Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

October 21, 2008

PINATA POLITICS TURNS TO DRUG USE.... In desperation, and with the other attacks coming up short, Republicans have begun an effort to re-ignite interest in Barack Obama's teenaged drug use. I should know better, but this is surprisingly cheap, even for them.

This apparently started over the weekend, when the New York Times published an item about Cindy McCain, which noted, among other things, her bout with drug addiction and the criminal efforts she engaged in, using an international charity to create phony prescriptions in the names of her staff. McCain's lawyer lashed out, insisting that the Times should go after Michelle Obama and "Barack Obama's drug dealer."

Yesterday, McCain campaign surrogates pursued a similar line. Mike Huckabee, who usually prefers to stay out of the gutter, said Obama's drug use as a teenager is now relevant. Rudy Giuliani followed suit during an interview on Fox News.

"[Y]ou can't even raise these issues. And, you know, God forbid somebody would do some reporting on Barack Obama's use of drugs. I guess that was the point that Mrs. McCain's lawyer made."

This is a terribly odd line of attack. First, the New York Times already wrote a detailed, well-researched, front-page piece about Obama's teenaged drug use. I'm not sure what more the Republicans want the Times to do.

Second, Giuliani's decision to bring this up, unprompted, is especially interesting, given that Giuliani specifically said during his own campaign that the media shouldn't push this issue, and even praised Obama's honesty and candor on the issue. It's almost as if Giuliani decided to bring it up yesterday, for no reason, as part of some kind of coordinated smear campaign.

Third, for Republicans to draw some parallel between Obama's background and Cindy McCain's is a stretch. Obama was a teenager, experimenting with drugs as young people often do; McCain was an adult, misusing the resources of a non-profit organization, and using "her status as a charity director and senator's wife to cajole the drugs she wanted." There seems to be a qualitative difference between the two.

And finally, what is it, exactly, that the Republican attack dogs want the media to report about Obama's teenaged drug use? That it happened? That's already been widely reported. Indeed, Obama wrote about it in his book, and has talked about it on the campaign trail.

The reality is, the McCain campaign doesn't want to see more "reporting"; it wants to get in another 11th-hour smear. It's kind of sad to watch.

Steve Benen 8:00 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (26)
 
Comments

IOKIYAR Hello choir, is anyone listening? The base will wring their hands while the rest of us yawn

Posted by: John R on October 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM | PERMALINK

DON'T YOU PEOPLE GET IT??

Pill popping is just fine. Rush Limbaugh, Matthew Perry and even Brett Favre did that. All Cindy did was take a few Mothers Little Helpers. Cmon, who hasn't saved a few Vicodin and taken them with a glass of red wine long after the pain from your back surgery has subsided?

These people have less than nothing if they are trying to get this crap to stick. Let them raise this while Obama is visiting his sick grandmother. It will backfire like everything else.

Posted by: swarty on October 21, 2008 at 8:24 AM | PERMALINK

Can someone slip them the kindergarten paper scandal?

That'll get the "uppity" meme going again.

It'd be high comedy.

Posted by: williamjacobs on October 21, 2008 at 8:24 AM | PERMALINK

Certainly, IOKIYAR, but also, since when is the New York Times synonymous with the Obama campaign? They are separate entities, and NYT has already delved into controversial aspects of Obama, most recently with the Ayers investigative piece.

Furthermore, why are they so sensitive about this? The McCains have already talked about this publicly.

Posted by: Taritac on October 21, 2008 at 8:25 AM | PERMALINK

Sadly, the McCain campaign (this includes the coordinated smears by Huckabee and Giuliani) is betting that society is more tolerant of drug use by an affluent white upper-class woman than drug use by a teenaged black male. Among Republicans, this is probably true.

Posted by: coldhotel on October 21, 2008 at 8:26 AM | PERMALINK

My opinion is that "drug use" reads differently between the types of people who make up the Republican and Democratic parties. It's partly age, but mostly I see it as an extension of the mindset in Republicans that demands conformity and never questions authority. In my teens I waited longer than probably 90% of my peers to try pot. But eventually by their example I began to suspect that the "Reefer Madness" line of the government was a lie. So I tested the lie and found it mostly a lie. I discovered that in reality, most "drug users" are not addicts and they are not criminals, and that many, perhaps the majority, simply pass through drug use as a phase of early adulthood.

It would be a true milestone if we had a president who could simply speak the truth about both him or herself, but about the nation. George W. Bush was careful to never deny cocaine use, but to state that he was young and irresponsible. John McCain cannot accept the truth that his wife has no more excuse for her drug use than anyone currently serving time for drug possession.

Posted by: Capt Kirk on October 21, 2008 at 8:26 AM | PERMALINK

Actually, I think the McCain campaign is fighting an heroic last ditch battle for the state and local tickets. It's an extreme "They Were Expendable" effort to save what little can be saved from the impending debacle.

Rather than go down in the statesmanlike manner for which he would like to be remembered, McCain is descending deeper into squalor to save the Bachmans of the party by appealing to the fever swamp that makes up the deep core. No rational person believes or minds the ridiculous charges being made by the McCain campaign. But the mouthbreathers who see Muslim symbolism in the Obama emblem--hell, in the flag of Ohio--need to be turned out.

Posted by: Steve Paradis on October 21, 2008 at 8:31 AM | PERMALINK

I take a very Libertarian approach to the subject. I think drug laws probably ruin more lives than the drugs themselves.

Posted by: Haik Bedrosian on October 21, 2008 at 8:32 AM | PERMALINK

Hmmm... In reality, more white kids use drugs than black kids. So let's push the stereotype that Obama is just a "typical" black drug user... you know, the bad kind of drug user, not the white kid who's "just experimenting," or the privileged white adult who needs help "coping" with their "complicated life."

Posted by: Dave Munger on October 21, 2008 at 8:33 AM | PERMALINK

Cindy's drug use brings up the question if John McCain wrangled a diplomatic passport for her so that she could transport her drugs unchecked. This isn't a peripheral issue for McCain.

Posted by: duBois on October 21, 2008 at 8:41 AM | PERMALINK

Breaking laws as an adult, is a bigger deal than breaking laws as a minor.


Posted by: dr2chase on October 21, 2008 at 8:47 AM | PERMALINK

I'm glad Obama has the maturity and restraint not to do it, but the Democrats could go medeival on the republicans with negative ads. There is just SO much material available.

That said, the Obama campaign should air all the available footage to expose the hypocrisy of their statements on this "issue."

Posted by: bdop4 on October 21, 2008 at 8:50 AM | PERMALINK

"[Y]ou can't even raise these issues" Rudy

Funny how adept the GOP is at raising these issues.

The real quote should have been: "We can't even raise these issues without injecting a universe of hypocrisy into the issues."

May the next self appointed member of the GOP's they-shoot-themselves-in-the-ass-firing-squad please stand up.

Posted by: lou on October 21, 2008 at 8:54 AM | PERMALINK

This attack is just a tit-for-tat. The Rovian rule book requires that repubs look surprised and hurt by any reporting that isn't a glowing affirmation of their righteous superiority. That, plus, rule number 1 (win the news cycle at all costs).

I'm just waiting for the inevitable Wright attacks. If the DNC doesn't all ready have a well cut commercial with plenty of footage of McCain standing next to Hagee and Sarah addressing the AIP, they need to cut one now. Repubs can go suck on that.

Posted by: Jim on October 21, 2008 at 9:11 AM | PERMALINK

IMO the NYT is at fault here anyway. I don't give a silent fart about Cindy M's drug use. I already knew as much about it as I ever wanted--the bare minimum--and I strenuously object to this kind of b.s. "reporting," which just further debases our whole political culture. It pisses me off when they do it to the Clintons and it doesn't piss me off any less just here because the target is a politician I'm opposed to. If this was news, it might just pass the smell test, not because of her drug use itself but solely because of the other aspects involved. But they're not bringing anything new to light and as it stands it constitutes an attack on the candidate's wife, which is despicable whatever you think of him or her. Utterly gratuitous sludge. The NYT should just STFU when it comes to this crap.

Posted by: DrBB on October 21, 2008 at 9:15 AM | PERMALINK

There seems to be a qualitative difference between the two.

How sweet. As if TV infotainment had any grasp of qualitative difference.

Posted by: Lucy on October 21, 2008 at 9:16 AM | PERMALINK

All my life we haven't even been allowed to talk about legalization of MJ. This has been an effective tactic by the 'squares' to keep MJ illegal.

If they now want to break that silence in some moronic last minute bid, I say bring it on. Lets have that discussion. Lets shine the spotlight on the idiots who keep up with the "think of the children" bullshit. Lets primary the Dems who feed at the prison-industrial complex trough.

Maybe McKranky will piss Obama off so bad that the first thing he will do is grant blanket immunity for all MJ convictions just to poke a finger in the eye of all the 'squares'.

Will all the assholes who can't get past 1968 please do the world a favor and croak already?

Enough of this crap.

Posted by: SnarkyShark on October 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM | PERMALINK

That article on Cindy McCain was as inappropriate as the one on the Clintons' marriage earlier this year.

Seriously, as a voter am I supposed to care that the doyennes of Washington froze her out socially because they liked John's first wife better?

Is that going to make health insurance more affordable for me? Or fight this recession?

This downward spiral started with the wildly inappropriate way everyone covered the Clintons, and it's just gone downhill from there. This right-wing celebrity culture coverage has infected all political news. And we'll all pay for it.

Posted by: anonymiss on October 21, 2008 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK

Mike Huckabee usually stays out of the gutter?!?!?!? What planet are you on? Holy crap, don't fall for the false humility, Huckabee will pull the gutter card at a moments notice.

Posted by: MeLoseBrain? on October 21, 2008 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK

"The NYT should just STFU when it comes to this crap." -DRBB

I agree that this kind of stuff should be off limits to an extent. However, I'll make two points in defense of NYT.

1) Cindy has begun injecting herself into her husbands campaign in a way that makes this kind of criticism pertinent. You don't start addressing crowds with "I've always been proud of America" and "as a mother, Senator Obama's Iraq vote sent shivers down my spine", and expect nobody to critique you.

2) It seems the press in general is beginning to explore the "meet the possible First Lady" meme.

Posted by: Jim on October 21, 2008 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK

How quickly the republicans forget their own former drug using, alcoholic president. Maybe he could weigh in on that issue? Ahhhh, selective memory.

Posted by: Random Canadian on October 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM | PERMALINK

Capt Kirk made an opinion is that "drug use" reads differently between the types of people who make up the Republican and Democratic parties. And…I discovered that in reality, most "drug users" are not addicts and they are not criminals, and that many, perhaps the majority, simply pass through drug use as a phase of early adulthood.”

Capt Kirk's comment swung open a field of thinking I could relate to. In my early days in college, it was consumed with drugs and alcohol. For those who deny that, and claim they were completely free of it is the few that fall victim to the “Liars Paradox” were likely much of the debate leads into a contradiction. Like the Palin effect. It is so Oh, oh clear for professionals today, that many have been enjoying extreme use like Limbaugh and his opium pills for who knows how long. Limbaugh, Hannity, Dick Morris, Joe Scarborough, Mathews, Willie Geist fall into the “Lairs Paradox” in wide open cowboy flavor. They all have a common way most of time with Limbaugh, Hannity, and Morris, these Journalists have that sneer sneakily, snotty, bias in tone with deliberate direction. Don't forget the pimp master David Shuster.

Especially MSNBC group that get together at the end of a program to let everyone know what they have learned. Here is a cluster of Journalistic sophist in major contradiction, then have the nerve to belt out comments in “News that you don’t need.” Sheesh. My God, two whole mediums MSNBC and CNBC money channel. Yikes, here, all supplemented with back stage drama and privy connections through Andrea Mitchell wife of former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Allen Greenspan, king pin of America’s economic melt down, the doctor of the Jekyll Island banking system that has been bilking the American tax payer for about century.

Then in a soft spoken way Andrea Mitchell leads the political stress for deliberate confusion side tracking and avoiding absolutely everything she knows as insider knowledge. Likely knowing this economic activity was looming and better likely in on the planning for Bush's exposure to the public. The whole thing stinks of first degree contradiction, threaded through Constitutional sedition, Arab connections to Bush and Company with trillion dollar laundering though out the banking system, secret prisons torture and mercenary corruption beyond anything anytime in American history. Grampa Prescott Bush would be proud.

Now that Huckabee has his own time slot on FOX News is the paramount of the “Liars Paradox” with Liberal rock song guitar serenades to under score Conservative ideals. We all are waiting for Laura Bush and Sarah Palin in push up bras and leggy action to host “The View “...


Posted by: Megalomania on October 21, 2008 at 9:34 AM | PERMALINK

There seems to be a qualitative difference between the two.

Not to the GOP. Their lifeblood is drawing false equivalences and it is the Media's job to report on both and treat them as equal because the Media is fair and balanced [/eyeroll]

Posted by: ckelly on October 21, 2008 at 10:27 AM | PERMALINK

When GWB first ran for prez, information came out that he used cocaine extensively while he was in collage. The story was quashed when Bush said "what happened is in the past and I won't talk about it". And the conservative talking heads followed suit only adding "But Clinton didn't inhale".

Posted by: wbn on October 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM | PERMALINK

I'll make time to be sad about this two years into Obama's second term.

Posted by: SteveB on October 21, 2008 at 8:35 PM | PERMALINK

Megalomania, you are quite well spoken. And somewhere tonight, Rush Limbaugh is retiring after a tough day of blathering to his private place, his favorite chair where he can relax with his ritual shot of Oxy. He'll be ready for another tough day tomorrow, to be sure...

"Junkies are often surprisingly enterprising individuals." –William S. Burroughs

Posted by: Capt Kirk on October 21, 2008 at 10:40 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals