Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

May 31, 2008
By: Cheryl Rofer

MARGIN OF ERROR....Another mini-uproar with (about?) North Korea ensues. Or perhaps more than one, if the media have their way.

Helene Cooper, or rather the editor who wrote the headline on her article, leads the media faction. Looky looky, the numbers don't match! American intelligence agencies estimated that North Korea had produced 40 to 50 kilograms of plutonium, but the documents handed over by the North Koreans list 37 kilograms.

The American intelligence estimates were constantly on the high side; not excessively so, but with appropriate caution. The size of the Yongbyon reactor is such-and-such, a reasonable range of loading with uranium (take the higher number), left in the reactor for an optimal time, reprocessed so as to retrieve every atom of plutonium. It's the calculation anyone would make in their place, but it's most likely going to be higher, rather than lower, although in the right range. If we put 37 next to 50, that's the way it looks. If we put 37 next to 40, the lower end of the intelligence estimates, we can call it right on.

As Cooper notes, it's appropriate also to be skeptical of the North Korean documents, but this is close enough for now. As negotiations proceed, the numbers (on both sides) will have to be brought closer.

The discrepancy, if we can call it that, is fodder for the end-negotiations-now faction in the administration, of course.

Meanwhile, Charles Pritchard, who has visited North Korea many times, including their nuclear installations, reports that the North Koreans will give up their reactor but not their nuclear weapons. Of course they are saying this. It is their way of negotiating, and not the worst obstacle they have put up. It looks like they want light-water civilian-style reactors in exchange for the weapons. That's not impossible.

It may well be that North Korea's latest bargaining point derives from their ever-present fear of being dissed. They're upset at a State Department report that called North Korea a "militarized society" and "dictatorship." So they react by hardening their position. They've done it before.

It's positive that the administration is reacting strongly to Pritchard's revelation. It looks like they're trying to get out ahead of their end-negotiations-now faction.

Ambassador Christopher Hill seems to have this negotiation thing right. His comments have been calm and oriented toward moving forward.

So much of the negotiations with North Korea is reported so quickly that it's a fascinating study in what diplomacy and negotiation require. And it's one place in which the Bush administration seems to be rising to that challenge.

Cheryl Rofer 10:49 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (3)

Bookmark and Share

Last night the cops pulled me over and said, "you're drivin' like you've drunk a quart of Beam," but they could only find an empty fifth bottle in the back seat.

My bail hearing is set for Monday. Send lawyers and money.

Posted by: thersites on May 31, 2008 at 1:01 PM | PERMALINK

Cheryl Rofer wrote: "It looks like they want light-water civilian-style reactors in exchange for the weapons. That's not impossible."

Neither is it a good idea. Nuclear power should be phased out. The US should not be encouraging other nations to develop nuclear power, let alone giving reactors or reactor technology to rogue nations who have demonstrated the interest and ability to acquire nuclear weapons in defiance of international agreements.

Let's give the North Koreans advanced photovoltaic and wind turbine technology instead.

Indeed, let's form an international partnership with countries like Germany, Japan, Spain and China, who have taken leadership in the development of photovoltaics and wind turbines, and now dominate the rapidly growing world market for these technologies while the USA (where these technologies were originally developed!) has fallen behind, to fund the widest possible dissemination of these technologies throughout the developing world, and most especially and urgently to those nations that are foolishly looking to nuclear power and coal to meet their electricity needs.

Posted by: SecularAnimist on May 31, 2008 at 1:54 PM | PERMALINK

It is more subtle than that; the US IC came up with two ranges of estimates, one between 35kgs and 40kgs, the other between 50kgs and 60kgs. The difference depended on whether or not the North Koreans operated the Yongbyon reactor before 1990 and reprocessed the used fuel.

The discrepancy between the original North Korean claim of 30kgs and their latest claim of 37kgs can be explained by the original claim excluding the 7kgs of plutonium used in their test which they are now including. At 7kgs of plutonium per device, the North Koreans only had enough for 4-6 devices.

I think that Helene Cooper joins the august company of Judith Miller and Michael Gordon as propagandists for the White House.

Posted by: blowback on May 31, 2008 at 4:41 PM | PERMALINK



Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly