Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

July 5, 2007

DOMENICI JUMPS SHIP....As recently as a few months ago, Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) was just another part of Team GOP when it came to the war. He voted with the party to give Bush everything the White House wanted, he blasted Dems' proposals, he refused to ask questions, and he spurned any efforts at administrative oversight. Domenici, like practically every other lawmaker with an "R" after his or her name, went so far as to say withdrawal timelines "encourage terrorists."

The good news is, Domenici appears to have come around to embracing the Dems' policy of a year-and-a-half ago. The bad news is, the depth of his commitment is still unclear.

At a press conference in Albuquerque, Domenici said he is "unwilling to continue our current strategy," but he also he opposes "immediate withdrawal." Domenici said the U.S. "cannot continue asking our troops to sacrifice indefinitely," but he rejects funding cut offs. He now supports legislation that could allow for a drawdown of combat forces by March, but does not set a deadline.

For those keeping score at home, there are now two Republican senators (Hagel and Smith) who actually support the Dems' policy, and four (Lugar, Voinovich, Warner, and Domenici) who have broken with the Bush policy and expressed support for some kind of draw-down in U.S. forces. Throw Snowe, Collins, Coleman, Sununu, and Specter into the mix and we might even get to double digits by August.

That said, the Speaker's office is asking the right question.

Senator Warner's benchmarks, Senator Lugar's declaration, and the realization by Senators Domenici and Voinovich that a change is needed in Iraq demonstrate bipartisan support for an end to the war. Now the question is whether they will join in a bipartisan way in voting to change course in Iraq and to bring our troops home?

What we have here are scared Republicans who finally willing to break with the president and stop endorsing failure, but unwilling to cross the aisle. It's incremental progress, I suppose, but a) Domenici and others will probably keep voting against Democratic proposals; and b) if it took these guys all this time to get to the where Dems were a year ago, there's no telling how long it will take them to get to where Dems are now.

The momentum seems to be moving in the direction of progress, but momentum won't mean much if Republicans' votes don't match their rhetoric.

And just as an aside, Domenici is up for re-election next year. Just thought I'd mention it.

Steve Benen 8:39 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (20)
 
Comments

Republicans suck.

Carry on.

Posted by: craigie on July 5, 2007 at 8:52 PM | PERMALINK

The most important question that must be asked of each & everyone of these potential ship-jumpers is "What will it take for you to actually support action to end this folly ?"

Negotiate w/them until the numbers are there for actual action

Democrats have to walk the hard road on this to get any progress & stop the loss of our troops

No time for posturing

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." – Buckminster Fuller

Posted by: daCascadian on July 5, 2007 at 9:00 PM | PERMALINK

The R's feel that it's better to bend than to break; but they still have their roots in the same dirt.

Posted by: eightnine2718281828mu5 on July 5, 2007 at 9:23 PM | PERMALINK

Why does Pete Domenici hate America?

Posted by: SHannity on July 5, 2007 at 9:26 PM | PERMALINK

Lugar isn't up for reelection till 2012 and Voinovich isn't up til 2010.

What's up with them. Competing for the minority leader position in a year and a half? Or do they actually give a f@%k about national defense and the state of our military?

Posted by: B on July 5, 2007 at 9:54 PM | PERMALINK

Guess this is a case of (R)s wanting to make their letters look like (I)s to the near-sighted voter.

(Cue Mr. Magoo responses now...)

Posted by: Kenji on July 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM | PERMALINK

(Cue Mr. Magoo responses now...)

Every so often, Mr. Magoo would suddenly open his eyes wide and actually see things.

Posted by: skeg on July 5, 2007 at 10:31 PM | PERMALINK

B, Lugar is -- I believe -- what passes for a statesman in today's Republican party. As for Voinovich 1) he CAN be reasonable, and 2) 2010 may not seem far enough away for him, given what happened statewide in Ohio last Fall.

Posted by: demtom on July 5, 2007 at 10:48 PM | PERMALINK

It does not sound like he is committing to much of a specific change of position.

But I am more interested is the liberal rallying cry of "end the war." Isn't it silly to suggest one side in a war can "end it," when in reality all one side in a war can do unilaterally is quit?

I realize that,unfortunately, this war has deteriorated to political manuevering, but wouldn't we be better served by honesty?

Posted by: brian on July 5, 2007 at 10:49 PM | PERMALINK

And just as an aside, Domenici is up for re-election next year.

And it isn't an aside. Republicans who support the war will be in big trouble in the next election unless things go improbably well in Iraq in the upcoming months.

Posted by: MatthewRmarler on July 5, 2007 at 11:10 PM | PERMALINK

These GOP idiots who so eagerly continued to send our kids to die in Iraq till yesterday do not have any credibility.

Who knows what kind of games they are playing at the expense of the lives of our troops?

Posted by: gregor on July 5, 2007 at 11:24 PM | PERMALINK

unless things go improbably well in Iraq in the upcoming months.

Could you entertain us with what that might look like?

Posted by: floppin' pauper on July 5, 2007 at 11:24 PM | PERMALINK

What we have is a growing group of Republicans smart enough to realize that the war is unwinnable, but still too selfish to place the interests of country over party. The trick is for the Dems to find a way to shame the smart Republicans into doing the right thing for a change.

Posted by: Disputo on July 5, 2007 at 11:54 PM | PERMALINK

I'll give 10:1 odds that Domenici will vote the President's will on Iraq. He is just talking to constituents who won't pay attention to his vote nearly so closely as all this nice coverage he is currently getting. They will have some vague memory of him talking tough (e.g., see Spector, Hagel, Snowe, etc. on every single issue that matters). If he doesn't tow the line to the end, Rove will just plant an inconvenient little US Attorney scandal story about Pete during his campaign.

Posted by: HungChad on July 6, 2007 at 12:04 AM | PERMALINK

Could you entertain us with what that might look like?

The Islamic Messiah descending from the heavens onto the Umm al-Ma'arik mosque and transforming all improvised explosive devices into fish?

Posted by: B on July 6, 2007 at 1:11 AM | PERMALINK

Domenici may be reflecting the stance that the White House will eventually adopt as the 08 season approaches. A slow-mo withdrawal from advanced hazardous surge positions back to enclaves in a suburban zone near Baghdad and other urban centers. A little like Vietnam, but here the unrest is genuinely between ethnic & religious & AQ.

BTW, AQ is now admitting it is taking a licking, but the MSM has no truck with good news during this war & that AQ self-assessment is not being disseminated. Honest reporters like John Burns at the NYT are being ignored and young TV suck-ups know that bad news is what their editorial bosses want to hearso it remains the explosion of the day. The Tet syndrome repeats itself. Some Repubs will bow to the prevailing winds & the stupidly conducted expedition to Iraq will slowly retreat.

Like the Euroweenie left, the Dems exult in non-performance & national self-abasement.

Posted by: daveinboca on July 6, 2007 at 5:25 AM | PERMALINK

Two questions:

Remind me again why all of these young soldiers are dying in Iraq again?

Where is Osama?

Posted by: The Conservative Deflator on July 6, 2007 at 8:13 AM | PERMALINK

Irony alert: brian, everyone's favorite faux-reasonable concern troll, asks: "wouldn't we be better served by honesty?"

As for Domenici, Lagar, etc.: Big deal. They stood up to be counted scant weeks ago when it really mattered giving Bush political cover to continue the war. Their buyer's remorse now is a day late and a dollar short at the very least.

Posted by: Gregory on July 6, 2007 at 8:51 AM | PERMALINK

Domenici is in real danger of not being reelected. But it is going to take more than posturing to get reelected. If Edwards is the next president his AG will have Domenici and many others tried for obstruction of justice. Not so sure about the other candidates.

Posted by: Captain Dan on July 6, 2007 at 9:02 AM | PERMALINK

Greeting. You may be disappointed if you fail, but you are doomed if you don't try. Help me! Looking for sites on: Benefit cosmetics bluff dust acne. I found only this - Benefit cosmetics return. Free delivery on orders of or more! Remarkable skincare and makeup plus beauty tutorials. Essie matte about you matte finisher. Best regards :o, Sherrod from Seychelles.

Posted by: Sherrod on August 17, 2009 at 6:36 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Free Credit Score

Addiction Treatment

Personal Loan

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals