July 2, 2007
LIBBY LOSES ANOTHER APPEAL....If Scooter Libby is counting on a pardon to keep him out of jail, he'll need Bush to act very quickly.
Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, must go to prison while appealing his conviction for obstructing a CIA leak probe, a U.S. appeals court said.
Libby may be behind bars within weeks after a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today denied his request for release. The decision will increase pressure on President George W. Bush to decide soon whether to pardon Libby, 56, as the former White House official's supporters have urged.
Libby "has not shown that the appeal raises a substantial question" under federal law that would merit letting him remain free, the court said.
It apparently wasn't too close a question for the appeals court panel -- it was a unanimous decision dismissing the appeal with a one-paragraph order.
For those who keep track of such things, Bloomberg reported, "The three-judge appeals panel that issued today's order included Judges David Sentelle, nominated by President Ronald Reagan; Karen LeCraft Henderson, nominated by President George H.W. Bush, and David Tatel, nominated by President Bill Clinton."
In other words, for those keeping score, Libby was charged by a prosecutor appointed by a Republican administration, he was sentenced by a judge appointed by a Republican president, and his appeal was heard by two more judges appointed by Republican presidents. Naturally, this will lead Fox News and the Wall Street Journal's editorial page to decry the "partisan" prosecution.
As for the inevitable questions about a presidential pardon, a former senior Bush administration official recently said, "It would show a deep disregard for the rule of law if [the president] was to do it right now, when there has been no remorse shown by a convicted felon and no time has been served."
In other words, it would be entirely consistent with the White House's m.o.
—Steve Benen 2:30 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (41)
Dammit, I hate to see a good man go to prison. Full disclosure: yes, I did serve time in prison for insider trading. No, I was not raped, except by the legal system and even then, I suppose I should have anticipated that I would get caught.
If all of the good public servants end up having to go to prison, then what kind of public servants will we end up with? Hmm?
And, Steve--you must slow down. I'm still trying to catch up from Friday, sir.
Posted by: Norman Rogers on July 2, 2007 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK
norm's a criminal! hence his sympathies.
Posted by: benjoya on July 2, 2007 at 2:38 PM | PERMALINK
And rape cannot occur with full consent.
Posted by: duh on July 2, 2007 at 2:41 PM | PERMALINK
sorry you went to the pokey, norm. you should have been born into a better family.
Posted by: w on July 2, 2007 at 2:49 PM | PERMALINK
Normie;
What makes Scooter a "good" man?
The fact that he was proven, in a court of law, to have lied, to obstruct the investigation to determine who violated national security by outing a covert agent and her entire undercover operation, working on nuclear proliferation?
Or because you know what happens to cute guys like that in prison?
Posted by: osama_been_forgotten on July 2, 2007 at 2:55 PM | PERMALINK
No, I was not raped
Then you were the one doing the raping...
Posted by: elmo on July 2, 2007 at 2:56 PM | PERMALINK
While terrorists try to kill us with Mercedes Benz bombs, we quibble on whether to send our esteemed public servants to jail for doing what they are sworn to do: protect us from evil.
Posted by: gregor on July 2, 2007 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK
What makes Scooter a "good" man?
Scores of people from all walks of life, many of them very prominent, wrote the judge to tell him what a good man Scooter is, not "was." How many former members of the US government are going to write the judge when they arrest your garden variety liberal for stealing from Wal-Mart or using drugs in a day care center?
The fact that he was proven, in a court of law, to have lied, to obstruct the investigation to determine who violated national security by outing a covert agent and her entire undercover operation, working on nuclear proliferation?
Oh, please. She was a bureaucrat who sat on her fanny and collected money from the government. She was no more covert than I am. And the investigation was not "obstructed." The investigation was fishing for whatever it could find, once it was known that Richard Armitage was the Aunt Blabby who told all of the secrets.
Correct me if I am wrong, but Richard Armitage is in what legal jeopardy at this time?
Hence, no crime was committed.
Next case, please!
Posted by: Norman Rogers on July 2, 2007 at 3:01 PM | PERMALINK
What makes Scooter a "good" man?
Er war immer partei- und führertreu.
Posted by: Conrad "Con" Sordino on July 2, 2007 at 3:04 PM | PERMALINK
Does gregor have any clue? He thinks public servents "are sworn to do: protect us from evil."
Rather than swearing to uphold the constitution, in which 'evil' is not defined or mentioned.
The Pope can protect us from evil. I want my public servants protecting us from more banal and concrete threats.
Posted by: MobiusKlein on July 2, 2007 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK
bmaz is out and about today. I don't think he will mind if I share his take. His view of the position the Court of Appeals in which the decision has placed Chief Justice Roberts actually adds a lot to this conversation.
Posted by: corpus juris on July 2, 2007 at 3:22 PM | PERMALINK
Scores of people from all walks of life, many of them very prominent, wrote the judge to tell him what a good man Scooter is, not "was." How many former members of the US government are going to write the judge when they arrest your garden variety liberal for stealing from Wal-Mart or using drugs in a day care center?
Norman Rogers
yeah, liberals are punks, not classy guys who commit credit card fraud at target.
your pal,
blake
Posted by: blake on July 2, 2007 at 3:26 PM | PERMALINK
If all of the good public servants end up having to go to prison, then what kind of public servants will we end up with? Hmm?
We want public servants that don't break the law.
Posted by: Andy on July 2, 2007 at 3:30 PM | PERMALINK
and his appeal was heard by two more judges appointed by Republican presidents
Including Sentelle, no less. I am shocked.
Posted by: Disputo on July 2, 2007 at 3:35 PM | PERMALINK
Norman Rogers: "Oh, please. She was a bureaucrat who sat on her fanny and collected money from the government. She was no more covert than I am."
Better check with Troll Central, because you're working on stale talking points right now.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18924679/
"Correct me if I am wrong, but Richard Armitage is in what legal jeopardy at this time?"
Armitage is in no legal jeopardy at this time. Amazing what telling the truth can do for a person.
Honestly, Norman -- you're mailing it in.
Posted by: junebug on July 2, 2007 at 3:51 PM | PERMALINK
No wonder Norman served time. He's dumb as a post.
Try this instead: If all the BAD (e.g lying, perjuring, obstructing justice) public servants end up having to go to prison, then what kind of public servants will we end up with? Hmm?
Posted by: space on July 2, 2007 at 3:59 PM | PERMALINK
While terrorists try to kill us with Mercedes Benz bombs, we quibble on whether to send our esteemed public servants to jail for doing what they are sworn to do: protect us from evil.
Yeah Scooter protected us from that evil REPUBLICAN-APPOINTED prosecutor finding out the truth about the outing of an undercover CIA agent tracking the movement of weapons of mass destruction blowing not only her cover but that of the entire "Brewster Jennings" operation she (and no doubt others) was using to keep her identity secret.
As Kevin would say, "better trolls, please."
Posted by: Jim in Chicago on July 2, 2007 at 4:03 PM | PERMALINK
….I guess the lesson here is….just don't remember anything. Freedom Fighter at 3:55 PM
That is what works for Abu Gonzales, the Bush DoJ, the GSA, Rove and rest.
So why did Libby go out of his way to lie? He must have been trying to protect Cheney.
Posted by: Mike on July 2, 2007 at 4:03 PM | PERMALINK
blowing not only her cover but that of the entire "Brewster Jennings" operation...
Speaking on non-proliferation disasters....
Source: Associated Press
Pakistan Lifts Restrictions on Scientist
By MUNIR AHMAD
Monday, July 2, 2007; 4:38 AM
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- Authorities have eased the virtual house arrest imposed on A.Q. Khan, the scientist who sold Pakistan's nuclear secrets to Iran, North Korea and Libya, officials said Monday.
Khan can now meet friends and relatives at his home in the Pakistani capital and travel to meet them elsewhere, two senior officials told
The Associated Press. They spoke on condition of anonymity because Khan's case remains sensitive.
Posted by: Conrad "Con" Sordino on July 2, 2007 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK
Oh, please. She was a bureaucrat who sat on her fanny and collected money from the government. She was no more covert than I am. Posted by: Norman Rogers on July 2, 2007 at 3:01 PM | PERMALINK
Hm. The Judge, and the Grand Jury disagree with you, as well as Fitgerald's brief, as well as the DCIA who ordered the Grand Jury in the first place.
And the investigation was not "obstructed." The investigation was fishing for whatever it could find, once it was known that Richard Armitage was the Aunt Blabby who told all of the secrets.
Armitage did not blab her covert status, and he was not the source of the original leak - (otherwise he would have been the subject of the original investigation as soon as that came to light).
Correct me if I am wrong, but Richard Armitage is in what legal jeopardy at this time?
None, because he did not leak her covert status, only her association with the CIA, her covert status was leaked BEFORE Armitage did his non-denial. (which, IMO - was a violation of his SF-312, so, if not criminal, at the very least he should have his clearance revoked - and so should anyone who confirmed to the Press, including Libby and Rove, and Cheney, as well.)
Posted by: osama_been_forgotten on July 2, 2007 at 4:22 PM | PERMALINK
Speaking on non-proliferation disasters.... Source: Associated Press Pakistan Lifts Restrictions on Scientist Posted by: Conrad "Con" Sordino on July 2, 2007 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK
Bushco WANTS nuclear proliferation.
If Iran and Pakistan don't have nuclear weapons, how else can he sell us a "Missile Defense System"?
Remeber: The Taliban was a creation of the Pakistani ISI, an organization stacked with fundamentalist radicals who hate the west. 9/11 was the opening shot in their proxy war against us. And Bush not only gives them a free pass, but he helps them.
And now they have nukes.
And Bush will make sure that Khan continues to help others get them.
Posted by: osama_been_forgotten on July 2, 2007 at 4:36 PM | PERMALINK
Schadenfreude, oh Schadenfreude,
How lovely are thy branches.
Posted by: anandine on July 2, 2007 at 4:45 PM | PERMALINK
I am convinced the "What, me worry?" president will pardon Scooter. What does he have to lose?
Posted by: Larry Hanry on July 2, 2007 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK
What does he have to lose?
His poll numbers could go below 20%. Oh, I forgot, he doesn't pay attention to polls.
Posted by: tomeck on July 2, 2007 at 5:24 PM | PERMALINK
The jury charge was so biased against the defense, essentially denying them the ability to mount a defense, that the judge should be the one going to jail.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis on July 2, 2007 at 5:33 PM | PERMALINK
"The jury charge was so biased against the defense, essentially denying them the ability to mount a defense, that the judge should be the one going to jail."
ROFL... Man, these 26-percenters are desperate for a talking point, any talking point, aren't they? I wonder if they realize just how silly they sound?
Posted by: PaulB on July 2, 2007 at 5:41 PM | PERMALINK
"The jury charge was so biased against the defense, essentially denying them the ability to mount a defense, that the judge should be the one going to jail."
Clearly, The Man is keeping him down.
Posted by: junebug on July 2, 2007 at 5:42 PM | PERMALINK
I find it interesting that dear little "Freedom Fighter" is back again. He/she/it laid low for a while after the initial round of deleted posts. I wonder how long he/she/it will last in this current incarnation?
Posted by: PaulB on July 2, 2007 at 5:43 PM | PERMALINK
AP is reporting that bush has commuted scooter's sentence
Posted by: benjoya on July 2, 2007 at 5:50 PM | PERMALINK
It's fucking Iran Contra and Watergate all over again.
Posted by: osama_been_forgotten on July 2, 2007 at 5:58 PM | PERMALINK
So much for the rule of law.
Posted by: PaulB on July 2, 2007 at 5:58 PM | PERMALINK
So much for the rule of law.
Yeah, Republicans have made it pretty clear that for all their hysterical screaming to the contrary they believe they're allowed to break the law with impunity as long as they feel it's "OK."
You know, the good 'ol boy system. "A nation of fat, cigar-smoking men and shiftless fratboys not laws".
Just like the Founders intended.
Posted by: trex on July 2, 2007 at 6:07 PM | PERMALINK
Commuted while everyone on vacation this week.
My level of disgust just hit an all time high.
Obviously Normie will celebrate, no doubt with a cake made from acorn file, in his dojo while telling us that all along he had the mojo to predict this.
CAN WE GET A CATBLOG TODAY, WE NEED IT.
Posted by: optical weenie on July 2, 2007 at 6:09 PM | PERMALINK
Obviously Normie will celebrate, no doubt with a cake made from acorn file, in his dojo while telling us that all along he had the mojo to predict this.
Posted by: optical weenie on July 2, 2007 at 6:09 PM | PERMALINK
No one could have predicted this. . .
Posted by: osama_been_forgotten on July 2, 2007 at 6:12 PM | PERMALINK
It was about payback for all the prosecutions in the Clinton administration. Libby was convicted by liberal outrage
Libby was convicted by a Republican prosecuter, you mouth-breathing asswipe, for breaking the law. The case was prosecuted during a Republican administration with a Republican Congress -- so if it were it were, in fact, driven by outrage then that outrage must have have been shared by a plurality of citizens in this country.
Did I mention that you're a mouth-breathing asswipe?
Posted by: trex on July 2, 2007 at 6:41 PM | PERMALINK
What trex said.
Posted by: Blue Girl, Red State (aka G.C.) on July 2, 2007 at 9:32 PM | PERMALINK
I just don't know what's up with Californa Congressman Waxman's nose?? I want to take him seriously, but he's so..ugly. Up here in the Northwest we are used to our folks being a handsome lot. Strong men and beautiful women and children. But I look at Waxman and I can't get past that nose! Get some plastic surgery, dude!! Bart Triesch
Posted by: Bart Triesch on July 2, 2007 at 10:05 PM | PERMALINK
orwell: I wonder if Armitage will be prosecuted now?
armitage didn't lie and he didn't obstruct justice..
Posted by: mr. irony on July 3, 2007 at 4:17 PM | PERMALINK
So much for the courts.
Posted by: Brojo on July 3, 2007 at 9:34 PM | PERMALINK