Editore"s Note
WM on the Radio
Email address
Powered by: MessageBot
August 22, 2008

NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PROGRAM.... Once in a while, a good op-ed is even better when you read between the lines and appreciate the point the writer hopes to make with subtlety.

Today, for example, World Bank president Robert Zoellick, who replaced Paul Wolfowitz about a year ago, has an important piece in the Washington Post that might get overlooked.

During a recent visit to Afghanistan, I was reminded of the counterinsurgency principles of "clear, hold, build." In the language of the World Bank Group, that translates to "security, governance and development." As events in Iraq have shown, who assumes responsibility for these principles is as important as the principles themselves: Local ownership is key to achieving legitimacy and effectiveness. [...]

The National Solidarity Program (NSP) that the World Bank helped launch with former finance minister Ashraf Ghani in 2003 empowers more than 20,000 elected Community Development Councils to allocate modest grants to local priorities, whether micro-hydroelectric generators, schools, roads, irrigation, erosion or water supply projects. It touches more than 17 million Afghans in all 34 provinces and has an economic rate of return of close to 20 percent. The program links self-help with self-determination.

In many ways, the NSP is a silver-bullet program for Afghanistan. It gets needed resources to Afghan villages; it promotes stability by connecting local governance and development with the national government in Kabul; and it fosters democracy and accountability throughout the country.

The problem, of course, is that the U.S. is poised to cut funding to the NSP, in part because of Wolfowitz's ineptitude, which no doubt frustrates Zoellick, though he wasn't in a position to admit it in the WaPo op-ed. Zoellick couldn't very well write, "Screw Wolfowitz and fund the f*#%ing program," so he diplomatically explained what the NSP can do, why it's important, and concluded that we have a "choice."

For more on this, Gregory Warner had a fascinating piece in the Monthly last year, called, "The Schools the Taliban Won't Torch." Take a look.

Steve Benen 1:51 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (4)
 
Comments

Well, shoot, if Afganistan becomes stable and prosperous there won't be any need to keep U.S. troops there and that would be....well, good, actually. So of course funding must be cut. Stands to reason, right?

Posted by: Curmudgeon on August 22, 2008 at 2:07 PM | PERMALINK

I remember reading that article when it came out thinking, surely now they'd see to funding this incredibly promising program. Unfortunately, I lost sight of the ball, just as I see this administration had hoped for all of us. Shameful.

Posted by: trog69 on August 22, 2008 at 2:22 PM | PERMALINK

Are we punishing Paul W. by cutting programs in Afghanistan? I don't quite get it.

Did the Bushites finally decide that borrowing money from the People's Army Bank of Beijing is a stupid idea?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Orange

Posted by: Lance on August 22, 2008 at 2:22 PM | PERMALINK

Lance:
No we are NOT punishing Paul W by cancelling it.
We are punishing all those who would benefit from
an intelligent program.

Bush is allowing PW's harebrained anti-corruption rules to over-rule all common sense programs.

PW's malign influence is being EXTENDED by the Bush
admin.

Posted by: catclub on August 22, 2008 at 3:27 PM | PERMALINK




 
------ ADVERTISEMENTS ------
Advertise in WM





Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here
---Paid Advertisements---

Personal Loans $10K-$100K+ Unsecured!

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Bad Credit Personal Loans