 |
 |
Dan Savage, the brilliant and foul-mouthed sex columnist, has become one of the most important ethicists in America. Are we screwed?
By Benjamin J. Dueholm
The federal government is supposed to issue new rules about debt levels for students in for-profit colleges. In the meantime, the states are working on their own regulations.
By Daniel Luzer
Washingtons budget hawks want to decimate the federal workforce to shrink the deficit. It will have the opposite effect.
By John Gravois
There arent nearly enough counterterrorism experts to instruct all of Americas police. So we got these guys instead.
By Meg Stalcup and Joshua Craze
|
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2008
by hilzoy
Stevens Again
Steve already noted that Ted Stevens was convicted on seven felony counts today. This is a very good thing, for (at least) two reasons. First, Senators who are corrupt ought to know that there is a non-negligible possibility that they will be convicted of felonies and sent to prison. Second, the Republicans might lose another Senate seat because of this, a fate they might well have avoided had they either induced Stevens not to run for re-election or fielded a successful primary challenger against him. I suspect politicians, like most people, will generally be unwilling to turn on one of their own in this way absent some compelling reason to do so. Knowing that they risk losing a Senate seat needlessly might help to concentrate their minds and firm up their resolve. (And yes, I do think this about politicians of both parties.)
Besides that, though, Stevens really is outrageous on the subject of earmarks. And while I don't think that earmarks are always and everywhere bad, Stevens seems to have gone way, way over the line in extracting them from Congress. Moreover, he is, by all accounts, a bully. Here's an excerpt from a profile of him from TNR, which I can't find online any more, but excerpted a little over a year ago:
""I'm a mean, miserable S.O.B.," he once proudly told his colleagues. And yet, he rose to awesome heights of influence in the Senate, controlling billions of dollars in public money. (...) How was Ted Stevens able to turn the fear and loathing he engendered in others into a political asset? (...)
Perhaps more than any other senator, Stevens obsesses over which of his colleagues are friends and which are enemies. "People who vote against this today are voting against me," he declared after one contentious vote on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (anwr). "And I'll never forget it." After another Senate debate, Stevens announced that he had "written off" several friends in the Senate who had allegedly betrayed him. "I'm not traveling with them anymore, and I'm not going to play tennis or swim or do various things with them," he seethed. Even something as simple as an October 2005 dispute about amending a spending bill led Stevens to liken relations with his old friend, longtime Republican Senator John Warner of Virginia, to a cold warera meltdown: "Our friendship is close to the brink, very close to the brink," he warned.
Stevens doesn't just end friendships--he gets revenge. (Or, as he has put it, "I don't make threats--only promises.") In the past, he has campaigned against colleagues who have angered him, and, in March 2006, he openly admitted to pulling a bill that would aid the Puget Sound shipping industry to spite Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington, who had crossed him over anwr. As a result, no one wants to say no to The Hulk, lest they land atop his hit list."
Lovely.
—Hilzoy 10:18 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (20)
... or fielded a successful primary challenger against him.
There's only one Alaska Republican who wouldn't had the guts to try. And it certainly would've changed a lot of history if she had.
We both know who I'm talking about.
Posted by: Grumpy on October 27, 2008 at 10:28 PM | PERMALINK
... or fielded a successful primary challenger against him.
There's only one Alaska Republican who would've had the guts to try. And it certainly would've changed a lot of history if she had.
We both know who I'm talking about.
Posted by: Grumpy on October 27, 2008 at 10:28 PM | PERMALINK
Oh, Dear God.... Senator Sarah? Oh. Dear. God.
Posted by: Singularity on October 27, 2008 at 10:47 PM | PERMALINK
Now darn it all, Grumpy, how am I supposed to get any sleep tonight with the thought of a "Senator Palin" running through my brain?
Posted by: Steve W. on October 27, 2008 at 10:47 PM | PERMALINK
If Stevens wins despite the conviction, I suspect that Caribou Valley Girl will appoint herself to fill the seat. Purely for the good of the country, of course.
Country First, you betcha,
-Z
Posted by: Zorro on October 27, 2008 at 10:48 PM | PERMALINK
In the past, he has campaigned against colleagues who have angered him, and, in March 2006, he openly admitted to pulling a bill that would aid the Puget Sound shipping industry to spite Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington, who had crossed him over anwr. As a result, no one wants to say no to The Hulk, lest they land atop his hit list." —Hilzoy
If Cantwell never does another thing of note in the Senate (and she may well never), she is forever in the hearts of sensible Washingtonians for standing up to the surly mother . . .
And Hilzoy, you didn't finish the story, because she was able to override him on a tanker safety measure for Puget Sound.
Posted by: Jeff II on October 27, 2008 at 11:02 PM | PERMALINK
The TNR story, going as usual for human interest, appears to have neglected the fact that Sen. Stevens has been so influential in large part because power in the Senate (as also in the House) has shifted so dramatically away from the authorizing committees and toward the leadership of the two parties and the Appropriations Committee.
This was actually something John McCain, who has never sat on Senate Appropriations crusaded against before he became a Presidential candidate in 2000, and Stevens was one of the Senators he regularly fought with. Robert Byrd, who disrupted entire federal agencies in the course of mandating they move offices from the capital area to West Virginia, was another. Even if Stevens is on his way out, the concentration of legislative power in the Appropriations Committee will remain a significant element of the legislative processes' degradation.
Posted by: Zathras on October 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM | PERMALINK
Two years ago Stevens promised to stop in Seattle every week on his way to Alaska and campaign against Sen. Maria Cantwell. The Cantwell campaign made it clear it would be happy to run against "Uncle Ted". In any case, Ted never showed up. What an arrogant jerk, and a bit C-S to boot.
Posted by: J. Frank Parnell on October 27, 2008 at 11:48 PM | PERMALINK
If Stevens had followed through on that threat (oops! "promise"), he would have been laughed out of Seattle in the second week. Seattle is one of the bluest cities in the country. There is only so much of a republican audience to go around. Even the Eastside Republicans I know would find him tiresome.
Posted by: jcricket on October 27, 2008 at 11:55 PM | PERMALINK
The TNR piece, titled "The Jerk" is at http://www.tnr.com/columnists/story.html?id=8e289eb3-7807-4e89-9245-00f5af05f919
Posted by: Mayson Lancaster on October 28, 2008 at 12:00 AM | PERMALINK
Now that Stevens has been convicted, isn't it accurate to say that Palin has been palling around with a convicted felon? Was Ayers ever convicted of a crime or just charged? Did he serve time for his alleged crimes? I honestly don't know the answer. What is the difference between a convicted felon and a terrorist? Haven't they both harmed others with their crimes? Is a sitting Senator who has been convicted of a crime a black mark on the body in which he sits? G. Gordon Liddy, anyone?
peace,
st john
Posted by: st john on October 28, 2008 at 12:29 AM | PERMALINK
For Zorro at 10:48 --
Nope. Not without a special election, anyway. Alaskans changed the law to get rid of the appointment process after the last vacancy debacle.
See here: http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/12/al-sen_special.php
Posted by: NotMax on October 28, 2008 at 12:40 AM | PERMALINK
You know, you reap what you sow.
The internets have been down all day in this country, and Ted Stevens just got convicted.
Is this a coincidence? NO!
Without Ted Stevens to direct the Big Trucks, there are a Series of Clogs in Our Tubes! Free Ted Stevens, for the Inter-Tubes!
Posted by: MNPundit on October 28, 2008 at 12:43 AM | PERMALINK
Anybody remember Rep. Bill Janklow, SD, who resigned after running a stop sign and killing a 55 year old motorcyclist. The same SD governor who wanted lights and a siren so he could speed legally. The same governor who had apparently been pulled over many times and never charged yet still managed 12 prior speeding tickets and 3 accidents. He got 100 days! and then appealed both the conviction and the sentence!! And got his law license back!
When Minnesota Public Radio covered his manslaughter conviction with a phone in, you should have heard the stories about his bullying and absolute self-righteousness. What an ass. Probably on archive there. But he served 2 8-year terms as governor.
Bullying is part of the vote gathering process, but there are ways to go about it and ways not too. Threats and grudges are short term fixes.
Posted by: notthere on October 28, 2008 at 12:44 AM | PERMALINK
They sure do things differently up there in Alaska. (Is Alaska part of Real America?) But we should be grateful that some level of civility exists in the northern frontier - they could be doing this stuff by gunpoint.
Posted by: JoeW on October 28, 2008 at 5:05 AM | PERMALINK
st john @ 12:29,
Was Ayers ever convicted of a crime or just charged?
The charges against William Ayers were dropped because the government had engaged in illegal wiretapping. Another way of stating that is that he got off on a technicality. I don't think you want to go there.
Peace.
Posted by: Jassalasca Jape on October 28, 2008 at 5:13 AM | PERMALINK
There is a politician in Africa who is similar to "Turd" Stevens, his name in Robert Mugabe. Both have been in power for Decades, both have mean dispositions, both are corrupt, both are arrogant enough to expect their subjects to vote for them even after they have been disgraced and both waste public funds in corrupt deals.
Did I mention that both are well into their eighties? Surely they should be a mandatory retirement age for politicians...
If a person has not achieved all he or she set out to do by the time they are 65 years old, what leads us to believe they can achieve these things if they remain in power in the next 15 to 20 years?
Posted by: on October 28, 2008 at 6:13 AM | PERMALINK
The irony in all of this is that Alaska is little more than a GOP dacha for the Central Committee member, Comrade Stevens---a spoiled-beyond-all-redemption brat within America's own rendition of the Communist Party and its KGB, wielding its "socialism for me, but not for thee" criminality. There's so little difference between Stevens and his soul-sister, Putin, that you could fit that difference in an upended thimble, and not cover the bottom of it.
And Palin is a shadow of it all, waiting in the wings to fill the gap when the old weasel finally cashes in his chips. The solution to her is to conduct federal investigations into her ties with TransCanada regarding that gas pipeline to nowhere.
Oh---and that irony thing? It's all about the GOP's use of the word "socialist" when, in fact, it is the GOP that imitates the methodologies and tactics of the Soviet Union....
Posted by: Steve W. on October 28, 2008 at 6:25 AM | PERMALINK
So Palin can't appoint herself to the Senate. Fair enough. But she is, sadly enough, still fairly popular in Alaska; there's every chance that she could run in the special election.
Leaving the First Dude as new Governor?
-Z
Posted by: Zorro on October 28, 2008 at 11:47 AM | PERMALINK
I'd be surprised if Sarah Palin wants to take on even the minimal sacrifices involved in being a senator. She never really even moved from Wasilla to Juneau, and it's unlikely she would be willing to relocate as fully as necessary to DC. She has had maximum freedom, minimum accountability as governor and as vp candidate, and she does not seem to have the attention span or the discipline needed to collaborate (with Republican colleagues, much less with a Democratic majority).
Posted by: mmiddle on October 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM | PERMALINK
|
|
|