 |
 |
   Washingtons budget hawks want to decimate the federal workforce to shrink the deficit. It will have the opposite effect.
 There arent nearly enough counterterrorism experts to instruct all of Americas police. So we got these guys instead.
 Last year there wasn�t a single fatal airline accident in the developed world. So why is the U.S. health care system still accidently killing hundreds of thousands? The answer is a lack of transparency.
|
   |
|
|
January 25, 2008
By: LETTER TO THE EDITOR....A quick note to my good friends at the LA Times: would it be too much to ask that stories that appear in your print edition also appear online? In some easily found format like, say, a list? That would be really cool. Thanks. —Kevin Drum 12:04 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (13)
Comments
Tripp: ads, of course. They make money on every page view. And no one buys the physical paper just to get a particular article that isn't in the online edition. couldn't agree more, kevin i glance at the paper on the way out the door and usually want to check an article or two once i am in the office. this is aggravating to no end Posted by: rik on January 25, 2008 at 1:15 PM | PERMALINKI've always been able to stick a couple of keywords in their search engine and the story will come up. I agree that they could make it easier. Posted by: Speed on January 25, 2008 at 1:20 PM | PERMALINKKevin, you can "read" the actual print edition online at pressdisplay.com. Not free (of course) but if you subscribe you get access to a huge number of publications from all over the world, exactly as they appear in print. Posted by: paul on January 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM | PERMALINKwould it be too much to ask that stories that appear in your print edition also appear online? In some easily found format like, say, a list? Is the LA Times, that Tribune Company abomination that has run out three editors in the past three years, of which you speak? If so, then the answer is no. It is way to much to ask. Posted by: Shine on January 25, 2008 at 1:52 PM | PERMALINKKevin: Isn't this ( http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/?track=leftnav-printedition ) good enough? Posted by: Alex R on January 25, 2008 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINKWell, the LA Times might be responsive to you, as a reader, and do what you ask....but it'll probably cost him his job. Posted by: Robert Earle on January 25, 2008 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINKPosted by: Joe Buck...ads, of course. They make money on every page view. Aren't we using AdBlock Plus yet? How primitive. Still using Monopolist Explorer? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865 Posted by: Luther on January 25, 2008 at 3:02 PM | PERMALINKAs a former Pasadenan, I'm a regular leader of the L.A. Times. So tell me, what stories have I missed? I mean, did Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa admit that he liked to dress up like Rita Moreno in West Side Story and lip-sync to the movie soundtrack? Posted by: Donald from Hawaii on January 25, 2008 at 4:43 PM | PERMALINKThe internets is just a fad. The LA Times will outlast all of the internets tubes! Posted by: Orson on January 25, 2008 at 7:07 PM | PERMALINKIt's the LA Times. Wait a month. They'll have another new editor and/or publisher fighting with each other and Chicago. Posted by: freelunch on January 25, 2008 at 9:20 PM | PERMALINKKevin, Use this link to get stories online that appeared in the print edition. http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/ All of the sections are lifted on the left side. Posted by: Danny on January 27, 2008 at 1:32 AM | PERMALINK
May 2011
April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 |
|
|
    |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly |
||||||
