October 6, 2008
THE COMPANY THAT HE KEEPS.... Here's John McCain's latest line of attack: "Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever befriended an unrepentant terrorist, or had a convicted felon help them buy their house." Substantively, this is ridiculous, of course, but everyone, everywhere, knew this was coming.
We can, however, take this a step further.
Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever befriended a convicted felon who advised his supporters on how best to shoot federal officials in the head. John McCain has.
Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever used the money of a convicted criminal to help them buy their house. John McCain has.
Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever befriended a radical televangelist who has lashed out at the Roman Catholic Church, calling it, among other things, "the great whore" and "a false cult system." John McCain has.
Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever sought economic advice from a far-right former lawmaker who "has diminished American solvency and power beyond the wildest dreams of anti-American terrorists." John McCain has.
Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever befriended a radical televangelist who blamed the attacks of Sept. 11 on Americans. John McCain has.
My point isn't that the presidential campaign should be based on who the candidates have met; my point is that we could probably play this foolish game all day long. And on balance, McCain's ties to a pretty motley crew are far more direct and meaningful than Obama's. So maybe we can just skip it and debate substance for the next month?
Rezko? Keating. Ayers? Liddy. Wright? Hagee. Hell, we've barely started to talk about some of the high-priced lobbyists on McCain's campaign staff and their controversial client lists. This is what McCain and his cronies want to spend the last 29 days of the campaign debating, because to them, anything beats talking about the economy. How very sad.
The Republican strategy of making the rest of the campaign about Bill Ayers and Tony Rezko is very tiresome, painfully unnecessary, and as Ezra explained last night, probably self-defeating.
[McCain's latest] assault probably will fail, and it probably will be defeated. Because the Obama campaign has figured out something pretty basic about it: Though the attacks work to touch something very deep and very real and a little bit scary in the American psyche, they're fundamentally pretty stupid. Stupider, I'd guess, than the voters, who may find a campaign based on reference to aging radicals and Columbia professors and crimes from the 1960s a bit esoteric amidst a financial crisis.
My hunch is John McCain is going to come to regret this campaign very much indeed.
—Steve Benen 9:00 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (31)
How about regretting getting a loan from a convicted felon to prop up his first campaign (Cindy McAce's dad)
Posted by: stevio on October 6, 2008 at 9:14 AM | PERMALINK
Let's not forget about the former Republican White House aide who led an effort to provide taxpayer money to Central American death squads. He was convicted of trying to cover up the scandal, but his conviction was overturned when his confession was thrown out on the kind of legal technicalities that Republicans scream about when they are used by poor people and people with dark skin.
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/chap_02.htm
Posted by: SteveT on October 6, 2008 at 9:14 AM | PERMALINK
I can't wait until McCain says, "At least I'm not related to Dick Cheney."
Posted by: Danp on October 6, 2008 at 9:14 AM | PERMALINK
As noted, Bill Ayers got his splendid legal representation and his professorship because of who his father was--the same way that John McCain got his place at Annapolis, his place at Pensacola and his Captain's stripes.
By all means, let's go into this as deeply as possible.
Posted by: Steve Paradis on October 6, 2008 at 9:18 AM | PERMALINK
If the media try to claim that the Keating scandal is irrelevant because it's "ancient history", as Tom Brokow agreed with yesterday, it should be pointed out that if Obama was McCain's age, Ayers and Rezko would be ancient history also. Puts the emphasis on the ancient in ancient history.
Posted by: smiley on October 6, 2008 at 9:27 AM | PERMALINK
It's sadly ironic that McCain's campaign has employed a take no prisoners strategy! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on October 6, 2008 at 9:27 AM | PERMALINK
Boy I wish I had your optimism...but must go back to my favorite bumper sticker...IT'S THE STUPID, STUPID! And, there are a body of folk out there who will be easily enticed by the innuendo put out there about all the Obama connections ...hopefully they are only the "base" (what a perfect word) and have already made up their minds...still it's the "BUT HE'S BLACK" insinuations that are most disturbing because of what it says about this country still...
Posted by: Dancer on October 6, 2008 at 9:28 AM | PERMALINK
What about that Alaska separatist party? Wasn't Mr. Palin a member and didn't Sarah hang out with them? They want to secede from the US.
Posted by: Ron Byers on October 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK
Unfortunately, all the "he did it too" ripostes that Obama could make will be lost in the cloud of accusations. They are known only to political junkies with good memories. Everyone is saying that McCain's character assassinations were totally predictable: but what is the effective response? After all, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry got killed by such tactics. Drew Westin has suggested some good ways of dealing with these attacks. I sure hope Obama takes his advice, because these are terrorist measures just as dangerous as any suicide bomber's.
Posted by: keith on October 6, 2008 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK
My hunch is John McCain is going to come to regret this campaign very much indeed.
Agreed.
He is politically dead going forward. You do not slander one of the most popular Americans to come along in decades and his social movement and live to prosper.
Looks like Air Caribou is jumping face first into the muck too. Goody. I wanted her to politically hang herself. She is obliging.
Posted by: koreyel on October 6, 2008 at 9:33 AM | PERMALINK
"Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry got killed by such tactics."
Precisely.
It ends here.
No more taking it without giving back in spades.
Maybe nobody will hire the Rovettes during the next election cycle.
Posted by: Ron Byers on October 6, 2008 at 9:35 AM | PERMALINK
Town hall debate format. Perfect setting for Obama to directly contront McCain on his slimeball tactics. Have you noticed how McCain always responds when dirstly confronted on his dishonest campaign and negative tactics? Alwys the same: Darting eyes, sickly grin, uncomfortable shifting. All Obama needs to do is confront him in person in a reasonable, measured fashion and the picture presented won't be pretty.
Posted by: Saint Zak on October 6, 2008 at 9:36 AM | PERMALINK
Is this really all they have? Don't underestimate the McCain tenacity though, even now he has an army of investigators out there putting the magnifying glass to every moment of Obama's life. By next week I predict that McCain will begin the true focus of his smear campaign when he reveals that "Obama Consorted with Black People."
Posted by: Capt Kirk on October 6, 2008 at 9:39 AM | PERMALINK
Town hall debate format. Perfect setting for Obama Saint Zak
Expect McCain to come out with statistical lies tomorrow. They're hard to debate without being vague.
Posted by: Danp on October 6, 2008 at 9:43 AM | PERMALINK
There is a pattern here. Whatever issue could embarass John McCain, he turns around and throws it at Obama. The MSM does their job by picking up the lies, repeating them, thereby making it a truth. Anyone who has no access to information outside of MSM only gets the lie. The issue is neutralized because McCain said it first. Obama, this will only get worse. These folks know there is a lot of money up for grabs and they will not give up.
Posted by: SteveA on October 6, 2008 at 9:45 AM | PERMALINK
Ezra: My hunch is John McCain is going to come to regret this campaign very much indeed.
And this time, his inevitable apology after the fact won't be enough to save his reputation.
The GOP has never loved him, and after this year, he'll have the stench of a loser about him.
Any Dems who once respected him will have changed their minds after his Rovian campaign.
The media - his onetime 'base' - has already jumped ship, aside from a few remaining holdouts like Michael Dobbs.
He'll be a pariah in this town. It wouldn't surprise me if he doesn't run for another Senate term in 2010.
Posted by: low-tech cyclist on October 6, 2008 at 9:46 AM | PERMALINK
Ya know McCain and Palin must be very careful on this "palling around with a terrorist" bit (her reference to Bill Ayers). It would be very easy for someone to say that McCain was very chummy with Communists for over 5 years...ridiculous statement, but perhaps no more so than the crap that the Repliars have started to dish out.
Posted by: RogerNoVa on October 6, 2008 at 9:50 AM | PERMALINK
The conclusion to be drawn isn't that Obama is slandered or honest, but that both are corrupt.
One hand washes the other in Washington. Look at illegal immigration. It is a national shame that for PC libs any discussion must be prefaced with 'what part of illegal don't you understand.' Having gotten that out of the way for a lib column, there is no action on illegal migration because BOTH parties are corrupt. There is no action on contractor corruption in Iraq, dollarwise the greatest scandal in the history of mankind, because BOTH parties are corrupt. There will be no action on the causes for the $800,000,000,000 bailout because BOTH parties are corrupt. We need more partisanship in Washington, not sham pillow fights.
Posted by: Luther on October 6, 2008 at 9:59 AM | PERMALINK
I lived through the Sixties. Attended Berkeley, got my head busted in street actions, and went to Vietnam anyway. I could give a fuck less about the Sixties despite.
I want to know what a presidential candidate has planned for now: 2008 and beyond. Seems to me that McCain and Miss Snowmobile don't have a strategy to deal with our problems.
Run against yesterday, Republicans, and we'll take today.
Posted by: Dennis - SGMM on October 6, 2008 at 9:59 AM | PERMALINK
One of my close friends (now in his late 60s) was a young man in the Bolivian air force in 1964, and he took part in the military coup against the democratically-elected government at the time. Later on he moved to the US and went to engineering school. Today, 45 years later, he is a different person and a fine human being.
I also have a friend who used to be in the Hells Angels in the 60s. He's a totally changed person as well. I have other friends with even more unsavory pasts. I'm sure we all do.
Guilt-by-association, whether directed at Obama or McCain or anyone else, is something I've always had a major problem with. We can't do background checks on every person who comes into our lives.
Posted by: Birdman on October 6, 2008 at 10:03 AM | PERMALINK
It's sadly ironic that McCain's campaign has employed a take no prisoners strategy!
Posted by: kevo
I prefer to embrace the irony of the situation, in that McCain continues to hand Obama the multitude of weapons with which the Republikanner Beast may be slayed. Now as for Bullwinkle Barbie, I'm curious as to whether wolves, moose, and other members of Alaska's fauna community can be taught to competently load, aim, and fire an antiaircraft gun at low-flying hunters.
Posted by: Steve on October 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM | PERMALINK
There's one thing I think is important to keep in mind. Sure, these types of smears helped sink Gore and Kerry - but remember, they BARELY lost (Gore actually won). They were smeared to high hell, and Bush was only able to eke out the slimmest of victories.
Now I don't know about you, but I'm guessing Obama is about a million times more appealling a candidate than either Gore or Kerry were. Also, he seems to be very adept at this whole campaigning thing.
so let's not worry too much about this stupidity. It'll convince those who are already convinced, and not a person more. Or to put it another way - it's October and they're still rallying the base. I like Obama's chances...I likes 'em a lot!
Posted by: neilt on October 6, 2008 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK
this is ridiculous, of course, but everyone, everywhere, knew this was coming.
Then I hope the Obama campaign is ready for this. I hope they have the gun loaded to fire back because you ain't seen nothing yet. McCain has betrayed all his principles at this stage, he won't hesitate to go after Obama in the most disgusting, dishonest ways possible.
Shall we compare the number of associates of the two candidates who have served jail time?
Posted by: ckelly on October 6, 2008 at 10:22 AM | PERMALINK
My hunch is John McCain is going to come to regret this campaign very much indeed.
McCain can go fuck himself. I hope his career implodes in a spectacular fireball after this. I hope people spit with contempt when speaking his name. He richly deserves it.
Posted by: ckelly on October 6, 2008 at 10:32 AM | PERMALINK
and meanwhile....every day sees the diminishment of the balance in my kids' college funds that my husband and I have worked so hard and have sacrificed so much to accumulate. Do these jokers really think I'm in the mood to listen to them sling mud? I don't care about what happened twenty or forty years ago--I care about what's going to happen to my kids.
Posted by: frances on October 6, 2008 at 10:36 AM | PERMALINK
Americans need to ask themselves if they've ever chosen a running mate for the office of Vice President of the United States who, along with her husband, has been affiliated with a political party that advocated SECEDING from the United States.
Posted by: Tom in Houston on October 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM | PERMALINK
This is all fodder for the dittohead base. It isn't aimed at "independent" or "undecided" voters. It is aimed at getting the weak-minded, ignorant mental slaves of Rush Limbaugh to the polls on election day. Because that's all the Palin-McCain campaign has left.
Posted by: SecularAnimist on October 6, 2008 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK
Everyone is saying that McCain's character assassinations were totally predictable: but what is the effective response?
"Why are you afraid to talk about the economy, Mr. McCain?"
Posted by: Mnemosyne on October 6, 2008 at 11:18 AM | PERMALINK
My hunch is John McCain is going to come to regret this campaign very much indeed.
I dunno-- I'm worried. These tactics have worked before; combine fear wtih election manipulation, and we're looking at four more years of this nightmare.
Posted by: True on October 6, 2008 at 11:35 AM | PERMALINK
"Americans need to ask themselves if they've ...had a convicted felon help buy their house."
McCain is blind to irony, or is relying on the expectation that the press is. He himself has had a convicted felon help buy his houses - not just one, but all of them. His father-in-law, Jim Hensley, was a convicted felon, and not only after McCain became involved with him. It was Hensley's money that bought the houses McCain lives in, along with everything else that makes McCain's career & style of living possible.
At least Obama didn't marry Rezko's daughter and heir.
Posted by: K on October 6, 2008 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
John McCain is utterly without honor or integrity & devoid of common decency. Sarah Palin is an unprincipled whore who will say & do ANYTHING to win, and who apparently has no problem using thinly veiled racist attacks against Mr. Obama despite her purported evangelical "Christianity". Christian, my ass. Narrow-minded, incurious bigot is more like it.
When is someone who is well-regarded in the media going to take to the airwaves and say that out loud? Who is going to call the McCain/Palin campaign on the carpet and say, "Shame on you!"? Anyone? Anyone?
I am utterly digusted.
Posted by: Kirsten on October 6, 2008 at 11:54 PM | PERMALINK