 |
 |
During a recession, should college presidents face the same pay cuts as CEOs?
By Daniel Fromson
Forty years of writing from Taylor Branch, James Fallows, Katherine Boo, Marjorie Williams, Joshua Micah Marshall, and more.
By the Editors
How a million surveillance cameras in London are proving George Orwell wrong.
By Jamie Malanowski
With help from Washington, the for-profit college industry is loading up millions of low-income students with debt they'll never pay off.
By Stephen Burd
The best recent memoir from republican Washington is a hoax. That should tell you something.
By Joshua Green
|
|
|
|
December 2, 2008
MANUFACTURED DRAMA.... The New York Times' Alessandra Stanley had a "TV Watch" column this morning on yesterday's press conference in Chicago, where Barack Obama introduced his national security team. In the absence of any actual drama at the event, it appears Stanley decided to inject some.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's speech was no ordinary public-service pledge; for plenty of viewers, it was the moment when Mrs. Clinton finally conceded the election for real.
The occasion was solemn, but like a wedding where the parents are divorced, the ceremony was carefully choreographed to avert awkward moments and camouflage past unpleasantness.
When Mr. Obama unveiled his economic team last week, he alone made a speech. In this more delicate selection, it was decided that Mrs. Clinton, his pick for secretary of state, should also speak. But that might look suspect -- or too political -- unless the five other appointees also said a word, and that, in turn, required a few words from Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr., who had yet to make public statements of any consequence since the election. (He spoke last, spiritedly, and at some length.)
Not all the staging was designed to address Mrs. Clinton's sensibilities....
This is all a bit much. Clinton "finally conceded the election for real" yesterday? Funny, I would have thought her June endorsement, followed by her convention speech, her multiple joint appearances with Obama, and her near-constant travel on Obama's behalf, would have been enough.
The transition had to address Clinton's "sensibilities"? Stanley didn't point to any evidence to bolster this, probably because there isn't any.
Matt Browner Hamlin had a great item on all of this, concluding that journalists "need to stop projecting their desired story lines onto the Obama administration (viz. making things up) and start reporting the news like professionals."
Good advice.
—Steve Benen 11:30 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (16)
Clinton "finally conceded the election for real" yesterday?
Notice, though, that Stanley doesn't have the courage to take credit for the editorializing here, instead hiding behind a notional horde of anonymous "viewers", saying:
for plenty of viewers, it was the moment when Mrs. Clinton finally conceded the election for real.
Posted by: cmdicely on December 2, 2008 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
it was the moment when Mrs. Clinton finally conceded the election for real.
As I read this, I am thinking about Palin and her neverending campaign. This morning at the Governor's conference, Biden welcomed her in his speech. Paraphrasing, he said, "She and I both know that once the campaign is over, the media forget you even exist. Maybe after the conference here, I will take a walk outside with her and see if we can get her noticed."
Posted by: Danp on December 2, 2008 at 11:46 AM | PERMALINK
This is exactly why I hoped Obama would pick someone else. The Clinton drama never ends for the press.
Posted by: smiley on December 2, 2008 at 11:50 AM | PERMALINK
Self-absorbed titlation and self-affected egos! What a volitile concoction permeating our 1st Amendment protected noble profession we used to call journalism! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on December 2, 2008 at 11:59 AM | PERMALINK
Heh, Hillary Clinton conceded for real at that magnificent Convention speech. Almost all Democrats will long remember that well-done, very magnanimous delivery with no snark I could detect. But that's how reporters operate: they must inject story spice where it doesn't belong, but ignore very real issues that their corpomedia or cocktail ties make it hard for them to move out.
Posted by: Neil B on December 2, 2008 at 12:22 PM | PERMALINK
I have my problems with Clinton but honestly almost all the 'Clinton Drama'(tm) is manufactured by a press corp obsessed with personality and soap operas.
Posted by: thorin-1 on December 2, 2008 at 12:24 PM | PERMALINK
The nature of reporting/journalism has long since passed from attracting readers to attracting attention - facts need not apply for current openings. The new job title/description should be MSU-er (making sht up).
Posted by: mikey on December 2, 2008 at 12:38 PM | PERMALINK
CDS is as virulent as it ever was.
Posted by: eyelessgame on December 2, 2008 at 12:57 PM | PERMALINK
We all just need to remember what the Corporate Slut called Chuck Todd said: "Our 'narratives' are more important than the actual reality or truth". And, as a result we get all the made up story lines of the Corporate Media so that they CAN HAVE SOMETHING TO DO TO JUSTIFY THEIR MILLION DOLLAR PAYDAYS. Thus, they keep pretending that our country is 'still' a center/ right country no matter what the actual facts are. And, of course, they themselves are 'center/right' journalists. So, of course, because of their own sense of self-importance, the entire country must be just like them. And they need to do that in order to pretend to themselves that they are 'relevant'. In reality they are one of the greatest dangers to our country, our democracy. Let us remember the 'role these corporate cum sluts played in getting us into Iraq: just for starters.
Posted by: stormskies on December 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM | PERMALINK
If you needed any additional proof that the media is staffed with people who haven't advanced emotionally since junior high, here it is. I really, really, really don't get this bizarre fixation on the Clintons that the media has.
Posted by: Mnemosyne on December 2, 2008 at 1:23 PM | PERMALINK
It's the damn 24/7 news cycle and internet blogs that are accounting for the making of drama in this and other election news. If there is no "news" to report 24/7, then some has to be "manufactured" to fill the space.
Posted by: phoebes in santa fe on December 2, 2008 at 1:23 PM | PERMALINK
Hillary could wind up being the best SoS we ever had, and a few schnozzles in the media would choose the narrative "Well, what choice did she have?" I'm half-surprised they don't all make meowing nosies whenever she gets onstage goading her into some kind of hissy fit they're all convinced she's capable of having, and are all pissed off that they've never got the chance to see, like children who get upset that they always fall asleep before Santa arrives, and this year, if they try really hard, they'll catch him in the act and 7AM already? I MISSED HIM! DAMN YOU SANTAAAAAA! DAMN YOU HILLARYYYYYY!"
Posted by: slappy magoo on December 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM | PERMALINK
"Pundits" Maureen Dowd and Christopher Hitchens are like Charlie Brown in the pumpkin patch, waiting for the Great Pumpkin to fly through the air with presents for all the good boys and girls. Except that what they're waiting for is the moment when Hillary Clinton steals the Democratic nomination from Obama. The fact that the election is over and he's won won't stop them from speculating when she'll pull off her coup, and start pursuing her own agenda. They will never, ever give up that narrative.
Posted by: T-Rex on December 2, 2008 at 2:41 PM | PERMALINK
...like Charlie Brown in the pumpkin patch, waiting for the Great Pumpkin to fly through the air... - T-Rex
That was Linus, and for most of the night, Lucy. Charlie Brown went trick-or-treating, and ended up with a collection of rocks. I miss being a kid.
Posted by: doubtful on December 2, 2008 at 3:09 PM | PERMALINK
This is so crazy. Isn't there a way to report Presidential news without a) repeating the party line or b) making shit up?
Posted by: Crissa on December 2, 2008 at 5:34 PM | PERMALINK
For most viewers it was the moment the Times finally admitted it's fiction....
Posted by: ricky on December 3, 2008 at 2:24 PM | PERMALINK
|
|
|