November 27, 2008
IRAQI PARLIAMENT APPROVES SOFA.... Just 10 days ago, Iraq's cabinet overwhelmingly approved a security agreement with the U.S. that calls for a withdrawal of U.S. troops by the end of 2011. The measure then went to the Iraqi Parliament for approval, but success was not a given.
As it turns out, it passed rather easily.
Iraq's parliament approved Thursday a security pact with the United States that lets American troops stay in the country for three more years.
The vote in favor of the pact was backed by the ruling coalition's Shiite and Kurdish blocs as well as the largest Sunni Arab bloc, which had demanded concessions for supporting the deal.
The breakdown of the vote was not immediately available. But parliament speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani said an "overwhelming majority" of lawmakers who attended the session voted in favor. Parliament's secretariat, which counted lawmakers as they entered the chamber, said 220 out of 275 legislators attended.
An AFP report added:
The vote came after a flurry of last-minute negotiations in which the main Sunni parties secured a package of political reforms from the government and a commitment to hold a referendum on the pact in the middle of next year.
Should the Iraqi government decide to cancel the pact after the referendum it would have to give Washington one year's notice, meaning that troops would be allowed to remain in the country only until the middle of 2010.
It prompted Spencer Ackerman to respond, "That would be ... give or take a few days ... why, sixteen months after Barack Obama takes office! Happy Thanksgiving from Baghdad, Barack!"
—Steve Benen 10:30 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (17)
You would be naive to think that this means anything. They just want to see what Obama will do. And then they'll go for the agreement they want. What they want probably won't work, but at least they'll get the chance to chose for themselves.
Posted by: fostert on November 27, 2008 at 10:23 AM | PERMALINK
Rather than SOFA, I prefer what The Editors call it, the Agreement on Withdrawal of Forces, or AIRWOLF.
Posted by: MikeJ on November 27, 2008 at 10:33 AM | PERMALINK
So now the mystery is this. If Sunni, Shia and Kurds all agree, they must have a certain level of confidence that they have political reconciliation. So why not just leave now? In fact, why doesn't Bush just declare victory and take a bow? Why does the media focus on restrictions to attack other countries from Iraq and the right of Iraq to try contractors and soldiers, when it even mentions this agreement? Forget oil. What is the public argument for staying?
Posted by: Danp on November 27, 2008 at 10:48 AM | PERMALINK
boy, working on thanksgiving day. i didn't know the iraqi parliament was so dedicated!
Posted by: mellowjohn on November 27, 2008 at 10:52 AM | PERMALINK
There are still at least parts of this agreement which reach the level of "treaty." It needs to be voted upon in our Congress to be legal. The President, alone, has no right to commit troops or money without the approval of the Senate and the House. In particular, check out Article 27 (Deterrance Security Dangers) of the agreement. This commits the U.S. to protect Iraq against FUTURE dangers. That is a TREATY!
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/iraq/story/56116.html
Posted by: impeachcheneythenbush on November 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK
IRAQI PARLIAMENT APPROVES SOFA.... still hung up on drapes.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Posted by: ericfree on November 27, 2008 at 11:37 AM | PERMALINK
does the agreement include a giant farewell parade down Bush Boulevard in downtown Baghdad with honorary parade marshals mccane, LIEberman, and Graham?
Posted by: zoot on November 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM | PERMALINK
they actually have giant, helium-filled balloons of bush, mcsame, holy joe, and huckleberry.
Posted by: mellowjohn on November 27, 2008 at 11:50 AM | PERMALINK
I've just been sitting around waiting for something to happen.,
Posted by: Lonnie on November 27, 2008 at 11:52 AM | PERMALINK
i thought bush already was a helium-filled balloon.
Posted by: Cubana por Obama on November 27, 2008 at 11:53 AM | PERMALINK
Actually, this is a 6-month plan. As of June, the U.S. military is constrained to its bases, which is a tacit end of the road. The rest of the time is just for withdrawal.
Posted by: Chango on November 27, 2008 at 12:16 PM | PERMALINK
A fat, floating sofa, suspended in the midst of a great emptiness.
Quite an attractive sofa.
This sofa could be commercial...with a few margaritas in the right company.
but I digress...
Posted by: The ghost of Frank Zappa on November 27, 2008 at 12:17 PM | PERMALINK
Danp: They didn't agree. Steve doesn't look hard enough at the number of Sunni bloc MPs who "agreed to disagree" by abstaining.
ImpeachCheney is right, too. BUT, B.O. will be no more desirous of submitting this baby to Senate review than Georgie-Porgie has been. And, the Senate probably doesn't want its advice sought, i9f that means taking responsibility.
Posted by: SocraticGadfly on November 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM | PERMALINK
I really thought al Sadr was going to do more to block this agreement from going through. Maybe he has other plans, oraybe it's a measure of his reduced clout in the country - we'll see.
In any case, the most immediate need has been satisfied by the agreement: to buy some time. American forces will not be truly out until they are all gone, and until that happens, there is a multitude of ways the departure can be delayed beyond the supposed end date. It is plain the Bush administration never intends to get out - that much is clear from the continued rationalizations for staying; if it's violent, America needs to stay to establish security, if it's not violent, Amerca needs to stay to consolidate security gains and progress the political agenda - so it remains to be seen if Obama is serious about discontinuing the American presence. I hope so, but there will be tremendous pressure brought on him to stay.
Posted by: Mark on November 27, 2008 at 4:44 PM | PERMALINK
That should be "or maybe" and not "oraybe" in the above message, of course; I guess I didn't have "insert" selected, and accidentally overwrote. Boy, it doesn't matter how many times I proofread, I always miss something.
Posted by: Mark on November 27, 2008 at 4:47 PM | PERMALINK
I realize the seriousness of this issue, but I just have to point out that the headline reminds me of the classic Onion article, "Supreme Court Overturns Car."
Posted by: JRD on November 28, 2008 at 2:01 PM | PERMALINK
Given Iraq's historic tension with Turkey, I guess there's little chance of an Ottoman being approved to go along with the sofa . . .
Posted by: rea on November 28, 2008 at 6:41 PM | PERMALINK