 |
 |
 March 3, 2008
IRAN'S NUKES....The UN Security Council voted today 14-0 to approve a third round of sanctions against Iran. A victory for truth in advertising? —Kevin Drum 6:09 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (14)Comments
Everyone should have nukes. Americans are such hypocrites. All I know is--George W. Bush is the LAST person who should have nukes. Posted by: Anon on March 3, 2008 at 7:12 PM | PERMALINKI'm sure that China will "exercise vigilance" as it puts the finishing touches on that pipeline deal with Iran. Posted by: RickG on March 3, 2008 at 8:07 PM | PERMALINKA victory for European diplomacy. W. could take note of that one, too. Posted by: SocraticGadfly on March 3, 2008 at 8:07 PM | PERMALINKWell, good. Hopefully through peaceful nuclear energy programs will spread so that millions of the world's people can be lifted out of poverty. Posted by: Swan on March 3, 2008 at 8:16 PM | PERMALINKNukes don't kill. People do. An armed international community, is a safe community. Nukes: the great equalizer. Posted by: snicker-snack on March 3, 2008 at 8:17 PM | PERMALINKWhat Iran "nukes", exactly? The ones that 5 years of IAEA inspections have failed to turn up? The ones that Iran has supposedly been "just 2 years away" from making for the last 20 years? Perhaps you mean their "seekig the capability" to make nukes... sorta a lot like "weapons of mass destruction program related activities"... Posted by: david on March 3, 2008 at 9:45 PM | PERMALINKoh sure. the taliban would have great with nukes. Posted by: mudwall jackson on March 3, 2008 at 10:25 PM | PERMALINKHey, no one should have nukes but since they exist only WE should have nukes. ;) And now for something completely different. Posted by: RA on March 3, 2008 at 10:38 PM | PERMALINKIrony abounds. My favorite is the observation by snicker-snack Posted by: Jake the Snake on March 3, 2008 at 11:19 PM | PERMALINKAntiwar advocates might want to start worrying again. Posted by: Brojo on March 4, 2008 at 11:26 AM | PERMALINKHow about sanctioning Israel's hundreds of real nuclear weapons, instead of the phantom menace of the nonexistent Iranian weapons? Posted by: matter on March 5, 2008 at 10:00 AM | PERMALINKAnti-proliferation efforts are mostly just a delaying game. If a country is determined to get nuclear weapons, if will find a way. As long as they are adept at playing off international differences of opinion, any country developing the capability to build nukes can forestall actions meant to stop them. Someone will eventually use one in anger and the world then might get serious about ditching these weapons. Until then, it's all an academic exercise. Something to snark over, but not truly think about. Posted by: Trashhauler on March 5, 2008 at 11:11 AM | PERMALINKPost a comment
January 2009
December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 |
|
|
    |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
------ ADVERTISEMENTS ------
|
||||||||
