毛 美女图库 口交肛交图片 A片下载 毛片 偷窥图片 裸体视频聊天室 成人网站 成人论坛 性爱论坛网站 性变态图片 淫女图片 日本女学生 美女下阴图 女性生殖器 操逼图片 美女激情

Posted by: amr铃声 on September 26, 2006 at 6:54 AM | PERMALINK

Katie sucks. Geo W. Sucks. Bill and Hillary back in the White House can never ever be as bad as having the Bush thugs in there!

Posted by: Elliott on September 26, 2006 at 7:16 AM | PERMALINK

Didn't see the 60 Minutes segment....but I've always thought Condi is the most (potentially, because we don't really know anything about her) interesting person in this appalling administration. There's been a zillion books on Iraq and Bush and Rove and Cheney etc. I'm waiting for someoneone to write about Condi. How did she get to the top at Stanford? Surely there's people connected to her along the way who would be willing to dish the dirt, or whatever there is. What makes Condi tick?

Posted by: emjayay on September 26, 2006 at 10:30 AM | PERMALINK

This is a test

test

Posted by: Keith G on September 27, 2006 at 3:26 PM | PERMALINK

another test

test

Posted by: Keith G on September 27, 2006 at 3:29 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly