September 4, 2008
UPPITY.... It was only a matter of time before Republican officials shifted from oblique racially-charged language to brazen racially-charged language.
Georgia Republican Rep. Lynn Westmoreland used the racially-tinged term "uppity" to describe Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama Thursday.
Westmoreland was discussing vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin's speech with reporters outside the House chamber and was asked to compare her with Michelle Obama.
"Just from what little I’ve seen of her and Mr. Obama, Sen. Obama, they're a member of an elitist-class individual that thinks that they're uppity," Westmoreland said.
Asked to clarify that he used the word "uppity," Westmoreland said, "Uppity, yeah."
Now, one is tempted to note how truly absurd it is that a Republican feels comfortable calling the Democratic candidate part of "an elitist-class" when the GOP nominee owns so many homes, he's lost count. But let's put that aside.
Lynn Westmoreland is a white, right-wing southerner who, not too long ago, took a bold stand against reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act. For him to smear the first major-party African-American presidential nominee as "uppity" is ... what's the word I'm looking for here ... unacceptable.
—Steve Benen 4:45 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (74)
What's the word you're looking for?
-appalling
-disgusting
-racist
-contemptuous
I think I'll go with:
-dickhead
-moron
-pinhead
-total fucking asshole
Posted by: MsJoanne on September 4, 2008 at 4:47 PM | PERMALINK
Yep, that's my congressman, Mr. Ten Commandments of Colbert fame, from the same district that gave us Newt Gingrich. Makes you proud.
Posted by: Skitso on September 4, 2008 at 4:48 PM | PERMALINK
He got the talking-points, but forgot "show, don't tell." Shakespeare knew idiots like this:
FLUTE
Most radiant Pyramus, most lily-white of hue,
Of colour like the red rose on triumphant brier,
Most brisky juvenal and eke most lovely Jew,
As true as truest horse that yet would never tire,
I'll meet thee, Pyramus, at Ninny's tomb.
QUINCE
'Ninus' tomb,' man: why, you must not speak that
yet; that you answer to Pyramus: you speak all your
part at once, cues and all Pyramus enter: your cue
is past; it is, 'never tire.'
FLUTE
O,--As true as truest horse, that yet would
never tire.
Re-enter PUCK, and BOTTOM with an ass's head
- A Midsummer Night's Dream, III, i.
.
Posted by: Grand Moff Texan on September 4, 2008 at 4:49 PM | PERMALINK
"they're a member of an elitist-class individual"
At first I thought this was just jumbled up word jazz.
On looking at it more closely, maybe it's Freudian.
Posted by: JC on September 4, 2008 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK
Calm down. It's all in good humor. It's not a personal attack. Don't play the race card.
--John McCain.
Posted by: gregor on September 4, 2008 at 4:51 PM | PERMALINK
Its baiting. The Republicans would like this to an OJ style media circus. Where angry blacks argue with angry whites. Best to ignore it.
Posted by: jimmy on September 4, 2008 at 4:53 PM | PERMALINK
I think this may be the pressure point to apply force at:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Lynn_Westmoreland#Campaign_contributions
Call his sponsors, and tell them how you feel about the racist.
Posted by: Racer X on September 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM | PERMALINK
It's "uppity" now; by the eve of election day they'll be screaming "n****r!"
They're desperate. They know they've hitched their wagon to a loser.
Posted by: Screamin' Demon on September 4, 2008 at 4:55 PM | PERMALINK
Its baiting. The Republicans would like this to an OJ style media circus. Where angry blacks argue with angry whites. Best to ignore it.
Yup. Keep killing them with facts.
Like the Republicans not saying shit about anything that, you know, matters.
Posted by: on September 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK
I like you, MsJoanne.
Posted by: paradox on September 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK
And so The Great Culture War of Ought Eight begins...
Folks, this is going to get UGLY.
Posted by: neilt on September 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK
Ever since McCain blew it by not being able to answer how many houses he owned, the Republicans have been in a downward spiral. This latest gaffe is just another example.
I said that the dynamics of the election would be set by labor day. It's now after labor day, and things look really bad for the Republicans.
Posted by: Tyro on September 4, 2008 at 4:57 PM | PERMALINK
I think the phrase you're looking for is "uppity white trash." Looks like McCain has the cracker vote all sewn up.
Posted by: Kuyper on September 4, 2008 at 4:57 PM | PERMALINK
Breaking:
GOP self-destructing...
Makes you wonder what they will resort to when Barack hits 52%.
Posted by: koreyel on September 4, 2008 at 4:59 PM | PERMALINK
I love how Westmoreland managed to link "elitist" and "uppity" and pretty much blow the whole notion that "elitist" was meant to be anything other than a racist code word straight out of the water.
I mean, even Lee Atwater knew you couldn't come right out and say this stuff. You had to say things like "forced busing" and "welfare queens" to keep it under the radar enough for people to support you.
Posted by: Mnemosyne on September 4, 2008 at 5:01 PM | PERMALINK
But John McCain was a POW!
Posted by: Brian J on September 4, 2008 at 5:01 PM | PERMALINK
Steve, you can drop the Kumbaya playbook.
Offensive, reprehensible, sleazy, also come to mind.
As do, deliberate, planned, targeted, etc.
Posted by: SocraticGadfly on September 4, 2008 at 5:02 PM | PERMALINK
Look! There is a racist around that corner! And another in that tree! Wait I think I see one BEHIND THAT CAR!!!!
Touchy, touchy.
How about Snobby - is that racist too?
Clarence Thomas is still getting called and uncle Tom as is Condeleza.
Get a grip progressives - I know it has been a bad day.
Posted by: Orwell on September 4, 2008 at 5:06 PM | PERMALINK
As do, deliberate, planned, targeted, etc
I don't think it was deliberate. I think that Westmoreland has a "language memo" that was distributed to Republicans explaining what terminology to use (eg, "instead of 'estate tax', say 'death tax'), and it contained talking points that say, "don't say uppity, say 'elitist'," and, unfortunately, Westmoreland let the cat out of the bag and forgot to do the correct substitution.
Posted by: Tyro on September 4, 2008 at 5:09 PM | PERMALINK
The words "thinks that they're uppity" make no sense. It's like "uppity" was just bursting to get said whether it fit the sentence or not.
Posted by: DonBoy on September 4, 2008 at 5:09 PM | PERMALINK
From this and the Palin pick, it seems to me the GOP are really running scared and figure they have to do whatever they can to shake it up. If they're losing N Dakota, they're looking at a blue landslide.
Good thing Obama's a cool customer and will meet these gross insults with humor and grace.
Posted by: Richard Cownie on September 4, 2008 at 5:12 PM | PERMALINK
I wonder if the plan is to continue to have these momentary "lapses," these little "mistakes," throughout the remainder of the election. It will serve to keep the race issue covertly alive as GOPers, with angst, decry these "errors' perhaps in much the same way as they attack the "sexists" who criticize Palin.
Posted by: -jlinge- on September 4, 2008 at 5:13 PM | PERMALINK
You know what? If Barack would just address Ol' Pops as "Massa", they'd probably stop with the uppity shit.
Where the hell is Dave Chappelle when you need him?
Posted by: 60days on September 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM | PERMALINK
They would've gotten around to the racist slurs sooner than this, but cut them some slack -- they had a hurricane to deal with.
Posted by: junebug on September 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM | PERMALINK
"Elite" means different things to Republicans and Democrats. When Republicans use the word, they're really criticizing someone for being too well educated. They're telling people, "He thinks he's smarter than you!" When Democrats talk about an "elite," however, they're talking about a money elite.
Posted by: AndrewBW on September 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM | PERMALINK
Republicans are going to lose and lose big ... and what will follow is 4+ years of smear tactics against the Obamas ... investigations, allegations ... recall what they did to the Clintons ... for god sakes, at one point (still in some circles) Hillary Clinton was accused to killing Vince Foster. How long before these sort of allegations start popping up?
And if a $300K outfit is not uppity, I dont know what is ...
Posted by: tang on September 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM | PERMALINK
Let me explain the Bill of Rights and why they were insisted upon way back in the day.
Most of the Colonists came from a place called England. England was run by someone called a King at the time. Kings originated from a selection process that involved being big, bad, and smart. If you read the Iliad, you can get some insight into the selection process. Despite some issues associated with inbreeding, the big, bad, and smart traits survived. Those two princes could probably get laid on any given Friday, even without their titles.
Although Kings were big, bad, and smart, they had to establish a strong executive government as there were many more subjects than there were royalty. Given the numbers of subjects and the nature of man, the Kings placed controls on speech to control the population.
America is truly blessed to have been founded by the men that we have as Founding Fathers, who believed in extending greater individual liberties to Americans and limiting the executive. Many of these founders, recognizing the nature of man, worried that if the Bill of Rights were not to be included in writing, that another big, bad, smart leader would come along and take away individual liberties all over again.
There are people today, and I’ll count you among them Steve, that want to place limits on free speech all over again. I do not regard these people to have good situational awareness. What they do not realize is that controversial speech is the thing that protects the masses from exploitation from big, bad, smart people. Rarely are the people who want to limit speech big, bad, and smart. Except for the few that are very, very big, bad, and smart, who would first stomp out the little ones quickly. Read Animal Farm for details.
So Steve, you’ve got your forum in which I have no rights, and as long as you allow this last post to remain, I will go quietly into the night. You can even advocate removing words from the English language. But I recommend against it.
Posted by: The Ghost of Brick Oven Bill on September 4, 2008 at 5:20 PM | PERMALINK
Look! There is a racist around that corner! And another in that tree! Wait I think I see one BEHIND THAT CAR!!!!
Yes, when Westmoreland tried to not renew the Voting Rights Act, he was doing it out of the kindness of his heart for all of those poor election monitors who have to go out every year and make sure we have fair elections. I mean, what kind of lame-ass country thinks that every American citizen should be allowed to vote, anyway?
Posted by: Mnemosyne on September 4, 2008 at 5:22 PM | PERMALINK
"Community organizers" is a racist code word for blacks too, they're assuming wealthy white suburban republicans will link that to black nationalistic preaching ala Rev. Wright.
Posted by: Jan in Stone Mtn on September 4, 2008 at 5:23 PM | PERMALINK
From PoliticalWire:
Vanity Fair estimates that the "rather fancy designer clothes" Cindy McCain wore while taking the stage Tuesday night at the Republican convention cost somewhere between $299,100 and $313,100.
But the Obamas are the uppity ones?
No wonder Republicans dislike community organizers - they're afraid the masses might get tired enough of "let them eat cake" to grab the pitchforks and torches.
Oh well. All I can say about all of this is that it drove me to hit the "Donate" button at Obama's site. The goal is $10 mil between when Palin left the stage and when McCain goes on.
Posted by: zeitgeist on September 4, 2008 at 5:26 PM | PERMALINK
Did B.O.B. just compare Steve to George III?
Posted by: Mnemosyne on September 4, 2008 at 5:26 PM | PERMALINK
Clarence Thomas is still getting called and uncle Tom as is Condeleza.
By who? Other than yourself, I mean.
And are you really such a drooling moron that you don't think calling a black man "uppity" is racist?
Posted by: DH Walker on September 4, 2008 at 5:27 PM | PERMALINK
Founding Fathers, who believed in extending greater individual liberties to Americans and limiting the executive
Yes, they were called liberals.
Sometimes you have to stop and take a look in the mirror BrickOven...it's called projecting.
Posted by: Gridlock on September 4, 2008 at 5:28 PM | PERMALINK
Besides the racist language, the statement doesn't even make grammatical sense. This person can't even speak an intelligible sentence. Best response is to laugh at them.
Posted by: Algernon on September 4, 2008 at 5:28 PM | PERMALINK
This time, Republican insults just ruin their chances. Every day, for one step forward, they go two steps back. Enjoy.
Posted by: Bob M on September 4, 2008 at 5:30 PM | PERMALINK
The voting core of the repugnican party is the Low Information Voter. Naturally, one would expect for rethugnicans to appeal to the Low Information Voter by describing Obama as an arrogant elitist.
This poor congressman just forgot to use the code! Or has he decided that the Low Information Voter just doesn't understand that 'arrogant' is the republican & corporate media code word for 'uppity'.
Interpretation of republican & corporate media speak to English:
- Low Information Voter = Stupid White Trash
- Arrogant = Uppity
- Elitist = someone who prefers to make policy and decisions based upon science and knowledge vs the republican mode of religious dogma and belief.
If Obama is ahead in the polls, as the election draws nearer you should expect the rethugs to get clearer and more explicit in their appeal to the LIV. What have the rethugs left, aside from fear and hatred, to sell to voters?
Of course, polls show that the Exxon/Bush/McCain energy plan has majority support among the amerikan public! But, it takes a hell of a lot of marketing effort & $$$ to sell 'drill, drill, drill' as an energy policy.
Posted by: SadOldVet on September 4, 2008 at 5:31 PM | PERMALINK
Vanity Fair estimates that the "rather fancy designer clothes" Cindy McCain wore cost somewhere between $299,100 and $313,100.
Since that is worth more than the median price of an American home, can we say they own 8 houses?
Posted by: koreyel on September 4, 2008 at 5:31 PM | PERMALINK
Seriously, expect to see incidents like this pretty regularly between now and November. And expect to see the corporate-controlled media, if they mention them at all, dismiss each occurrence as an "isolated incident". That's the term they use every time a bunch of white cops beat up or shoot an unarmed black man.
Posted by: SteveT on September 4, 2008 at 5:33 PM | PERMALINK
Yo Billy Jack! There's free speech then there's blogs. Just like movie ratings exclude various ages, bloggers must filter for mental cases, such as you.
Posted by: on September 4, 2008 at 5:34 PM | PERMALINK
"smear the first major-party African-American presidential nominee as "uppity" is ... what's the word I'm looking for here ... unacceptable."
Just imagine: President Obama called the white Congressman from Georgia uppity, Ohhh, the humanity; calling a Congressman uppity, the nerve.
The good news is that Westmoreland is sooo gone, he didn't even pretend to use a dog whistle: Everyone was supposed to hear this whistle.
Don't ever accuse Repugs of racism. It is non-existant in their sick alternative reality of a mindset.
Posted by: barkleyg on September 4, 2008 at 5:42 PM | PERMALINK
Vanity Fair estimates that the "rather fancy designer clothes" Cindy McCain wore cost somewhere between $299,100 and $313,100.
Did they happen to mention the diamond pin? Couldn't read what it spelled out but it was quite dazzling.
Maybe "McCain 2008" in diamonds?
Yeah, that speaks to my heart right there.
Posted by: MsMuddler on September 4, 2008 at 5:48 PM | PERMALINK
Vanity Fair estimates that the "rather fancy designer clothes" Cindy McCain wore cost somewhere between $299,100 and $313,100.
I can just imagine what she was thinking while she was holding the baby, "Oh God, please don't throw up!"
Posted by: Marko on September 4, 2008 at 5:50 PM | PERMALINK
Hey, marcopolo, you fucking idiot -
McCain's executive experience = ZERO
By the way - Cheney and Rummy had scads of experience, and look how bad they fucked everything up.
Posted by: Blue Girl on September 4, 2008 at 5:56 PM | PERMALINK
McCain's chance of winning=ZERO. There. Fixed it for you. Invoice to follow.
Posted by: mexpat on September 4, 2008 at 6:00 PM | PERMALINK
Lynn!! Lynn!! where I come from that's a bird's name!
Posted by: Tim on September 4, 2008 at 6:01 PM | PERMALINK
Cue Eddie Murphy as Reggie Hammond in the redneck bar in 48 Hours. "There's a new sheriff in town . . . "
Posted by: Ephus on September 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM | PERMALINK
I can imagine Rep. Westmoreland stomping her foot in private..."Oh, that Negro!"
Posted by: Vincent on September 4, 2008 at 6:11 PM | PERMALINK
This was mentioned in the last thread, so I'll repeat my comment from there:
You have to remember, about the 'uppity' quote, that it comes from Lynn Westmoreland, who might only be a second-bracket competitor in the 'craziest Congressperson competition' but has 'retired the cup' in the 'stupid competition.' (They don't even award a bronze or a silver, because no one is worthy to stand on the platform with him.)
This is the same guy who, on Colbert, announced that the Ten Commandments should be posted in all public buildings, but when he was asked to name them, he could name only three.
It's disgusting, sure, but Westmoreland is an embarrassment to Republicans, to Georgians, and even to garden variety idiots.
Posted by: Prup (aka Jim Benton) on September 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM | PERMALINK
Westmoreland is running against Stephen Camp.
http://www.stephencampforcongress.com/
Don't get mad, donate...
Posted by: Fuzzy on September 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM | PERMALINK
When Obama wins, expect more than a few Republicans to use the complete phrase.
Posted by: Rapid Eddie on September 4, 2008 at 6:36 PM | PERMALINK
I quote Lee Atwater:
You start out in 1954 by saying, 'Nigger, nigger, nigger.' By 1968 you can't say 'nigger' - that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.
And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me - because obviously sitting around saying, 'We want to cut this,' is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than 'Nigger, nigger.
The modern Republican philosophy in a nutshell.
Posted by: Joseph Miller on September 4, 2008 at 7:13 PM | PERMALINK
But he didn't call them "uppity." Read it carefully.
He just said that they think that they're uppity.
I didn't think that the Obamas had such a conflicted self-image, but you never know.
Posted by: thersites on September 4, 2008 at 7:26 PM | PERMALINK
He could probably figure by now that Obama more than "thinks" he's uppity. LOL!
Posted by: Kenji on September 4, 2008 at 7:27 PM | PERMALINK
And if a $300K outfit is not uppity, I dont know what is ...
Uppity is someone of a lower caste acting above their station.
(And "they're a member of an elitist-class individual that thinks that they're uppity" contains almost as many clear syntactic and probable semantic errors as it does words, but I suppose the speaker would think that using the English language, rather than abusing it, would be an "uppity", "elitist-class" thing to do.)
Posted by: cmdicely on September 4, 2008 at 7:36 PM | PERMALINK
I know Zeitgeist and CB have long argued about who is the dimmest "star" in the Congressional firmament: Michelle Bachman or Steve King?
My money has always been on Lynn Westmoreland. Stephen Colbert's "Better Know A District" segment with him was priceless.
Posted by: TuiMel on September 4, 2008 at 7:46 PM | PERMALINK
Southern Strategy:
You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.
Posted by: croatoan on September 4, 2008 at 7:50 PM | PERMALINK
9iu11iani also mentioned that Democrats were scared to use the ter. Then went to say that they should say the word Islamic Terrorists to call them what they are - terrorists (Democrats did mention terrorists, just not the specific "Islamic Terrorists"). 9iu11iani went ahead and said out louder to the thunderous applause as if it were some kind of check-mate talking point, also he looked like he was having a cathartic moment saying "Islamic Terrorists" the second time. It was kind of, for lack of a better word, whack.
It's become painfully clear that the GOP have become pretty brazen as of late, that they can say whatever they want however they please because somehow they're the party that puts country first and therefore can piss all over it? This makes zero sense. They're the party of stereotypes and generalities, not big ideas.
Posted by: Mick on September 4, 2008 at 8:02 PM | PERMALINK
Will the MSM take this up like they report on the "sexism" against Sarah Palin? They likely won't unless we push them by making enough buzz on alt-media that they have to report the reporting.
Posted by: Neil B on September 4, 2008 at 8:22 PM | PERMALINK
oic, the Obamas aren't uppity, they just think they're uppity. Whatever that means.
Posted by: mim on September 4, 2008 at 8:57 PM | PERMALINK
But this is the reporter's fault, whoever he/she is. The next follow-up question needs to be, explicitly, "Are you aware of the racist content of the word 'uppity', particularly when used by a white Southerner to describe an African-American?"
Reporters shouldn't depend on inference. They should drive the facts home.
Posted by: larry birnbaum on September 4, 2008 at 9:20 PM | PERMALINK
I guess they've decided a more civil tone is a loser, so they're going with divisive to try and eke out a 50.0001% win.
It shows they have no respect for America and that they are completely incapable of governing all of America. They just want to have the power -- same as George W. Bush.
More of the same b.s. as Bush gives us.
Posted by: MarkH on September 4, 2008 at 9:56 PM | PERMALINK
So, Palin's rants last night had me stewing, slowly, on back burner, for 24hrs. The "uppity" thingie pushed the pot right to the front and Obama profited, even though -- after FISA -- I promised myself I wouldn't donate to him, ever again.
You figure that it was Obama who, somehow, managed to steer Palin into McCain's field of vision?
Posted by: exlibra on September 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM | PERMALINK
Lynn Westmoreland exemplifies the Southern Republican virtue of Racismo.
Posted by: Cap'n Chucky on September 4, 2008 at 11:18 PM | PERMALINK
Actually, the word you're looking for is "brazen."
Westmoreland knew exactly what he was saying, who it was meant to resonate with and who it was meant to provoke. Dixiecrat Republicans are experts at race baiting, and at baiting liberals to remind whites who take sides racially whose side the Republicans are on.
Posted by: allbetsareoff on September 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM | PERMALINK
I expect nothing less from a dumbed-down, uneducated man who doesnt even have a bachelors degree. Westmoreland, along with Karen Handel and Casey Cagle, (all Georgia Republicans who are rumored to run for governor), doesn't even have a bachelor's degree. All three of them are either high school dropouts or stopped their education at high school. So Im not shocked that he used this euphemism for nigger. How else could he respond to the Democratic nominee? He knows it's easier to appeal to the lowest part of people with fear than it is to discuss the issues.
Posted by: kj on September 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM | PERMALINK
"'uppidy' [sic] means presumptuous or putting on airs of superiority...."
You might look up the word 'connotation', while you're at the dictionary.
Posted by: Michael Drake on September 5, 2008 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
I had no idea the word uppity had racial undertones. The things you learn during an election year... like how much you make, how many homes you own, whether you old or young actually mean more than your desire to do the right thing.
We have two very good canidates running, with very different ideologies and what do we talk about... everything but their plans and vision.
If we (and the media) are serious about doing what is best for America, lets listen to Obama, lets listen to McCain. Look at their vision, their ideas, their plans and then make a decision.
Posted by: Living in a world of fools on September 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM | PERMALINK
Pretty much to be expected isn't it? Some dumb yokel gets elected to be head of his state's gubmint and then while trying to insult Obama, can't even get it right. I only noticed one post here pointing out that he said the Obamas think they are uppity.Huh? Somebody get that guy a flashlight and tell him to get back in the tent, set down in the circle and wait for his turn.
Posted by: T on September 5, 2008 at 6:23 PM | PERMALINK
I cannot believe that anyone raised in the southern US would misconstrue Westmoreland's use of the term "uppity." When I was a white child raised in the South, uppity referred to a black man driving a new car, a black family that owned a well maintained home, any African American who aspired to be anything other than a laborer. In fact, it was a term used for any African American trying to better his/her self.
Wish I lived in Georgia so I could vote against this man.
Posted by: Linda Hamilton on September 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM | PERMALINK