Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 2, 2008

THE ALASKA INDEPENDENCE PARTY.... What may prove to be the single most damaging angle to Sarah Palin's role on the Republican Party ticket? There are quite a few contenders (ethics scandal, earmarks, inexperience, outside-the-mainstream views), but following up on Hilzoy's item from last night, Palin's association with the Alaska Independence Party might be the most politically detrimental.

It's practically impossible to make a "Country First" argument when your running mate is affiliated with a political party that puts country second.

Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which since the 1970s has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.

And while McCain's motto -- as seen in a new TV ad -- is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."

Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time.

"We are a state's rights party," Clark -- a self-employed goldminer -- tells ABC News. The AIP has "a plank that challenges the legality of the Alaskan statehood vote as illegal and in violation of United Nations charter and international law."

For all the talk about Barack and Michelle Obama's patriotism, John McCain's running mate was a member of a political party that liked the idea of seceding from the United States altogether. It's the kind of idea that would have been more common in the 1850s.

Advocating secession is, practically by definition, un-American. How does the right go after Obama's patriotism while supporting a ticket with a candidate who joined a secessionist party?

We are, after all, talking about a party founded by a man who said, "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions." The same man, AIP founder Joe Vogler, also said, "[T]he fires of Hell are glaciers compared to my hate for the American government."

How is this any better than Jeremiah Wright? Why would Sarah Palin voluntarily join this man's political party?

Complicating matters, Marc Ambinder has a video of an AIP leader explaining that party members "must 'infiltrate' -- his words -- the other two parties and push for the cause of Alaskan independence."

I suspect McCain and his aides didn't know about any of this. Indeed, they couldn't have -- they didn't vet her. But now that this revelation has come to light, what's the defense?

Steve Benen 12:32 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (97)
 
Comments

Seceding, not succeeding.

Posted by: Halfdan on September 2, 2008 at 12:33 PM | PERMALINK

"But now that this revelation has come to light, what's the defense?"

Gramps was brainwashed.

Posted by: Doofus on September 2, 2008 at 12:33 PM | PERMALINK

What's the defense? That the rumors about Trig being her own grandson were warped, therefore the rumors about her ties to the AIP are exaggerated.

Consulting fee, please.

Posted by: Grumpy on September 2, 2008 at 12:34 PM | PERMALINK

I think you mean "seceding"

Posted by: dpl on September 2, 2008 at 12:34 PM | PERMALINK

the defense will be "times change, and people change with them."

i actually don't think this will be a big deal for that reason, but you never know....

Posted by: howard on September 2, 2008 at 12:34 PM | PERMALINK

And let's not forget, if Palin's affiliation with AIP means that she also has fiery 'hate for the American government', then so must McCain. Palin and McCain are soulmates, after all.

Posted by: David Bailey on September 2, 2008 at 12:35 PM | PERMALINK

Viva Aztlaska!

Posted by: crabgrass on September 2, 2008 at 12:35 PM | PERMALINK

Senator McCain, if being a secessionist when a candidate first seeks public office, and continuing to encourage the secessionist party as governor, is not a disqualification for the vice presidency: what WOULD be?

Posted by: anonymous on September 2, 2008 at 12:36 PM | PERMALINK

VOTE DIGBY-CLARK-2008---VOTE THE INTERNET sane and sensible.
VOTE JONATHAN VERSEN FOR TEXAS US SENATOR-2008---VOTE THE INTERNET dedicated to the People of Texas.

Posted by: Mike Meyer on September 2, 2008 at 12:39 PM | PERMALINK

"Party of Lincoln", my a**! Man, you almost have to want to lose if you pick a former secessionist as your running mate.

Posted by: Mark Kawakami on September 2, 2008 at 12:40 PM | PERMALINK

Sarah Palin, the gift that keeps on giving. If this continues Obama will break 60%.

I wonder how many professional Republicans in the noise machine are going to damage their careers pushing Palin's association with the AIP? Probably some, but watch them fall away.

Posted by: Ron Byers on September 2, 2008 at 12:40 PM | PERMALINK

So how do we get this into the MSM? I have seen a few mentions of this in print but so far nothing on the TV networks. The media are clearly aware of the issue but are still dancing around it.

I am growing concerned that the MSM frenzy will spend itself on dangerous ground (Palin's family) without ever getting to the more damaging issues like the AIP.

Posted by: sven on September 2, 2008 at 12:42 PM | PERMALINK

on the other hand. McCain/Palin just locked up the John Birch Society vote. . .

Posted by: zeitgeist on September 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM | PERMALINK

That guy who vetted her so carefully must have been drunk.

Posted by: Ron Byers on September 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM | PERMALINK

Sheer lunacy! And I love it!

sven, keep tuned to CNN *Grill* on now. John Roberts is not giving any spin-ster a pass!

I'm so impressed.

Posted by: 63days on September 2, 2008 at 12:45 PM | PERMALINK

Steve: it's Joe, not John, Vogler.

Posted by: Daniel on September 2, 2008 at 12:45 PM | PERMALINK

"But now that this revelation has come to light, what's the defense?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
POW! POW! POW!!

Posted by: steve duncan on September 2, 2008 at 12:47 PM | PERMALINK

What's the defense? It's obvious - Dems and liberals are sexist!

Oh, and did you know that McCain was a POW?

Posted by: Bob Loblaw on September 2, 2008 at 12:49 PM | PERMALINK

We are, after all, talking about a party founded by a man who said, "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions." The same man, AIP founder John Vogler, also said, "[T]he fires of Hell are glaciers compared to my hate for the American government."

He and Reverend Wright should hang out together.

Posted by: SJRSM on September 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM | PERMALINK

She can get out of being a member in 94-96 because of the ever-popular "youthful indiscretion" ploy.

But it should be a lot harder for her to explain sending them a video-taped message of support - in 2008.

Sort of as if Lincoln had sent a message of support to Jeff Davis in 1861: "I've always thought that competition is so good!"

Posted by: Basilisc on September 2, 2008 at 12:53 PM | PERMALINK

Seceding, not succeeding.

Oops. Typos fixed throughout.

Posted by: Steve Benen on September 2, 2008 at 12:54 PM | PERMALINK

Bu-but Obama is a Manchurian Muslim!

I seem to recall one of her first comments re: being VP was something along the lines of being able to do a lot for Alaska.

I know I read it here. Pity the search function works as well as RPI.

Posted by: The Answer WAS Orange on September 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM | PERMALINK

Shorter Mike: quick! Look over there!

Of course, the Revered Wright was a Marine Corps private and after being honorably discharged fom the Marines then reinlisted as a medical corpsman in the Navy, where he was assigned to the medical team taking of President Johnson at Bethesda (obviously a position of great trust and responsibility) so I don't think Wright's willingness to serve and fight for his country is in any question -- unlike Palin, who doesn't seem to have fully made up her mind as which country she really wants to be a part of.

Posted by: Stefan on September 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM | PERMALINK

SJRSM: "He and Reverend Wright should hang out together."

Not likely. Vogler is long dead.

Posted by: Grumpy on September 2, 2008 at 1:00 PM | PERMALINK

You can't compare Wright to Vogler. Wright is a preacher doing his job by condemning American hypocrisy. His famous screed was entirely consistent with Christian precepts. Further, Wright served honorably in the US miltary.

Vogler, on the other hand, is a self-proclaimed enemy of the United States.

Big difference.

Posted by: Lucy on September 2, 2008 at 1:01 PM | PERMALINK

In principle, I am not opposed to secession. I have raised secession as a possible option in discussion with liberal friends, something to be considered by a federal union of states that no longer can agree on a shared identity or the common good. I think in many ways, the U.S. is there. And if we could somehow jettison the Enlarged Prostate known as Texas, we should do so.

At the same time, most secessionist parties are huge havens for extreme people, as demonstrated by Volger's statements. I also find it interesting when a person with secessionist sympathies would accept an invitation to run as vice president. I would think if you are truly working for secession, your primary goal should be to preparing your state for independence, not locking yourself into a government you despise. Granted, I am describing Republicans in general...

Posted by: Andrew on September 2, 2008 at 1:01 PM | PERMALINK

"Party of Lincoln", my a**! Man, you almost have to want to lose if you pick a former secessionist as your running mate.
Posted by: Mark Kawakam

Let's hope they lose. They're the party of Lincoln Logs and a few sad-assed Logcabin Republicans.

That's Just What I Said

Posted by: Dale on September 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM | PERMALINK

the defense will be "times change, and people change with them."
i actually don't think this will be a big deal for that reason, but you never know....
Posted by: howard

She taped a welcoming message for their convention this year, so obviously Palin in particular hasn't changed that much. I assume this was before her name began arising in the VP discussion, any idiot should know not to associate themselves with an anti-American party when they're looking to become the American VP.

Posted by: Shalimar on September 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM | PERMALINK

It's the kind of idea that would have been more common in the 1850s.

Well, and the Southern Strategy.

It's pure post-Nixon/George Wallace GOP.

Posted by: woody, tokin librul on September 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM | PERMALINK

I think this is the proverbial straw. There is no way that this can be defended, none whatsoever.

I see that some operatives are trying to deflect with Ayers, Bill. But that won't fly - she's a member of a group that says "I've got no use for America or her institutions"

If she makes it past next Friday I'd be VERY surprised.

Posted by: neilt on September 2, 2008 at 1:03 PM | PERMALINK

This matter is complicated even further by her active pursuit of earmarks from the federal government when she was a mayor. She could argue that her hiring of a lobbyist to gain federal funds for her town is a sign of her support of the nation, but then she is reminding us that she pursued (and obtained) millions of dollars from the federal government. Does the AIP plan to take as much money as possible from our government and then run with it if Alaska gains independence? What is Sarah Palin's current position on Alaska's potential sovereignty? Will she buy me a new flag for my front porch if our flag loses a star? I have a really nice one that has embroidered stars, and I would want one of comparable quality as a replacement. Oh, and if Alaska obtains independence, doesn't that mean we would be dependent on foreign oil even more so than currently?

Posted by: Cindy McCant on September 2, 2008 at 1:04 PM | PERMALINK

any idiot should know not to associate themselves with an anti-American party when they're looking to become the American VP.

Yes, but as is becoming increasingly apparent, Sarah Palin is not just any idiot.

Posted by: Stefan on September 2, 2008 at 1:07 PM | PERMALINK

"But now that this revelation has come to light, what's the defense?"

D'oh!

Posted by: Marko on September 2, 2008 at 1:07 PM | PERMALINK

The bigger picture here is as Governor would she assume leadership if they were successful in succession or worse, would she assume leadership if they were to succeed while she is the Vice President or possibly President of the United States ?

Talk about a real conflict of interest. I don't know anything about succession law, but could the president sign an executive order granting it ?

A guess we can officially call this gamble one of the worse McCain has ever made. I personally can wait for Fox News (Ducci in particular) to spin this one. As a member of the AIP they could try and claim her foreign policy experience was governor of Alaska.

Posted by: ScottW on September 2, 2008 at 1:08 PM | PERMALINK

How nice. Maybe now McCain can use Palin to corner the market on the key Confederate Zombie voting bloc.

Posted by: gf120581 on September 2, 2008 at 1:12 PM | PERMALINK

"I've got no use for America or her damned institutions."

Imperialism is the last stage of capitalism! Workers of the world unite!

I can live with that.

Posted by: CSTAR on September 2, 2008 at 1:12 PM | PERMALINK

@The Answer WAS Orange: is this what you're referring to?

"As for that VP talk all the time. I tell ya, I still can't answer that question until somebody answers for me -- what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I'm used to being very productive and working real hard in this administration. We would want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we're trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S. before I can even start addressing that question."

You'd be surprised how big that VP job is, Kudlow said.

"Well this is a pretty cool job here too, though, as governor of Alaska," Palin replied.

Source:
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/512333.html

Posted by: EvilPoet on September 2, 2008 at 1:14 PM | PERMALINK

Zeitgeist - not so sure about the Birch Society vote.

There is a quote from Vogler on the AIP site dissing them as too liberal.

Posted by: snoey on September 2, 2008 at 1:14 PM | PERMALINK

Sara Palin's views are stuck in the 50's. The 1850's.

McCain should be ashamed of himself for picking her as a VP candidate. States aren't allowed to secede, except for Florida.

Posted by: Aaron on September 2, 2008 at 1:15 PM | PERMALINK

She was just a kid... it's what kids in Alaska do... like smokin' pot and wearing funny clothes.

Posted by: Jim G on September 2, 2008 at 1:15 PM | PERMALINK

Yeah, AIM matters a lot (she isn't a member though, is she?) but Steve (always, like Kevin, the nerdy gentleman who won't bring up prickly personal subjects) you forgot something here:

There are quite a few contenders (ethics scandal, earmarks, inexperience, outside-the-mainstream views)...

Well, you didn't mention the pregnant daughter (since the "ethics scandal" is of course other things.) OK, so the campaigns and literal surrogates shouldn't harp on that (? - they would have decades ago, this "off limits" thing is a cynical modern invention more to help win elections than real "concern") - but you are under no such compunction. I still respect you guys for your choices, but it *does* matter when a social-conservative icon pick's daughter becomes pregnant out of wedlock, then the girl's mother says she's proud of the girl's "decision" (!) Well, that isn't what conservatives are supposed to think about such things, not pride. Not meanness, but not pride either.

A caller today to a local show complained about that, saying he's one of the old school who thinks it's 99% the parents' influence that determines what kids do about things like that. I don't agree, but it matters.

Check Sally Quinn today, making the same point:

http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sally_quinn/2008/08/sarah_polin.html

Posted by: Neil B on September 2, 2008 at 1:16 PM | PERMALINK

So how is this any worse than driving a pickup with a confederate flag on it? Or many Texans' claim they can secede any time they want? It's shear maverickery, I tells ya.

Posted by: idlemind on September 2, 2008 at 1:19 PM | PERMALINK

This matter is complicated even further by her active pursuit of earmarks from the federal government when she was a mayor. She could argue that her hiring of a lobbyist to gain federal funds for her town is a sign of her support of the nation, but then she is reminding us that she pursued (and obtained) millions of dollars from the federal government.

Alaska is funky. Over 60% of its total land area is owned by the federal government way the heck down in the lower 48, with a huge part of that land grab coming back in the Carter days, i.e., recent memory, so you can imagine the love/hate going on with the feds there. They also see how important to it is to have politicians in power in the Senate and House, and earmarks as being some sort of payback.

Posted by: SJRSM on September 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM | PERMALINK

OK, back on topic: we need to carefully tease out and candidly and honestly present (no cheating either way) in just what ways and concise sense Palin is "affiliated" with the Alaskan Independence Party - that term is such a sloppy moniker by itself. Sure, it's been discussed but good talking points need to be brief and have a good framing definition of what the person is up to.

Posted by: Neil B on September 2, 2008 at 1:21 PM | PERMALINK

Affiliation with groups like this is typically a bar to obtaining government security clearances (or at minimum makes it very difficult). Apparently the official government policy is we can't trust people like Sarah Palin.

Posted by: MLE on September 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM | PERMALINK

Goes along with her and her husband not wanting her to deliver that baby in Texas. God forbid he would be anything other than an Alaskan! Just couldn't be identified as an American. These people are just fucking nuts, just like McCain.

Posted by: lou on September 2, 2008 at 1:23 PM | PERMALINK

Steve, I rarely criticize someone I consider the best political commenter going, but you really made an insultingly bad mistake by saying -- re Joe Vogler -- "How is this any better than Jeremiah Wright?"

Wright said, in one sermon, "God damn the United States" -- for not working harder for racial equality, for its poor and black citizens, etc. (Okay, his idea that the drug problem is a Government plot is crazy.) And Wm. Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution a covenant with hell, and burned it because it accepted slavery.

In each case they were 'rhetorical exaggerations' to make a point. Both were true patriots who loved their country and were acting along the line of 'if wrong, make it right.' Stefan, above gives details of Wright's service -- certainly the equal of McCain's as far as military matters go -- he just didn't get shot down and captured.

Condemning him, implying his is not a patriot, using one phrase in one sermon, without going on to say why he said it, is simply buying into the Republican/PUMA propaganda.

Vogler, on the other hand, seems sincere in his hatred for America and American Institutions -- based on a misguided right-libertarian position to give him the benefit of the doubt -- and a VP candidate who, so recently, sent a congratulatory letter to the party he founded and she belonged to does not deserve to be mentioned in the samew breath as does Rev. Wright.

Posted by: Prup (aka Jim Benton) on September 2, 2008 at 1:26 PM | PERMALINK

Andrew.
For the record, Texas can succeed at any time, legally. It is one of many exceptions made so we would agree to join the Union.

We have the refineries and Big Oil, something you don't want to lose. So before you mock us, please the realize the world thinks we are a bunch of idiots because of Bush, the same is true for Texas.

Posted by: on September 2, 2008 at 1:30 PM | PERMALINK

In the video where she says she doesn't know what the VP does all day, she also says that before she would consider it she "wanted to be sure that the VP would be a fruitful kind of position, especially for Alaskans."

Country first?

It seems to me that she is very clearly interested in Alaska first.

Posted by: Buffalonian on September 2, 2008 at 1:32 PM | PERMALINK

Over 60% of [Alaska's] total land area is owned by the federal government way the heck down in the lower 48

...which, y'know, bought it from Russia in the first place.

Posted by: Gregory on September 2, 2008 at 1:36 PM | PERMALINK

OK Steve maybe I was too hard on you, you did post about the Palin girl's pregnancy (but didn't list it above.) BTW, so Sarah Palin is indeed a former member of the Alaskan Independence Party? That about settles her being too wacko. (Note: Drudge is not reporting on it! He must have a thing for her now, what a worthless hack.)
Worst. Vetting. Ever. (So how is that climbing on Google?)

However - it's still dangerous to assume that voters will rationally assess this and other factors about Palin and conclude she (and by extension, McCain) is not fit. George Lakoff writes of how voters "think" with their emotional brains, and here is a link where he warns of taking rational critique's role for granted about Palin:

http://www.alternet.org/election08/97193/

Posted by: Neil B on September 2, 2008 at 1:41 PM | PERMALINK

Thanks EvilPoet.

Let's hope the MSM starts asking if a person who doesn't want to be a U.S. citizen should be allowed to run for office.

And while we're at it, let's hope those flying pigs don't crap on us.

Posted by: The Answer WAS Orange on September 2, 2008 at 1:46 PM | PERMALINK

Has anyone mentioned the fact that Alaska only has THREE electoral votes? Why wasn't this factored into the mix by McCain. Stunning.

Posted by: JMA on September 2, 2008 at 1:47 PM | PERMALINK

...which, y'know, bought it from Russia in the first place.

And spent billions of dollars building roads and bridges and schools and airports...

Posted by: Blue Girl on September 2, 2008 at 1:48 PM | PERMALINK

It seems very obvious that McCain has given up all pretense of being a person, he has been taken over by the neocons, of course he did not vet her, he wanted Lieberman and the neocons would not go for that. Grover Norquist & Co are the ones running the show, McCain does what he is told. Simple as that, and if by chance he gets elected, he will still do as he is told. Just like Bush, who was told by them to nominate the judges to the supreme court that are giving all this trouble to the country.

Posted by: JS on September 2, 2008 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK

We have the refineries and Big Oil, something you don't want to lose.

you don't contribute much oil anymore (it's mostly foreign), and refineries can be built in other state--in fact they already have them. Besides, we won't need much oil at all soon enough, so go ahead and secede.
And don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, cuz I don't want ass prints on my good door!

Posted by: whatever on September 2, 2008 at 1:50 PM | PERMALINK

Alaska: The Alabama of the Midnight Sun.

Posted by: Michael7843853 on September 2, 2008 at 1:53 PM | PERMALINK

And spent billions of dollars building roads and bridges and schools and airports...
Posted by: Blue Girl

We bought the Louisiana Purchase too, yet somehow managed to not maintain control of 60% of the lands.

The 60% land grab was a recent thing, not a process of giving 40% to the people and keeping from the 60% bought from the Russkies. Ever had property taken under imminent domain? It tends not to endear you to the taker.

Posted by: SJRSM on September 2, 2008 at 1:54 PM | PERMALINK

And spent billions of dollars building roads and bridges and schools and airports...

Wal-Mart* built a store in Juneau, which "required" the installation of a traffic light, which was installed on a highway.

Because it's a highway it's eligible for federal highway dollars--except the traffic light puts the kabosh on that. It can't have the traffic light and remain eligible for federal dollars.

Solution: build a multi-million dollar flyover from the highway to the Wal-Mart, the only thing to which the flyover will lead (except maybe the landfill, where you can see a resurgent American Bald Eagle population), or some really cool hiking spots.

If you ever meet Palin, ask her about the McDonald's in Juneau. All Alaskans know the story.

Posted by: Juneau Visited on September 2, 2008 at 1:55 PM | PERMALINK

When at first you don't succede keep on sucking until you do succede.

Posted by: Gandalf on September 2, 2008 at 1:56 PM | PERMALINK
It's practically impossible to make a "Country First" argument when your running mate is affiliated with a political party that puts country second.
That's not fair. She puts country first.

It's just that her country is Alaska.

VIVA LA REVOLUCION DE ALASKA!

Posted by: on September 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM | PERMALINK

Let's play my favorite game, "What If It Was a Democrat?" and imagine that Barack Obama had been in any way "affiliated" with a political party that advocated Hawaii secede from the United States. And then just imagine the piggy squeals of outrage of all the conservatives who would have stomped their little $500 loafer clad feet in sheer outrage that such a traitor could even show his face in public, much less be considered for high office....

Posted by: Stefan on September 2, 2008 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINK

It isn't just Alaska - about half of Oregon is federal land, ditto Washington, Idaho, Montana...you get the picture.

Alaska is a state of less than 700,000 and every man, woman and child is a welfare recipient. Where is the conservative outrage about that?

Posted by: Blue Girl on September 2, 2008 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINK

We bought the Louisiana Purchase too, yet somehow managed to not maintain control of 60% of the lands.

Partly because in most of those states people actually live there. In Alaska, not so much.

Posted by: Stefan on September 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM | PERMALINK

Hey, if Alaska goes, can we go, too?

Posted by: CalGal on September 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM | PERMALINK

If this continues Obama will break 60%.

I certainly hope it does, since it will take a greater than 60:40 ass-whooping to put this election out of stealable range for the GOP.

-Z

Posted by: Zorro on September 2, 2008 at 2:08 PM | PERMALINK

We should send half of the population of NYC up there to live since they are on the dole now.

Just for the morons out there, New Yorkers pay more in taxes than they receive back from the federal government. Alaskans pay less in taxers than they receive back.

Or, in simpler terms, New Yorkers produce, Alaskans consume.

Posted by: Stefan on September 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM | PERMALINK

ooh, ooh, and now Texas can secede? We're definitely going when Texas goes.

Oh, wait a minute. If Texas goes, we might not need to. The rest of America looks pretty good without the state that gave us Dim Son.

And that border fence? We wouldn't have to pay for it.

Hmmmm. Choices, choices.

Posted by: CalGal on September 2, 2008 at 2:13 PM | PERMALINK
We have the refineries and Big Oil, something you don't want to lose.

Not a problem mi amigo. President McPOW will just invade to stop your WMD program.

Posted by: The Answer WAS Orange on September 2, 2008 at 2:13 PM | PERMALINK

As long as the news destroys the family of Sarah Palin the progressives will be happy.

Yeah, because Republicans would never, ever engage in politics of personal destruction. They wouldn't tie up the mechanisms of government for an impeachment over a blowjob....oh, wait. Well, they wouldn't engage in a whispering campaign that McCain's adopted South Asian daughter was an illegitimate black child...oh, wait. Well, at least McCain would never hire the jackass who did that to him...oh, wait.

Just for the record, Orwell, I'll settle for the destruction of Palin's national political career, and on that score she seems to be doing fine all by herself, and taking McCain down with her.

Posted by: Gregory on September 2, 2008 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK

I'm sure that publication of the fact that they were former members of a secessionist party will tear apart the Palin family.
/snark off

Poor "Orwell" laments that facts have a liberal bias.

Better trolls, please.

Posted by: BuzzMon on September 2, 2008 at 2:23 PM | PERMALINK

if AIP wants to infiltrate the gubmint, why are they copping to Palin's membership? you'd think they'd be freaking thrilled.

Posted by: northzax on September 2, 2008 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK

We should send half of the population of NYC up there to live since they are on the dole now.

Here are some numbers from 2004:

1. D.C. ($6.17)
2. North Dakota ($2.03)
3. New Mexico ($1.89)
4. Mississippi ($1.84)
5. Alaska ($1.82)
6. West Virginia ($1.74)
7. Montana ($1.64)
8. Alabama ($1.61)
9. South Dakota ($1.59)
10. Arkansas ($1.53)

As you can see, Alaska is a "welfare queen."

Now let's take a look at New York:
1. New Jersey ($0.62)
2. Connecticut ($0.64)
3. New Hampshire ($0.68)
4. Nevada ($0.73)
5. Illinois ($0.77)
6. Minnesota ($0.77)
7. Colorado ($0.79)
8. Massachusetts ($0.79)
9. California ($0.81)
10. New York ($0.81)

Looks like we're getting shortchanged up here in the Empire State. Maybe the above states should secede and leave the states "on the dole" to figure out how to care for themselves.

Here's the link.

Posted by: lobbygow on September 2, 2008 at 2:28 PM | PERMALINK

Shhhh... What do you want to do, force McCain to dump her? She's a goose laying golden eggs for the Democrats, but only as long as the religious right forces McCain to keep her on the ticket.

Interesting to see that the intrade contract on withdrawing Palin's name is creeping up slowly...

Posted by: paul on September 2, 2008 at 2:33 PM | PERMALINK

Here are some numbers from 2004:

Forgot to explain that the number in parentheses is the amount of federal dollars the state receives per every dollar contributed in federal tax dollars.

Posted by: lobbygow on September 2, 2008 at 2:33 PM | PERMALINK

She may be a "former member" of the AIP, but that did not prevent her from sending a video message to the 2008 AIP Convention in strong support of their work. Take a look for your self it is at the AIP website and YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4iCDBIAde8&feature=related , http://www.akip.org/conv08.html
PASS IT ON THIS NEEDS TO GET OUT!

Posted by: Jethro Loftus on September 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM | PERMALINK

I hate to keep playing the "If a Democrat Had Done This ... " game, but it's a valid point -- if a Dem had been part of a group like this, he'd never be elected Dog Catcher, let along be a viable Veep candidate.

Yet the media has been slow to pick up on this story. Why?

Considering the asinine Rev. Wright flap was covered for weeks -- and even made an appearance in a few debates -- I fail to see how this isn't bigger news. This isn't someone close to Palin doing something. This is Palin herself doing it.

I really don't get it.

Oh, one other thing: Anyone on the right (or even our concern trolls) who talks about how the left wants to "destroy the Palin family" should shut the fuck up.

Last I checked, the right has had no problems going after any and all Democrats with some of the most disgusting -- and often patently false -- accusations of personal impropriety. They don't give a rat's ass about anyone's family and don't give a crap about any damage they may inflict. For them, it's all about winning at all costs.

If anything, 99% of the left has been incredibly gracious to the Palin family over some of the recent revelations, choosing to focus on substance (membership in AIP, abuse of power, lying in her presser last week) rather than anything personal.

So either shut it, or admit you're flaming hypocrites lacking a clue. Your call.

Posted by: Mark D on September 2, 2008 at 2:41 PM | PERMALINK

daveinboca wrote: The AIP allegation has already been disproved

How do you figure that? (Please do factor her 2008 video in support of the party as cited above.)

they are heedless of the fact that they are disgracing themselves shamelessly & losing what little cred they still have with independents and sane Democrats.

Yeah, because independents and sane Democrats overwhelmingly support Palin's religious extremism, not to mention her embrace of a successionist party.

Demented, indeed...

Posted by: Gregory on September 2, 2008 at 2:43 PM | PERMALINK

America: Sarah was against it before she was for it. Heckuva job, Johnny.

Posted by: mle on September 2, 2008 at 2:53 PM | PERMALINK

Sarah Palin is an extremist--that seems to be the bottomline...and an extremist in about everything she stands for. She's even more extreme than Bush or McCain. Need we know anything else than that?

Posted by: Sandra on September 2, 2008 at 3:06 PM | PERMALINK

One should also note that her past membership in the Alaska Independence Party is interesting viewed alongside her comments earlier this year on the Vice Presidency; while here "what does the VP do all day" comment has gotten the most attention, if you watch the video you'll note the next thing she says is that she'd only take the VP job if she was convinced that she would be able to bring back pork for Alaska by doing it.

Posted by: cmdicely on September 2, 2008 at 3:19 PM | PERMALINK

If anything, Palin's support for a secessionist group will *solidify* her support among Republicans. Secessionists and the great-grandchildren of secessionists are the backbone of the Republican Party -- they wear rebel flags as t-shirts and mutter amongst themselves that the South will rise again. They'll offer Sarah Palin honorary membership in the Confederate States of America and vote for her in droves.

Posted by: Helen Highwater on September 2, 2008 at 3:22 PM | PERMALINK

about half of Oregon is federal land, ditto Washington, Idaho, Montana...you get the picture.

Only 28 percent of Washington state land is federally owned - nowhere near half.

www.blm.gov/natacq/pls98/98PL1-3.PDF

Posted by: Washington state resident on September 2, 2008 at 3:24 PM | PERMALINK

A very highly suspect VP pick. Her views are wacked out and weird - I say let Alaska secede and she is no longer a citizen and can not hold office - oh what then--- Mitt Romney - an even worse pick. McCain first big decision is a poor one at best and she should have never accepted it. Ego and independence are not traits to have as a VP.

Posted by: you78 on September 2, 2008 at 3:31 PM | PERMALINK

Or...

The AIP is talking complete bullshit, and she has been a registered republican since she was 18 years old.

http://hotair.cachefly.net/images/2008-09/palin-voting.pdf

Will we get a correction?

Posted by: rory @ parentalcation on September 2, 2008 at 3:36 PM | PERMALINK

Oops. Duly noted. I should have said "significant percentages" instead of "about half."

Posted by: Blue Girl on September 2, 2008 at 3:37 PM | PERMALINK

Mitt Romney - an even worse pick.

I disagree. While Palin at the most mollifies the Christian right, Romney thrills the money-con branch of the GOP. By comparison, mollifying a third of your base wouldn't help McSame as much as thrilling a third of it.

-Z

Posted by: Zorro on September 2, 2008 at 3:38 PM | PERMALINK

The AIP is talking complete bullshit, and she has been a registered republican since she was 18 years old.

Yeah, and that was actually a Muppet doing the endorsement video she sent to AIP's 2008 convention.

Posted by: Gregory on September 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM | PERMALINK

Steve,

There is a guy named Donald Fowler who was a DNC Chairman and, shortly thereafter, the SC Chairman of the Southern Party ... a party chartered for the purpose of seeking secession of the South from the Union, back in 1998-99.

We need more politicians who are bold about sovereignty issues, even if they do apply to States. Moreover, some parties are just lobbying groups by another name. The Southern Party was actually more concerned with states rights, as might well be the case with the Alaskan party. That's one problem of a government that tramples the Constitution: simple constitutional remedies are seen as radical acts of rebellion. Its a shame.

Posted by: Steve on September 2, 2008 at 3:59 PM | PERMALINK

Her voter registration documents are posted. Correction coming? Doubtful given the bias here. But an update might at least be useful. Others have pointed out that Obama supported the Hawaiian independence movement. This ain't gonna be the issue that takes down Palin, losers!

Posted by: Yawner on September 2, 2008 at 4:04 PM | PERMALINK

Others have pointed out that Obama supported the Hawaiian independence movement.

Sigh. This doesn't even rise to the level of "good try."

Sorry, wingnut, but no one made that claim. What was said was if he had, the wingers would be making hay of it. But since she is a registered republican the corporate media is holding their fire.

Posted by: Blue Girl on September 2, 2008 at 4:19 PM | PERMALINK

Her voter registration documents are posted. Correction coming? Doubtful given the bias here.

Shorter Yawner: This time Hot Air must be right!

Sadly, no! Listen, jackass: She sent an endorsement video to AIP's 2008 convention.

Others have pointed out that Obama supported the Hawaiian independence movement.

And I'm sure the sourcing is unimpeachable!

This ain't gonna be the issue that takes down Palin

I gotta admit, you got me there. There are so many to choose from...

Posted by: Gregory on September 2, 2008 at 4:21 PM | PERMALINK

if we could somehow jettison the Enlarged Prostate known as Texas, we should do so.

Just give me time to get to higher land, will ya...

btw, texas needs to pay their debt before they can get out..I'd be willing to contribute.

Posted by: barely survivin in tejas on September 2, 2008 at 4:39 PM | PERMALINK

Secession is un-American?!?

Why did the US encourage former Soviet States to secede from the Russian confederation?

Even better, what in the heck was the American Revolution if not a secession? Do you celebrate the Fourth of July? What do you think that holiday celebrates?

Posted by: JM on September 2, 2008 at 9:49 PM | PERMALINK

Secession is un-American?

Unbelievable. What next, Marxism is American?

Posted by: DixieFlatline on September 2, 2008 at 9:58 PM | PERMALINK

Most of the comments on this sight are obviously made by deceived, leftist, liberal, blabbering idiots. Bless your hearts....you are all deceived by the "powers that be". I feel sorry for you.

Posted by: patriotpride on September 3, 2008 at 1:24 PM | PERMALINK

Wow! What else can you say? If this is true, I'm sure the McCain campaign will downplay it as a fringe group trying to give themselves legitimacy by claiming Palin was a member. They will never admit it, and barring a video of Palin saying, "Death to America", then I think they will get away with it. Great reporting. Keep up the good work.
Jerame Clough
-Next Gen Politics

Posted by: Next Gen Politics on September 3, 2008 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals