Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 22, 2008

NO ONE IS ATTACKING PALIN'S FAMILY.... Two weeks ago, the McCain campaign sent out a letter to supporters, ostensibly written by Sarah Palin, insisting that "the Obama/Biden Democrats have been vicious in their attacks directed toward me, my family and John McCain."

Asked to identify Democrats who've been vicious towards the candidates and Palin's family, the best the McCain campaign could do was point to an Obama spokesperson who said Palin had supported Pat Buchanan's presidential campaign. That was it; that was their support.

Today, the McCain campaign sent out a very similar letter to supporters, once again "written" by Palin, charging, "Friends, in the course of a few weeks, the Obama-Biden Democrats have launched attack after attack on me, my family and John McCain. They're desperate to win and they'll no doubt launch these attacks against other reformers on our ticket."

So, Greg Sargent followed up, asking for evidence to support the claim. The McCain campaign responded by pointing to these examples of "Obama-Biden Democrats":

1) Obama finance committee member Howard Gutman questioning Palin's parenting and her willingness to take on the Veep candidate role when her family is so consuming -- a comment he subsequently apologized for.

2) Andrew Sullivan's demand that the McCain campaign release medical records putting to rest rumors about the birth of Trig Palin.

3) A user diary on DailyKos, which is of course the site of leading Obama supporter Markos Moulitsas, raising questions about that pregnancy.

So, what do we have here? A Dem I've never heard of who said something dumb and apologized; a blog post from a writer who voted for Bush; and a Kos diary. This is evidence of "Obama-Biden Democrats" "attacking" Palin and her family.

Even by McCain campaign standards, this is just cheap and fpolish. If the Obama campaign wanted to play by similar rules, I wonder what Democrats would find if they looked for questionable attacks from prominent conservative blogs and user threads at the Free Republic, attributing all of it to "McCain/Palin Republicans"?

Either way, I'd just add one thing: there's only one candidate for national office this year who's been "vicious" in attacking a rival's family. His name is John McCain.

Steve Benen 4:33 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (41)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

To be fair, Sully didn't vote for Bush. He's not a citizen.

Posted by: scarpy on September 22, 2008 at 4:34 PM | PERMALINK

Weak, whiny, and confused.

Yep, that's just what we need now.
.

Posted by: Grand Moff Texan on September 22, 2008 at 4:36 PM | PERMALINK

Your item sort of misses the point. The purpose of the letter is to keep alive the (necessary)conservative sense of outrage and grievance. Additionally, the letter will become the basis for a false-balance item in the MSM, showing how Obamba "does it too" when describing McCain's tacitcs.

Posted by: Greg Worley on September 22, 2008 at 4:37 PM | PERMALINK

They forgot the anonymous blog commenters!!!

Posted by: ckelly on September 22, 2008 at 4:38 PM | PERMALINK

Steve, you may want to fix fpolish (I think it should be foolish). We don't want to upset libra. :-D

DKos? Honestly?

Boy, how about I hop over to one of the freeper sites and see what they have to say. I've seen the N word (lying Chicago ni**er), angry black woman (more times than I can count), and other things not worth repeating.

Spare me the Boehner quality whining and crying.

Feinting couches all around, please. (Intentionally misspelled, thank you very much. :D )

Posted by: MsJoanne on September 22, 2008 at 4:39 PM | PERMALINK

I call her negative culture war attack harpy, does that qualify?

Posted by: The Galloping Trollop on September 22, 2008 at 4:45 PM | PERMALINK

more of the same. . .
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13747.html

Posted by: forthebirds on September 22, 2008 at 4:48 PM | PERMALINK

No wonder I couldn't spot the satire in the SNL McCain skit.

Posted by: shortstop on September 22, 2008 at 4:49 PM | PERMALINK

*.

Posted by: Eric Blair on September 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM | PERMALINK

McCain/Palin attempt #341 to change the subject.

Posted by: ckelly on September 22, 2008 at 4:53 PM | PERMALINK

Weak tea response, Steve.

Asking questions about Trig Palin’s parentage or the possibility she had an affair with one of her husband’s best friends — when the GOP has made ANTIPRIVACY a campaign issue for more than 20 years (allegations never denied by McCain-Palin, either, BTW) — is NOT “attacking.”

And, this is what Obama gets for taking money away from 527s. He could have MoveOn running with this football a mile down the field.

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on September 22, 2008 at 4:54 PM | PERMALINK

Even by McCain campaign standards

The McCain campaign has standards?

Posted by: Tom Nawrocki on September 22, 2008 at 4:55 PM | PERMALINK

Well, they may have a point...I hate Trig.
But calculus is teh awesome.

Posted by: ckelly on September 22, 2008 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK

McCain's campaign looks absolutely, completely fucking lost right now.

Posted by: Jake on September 22, 2008 at 5:05 PM | PERMALINK

Speaking of attacking a rival's family, is there any reason that Obama/Biden Dems should not be attacking Palin for allowing her unelected secessionist husband to act as an independent agent, at Alaskan taxpayers' expense, on the Governor's behalf? If Michelle Obama is unpatriotic for a benign comment, then this guy is off the charts.

Where's the media? Where's the outrage?

Posted by: CJ on September 22, 2008 at 5:15 PM | PERMALINK

My doctor (whom, sadly, I have to see every three months and cannot replace), had a hand-made sign in his office with a pic of Palin and McCain that read, "How DARE they say can't serve because she's a mother!"

When I asked, "Who has said that?" he replied, "The media."


I asked for a specific example, and he couldn't do it. So I provided an example for him: Dr. Laura. A Republican.

I asked if there was a single Democrat who had done so, and he said "I don't know, but I bet they have!"

That's right, folks -- these people are ginning up some faith-based outrage. No evidence, no truth, and no basis in reality. It's crazy, clinically stupid and, for the GOP, typical.

But there it is.

Posted by: Mark D on September 22, 2008 at 5:16 PM | PERMALINK

Let's make a deal. The Palin's quit harassing Wooten, and firing people just because they don't kiss a.. abjectly enough, and the rest of us will lay off of them - at least personally.
Politically, we still have sooooo very much to parse.

Posted by: Marnie on September 22, 2008 at 5:18 PM | PERMALINK

One must always remember that, in the mind of Empress Palin the Lipsticked, anything less than unanimous kowtowing constitutes "vicious attacks."

which leads me to wonder: If someone were to suggest that the solution to all of America's problems, both foreign and domestic, would be to grind some particular Alaskan Independence Party associates Republicans into the freshly-thawed permafrost with a Soviet Russian tank---would Empress Palin the Lipsticked pull a Mr. Creosote, and explode all over a staged-McTownhall stage?

Inquiring minds want to know....

Posted by: Steve on September 22, 2008 at 5:19 PM | PERMALINK

Wasn't that diary subsequently locked and the user banned from Kos?

Posted by: Crissa on September 22, 2008 at 5:20 PM | PERMALINK

She's a corrupt governor of a welfare state who used her office to pursue personal vendettas, hired her high-school friends at fat salaries, paid herself a per diem to live at home, furnished the governor's mansion with a tanning bed, is defying subpoenas into corruption investigations, lied about going to Iraq, lied about the bridge to nowhere, and she counts the Alaskan frontier with Russia as her international experience.

She's attacked Obama with repeated lies about his tax plans and his record, but when she's called her own past and record, her campaign screeches "sexism" and "attacks on her family".

Posted by: Max Power on September 22, 2008 at 5:29 PM | PERMALINK

4) A post on a Washington Monthly blog states that...
"Palin faked her pregnancy with Trig, Bristol is the mother. How amusing it will be if Palin, through a bizarre but quite possible series of events becomes President only to have the real truth of this pregnancy come to light. The US will be in the deep dark waters of a horrible recession or depression, two losing wars, a gas crisis, and the President of the United States will have her sorted lies up for display and ridicule on every tabloid rag across the globe. What this is my friends, is the end of America, drunken celebrity style. You best dig yourself a bunker and fill it with canned goods!"

Posted by: on September 22, 2008 at 5:37 PM | PERMALINK

Who cares whose kid it is? If anybody should release their medical records it is John McCain -- he's confused, can't remember even what he said one day to the next -- sounds like a small stroke or dementia - he's too sick to be President. Or he just the cover for the conservative Republicans bait (John McCain) and switch (President Palin) routine?

Posted by: Ray Waldren on September 22, 2008 at 5:51 PM | PERMALINK

The McCain campaign is like a bunch of arsonists yelling fire to take the focus off themselves, or are they like a bunch of purse snatchers yelling crime and pointing in the other direction to divert attention from their skullduggery.

McCain/Palin sure know how to take the noble out of the expression - democracy, a noble human experiement. I see them naked as they are - powermongers who wish to ascend to the presidency to continue helping their "friends" on Wall St. instead of Main St.

If they have to twist the moment into what is essentially a paranoid call to arms, they'll need a whole lot of therapy after November 4th. -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on September 22, 2008 at 5:55 PM | PERMALINK

a quick trip down memory lane reveals that after McCain told the tasteless joke about both Chelsea and HER parentage["Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno." ]....the PRESS COVERED FOR SAINT JOHN.....

shocking!!! really.....

David Corn
June 1998

The fact that McCain had made the tasteless joke was reported in major newspapers, as was the vain attempt by his press secretary to initially deny what McCain had done. But in several major newspapers, the joke itself was kept a secret.

When McCain subsequently apologized to President Clinton, the Washington Post, in its personality section, noted the apology but said the joke "was too vicious to print."

The Los Angeles Times, in its Life & Style section, provided an oblique rendering of the joke that did not fully convey its ugliness.

When Maureen Dowd penned a column in the New York Times about the joke, she wrote that McCain "is so revered by the press that his disgusting jape was largely nudged under the rug." But Dowd chose not to relay the joke, either.

The joke did appear in McCain's hometown paper, the Arizona Republic, and the Associated Press did report the joke in full, so everyone in the press had access to McCain's words.

But by censoring themselves, the Post, the Times and others helped McCain deflect flak and preserved his status as a Republican presidential contender.

sh!t, some things NEVER CHANGE...
rusty

Posted by: dj spellchecka on September 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM | PERMALINK

Palin's been doing it to herself from the get-go. IF she had been out there (leaving aside the question of actually being able to handle pressers without handlers) she might have modified the view a tad more favorably.

As it is now, we have clear stonewalling, the Anchorage paper saying nasty things in the op-ed about the McSame campaign taking over Alaska, and an elitist beauty queen who won't deign to talk to the press unless they show deference to her "highness".

In the end, however, I'm sure McSame loses because this really won't go away no matter how much they whine. They've lost Will and Krauthammer this week as well.

And, Sarah, if you can't handle a presser with tough questions, you can't handle the presidency.

Posted by: rugger0 on September 22, 2008 at 6:35 PM | PERMALINK

our country may go to hell, but at least SNL might be relevant and funny again. maybe.

Posted by: effluviantOne on September 22, 2008 at 7:58 PM | PERMALINK

Hilarious in view of the previous post about Todd Palin. Actually, I thought the article was fair although not for lack of trying.

Posted by: Mike K on September 22, 2008 at 8:44 PM | PERMALINK

McCain was asked last night why Sarah Palin can't be interviewed or host press conferences. McCain responded, "The American people are vetting her."

If that's how they see it, they can't bitch about this:

A user diary on DailyKos, which is of course the site of leading Obama supporter Markos Moulitsas, raising questions about that pregnancy.

Posted by: low-tech cyclist on September 22, 2008 at 9:01 PM | PERMALINK

Hilarious in view of the previous post about Todd Palin.

You don't understand the difference between "attacking someone's family" and questioning the appropriateness of an unelected, unappointed spouse:

--conducting state business (including lobbying for industries in which he has a business interest)
--traveling on the taxpayer's dime
--refusing to comply with a subpoena, putting himself in contempt of the Alaska legislature?

No, you wouldn't. The Mike K arteries are almost all the way closed now. Lucent thoughts are few and far between.

Posted by: shortstop on September 22, 2008 at 9:02 PM | PERMALINK

rugger0 wrote: "Sarah, if you can't handle a presser with tough questions, you can't handle the presidency"

Biden should use this line.

Posted by: coldhotel on September 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM | PERMALINK

I have always thought that since her husband is an anti-American secessionist, and her two oldest children were out-of-control with substance abuse and made terrible, irresponsible decisions (parenting DOES matter), and the fact that the family defrauded the state of Alaska for thousands of dollars in elicit expenses perdiem, was very germane to HER campaign. She isn't running for Mayor anymore. It's not that Palin is just unready--she is unsteady, vengeful and vapid.

Posted by: Sparko on September 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM | PERMALINK

What a bunch of oinkers.

Posted by: Pat on September 22, 2008 at 10:23 PM | PERMALINK

How dare anyone question Sarah Palin's ___________ (fill in blank)? Don't they know she's chosen by a former POW?

Posted by: Capt Kirk on September 23, 2008 at 12:03 AM | PERMALINK

"unsteady, vengeful and vapid": Sparko at 10:18 PM

Spot on. Vote for the geriatric houseboy and the brain-dead harpy - Vote McPalin.

Posted by: on September 23, 2008 at 12:05 AM | PERMALINK

"unsteady, vengeful and vapid": : Sparko at 10:18 PM

Spot on. Vote for the geriatric houseboy and the braindead harpy - Vote McFeeble/Porky Palin.

Posted by: Conrad's Ghost on September 23, 2008 at 12:09 AM | PERMALINK

Only two weeks and suddenly the sounds of crickets is driving her mad? What?

It's like the guy in Monty Python and the Holy Grail saying, "she turned me into a newt!"

Posted by: Capt Kirk on September 23, 2008 at 12:10 AM | PERMALINK

"Friends, in the course of a few weeks, the Obama-Biden Democrats have launched attack after attack on me, my family and John McCain. They're desperate to win and they'll no doubt launch these attacks against other reformers on our ticket."
-----

So attacks on Mrs. Palin and her family and John McCain - I follow that; desperate to win - I would disagree, but okay; no doubt they'll launch these attacks against other reformers on our ticket - wait, McCain/Palin/Unnamed Reformers - who exactly is left on the ticket to be attacked?

Posted by: TBone on September 23, 2008 at 12:40 AM | PERMALINK

If Palin duo can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. Has she released ten years of her taxes yet?

Posted by: ml johnston on September 23, 2008 at 7:19 AM | PERMALINK

People have been very gentle with Palin's family and her own tawdry past. She suddenly eloped on Aug 29, 1988 and gave birth to her first son on April 29, 1989. If my math skills haven't deserted me, either her son was born 5 1/2 weeks prematurely, or Ms. Palin was 5 1/2 weeks pregnant when she eloped.

Now this would be completely irrelevant to the campaign but for her holier than thou moralizing against sex education (except abstinence) and the Republicans' frequent attacks on premarital sex. Her behavior just highlights the hypocrisy and racial bigotry of the Republican leadership (and an awful lot of Republican voters) because they just love to rail against those 17 year old unwed mothers in the ghetto. And imagine the outcry if Barack Obama had a teenage daughter pregnant out of wedlock.

Posted by: Dan L on September 23, 2008 at 10:38 AM | PERMALINK

But DAN L, as the GOP is always patiently EXPLAINING to you, unwed teenage pregnancy is fine as long as the taxpayers don't have to support these kids via welfare. The Boyfriend, a high-school dropout, will get a very nice job with the State of Alaska, so you see, the young couple won't be a drain on society at ALL.

Posted by: shortstop on September 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM | PERMALINK

Has anyone seen the video on The View about Focus on the Family holding a fundraiser and selling waffles with Obama's face on the box in place of Aunt Jemima? On the bottom there's a picture of him in a turbin and an arrow that says, "point toward Mecca for better taste". And these people have the nerve to whine about personal attacks?????

Posted by: Always Hopeful on September 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs