Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

December 1, 2008

DYSFUNCTION ON THE HILL.... We knew, shortly after Democrats reclaimed the congressional majority in 2006, that governing might be a little, shall we say, tricky.

The Bush White House didn't really have a policy agenda, and even if it did, Democrats weren't likely to support it. Likewise, Democratic lawmakers were filled with ambitious ideas, but had to wrestle with presidential vetoes and a Senate Republican caucus that blocked floor votes on practically everything. All the while, there was a historic presidential election dominating the landscape, with members of both parties waiting to see whether their priorities may stand a better chance in 2009.

Roll Call reports on the results from the last two years.

Members of the 110th Congress introduced nearly 14,000 pieces of legislation, more than any Congress since 1980, but only about 3.3 percent of the bills actually were signed into law, the lowest success rate since 1976.

While the percentage of bills that pass has dropped significantly over the past two decades, the number of ceremonial bills -- naming post offices and other federal buildings -- has risen dramatically, squashing the substantive work of Congress into fewer and fewer pieces of legislation.

Of the 449 bills that became law in the 110th Congress, 144 of them -- 32 percent -- did nothing more than rename a federal building.

That sounds pretty bad, and by most standards, it is. But the statistics here can be somewhat misleading.

First, the 3.3% success rate uses all introduced bills as a baseline. That's unwise -- plenty of lawmakers introduce plenty of legislation they have no intention of passing. Some are symbolic gestures, and some are about scoring points back home, but it skews the overall numbers considerably.

And second, the significance of the bills, not the size of the number, matters more. This Congress passed a massive bailout package, a modernized GI Bill, and a minimum wage increase. Plenty of good bills died for a variety of reasons, but these are three items that will have a lasting impact.

Even taking this into account, though, the last two years haven't exactly been a model of political function and efficiency. With Bush on one side of Pennsylvania Avenue, and Reid/Pelosi on the other, it wasn't expected to be. Expect the 111th to be far more productive.

Steve Benen 9:30 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (7)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

more evidence that the Bush presidency was the worst in history ...

thanks for flagging this important story

Posted by: sjw on December 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM | PERMALINK

There is an interesting contrast, however, between the 110th congress and the one that preceded the 2000 election (106th?). The Dems were trying to pass a lot of bills these last two years, while the Reps used their majority status in 1999 and 2000 to make sure nothing got done. They didn't even try to embarrass Clinton by passing some "obviously popular" measures.

Posted by: Danp on December 1, 2008 at 10:04 AM | PERMALINK

We're still stuck with Mitch McConnell, who should also be on the Capitol Hill end of your list, since he's responsible for doubling the record number of filibusters. Obstruction is what he's best at, and unfortunately, he runs rings around Reid in parliamentary interference.

Posted by: Redshift on December 1, 2008 at 10:09 AM | PERMALINK

he runs rings around Reid in parliamentary interference.

It's a lot easier to obstruct the Senate from a 49-seat minority, and with the Executive as your partner, than from a 42-seat one all on your own. The GOP has to know that if they are seen as obstructing critical stuff then they'll face a third bloodbath in 2010.

With the dixiecrats gone and Obama fine-tuning his administration for maximum legislative effectiveness, I think we'll see something we haven't seen in over a generation - a Democratic executive-legislative coalition that can do what it wants, and a Republican leadership that finds itself being rolled over and over again.

Posted by: jimBOB on December 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM | PERMALINK

Renaming Federal buildings?

Make a well-known phrase or saying involving the words "whilst Rome burns". A leading investment bank of your choice for the winner.

Posted by: al on December 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM | PERMALINK

Assumes passing bills is a positive thing.

Posted by: Luther on December 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM | PERMALINK

I have great faith in the ability of the magnificently spineless and flaccid Harry Reid to fold even when he's holding a royal flush.

Posted by: bluestatedon on December 1, 2008 at 1:33 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs