Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

October 17, 2008

ROBOCALLS CONTINUE.... Following up on yesterday's item, Greg Sargent reported on the fourth in a series of robocall smears launched by the McCain/Palin campaign, this time attacking Obama for opposing "a bill requiring doctors to care for babies born alive after surviving attempted abortions." As Greg rightly emphasized, "These aren't the work of any fringe groups. Every one of these is paid for by the McCain campaign and the RNC. It looks like there's a huge wave of them blanketing the country."

Because robocalls are illegal in Minnesota, Republicans there are reportedly hiring actual people to make live calls, reading the smears from a script. (Ben Smith noted, "The upside of these calls is that they're cheap and direct. The downside is that they're annoying and get bad press.")

As for the big picture, Time's Joe Klein is right to emphasize the irony of McCain trying to win by relying on the same kind of robocall smears that ended his first presidential bid.

Back in 2000, in South Carolina, the robocalls -- and calls to local right-wing talk radio shows -- were about John McCain's "interracial child" and Cindy McCain's drug addiction. They were a craven, disgusting tactic by the George W. Bush campaign. McCain was, rightly, outraged by them.

Now McCain's campaign is making robocalls distorting Barack Obama's non-existent relationship with Bill Ayers....

Certainly, such calls are not the sort of activity normally attributed to "a man whose courage has never been questioned," as McCain described himself last week. Real men don't hide behind robocalls. It is nowhere near honorable.

And that's really the key takeaway here -- making ugly attacks, below the radar, with automated calls is fundamentally gutless. After watching the campaign unfold over the last several months, many of us have come to expect dishonesty and dishonor from McCain, but this is the most meaningful example of cowardice we've seen this year.

Worse, McCain knows this. He hated this kind of campaigning when it was used against him eight years ago.

A win-at-all-costs attitude does strange things to a person's judgment.

Steve Benen 10:20 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (19)
 
Comments

What's ironic about McCain using smears - no one knows better than he does how well they work. Being honorable and honest is a strategy that he knows doesn't work - at least for Republicans.

Posted by: skeptonomist on October 17, 2008 at 10:35 AM | PERMALINK

just to play armchair psychologist for a moment: the issue with mccain is not the win-at-all-costs mentality.

the issue is that he has internalized the notion of honor without the values of honor. he is sure that he is honorable, and that, by definition, means that anything he does is honorable.


Posted by: howard on October 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM | PERMALINK

Being honorable and honest is great...if you have something legitimate to offer the people. McCain doesn't, Obama does. That's why Obama is winning and McCain is smearing.

Here's a new name for McCain: Roboflop

;-)

Posted by: independent thinker on October 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM | PERMALINK

We learned all we needed to know about McCain's "honor" when he hugged Bush after Bush beat him in North Carolina with the "black baby" smear tacitcs. We had our knowledge confirmed when McC hired the guy responsible for the smear campaign.

Posted by: Greg Worley on October 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM | PERMALINK

Hello! Alert! Surrogates MIA as usual. Someone needs to stand up right now and accuse McCain of having no honor - to go back on his word " I don't care about some washed up terrorist" Hit back fast and hard *before* it becomes 2000 redux

Posted by: John R on October 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM | PERMALINK

The other angle on the robocalls is that McCain has not bothered to put together a field operation of any size, so he needs something to counter the massive Obama mobilization now going on. The quick and dirty way to do this is to set up a massive robocall operation. I suspect it will not be very effective.

Posted by: jimBOB on October 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM | PERMALINK

Details about this bill Obama supposedly backed are sketchy.

Does John "Deficit Hawk" McCain say who pays for the medical care this abortion survivor gets? I imagine if an abortion was attempted, some measures must be truly amazing, Herculean, and EXPENSIVE.

Does teh hospital eat the cost? The taxpayer? The mother who couldn't afford it to begin with?

Once again, the right doesn't seem to think much about babies outside the womb.

Not saying he's wrong, and Obama is right. Just asking whether "Ace" has even thought about the subject more than two minutes.

Posted by: toowearyforoutrage on October 17, 2008 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK

McCain is making these robocalls because he was the victim of a robocall attack in 2000. Not despite of it. Since it was done to him, he feels justified in doing it to someone else. It's only fair, right?

He'd probably torture Obama in a Vietnamese prison if he could.

Posted by: MillionthMonkey on October 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM | PERMALINK


I still fail to see how these things are at all effective.

Even if you grant that they were the reason he lost the primary in 2000, those were targeting Republicans (who seem to really dig crazy conspiracy theories). This is supposed to convince undecideds??

I very much doubt it (even if people actually listen to the whole thing...which I very much doubt as well)

Posted by: neilt on October 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM | PERMALINK

I don't think McCain is relying on robocalls because he's a coward, or because of the 2000 campaign, or any of that. I think he's relying on robocalls because they're cheap. He is so spread out, forced to defend so many states that he should have expected would vote Republican, that he has to stretch his thin resources as far as they can go. Robocalls are cheap and easy to set up, so they're his best (and possibly only) option for playing defense.

Posted by: Remus Shepherd on October 17, 2008 at 11:47 AM | PERMALINK

Yeah, sure, and John McCain hated his Vietnamese captors too. Didn't stop him from collaborating with them though, did it?

One thing McCain has always demonstrated: he'll do whatever it take - WHATEVER IT TAKES - to get what John McCain wants.

I guess some people call that honor. I don't.

Posted by: gypsy howell on October 17, 2008 at 11:58 AM | PERMALINK

Or maybe, if you stopped buying into the 'look how mccain has changed' meme, he is using robocalls because he has used them before.

(http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh092508.shtml)

His judgement has NOT changed. It's the same old Mccain. Geez.

Posted by: bh on October 17, 2008 at 12:04 PM | PERMALINK

Where the hell is Bill Ayers anyway? Why doesn't he come forward and clarify the (non)relationship he has with Obama?

Posted by: Brandt on October 17, 2008 at 12:12 PM | PERMALINK

It may backfire on them. Nothing pisses me off more than automated calls (haven't received one, however, since the national Do Not Call list went into effect). I hang-up immediately.

Where the hell is Bill Ayers anyway? Why doesn't he come forward and clarify the (non)relationship he has with Obama? Posted by: Brandt

They do have a relationship - a professional one. Ayers has numerous professional relationships with conservatives as well because of organizations they work with.

I think a better question to answer, one David Letterman had the balls to ask, is why McCain takes campaign contributions from Gordon Liddy, a convicted felon who advocated murdering various government officials around the time of Watergate.

While Liddy "served his debt to society," he's still a hateful piece of human garbage who does nothing to benefit anyone but himself. Regardless of how you feel about what Ayers did 40 years ago, when Obama was a child, the same can't be said about him.

And when will the press ask about Palin's husband's political activities? And why do we not get to see all of McCain's medical records?

The list is nearly endless.

Posted by: Jeff II on October 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM | PERMALINK

Brandt,

"Where the hell is Bill Ayers anyway? Why doesn't he come forward and clarify the (non)relationship he has with Obama?"

If that's the thing that you're worrying about the most, then you are completely out of touch with what is going on in this country right now.

Of course, my guess is that you could actually give two shits about Bill Ayers, and instead are doing your little part to keep the smear alive for the McCain campaign, just like a good little soldier.

Posted by: OhNoNotAgain on October 17, 2008 at 12:43 PM | PERMALINK

I think a better question to answer, one David Letterman had the balls to ask, is why McCain takes campaign contributions from Gordon Liddy, a convicted felon who advocated murdering various government officials around the time of Watergate.

Not just Watergate -- he was one of the main people calling for the murder of ATF agents after Waco (which is where the infamous "they'll be wearing flak jackets, so aim for the head" comments came from).

But we can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Timothy McVeigh listened to Liddy's radio show, so that proves that Liddy is completely innocent and a victim himself, because no one could have expected that anyone would take his advice seriously. Or so the right wing tells me.

Posted by: Mnemosyne on October 17, 2008 at 1:03 PM | PERMALINK

The good news is that robocalls are only marginally effective, if that. They are so cheap that campaigns have overdone them outrageously. Here's a study from 2004. And that was then. When you've been called enough times, and most will be, you turn off.

Posted by: janinsanfran on October 17, 2008 at 1:06 PM | PERMALINK

At least stories about Cindy McCain's drug addiction (and stealing!) have the virtue of being true!

Posted by: Neil B on October 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM | PERMALINK

People I know have received robo calls from the Obama campaign attacking McCain vis-a-vis Gordon Liddy. So Obama is doing the same exact thing -- however no news outlet reports it because the press must keep Obama as chaste as driven snow.

And let's see who else reports this story:

Complaint hits Rezko land deal.

http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/18/whistleblower-hits-obama-friends-appraisal/

Posted by: Mary on October 18, 2008 at 8:27 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals