Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

December 8, 2008

CHURCH ATTENDANCE REPORTS.... I've noticed that the Politico has been reporting quite a bit since the election on Barack Obama's church attendance, or in this case, the lack thereof. Yesterday, it had another item, from the estimable Ben Smith, under the headline, "Another Sunday without church."

As my colleagues Jonathan Martin and Carol Lee noted last week, Barack Obama -- despite undergoing a campaign maelstrom over his pastor -- isn't a regular churchgoer. He didn't often attend Sunday services on the trail, and -- unlike Presidents-elect Bush and Clinton -- hadn't been since his election.

He extended that streak this morning, with the pool report saying only that he'd been a bit late for his regular workout this morning.

There are a few ways to look at this. John Judis, for example, argues persuasively that these reports are unnecessary, and ultimately, "an invasion of Obama's privacy."

What's more, Media Matters noted yesterday that the Politico's reporting on this has left out a relevant detail: George W. Bush has been an infrequent churchgoer and apparently never became a formal member of a congregation during his eight years in Washington.

I'd just add that there's also a practical aspect to this. Obama left Trinity UCC -- apparently, there was some kind of controversy about his former pastor's sermons -- and, in the midst of a presidential campaign, the Obamas didn't find a new spiritual home for their family. They're getting ready to move to Washington, where they hope to join a local church.

With this in mind, maybe the media can cut Obama a little slack until after the soon-to-be First Family can finish packing and pick a congregation they're comfortable with in their new city.

If Obama had pledged to attend weekly services during the transition, I could see his Sunday schedules being of some interest. But since that isn't the case, maybe we can do without the regular reporting on the president-elect's worship routine, at least until after the inauguration.

Steve Benen 3:00 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (54)
 
Comments

This should not even be a story. "Going to church" doesn't mean you don't practice your spiritual beliefs. Why does Political even bother to mention it since it has nothing to do with being president elect or any other government position. It relates to absolutely nothing so why mention it....gooberism at its finest.

Posted by: bjobotts on December 8, 2008 at 3:07 PM | PERMALINK

This is exceedingly stupid. He just won a damn election. If he wants some downtime, INCLUDING Sunday mornings, that is his business. Obviously, what church he goes to will be watched, so he may be unwilling to causally visit a congregation.

Posted by: Andrew on December 8, 2008 at 3:09 PM | PERMALINK

Steve,

Please stop doing any items regarding Politico. They do not represent beltway conventional wisdom.

Politico is on par with Faux News, and not to be taken seriously or trusted.

And every time you put up a link to them all you are doing is building up traffic on their site which they can turn around and attract ad revenue.

Posted by: Mathew on December 8, 2008 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK

Let's hope that things get so prosperous and peaceful that this becomes a real news story.

Posted by: Frak on December 8, 2008 at 3:11 PM | PERMALINK

Since Obama made quite a bit out of his Christian faith during the campaign, and it is part of the explanation for his crossover appeal, I think this issue is fair game.

However, I do think one continuing, but infrequently discussed, issue for the Obamas is the prevalence of security concerns in their lives. Some of Obama's body language and behavior during his convention acceptance speech and election night victory speech indicate to me that he is quite concerned about his children appearing in stage with him, and next to him in open spaces. The Obamas cannot just pick out a random church out on the road, and head there for a service, without a lot of advance security work, and without subjecting the unsuspecting congregation to a lot of unexpected, time-consuming and possibly unwelcome security checks and precautions.

When he is in Washington, he will be able to select a congregation that expects such precautions, and has experience living with them.

Posted by: Dan Kervick on December 8, 2008 at 3:11 PM | PERMALINK

Just as establishment Dems now have to "punch hippies" to prove their moderatehood, President-Elect Democrats have to go to church to prove they're not atheists. IOKIYAR.

Posted by: Howard on December 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK

What Matthew said. Seriously. Think of Politico as a troll, and do not feed it.

Posted by: Steve LaBonne on December 8, 2008 at 3:16 PM | PERMALINK

We can probably safely assume that the reporters and editors responsible for this piece have little or no experience of their own with true church membership or regular attendance, so they're just trying to play to a certain audience.

Posted by: Lukeness on December 8, 2008 at 3:17 PM | PERMALINK

Did they think to check the local mosques on Friday - after all, according to the right he is a Muslim...

Posted by: Ethel-To-Tilly on December 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM | PERMALINK

They must be talking about regular church attendess like GW and DC. If that what we have to gain by church membership, fine with me if he is an Atheist.

Posted by: SteveA on December 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM | PERMALINK

Unfortunately, liberals gave Politico a full acceptance when it was clear the supported Obama over Clinton.

Posted by: DR on December 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM | PERMALINK

Keeping up with who does and does not attend church is presumptuous.

Let it go.

Matthew 6.6: But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

Posted by: lo on December 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM | PERMALINK

Seeing as his eternal damnation (or salvation or whatever each of us as individuals believes) isn't my concern, nor was it a concern when I voted for him, I could give two shites less about his churchgoing habits.

In reference to Dan's comment about this being fair game:
The only reasons his Christianity was an issue on the trail is because:
1. Rev Wright's megolamania (past this)
2. Lies about his being a Muslim (apparently the word got out or people didn't care enough)
2a. Relating to #2 - as a majority of Americans vaguely identifies themselves as Christian, he recognized that people like to see common ground/values with their leaders.

Obama didn't make a big deal about his Christianity to promote himself but only to defend the reality of the situation. His faith is, and should be, his business. Otherwise, how does one judge whether a President has been pious enough? Let this crap go.

Posted by: Mike on December 8, 2008 at 3:23 PM | PERMALINK

The last thing we need is magical thinking in our current situation. Not going to church is a big plus in my book.

Posted by: Raindog on December 8, 2008 at 3:27 PM | PERMALINK

As others have said, a) the guy is rather busy, and b) I think he gets to skip a few Sundays if he wants a bit more family time out of the public eye. And as Dan just pointed out, security concerns are no minor matter.

For example, on Reagan's (lack of) church attendance, from Kevin Phillips' review of Douglas Brinkley's edited version of Reagan's diaries, at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/17/books/review/Phillips-t.html :

"Reagan’s religion, in turn, comes across as important, but quirky. Entries for early 1981 include references to Armageddon being in the air. Reagan also sets down his strong feelings that the fetus is a living human being and that the Shroud of Turin is authentic. He was obviously bothered by his limited church attendance, especially in the wake of the 1981 assassination attempt, as we can glean from his comments about how “elaborate security measures” made his visits “a hazard to others.” On the quirky side, the 1988 flap over the Reagans’ interest in astrology gave some church groups pause — the Southern Baptist Convention briefly considered withdrawing the speaking invitation it had extended to him — and it must be said that Reagan’s easy dismissal of the astrology question in these diaries is too brief to be convincing."

I think presidential concerns over security (both for their families and for everyone else in their vicinity) must limit options for just dropping in on churches to see if you want to join that congregation.

Posted by: N.Wells on December 8, 2008 at 3:28 PM | PERMALINK

I want to know when and where Ben Smith attends church, and how much he contributes to the church as well. Without this information (updated every day) he should STFU about anyone else's churchgoing habits.

Posted by: BuzzMon on December 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM | PERMALINK

Ronald Reagan was a notorious non-attender during his time in Washington. Anybody else remember Jesse Jackson mocking him on this point on SNL? Reagan was asked about his non-attendance during a debate w/ Mondale. St Ronnie said that he did not want to be a distraction or a security concern in a group of 100s of people. As Jesse pointed out on SNL, Reagan offered this defense at a debate, while he was in the midst of a group of 100s of people. Carl Rove has also admitted that he is not 'a person of faith.' The leaders of the religious right need to fess up--they've been taken for a ride by hypocritical Republicans on the faith issue for almost 30 years. If Obama were a useful secularist for them--if he hated gays and abortion, they would not care whether he went to church or not.

Posted by: WSP on December 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM | PERMALINK

This is pretty much water under the bridge at this point, but Obama's lack of punctiliousness with respect to church attendance only bolsters the plausibility of his claims that he hadn't heard any of Reverend Wright's more hate-filled, controversial sermons.

Posted by: Jasper on December 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM | PERMALINK

The last time I looked, church attendance (as well as religious belief itself) was not a requirement for the presidency.

Posted by: Lee on December 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM | PERMALINK

Frankly, I'd be happy enough if the Obamas NEVER went to church while they were in Washington, D.C., over the next eight years. I think we need to stop caring about whether politicians attend religious services, and instead be more concerned with whether they do right by all Americans. How many times do we need to see supposedly God-fearing right-wingers spreading hate around and acting out of selfishness and political expediency, before we accept that going to church and acting in the best interests of people don't necessarily go together?

If the Obamas do choose a church to attend in D.C., that's fine. But by all means, give them the time to find one that really speaks to them in some way. Good grief! The 44th president will have a hell of a lot more important things on his plate over the next year than deciding where the pray.

Posted by: J. Kingston Pierce on December 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK

This is fundagelical troll-feeding on Politico's part. I reviewed an article in which the author said that Bush was too nice to be President, evidenced by his "dramatic" conversion to Christianity.

What you do doesn't matter to these people, only what church you belong to and how loudly you trumpet your faith. Obama could be the best leader in the history of time, and it wouldn't matter if he didn't go to the "right" church. Yeesh.

Posted by: Personal Failure on December 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK

yeah Ben Smith is a joke.

Why waste the electrons?

Posted by: jvoe on December 8, 2008 at 3:45 PM | PERMALINK

Politico -- politics for stupid people.

Posted by: npr on December 8, 2008 at 3:45 PM | PERMALINK

And where was John McCain attending while on the campaign trail? Nowhere that I saw...

Posted by: Always Hopeful on December 8, 2008 at 3:53 PM | PERMALINK

Mike,

I think you are wrong. Obama presented his faith, his conversion, the way his faith informed his political outlook and his ability to speak the language of religion with believing Americans as major selling points during his campaign. He eagerly embraced and promoted this aspect of his political identity, and did this well before the Wright flap and the Muslim claims were raised. Some of his better speeches during the campaign were actually sermons. Now this may make a lot of secular Democrats very uncomfortable, but it is an extremely important component of his national reputation and is something he should work to maintain. It is going to help him get a better hearing for his views and expand his circle of trust beyond the limits that Democrats have experienced in the past.

Posted by: Dan Kervick on December 8, 2008 at 3:53 PM | PERMALINK

Why does he have to go to church at all? Maybe he doesn't like that sort of thing.

Posted by: Goldilocks on December 8, 2008 at 3:54 PM | PERMALINK

My mother is a Methodist like Dub nominally is, so I know of one reason he might not go to church much: The Methodist Church has condemned much of what he did, like the War, violation of rights and environment, neglect of the poor etc. (They are at top one of those much-neglected "main stream" liberalish churches, although members out in the sticks can be more conservative.)

Posted by: Neil B ☺ on December 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM | PERMALINK

I also didn't go to church yesterday

Posted by: rusrus on December 8, 2008 at 3:58 PM | PERMALINK

This is what happens when we're all in limbo, awaiting the transition to actually happen.

Junk journalism...

And yeah, I agree, who the fu** cares what church or any church he attends? It is invasive beyond belief.

Posted by: Drama Seekers in Limbo Time on December 8, 2008 at 3:59 PM | PERMALINK

Politico, I'd rather know how many military funerals, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Rice attended, both collectivley and their individual tallys.

Posted by: Winkandanod on December 8, 2008 at 4:03 PM | PERMALINK

I am a regular attendee of Sunday Services in my spiritual center and am also a paid employee of that center. Participation in this community brings me joy and fulfillment, and we have a lot of fun! I have deeply held spiritual convictions and encourage others to find their spiritual center. I do not "push" others to join my congregation, though I feel that what we practice is beneficial to many, regardless of their religion of origin. We call ourselves trans-denominational and include anyone who chooses to come, whether once or on a continuing basis. I say all this to give context to what follows.

Barack Obama and his family are entitled to choose any spiritual practice to follow, or not. What is much more important to me, and "should" be to others, is how he lives his life and demonstrates his principles. It seems hypocritical to me that so much is made of what one does on a Sunday, yet the major political news shows are conducted on Sunday Mornings, along with NFL football. (Oh, and I believe Joe Lieberman does not work on Friday night in recognition of his Jewish Sabbath, so he is free to do whatever he wants on Sunday.) So, if I watch Meet The Press or one of the other Network interview shows instead of going to church, what does that make me? Or, of more importance, if I am an invited guest of one of these shows, but decline in favor of attending church, what is the judgment?

In spite of what many think, this country was not founded by Christians and is not even a Judeo-Christian nation. One of the great attractors to this country is the perception that we are a nation that recognizes and honors diversity. Obama is a great example of the embodiment of that diversity: a man of mixed-race, married to a woman of African-American roots, descended from slaves. The more we can embrace diversity as an asset, the more we can move this nation forward as a leader in the global community. E Pluribus Unum, out of many one, is the founding principle. Not, In God We Trust. There are as many definitions of God as there are people, and almost as many names for God. So, let Obama attend church, or not attend church, for his own reasons. Use the energy of criticism to examine your own spiritual or secular beliefs and see how you are contributing to building a peaceful and prosperous community.

I am committed to Oneness through Justice and Transformation
peace,
st john

Posted by: st john on December 8, 2008 at 4:12 PM | PERMALINK

Let's let God weigh in on this.

God, do you care if Barack didn't go to church? (I'll leave three blank lines for you to fill in you answer.)

Hmm. Nothing. I'll take that as a 'no.'

Posted by: doubtful on December 8, 2008 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK

Might I say - it's none of your f---ing business whether Obama attends church or not, nor is it mine.

Posted by: Barry Walden on December 8, 2008 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK


"I also didn't go to church yesterday."

Well, except for a few funerals I haven't set foot in a church since I was 17. Tomorrow I will be 63.

lo

Posted by: lo on December 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM | PERMALINK

I would like to someday have a president who has a regular meditation practice, who practices mindful breathing meditation every day, and who is willing to use the "bully pulpit" to talk about the benefits of meditation and to encourage others to practice it.

By the way, it seems to me that the phrase "bully pulpit" is sometimes used without a proper understanding of its meaning. In the phrase originated by Theodore Roosevelt, the word "bully" does not have its common modern meaning of "to intimidate". Roosevelt was not saying that the presidency gave him the power to push people around.

Roosevelt was using "bully" as an adjective meaning "excellent" or "superb" (in today's slang, "awesome"). As Wikipedia puts it, Roosevelt was saying that the presidency was "a terrific platform from which to advocate an agenda."

Posted by: SecularAnimist on December 8, 2008 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK

And, and, and HE'S NOT WEARING A FLAG PEN!!! God Help Us All!!!

Posted by: CT on December 8, 2008 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK

Being a Christian and being a church-going Christian are two different things. Obama may have talked a lot about the former and the values of generosity and such but how much has he talked about the latter?

Posted by: Vincent on December 8, 2008 at 4:41 PM | PERMALINK

Good for him -- he has more important things to do.

Posted by: Michael Carpet on December 8, 2008 at 4:44 PM | PERMALINK

SecularAnamist: That would be wonderful if he were to advocate meditation and mindful breathing. I just finished reading The Art of Happiness: A Handbook for Living by H.H Dalai Lama and Howard C. Cutler MD, in which the Dalai Lama advocates these practices and at the same time encourages people to find their own practices that promote happiness and compassion and kindness and joy. Whether you are a Theist, an Atheist or decline to state, I highly recommend this book for its advocacy of openness and inclusivity of all pathways to a fulfilling and happy life.

I practice my own version of spirituality and welcome the opportunity to share what I have learned. That being said, to each his/her own as long as it promotes the highest good of all.

peace,
st john

Posted by: st john on December 8, 2008 at 4:45 PM | PERMALINK

Ben Smith, Jonathan Martin and Carol Lee may be polishing up their resumes to work for James Dobson. While they're at it, they can tell us about their own church membership and more important, the percentage of their tithe.

(cue Scott Glenn in "The Right Stuff": "Oh, I attend church--regularly.")

Posted by: Steve Paradis on December 8, 2008 at 4:46 PM | PERMALINK

This is one of my favorite sayings. "Spending time in church doesn't make you a Christian any more than spending time in a garage will make you a car"!!! Some of the most christian people I know are not church goers.

Posted by: redrover on December 8, 2008 at 4:49 PM | PERMALINK

Uhh, when the depth of Obama'as belief was first questioned, he said he was praising Jesus at Trinity UCC every Sunday. That's a direct quote.

So, it's a bi gotcha'by the Politico -- it's still "gotcha" that B.O. brought on himself.

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on December 8, 2008 at 5:02 PM | PERMALINK

I hope he attends many of the places of worship in D.C. including mosques, synagogues, AND temples of all persuasions. Where is it written you have to be a member? And where does it say he must be Christian? I must've missed the memo.

Posted by: MissMudd on December 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM | PERMALINK

After the right-wing and the media's relentless BS attack on Obama based on his association with a loudmouthed pastor, Obama has probably decided he will no longer give them such an easy target.

Posted by: Bob C on December 8, 2008 at 5:17 PM | PERMALINK

This is why we need a complete separation of church and state.

Who's to say one religion is better than the other.

In this country, there's catholics, mormons, judaism, buhhism, muslims....

If this keeps up, the U.S. will start having its own religious wars like the middle east.

Meaning, some of the muslims want Sharia law incorporated here in their lives. So, why isn't this acceptable?

Some of the people from the Caribbean have some type of rituals, like human skulls, that we consider inappropriate.

No, I am not atheist, I am agnostic, thanks to the GOP rightwing nuts.

Posted by: annjell on December 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK

I don't see this as a non-issue - I see this as an important issue - that going to church and believing in a god should not be prerequisites for being a good leader.

Posted by: Andy on December 8, 2008 at 8:55 PM | PERMALINK

and how frequently did St. Ronald go to church?

Posted by: Michael on December 8, 2008 at 11:03 PM | PERMALINK

And helping at a food bank at Saint Columbanus Church on Thanksgiving doesn't count as CHURCH. So don't even.

Posted by: justaguy2 on December 9, 2008 at 12:32 AM | PERMALINK

Personally, it'd be fine with me if he and his family never attended church again. I'm frankly tired of the notion that one must be a church-going Christian in order to hold high political office in this country. Those of us who don't attend church don't have three heads and are perfectly capable of being effective leaders nonetheless. It has long bothered me that this even has to be said.

Posted by: Gina on December 9, 2008 at 12:59 AM | PERMALINK

The President-elect does good works and professes his faith openly. He also has to be the leader of every American, not just Protestants.
The whole story insults me. Some of the best Christians I have met were atheists. Think about it--deeds not words. . .

Posted by: Sparko on December 9, 2008 at 1:10 AM | PERMALINK

Saint Ronnie Reagan hardly ever went to church.

Posted by: Nancy Irving on December 9, 2008 at 3:19 AM | PERMALINK

as a UCC member myself, the church is extremely liberal, forgiving and accepting. I don't think that his lack of attendance is going to make a huge difference.

Maybe he'll attend our church....

Posted by: TheHolyFatman on December 9, 2008 at 11:27 AM | PERMALINK

Some of the people from the Caribbean have some type of rituals, like human skulls, that we consider inappropriate.

As do the Methodists.

Posted by: Stefan on December 9, 2008 at 11:40 AM | PERMALINK

We had a pious, church-going, straightlaced president in Jimmy Carter. What the hell good did that do us?

Posted by: Lee on December 9, 2008 at 3:07 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals