Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

March 11, 2008
By: Kevin Drum

SCIENCE FOR SALE....According to the Weinberg Group's website, one of their specialties is defending corporate clients with, um, PR problems:

The Weinberg Group knows how critical it is to protect products, markets and revenue streams and to minimize the damage done to corporate image, business and brands. We've developed a highly-effective, integrated approach to preparing and defending against attacks on products and processes, averting crises, and diminishing the effects of civil and criminal litigation.

Indeed. Justin Rood reports today that congressional Democrats have some questions about this:

Investigators for the House Energy and Commerce Committee say they have obtained deleted pages from the Weinberg Group's Web site where the firm took credit for delaying the cancellation of a harmful drug for nearly a decade at the request of two pharmaceutical clients, and other industry victories.

The firm's efforts "led to an extensive process" and eventually "10 additional years of sales prior to the ultimate cancellation of the drug," according to a printout of the page provided to ABC News by the committee.

In a March 6 letter, the committee asked Weinberg to turn over documents naming that drug, its manufacturers and the experts it involved in allegedly keeping the drug on sale.

Hey, if they were willing to brag about it on their website, I'm sure they'll be happy to brag about it under oath in front of a congressional subcommittee. Let's name some names.

Kevin Drum 3:03 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (13)
 
Comments

No relation, of course to the Spitzer scandal. Those are hard-working women, earning a living. These are fucking whores.

Posted by: thersites on March 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM | PERMALINK

At the same time, other people have managed to stall "tort reform" for just as long.

Ironic, ain't it?

Posted by: Quaker in a Basement on March 11, 2008 at 3:25 PM | PERMALINK

Vytorin?

Posted by: troglodyte on March 11, 2008 at 3:34 PM | PERMALINK

Hee hee, thersites!

If Congress manages to shine some sun on this company's lowjinks, I'd like to see the 'risk management' estimates:

present discounted value of extra years of profits

-

present discounted value of future lawsuits

Posted by: MaryCh on March 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK

Isn't this how the free market is supposed to work? Let consumers buy unsafe drugs for as long as they want. When they get tired of the side effects that are killing them the drug will gradually become unprofitable and the manufacturer will take it off the market.

This way we not only cull the herd of the weak and infirm, we also preserve the sanctity of free markets and the profitability of private enterprise. Sounds like a win-win-win.

Posted by: pj in jesusland on March 11, 2008 at 4:35 PM | PERMALINK

Wait, I'm starting to get it. Yeah. A "Trial lawyer" is someone who represents a person against a company. So what do we call someone who represents a company against the government and the public? Oh yeah, "rich."

Posted by: Tripp on March 11, 2008 at 4:59 PM | PERMALINK

"..fucking whores..."

-good pun.

Posted by: absent observer on March 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM | PERMALINK

Grammar alert, on a pet peeve of mine.

Kevin, there's just one Weinberg Group. Your opening sentence should say "one of its specialties" rather than "one of their specialties."

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on March 11, 2008 at 5:15 PM | PERMALINK

Sorry, "website" is the subject, not "group," and of course, there's only one website. Same critique applies.

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on March 11, 2008 at 5:17 PM | PERMALINK

I hope these guys fry.

Posted by: Pinko Punko on March 11, 2008 at 6:58 PM | PERMALINK

Just think, they caused or contributed to the deaths of many ill patients! Kudos!

Posted by: Anon on March 11, 2008 at 7:06 PM | PERMALINK

trog: not Vytorin.

Vytorin is a combination of simvistatin, a good cholesterol reducing drug and ezetimibe, which is probably useless.
The infamous drugs that have been withdrawn in the last 10 years are actually not that numerous, but since there should be none in this category...

It may not be Vioxx, because it only came on the market in 1999 and was withdrawn in 2004. Fen-phen was widely used only for 3-4 years in the mid 90's. Another NSAID, Bextra, was found to be dangerous after only 4-5 years on the market. Baycol [a statin] was only on the market for about the same amount of time in the late 90's to 2001.

In each of these cases there are some solid allegations that the companies knew about the dangers long before they withdrew the drugs form the market, but none of them looks like it took ten years. That leaves two alternative explanations:
1. The drug companies knew about the dangers long before FDA approval, or
2. The Weinberg group bullshitting everyone by claiming to be a bigger bad guy than they actually were.

Posted by: natural cynic on March 12, 2008 at 1:55 AM | PERMALINK

you'd think that someone having PR savvy would know better than to make such claims on their website. because it makes you (and your customers) look like total scumbags when it comes to the media's attention.

Posted by: Cash Money on March 12, 2008 at 8:43 AM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals