September 24, 2008
BIDEN SLAMS MCCAIN AS 'DANGEROUSLY WRONG'.... Joe Biden was swimming up-stream a bit this morning, delivering a real stemwinder in Cincinnati on national security. Much of the nation's attention is on the crisis on Wall Street, and much of the political world's attention is on yet another McCain campaign controversy, but there is a presidential debate on Friday focusing principally on foreign policy, and Biden was laying the groundwork for some very effective criticism.
On McCain's judgment:
"This week, John talked about the judgment required to be Commander in Chief. He's right: nothing is more important than judgment. But time and again, on the most critical national security issues of our time, John McCain's judgment was wrong. Right after the terrorists attacked us on 9-11, John responded by urging that we consider attacking countries other than Afghanistan, including Iraq, Iran and Syria. In the run up to the war in Iraq, John insisted that we would be greeted as liberators... that we didn't need a lot of troops... that victory was imminent. Then, he said he wasn't worried about Afghanistan... that we would 'muddle through'... and he declared Afghanistan to be 'a remarkable success.' In John's judgment, there is nothing to talk about with Tehran. And he has one idea for dealing with Russia: kick it out of the Group of Eight nations."
On Iraq and counter-terrorism:
"It is John's judgment that six years into the war in Iraq, we should keep spending $10 billion a month... indefinitely... at a time Iraq is running an $80 billion surplus. And John McCain continues to insist, against all the evidence and all the facts, that Iraq is the central front in the war on terrorism... and not the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan where the people who actually attacked us on 9-11 reside and are regrouping. John is more than wrong -- he is dangerously wrong. On a question so basic, so fundamental, so critical to our nation's security, we can't afford a Commander-in Chief so divorced from reality and from America's most basic national interests."
On Spain:
"Last week, John McCain said he would not meet with the leader of Spain. Now folks, he would not meet with the leader of a NATO ally. A NATO ally who has Spanish forces in Afghanistan, who has forces fighting side by side with the U.S. Ladies and gentlemen, what kind of judgment is that? What kind of bluster is that? Ladies and gentleman, John McCain's notion about how to deal with our allies as well as adversaries is something I just don't understand. How in God's name will we deal with Russia, without a united NATO. Ladies and gentleman, John McCain has gotten it wrong on so many fundamental issues."
On Obama:
"Time and again, Barack Obama has demonstrated the judgment we need in our next president... and the vision to see over the horizon. Seven years ago, Barack Obama opposed one of the most disastrous decisions in the history of American foreign policy: the diversion of our military might, our resources and focus from Afghanistan to Iraq. He was profoundly right. Now, he is right again: Barack Obama will end the war in Iraq responsibly. He will be as careful getting out as George Bush and John McCain were careless getting in.... Barack Obama understands what John McCain does not: the next President must be more than the Commander-in-Chief for Iraq. He must be Commander-in-Chief for America's security around the world."
I can appreciate the fact that Obama picked Biden for the ticket with governing in mind, but a speech like this morning's is a reminder that Biden can be a real asset to the ticket on the campaign trail.
More of this, please.
—Steve Benen 1:24 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (19)
Apropos of nothing – the amazing venue –
http://www.justabovesunset.com/Ohio/html/once_elegant_travel.html
Posted by: Alan on September 24, 2008 at 1:28 PM | PERMALINK
When will Biden state that the latest anti-McCain add he's seen is so very terrible?
When will he again defend Palin from attacks on her readiness and experience (or TOTAL lack thereof)?
Biden is haphazard in his value at best.
Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 24, 2008 at 1:35 PM | PERMALINK
"Ladies and gentleman, John McCain has gotten it wrong on so many fundamental issues"
[pause a beat]
"And why not? He's a Republican."
Posted by: Gregory on September 24, 2008 at 1:35 PM | PERMALINK
Yes, but let's continue to expand the useless and outdated NATO! It isn't provocative in the slightest to drive NATO right up to the walls of Russia and stick our missiles and bases RIGHT THERE. Not provocative at all...and we ALL want to go to war for Georgia and the Ukraine!
Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 24, 2008 at 1:37 PM | PERMALINK
I disagree with Praedor Atrebates, I think Biden has been a huge asset to Obama. The man goes out there and punches away. The occassional gaffe probably helps rather than hurts, CNN even ran his speech live. I can't imagine who would of been a better choice in this race. I don't buy this Clinton would have neutralized Palin argument anymore. Palin is a sorry joke now.
Posted by: g. powell on September 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM | PERMALINK
g. powell, I am simply saying that for every two steps forward that Biden may make, he invariably takes a step back by kissing McInsane's "honorable" ass (there isn't an honorable bone in McInsane) or trying to build up Palin because to mention her total unsuitability to be more than a beauty queen is sexist. We MUST respect her foreign policy bona fides based on "seeing Russia from her back porch".
He could totally eliminate the step backwards screwups by NEVER defending either McInsane or Palin and NEVER attacking their own freakin' adds!
Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 24, 2008 at 1:47 PM | PERMALINK
The twighlite zonish Spain fiasco, choosing Sarah Palin as his runningmate, the economic crisis surely entering the mix...McCain may not have an easy time of it Friday in a debate that we're told should play to his strengths. Great speech by Biden, and I'm glad to see them attacking on two fronts. Foreign policy won't be a safe haven for him from the economy. I hope in the debate Obama ties foreign policy in with economic concerns. He needs to completely hog-tie McCain and keep him on the defensive about everything.
Remember a while back when McCain was heckeled by anti-war protesters? He grinned his creepy smile and said, "My friends, I will never surrender in Iraq. I will never surrender in Iraq." He looked like he was ready blow his top. I'm not expecting a melt down, but Obama can goad im into a nasty moment. I won't take much.
Posted by: Saint Zak on September 24, 2008 at 1:50 PM | PERMALINK
Is "ladies and gentlemen" Biden's version of "my friends"?
Posted by: jibeaux on September 24, 2008 at 1:50 PM | PERMALINK
I see your point PA, but actually having the Dems build up Palin is kind of clever. It will make her inevitable crash and burn that much more dramatic. It also reverses the whole sexism issue. "Why don't they let this intelligent woman speak?"
And that 1980 ad was so bad, there's no point in defending it. It sucked, move on.
Posted by: g. powell on September 24, 2008 at 1:55 PM | PERMALINK
Gentle truth when the opposition is screaming out degrading lies.
There is so much to work with on McCain...he's so wrong...so many mistakes of judgment, so many lies, and he's basically shallow...staff must tell him what to say. (Look how he described "fundamentals"...he didn't think that one up himself). Now reading his speeches and his age is showing his weariness. The man is a mockery of himself and Palin is cramming for the VP position trying desperately to prove it's not over her head.
Biden's main problem is ...where to begin shoveling through this avalanche of McCain bullshit. He should always tell Obama's plan and show his vision and stop showing "respect" toward this pathetic McCain ticket. This is not the McCain Biden once knew and it IS McCain's character that is offensive, dishonest and deceitful. It's not that McCain just doesn't get it or that he is wrong on the issues, he IS dishonorable, he IS a liar, he lacks integrity, he IS every lobbyist's "pet senator on a leash", he is exposed and detrimental to our country. He doesn't deserve respect and will destroy our democracy. This McCain is lame.
Posted by: bjobotts on September 24, 2008 at 1:59 PM | PERMALINK
he IS dishonorable, he IS a liar, he lacks integrity
We knew that from his collaboration with the N. Vietnamese when he was a POW (you DID know he was a POW don't you...he NEVER mentions this). We also knew it shortly after his return from collaborating with the NVC when he dumped his broken wife for a younger, richer model.
The rest follows from these two items.
Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 24, 2008 at 2:04 PM | PERMALINK
My wife who is very liberal and not particularly interested in the day to day of the campaigns, observed last night that at some level it must be hard for Biden to realize that he is not the one running the show. I think Barack might have sensed this as well, and put his running mate on notice this week (re AIG and bailout). Made me respect Barack all that much more.
Frankly, I am relieved that Obama is much tougher than I initially gave him credit for. The Chicagomachine meme is a tacit admission by the McCain campaign that they've underestimated this guy. I don't think it will hurt Obama nearly as much as the vacuous celebrity meme.
I like Biden, always have, you take the good with the bad.
As for that 1980s ad, I agree it sucked, but maybe this 40 something was not the intended target audience.
Posted by: Scott F. on September 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM | PERMALINK
What is the difference between Joe Biden and a pit bull?
Literally.
Posted by: The Answer Is Green on September 24, 2008 at 2:13 PM | PERMALINK
Sorry to nitpick, but it's not quite fair to say that McCain "said he would not meet with the leader of Spain." He just refused to commit to doing so, responding again and again with boilerplate about how he'd meet with leaders who shared our goals and not with those who didn't. And it was painfully clear that he was doing that because he didn't know who Zapatero was, even after repeated prompting by the interpreter. Afterwards, instead of admitting that he made a mistake he insisted that he knew what the interviewer meant, which would have meant that he dissed an ally.
Posted by: T-Rex on September 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK
T-Rex...and that "defense" means it is OK or not as bad as the alternative?
No matter how you slice it, it is a horrible mistake and a sign of incompetence, dementia, melanoma in the brain, petite strokes, or whatever else you wish to list.
Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 24, 2008 at 2:18 PM | PERMALINK
On the whole McCain on Spain thing:
Has anyone pointed out that McCain's answer is even more pathetic -- no matter the reasons for it -- due to the Madrid bombings?
I know those didn't get as much play as those in London, but they were real, killed lots of people, and showed that many nations face lots of terrorist-like threats, both from inside and out.
Given McCain's bellicosity when it comes to things like this, one would think he'd saddle right up to Spain to fight the common fight. Yet he didn't.
Does anyone else think this an important point? If so, why hasn't it been mentioned.
And if not, just ignore all this and move along. :-)
Posted by: Mark D on September 24, 2008 at 2:24 PM | PERMALINK
Mark D, McInsane's instinctual response to the Madrid Bombings is to start aerial bombardment of Spain. Why? Because those people, instead of getting mad and attacking...Brazil...they instead opted go the other way and NOT attack anybody! Can you imagine? They didn't even respond by starting a draft and sending ALL their young to Iraq to waterboard and shoot up Iraqis. That pisses him off no end.
If they wont bomb someone, then by golly, HE will bomb THEM.
Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 24, 2008 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK
jibeaux asks, Is "ladies and gentlemen" Biden's version of "my friends"?
Yes, it is. Literally.
Posted by: gradysu on September 24, 2008 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK
What I like about Biden is that I think he has the knowledge and intelligence to really help with government. As for building up Palin or McCain, well, it's called managing expectations. No one expects Palin to do better than Biden in a debate. No one expected Bush to be better than Gore in a debate. But by setting the bar so low, Bush effectively won the debates by not sitting there drooling the whole time.
Posted by: Diogenes on September 24, 2008 at 4:18 PM | PERMALINK