Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

March 16, 2008
By: Kevin Drum

THE 27TH DAY....Last night I watched The Jane Austen Book Club, which turned out be an OK movie as long as you don't mind lots of coincidences and a happy ending that's so happy and so unlikely they really ought to invent a whole new Academy Award category for it. And then retire it.

But whatever. Constructing a plausible ending seems to be a lost art these days. In any case, I learned something new from watching it: back in 1957 someone made a movie out of the book The 27th Day. (The Silicon Valley geek character has a lobby poster for the film hanging on one of his walls.) Wow! The 27th Day is one of my favorite trashy potboilers, a Cold War sf novel featuring a stalwart young American, a beautiful British love interest, a brilliant German scientist, a bunch of evil Russians, and — aliens! I didn't really think anyone else in the world had even heard of the book, let alone made it into a movie. But they did, and IMDB informs me that it starred Gene Barry and Valerie French.

(According to Wikipedia, the author of the book, John Mantley, "trained as a fighter pilot in the Royal Canadian Air Force during World War II, and was sent to England and India. While there he exchanged long letters with his second cousin Mary Pickford, from which later evolved his first novel, The 27th Day." Huh. Then he became a writer and producer for Gunsmoke. Huh again. The entry also informs me that not only am I not the only person who's heard of The 27th Day, but it was a Book-of-the-Month Club selection back in the day. Triple huh. I'm sure my loyal commenters will be able to make much sport of this.)

Anyway, I'll bet it's a really bad movie, but now I want to see it. There's no way I'll find it at Blockbuster, though, and even Netflix doesn't carry it, so I guess I'll have to buy a copy from eBay or something. Unsurprisingly, I suppose, the trailer for the movie is available on YouTube.

Next up: World Out of Mind, by J.T. M'Intosh. Now that's a so-bad-it's-good book that hasn't been made into a movie and never will be. Anybody but me ever read it?

UPDATE: In comments, FearItself writes:

I haven't seen the movie, but I've read enough Jane Austen to know that "a happy ending that's so happy and so unlikely they really ought to invent a whole new Academy Award category for it" is a staple of her books. Indeed, you could easily make the case that she used the very improbability of her novels' endings to further their arguments, and to poke fun at the novelistic conventions of her society. So I'd imagine the movie's ending was something of an homage.

OK. I'll buy that, especially given the structure of the rest of the movie.

Kevin Drum 3:31 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (35)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

The Jane Austen Book Club *was* a silly movie, but as far as romantic comedies go, it was very decent. And I really liked how all of the characters were stand-ins for a Jane Austen's character, and how elements of the plot mirrored elements of Austen's plots. It was a fun homage. (I just wish they hadn't aged down so many of the characters. Typical Hollywood!)

And, actually, Griggs's enthusiasm (in the book, not so much the movie) for sci-fi inspired me to check out the Ursula Le Guin novels he kept trying to get Jocelyn to read.

Kevin, I like it when you blog about (non-political) media! You should do it more often.

Posted by: Caitlin on March 16, 2008 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK

Nope. Read One in Three Hundred when it ran serialized in F&SF, but none of his other novels.

Posted by: theophylact on March 16, 2008 at 4:18 PM | PERMALINK

Constructing a plausible ending seems to be a lost art these days.

Here's to the lost arts.

Posted by: anabel on March 16, 2008 at 4:32 PM | PERMALINK

I'd be surprised if the movie were even available on VHS.

Posted by: deed on March 16, 2008 at 4:39 PM | PERMALINK

Constructing a plausible ending seems to be a lost art these days.

I haven't seen the movie, but I've read enough Jane Austen to know that "a happy ending that's so happy and so unlikely they really ought to invent a whole new Academy Award category for it" is a staple of her books. Indeed, you could easily make the case that she used the very improbability of her novels' endings to further their arguments, and to poke fun at the novelistic conventions of her society. So I'd imagine the movie's ending was something of an homage.

Posted by: FearItself on March 16, 2008 at 4:48 PM | PERMALINK

Read and liked both, in fact recently re-read World Out of Mind. It's actually quite interesting and fun, good even.

Posted by: michael engelberg md on March 16, 2008 at 4:55 PM | PERMALINK

I saw the 27th day a couple of years ago late at night. Or maybe it was on Mystery Science Theater...bummer that Netflix doesn't have it. It seems like one of the cheezy that they have for viewing online.

If you find it anywhere, let us know...

Posted by: Charles on March 16, 2008 at 5:10 PM | PERMALINK

I've seen it, about 35 years ago. IIRC, it wasn't terrible; not great, but not terrible.

Posted by: Leszek Pawlowicz on March 16, 2008 at 5:11 PM | PERMALINK

Ha! There is a copy of this not eight feet behind me sitting on the bookshelf and filed with the M's.

Posted by: Scorpio on March 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM | PERMALINK

I think One in Three Hundred and World Out of Mind were both J T McIntosh books. I have half the books that man wrote.

:)

Posted by: Scorpio on March 16, 2008 at 5:28 PM | PERMALINK

It couldn't possibly have anything on Robot Monster. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Jennifer on March 16, 2008 at 5:44 PM | PERMALINK

Was his second cousin THE Mary Pickford? They are doing a retrospective of her films this month at the Silent Movie Theater on Fairfax (that's in L.A. for you Orange County folks). She began acting for D.W. Griffith at the dawn of American film, continued through the 1920s, retired after doing a couple of talkies, and lived in wealthy retirement at the top of Pickfair (off Benedict Canyon) for many more years. She was incredibly popular in her day and considered to be the brains behind United Artists.

Posted by: Bob G on March 16, 2008 at 5:56 PM | PERMALINK

I saw The 27th Day when it was first released, about 1957. It was on a double bill with a horror film, either one about giant eyeballs from outer space or about some 17th century English explorer who got his head chopped off. There were a number of "millennial" low-budget sci-fi films floating around back in the fifties -- about how some random group of people would discover a mysterious gift that would allow them to solve all the problems of the world -- a reaction to the then novel possibility that we all might be blown to bits. Those were the "duck and cover," get under the school desk and cover your heads days.

Posted by: Alan Vanneman on March 16, 2008 at 6:03 PM | PERMALINK

I saw the movie, which was shown on TV back when I was about 11 in the mid-1960s. I remember (1) that it DID star Gene Barry (even in those days he was unmistakable); and (2) that it struck both me and my mother (who ordinarily hates SF) as an unusually good, intelligent SF movie. Of course, this WAS the mid-1960s, at which time "good SF movie" was still something of an oxymoron. (To an alarming degree, it still is. But I digress.)

When, decades later, I read Damon Knight's review of the book in his compilation "A Sense of Wonder", it turns out that (1) the movie followed the book perfectly; and (2) HE liked the book (which I also found in the library at about this time but only skimmed). And Knight was a pretty smart and intolerant critic. In fact, I've even wondered once or twice about trying to find and rent the movie.

Posted by: Bruce Moomaw on March 16, 2008 at 6:04 PM | PERMALINK

There's a copy of the 27th Day DVD on EBay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=617&item=280209060504

Posted by: Rich on March 16, 2008 at 6:11 PM | PERMALINK

the trailer is sooooo boring.

Posted by: JonE on March 16, 2008 at 6:23 PM | PERMALINK

Jane Austen's Book Club sucked, as did Becoming Jane, the fictional account of Austen's turn into adulthood that came out last year. Definitely, Maybe starring Ryan Reynolds, Rachel Weisz, Elizabeth Banks and Borat's real-life girlfriend, was surprisingly decent.

I grew up a movie buff, seeing 3-4 movies a week, but it's hard to find more than one decent film a week. TV, on the other hand, totally kicks ass right now.

Posted by: Mike on March 16, 2008 at 6:36 PM | PERMALINK

What I'd like to know is, when will they make a movie of Roger Zelazny's Lord Of Light?

Posted by: SecularAnimist on March 16, 2008 at 7:26 PM | PERMALINK

See the trailer on YouTube.

Geez, it seems creaky, even by the standards of low-budget science fiction of the Fifties. And that lead alien reminds me of the one from Plan 9 From Outer Space.

The good news is that apparently it was available on DVD at one point, even though it's now out-of-print, so there are a couple copies on eBay. And I'll bet it shows up now and then on Turner Classic Movies.

Posted by: The Pop View on March 16, 2008 at 7:31 PM | PERMALINK

I also remember seeing this is a kid. Very, very much smarter than most 50s science fiction. I recall being shocked that one of the people giving the power to judge humanity would kill herself rather than face the responsibility. But that's something that might happen, particularly for someone from a traditional society.

Posted by: Berken on March 16, 2008 at 7:33 PM | PERMALINK

OMG, SA! I read every word Zelazny wrote when I was in Jr. High, and I idolized Sam. You have read the Chronicles of Amber series, I presume?

Posted by: Blue Girl, Red State on March 16, 2008 at 7:36 PM | PERMALINK

Available in VHS, on amazon, from THEVIDEOGAMEDOCTOR, 24.95, new. Your good for it Kev.

Really, I don't think DVD is going to increase the viewing experience of this movie, much.

Kevin, you do still have a functioning VCR?

Posted by: TT on March 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM | PERMALINK

FearItself, you could also make an argument that Austen was Emily Dickenson on a Prozac IV.

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on March 16, 2008 at 9:23 PM | PERMALINK

Interestingly enough, the author of the novel on which "The Jane Austen Book Club" movie was based, Karen Joy Fowler, began her publishing career as an SF/fantasy writer. Those rereading Ursula LeGuin should also check out Fowler's story collection, "Black Glass."
As for J T M'Intosh, I loved everything he wrote back in the day; but then, I was only 13 or so at the time.

Posted by: fyreflye on March 16, 2008 at 9:33 PM | PERMALINK

"The 27th Day" played on the Saturday Morning SF & Horror ghetto several times when I was a kid. I remember being fascinated by the setup, but bored by the brinksmanship and intrigue . . . and I don't remember the ending.

There's another really intriguing cold war SF movie to look for. It's about a group of clean-cut American scientists who receive a signal from Mars. It begins with the digits of Pi, and eventually all sorts of philosophical revelations with world-shaking consequences. There's a triumphalist twist ending. Can't remember the title at all . . . anyone?

Posted by: Stefan Jones on March 16, 2008 at 10:48 PM | PERMALINK

Ah, here we go:

"Red Planet Mars"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045073/

Posted by: Stefan Jones on March 16, 2008 at 10:51 PM | PERMALINK

And on the eve of the Great Collapse, they discussed Jane Austen.

Posted by: lampwick on March 16, 2008 at 11:20 PM | PERMALINK

I haven't seen it yet, but "Becoming Jane" was enjoyable light-weight fare. It's worth it just to moon over dreamy, dreamy James McAvoy. It was so surprising and interesting to learn that he's married to the actress Anne-Marie Duff, since I've seen her in various things and she's one of those actresses who just ooze delicate, English, BBC-drama class. It speaks very well for him.

"Gone Baby Gone": Not what I expected. For one thing, some of the violence and dark elements are really, really gross. With all of the talk about it being a portrait of a place and a people, and about how Casey Affleck fit in beautifully and how he wended through the neighborhood, I expected rather a character study, a study of local eccentrics and a delicate psychological thriller. Something along the lines of "Bunny Lake Is Missing" or "Picnic At Hanging Rock." Nope. Mean, nasty stuff. Still good, but....

"American Gangster": sweeping and operatic. It had to have been based on the "New York" magazine article I read years ago, because it did all feel sort of familiar, but only because I'd previously read about the case. Anyway, quite fascinating. I watched the extended version on the DVD. There was violence, but nothing that wasn't telegraphed, so I could safely turn away in advance so as not to see anything grotesque. A nostalgic evocation of 1970s Harlem drug-dealing and violence. Just don't be inspired to go dressing up for a Pimp-and-Hos ball like right-wing jackass Congressional assistants in Washington.

Posted by: Anon on March 16, 2008 at 11:28 PM | PERMALINK

They're making a remake of "When Worlds Collide". Could be fun.

Posted by: herostratus on March 17, 2008 at 12:05 AM | PERMALINK

Actually, eleven copies of the VHS available at Amazon, from $25 and up

http://tinyurl.com/3bgabs

There are also two VHS copies on eBay with "buy it now" prices of $9.99 (plus shipping), as well as a DVD of three movies on one DVD including "27th Day". I suspect this is 'home made'. I think I'd stick with a VHS.

http://tinyurl.com/2fewpn

Posted by: Robert Earle on March 17, 2008 at 12:28 AM | PERMALINK

They'll never make a movie out of Lord of Light. They'll never make a movie out of Alfred Bester's The Demolished Man, either, although it's been optioned more times than I can imagine. I do think there's a good chance of making The Stars My Destination, though, despite the stunning lack of success of Jumper.

Posted by: theophylact on March 17, 2008 at 9:28 AM | PERMALINK

Won't see the movie because the book "The Jane Austen Book Club" was a prime grade dog.

Posted by: Hedley Lamarr on March 17, 2008 at 10:57 AM | PERMALINK
What I'd like to know is, when will they make a movie of Roger Zelazny's Lord Of Light? Posted by: SecularAnimist on March 16, 2008 at 7:26 PM

Or for that matter, Nine Princes in Amber? That series of novels could have a better run than the Harry Potter/Lord of the Rings/Star Wars series.

Assuming, of course, that they hire a decent director, cast and screen writer....

Posted by: Dr. Morpheus on March 17, 2008 at 11:54 AM | PERMALINK

A guilty pleasure of mine since childhood! (I own a DVD copy from ebay). The film/book does have an absurd "let's just get along" ending, but its almost allegorical view of power (and various attitudes toward same) remains interesting. A remake is in order, but this time I'm betting the female characters would not commit suicide and/or throw away their power.

Posted by: schmed on March 17, 2008 at 1:56 PM | PERMALINK

There used to be a video rental store in Santa Monica where one could rent just about every movie made. I did not realize there were so many Fritz Lang movies with Dr. Mabuse until I visited that store while on vacation in the late Nineties.

Posted by: Brojo on March 17, 2008 at 5:40 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly