November 20, 2008
DEMS HURT MCCONNELL'S FEELINGS?.... I can appreciate the fact that the Senate operates with a certain degree of cordiality, but surely members realize that when the election season comes, party leaders on both sides want to increase the size of their caucuses.
With that in mind, I have no idea why Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) feelings are hurt.
[D]espite a previously solid working and personal relationship with his Democratic counterpart, McConnell chose to ignore both the election night call and a subsequent follow-up call from Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), whose party had dumped more than $6 million into Kentucky in an ultimately futile push to knock off the Republican leader.
In fact, according to Democrats and Republicans familiar with the situation, while McConnell and Obama spoke on the Thursday following the election, it took McConnell some nine days to ultimately respond to Reid's overtures.
Republicans warned that Reid should be prepared for a full-court press during his own 2010 re-election bid, and that the sudden deterioration in relations, no matter how short-lived, is a direct result of what they view as an overly aggressive Democratic effort to unseat McConnell.
"The Majority Leader made a tactical error that could potentially cost him his job when he signed off on $6 million of attack ads the last few weeks in Kentucky. McConnell never takes political attacks personally, but he is someone who has never hesitated to repay his opposition for their courtesy," a senior Republican official said, adding that identifying a high-quality opponent to challenge Reid will be a priority for the party in the coming months.
So, let me get this straight. The relationship between the two parties' Senate leaders is in "tatters" because the Republican leader thinks the Democratic leader supported an effort to win a competitive Senate race. The Big Bad Harry Reid was mean in trying to help his party gain another seat.
What, did McConnell think his leadership role left him immune? Funny, I don't remember him encouraging Republicans to scale back their efforts to take down Tom Daschle in 2004.
—Steve Benen 9:43 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (32)
The first attempt to pass the $700B bailout package was thwarted apparently because Nancy Pelosi hurt the feelings of some of the Republican Congressman who took offense to her telling the truth about deregulation. Now McConnell is pouting because he came close to losing his seat in the Senate. When will the Republicans elect some grown-ups?
Posted by: lamonte on November 20, 2008 at 10:13 AM | PERMALINK
Not only that, but Frist, then Senate Majority leader, actually went to South Dakota to campaign against Daschle. These guys have such short memories.
Posted by: Bruce on November 20, 2008 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK
I think some Republicans need some hugs from their mommies.
Posted by: low-tech cyclist on November 20, 2008 at 10:28 AM | PERMALINK
Piss on these guys. Who cares what they think?
Posted by: Chocolate Thunder on November 20, 2008 at 10:29 AM | PERMALINK
Wow, sounds just like dealing with my narcissistic mother. The only thing that works there is ignoring her until she's done whining. Giving her whatever it is she wants just makes her more insufferable next time.
Posted by: Shalimar on November 20, 2008 at 10:32 AM | PERMALINK
The Senate needs to be abolished, for real.
Posted by: jeebus on November 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM | PERMALINK
See, it is okay when the Republicans target Daschle and Majority Leader Frist campaigns against him. It is not okay for the Democrats to target McConnell. Basic principles of fairness here, people.
Yes, this is heavy snark.
Posted by: VOR on November 20, 2008 at 10:37 AM | PERMALINK
L'il Orphan Mitchie whining about Democrats trying to unseat a party's Senate Leader.
Orrin Hatch declaring that it is unprecedented that the Democrats are blocking votes on eleven of the Republican president's judicial nominees.
Newt Gingrich pontificating that Democrats have no respect for the institution of marriage.
Oliver North in his Senate campaign complaining about guilty criminals who get off on legal technicalities.
These people have no shame and no integrity whatsoever. Why doesn't anyone in the Democratic party or the media call them on it?
Posted by: SteveT on November 20, 2008 at 10:38 AM | PERMALINK
What? A GOP politician is a brazen hypocrite? No fuckin' way! Next, you'l be telling me the sun rises in the east.
Posted by: bikelib on November 20, 2008 at 10:41 AM | PERMALINK
They're bullies. And, as so often is the case with bullies, they are also crybabies.
My question is: when will the DC pundits notice how partisan the Republicans are? When will the DC pundits start crying out for Republicans to be more bipartisan?
Lots of intellectually dishonest assholes in DC.
Posted by: wonkie on November 20, 2008 at 10:41 AM | PERMALINK
When Reid is up for election I am sending money to anyone running against him, even if it's the dirtiest dirtbag in the GOP. Hopefully Reid will have a progressive primary opponent, but either way I am all for eliminating Reid and/or sending him a clear message.
Reid told us to go fuck ourselves, people.
Act accordingly.
Posted by: Racer X on November 20, 2008 at 10:47 AM | PERMALINK
I occasionally have a dream where the grownups are actually in charge and the current batch of politicians is retired back to the nursery.
Posted by: AJB on November 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM | PERMALINK
"identifying a high-quality opponent to challenge Reid will be a priority for the party in the coming months."
Nice to see he has his priorities on governing and not some playground vengeance.
Posted by: ScottW on November 20, 2008 at 11:07 AM | PERMALINK
While they were on top, they behaved like thugs. Now they've lost, they're whining. Can you believe it?
Posted by: davidp on November 20, 2008 at 11:08 AM | PERMALINK
GOP sending a boatload of money to unseat Harry Reid sounds like a win-win for me.
Posted by: anon on November 20, 2008 at 11:18 AM | PERMALINK
Sen McConnell reminds me of some the frumpy characters in the old screwball comedies of the 30s. Most of these characters were played to the hilt by gay actors. Just wondering about old Mitch.
Auntie PrissyPants
Posted by: grumpyoldvet on November 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM | PERMALINK
Let's be clear: McConnell has transformed from an obstructionist bully to a hurt, remorseless obstructionist whiner.
So what? Who cares?
Posted by: Annie on November 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM | PERMALINK
I do believe that there was an unwrittten rule in the Senate that a party would not try to target the opposition leader in an election. Unfortunately that agreement went out the window with the take-down of Daschle in 2004.
Posted by: wasa on November 20, 2008 at 11:27 AM | PERMALINK
Go cheney yourself McConnell
Posted by: Winkandanod on November 20, 2008 at 11:29 AM | PERMALINK
Let's be clear: McConnell has transformed from an obstructionist bully to a hurt, remorseless obstructionist whiner. So what? Who cares? Posted by: Annie
Annie, I care! I want to add injury to (perceived) insult. Isn't there some way we can fuck over Kentucky appropriations in some fashion? Isn't Kentucky just another welfare red state?
I really hate Republicans, especially the Southern ilk.
Posted by: Jeff II on November 20, 2008 at 11:31 AM | PERMALINK
Oh, c'mon. Mitch has a point. Harry rewarded Lieberman for God's sake--so, what, nothing for him? After all, Lieberman campaigned more for Rethugs than McConnell did. And challenging Reid for re-election. Get in line Mitch. It's doubtful that Reid will survive the primary.
Posted by: Frak on November 20, 2008 at 11:34 AM | PERMALINK
unfortunately for harry reid, he's got more problems than simply mcconnell's hurt feelings.
reid has pissed off more than a few democrats who have their $25 ready to send to whoever challenges him in 2010.
Posted by: karen marie on November 20, 2008 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
It won't matter, the last poll I saw had Harry Reid's approval in NV in the mid 30s. If he doesn't bring that up (and there's no evidence he will) we'll be losing that seat regardless of what McConnell does.
Posted by: MNPundit on November 20, 2008 at 11:47 AM | PERMALINK
I'm with Racer X!
Posted by: Rick on November 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM | PERMALINK
Following up on ScottW's comment at 11:07 AM...
While I am not (thus far) a fan of Obama's stance on Lieberman, there's a pretty clear distinction here. Obama is letting bygones be bygones and moving forward on governing.
Meanwhile, a senior Republican is saying that political revenge is a top priority for their party.
I hope the Dems can get someone to do the rounds on the Sunday shows to point out this distinction.
Posted by: TG Chicago on November 20, 2008 at 12:12 PM | PERMALINK
Does McConnell's face and being remind anyone else that it's like an open, oozing, herpes sore ?
Posted by: stormskies on November 20, 2008 at 12:19 PM | PERMALINK
Republicans are targeting Harry Reid in 2010?
They just might be doing us a favor.
Posted by: Big River Bandido on November 20, 2008 at 12:45 PM | PERMALINK
Can we PAY the Republicans to target Reid? I'll gladly chip in a modest contribution.
Posted by: Steve LaBonne on November 20, 2008 at 1:38 PM | PERMALINK
With any luck, Reid will have already been primaried out of the general election and Republicants will have to run against a real Democrat.
Posted by: mak on November 20, 2008 at 1:38 PM | PERMALINK
And if Reid HADN'T helped try to unseat McConnell he would have been deemed untouchable?
What kind of pantywaist fops are they?
Stand up and fight, you prissy little dandies.
Posted by: toowearyforoutrage on November 20, 2008 at 1:51 PM | PERMALINK
OK, so here's the deal. Mitchie Mac gets Bible Spice to move down to the Lower 48, say somewhere near the Mustang Ranch or maybe Black Rock City, so she can then challenge Reid in the upcoming (as Pappy O'Daniel would say).
Posted by: felonious monk on November 20, 2008 at 3:54 PM | PERMALINK
When you're entitled to power, any effort to unseat you is reason for retribution.
Posted by: SteveB on November 20, 2008 at 8:54 PM | PERMALINK