December 17, 2008
TIME'S PERSON OF THE YEAR.... When presidents win their first national election, they tend to win Time magazine's "Person of the Year" award. Looking over the list, it's actually pretty common: FDR in '32, Truman in '48, LBJ in '64, Carter in '76, Reagan in '80, Clinton in '92, and Bush in 2000.
With this in mind, it's not too big a surprise that Barack Obama won (and obviously deserved) the honor this year.
It's unlikely that you were surprised to see Obama's face on the cover. He has come to dominate the public sphere so completely that it beggars belief to recall that half the people in America had never heard of him two years ago -- that even his campaign manager, at the outset, wasn't sure Obama had what it would take to win the election. He hit the American scene like a thunderclap, upended our politics, shattered decades of conventional wisdom and overcame centuries of the social pecking order. Understandably, you may be thinking Obama is on the cover for these big and flashy reasons: for ushering the country across a momentous symbolic line, for infusing our democracy with a new intensity of participation, for showing the world and ourselves that our most cherished myth -- the one about boundless opportunity -- has plenty of juice left in it.
But crisis has a way of ushering even great events into the past. As Obama has moved with unprecedented speed to build an Administration that would bolster the confidence of a shaken world, his flash and dazzle have faded into the background. In the waning days of his extraordinary year and on the cusp of his presidency, what now seems most salient about Obama is the opposite of flashy, the antithesis of rhetoric: he gets things done. He is a man about his business -- a Mr. Fix It going to Washington. That's why he's here and why he doesn't care about the furniture. We've heard fine speechmakers before and read compelling personal narratives. We've observed candidates who somehow latch on to just the right issue at just the right moment. Obama was all these when he started his campaign: a talented speaker who had opposed the Iraq war and lived a biography that was all things to all people. But while events undermined those pillars of his candidacy, making Iraq seem less urgent and biography less relevant, Obama has kept on rising. He possesses a rare ability to read the imperatives and possibilities of each new moment and organize himself and others to anticipate change and translate it into opportunity.
The real story of Obama's year is the steady march of seemingly impossible accomplishments: beating the Clinton machine, organizing previously marginal voters, harnessing the new technologies of democratic engagement, shattering fundraising records, turning previously red states blue -- and then waking up the day after his victory to reinvent the presidential-transition process in the face of a potentially dangerous vacuum of leadership.
Time managing editor Richard Stengel, appearing on NBC this morning, said, "The Person of the Year was, in effect, invented for Barack Obama. He's a transformational figure. He has done something extraordinary."
The runners-up, in case you were wondering, were Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Sarah Palin, Chinese director Zhang Yimou, and French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
—Steve Benen 10:00 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (25)
The runners-up, in case you were wondering, were Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson...
Dodged a bullet on that one.
Posted by: Hank P on December 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM | PERMALINK
Barack Obama was the obvious choice, but you've got to be kidding me on the runners up! Sarah Palin was on the national (not international) stage for approximately 15% of the year. Of that 15%, about 75% of the time was mocking her. Paulson was on the national stage for less than that. And I'm probably blanking badly on a couple of major international reasons, but Yimou and Sarkozy? Please!
Posted by: Michigoose on December 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM | PERMALINK
How could she not win, for showing just how ignorant and craven the Republicans are????
Posted by: Palin wuz robbed! on December 17, 2008 at 10:05 AM | PERMALINK
Boring! Fix the economy already.
Posted by: Boronx on December 17, 2008 at 10:07 AM | PERMALINK
Paulson?
Seriously.
Well, I guess it is a magnificent feat to steal $700 billion from the taxpayers and get away with it.
He's the anti-Robin Hood.
Posted by: doubtful on December 17, 2008 at 10:07 AM | PERMALINK
Palin was on the national (not international) stage
Well, except for the call from Sarkozy.
Posted by: Danp on December 17, 2008 at 10:09 AM | PERMALINK
Well. It is indeed not a big surprise that Obama was the one chosen for the award. Nonetheless, he deserved the award more than the other runner-ups.
Posted by: News Review on December 17, 2008 at 10:13 AM | PERMALINK
Isn't there supposed to be a week of hype, leaked candidates, stories on sister-network CNN, more drama, suspense....???? This was it?? I smell an anti-Obama conspiracy here to downplay the significance of this transformative award..;-)
Posted by: Bruce K on December 17, 2008 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK
Well, except for the call from Sarkozy.
Oh, yeah. Forgot that--I'll be that's how he made runner-up! :-)
Posted by: Michigoose on December 17, 2008 at 10:18 AM | PERMALINK
Zhang Yimou??!!!?
He's made some spectacular movies, and we are forever grateful for his introducing the world to the lovely Gong Li, but person of the year for doing the Olympic opening ceremony???? How did he even get in contention?
Next year: Philip Seymour Hoffman for just being cool.
Posted by: martin on December 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM | PERMALINK
And, if you dismiss the Liberal Media label as a canard, I submit Yimou over Joe the Plumber. At least PlayGirl still has Joe as their Center Fold of the Year. Well, they would if they were still around. Joe would join Fred Williamson and Burt Reynolds as a Classic.
Posted by: berttheclock on December 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM | PERMALINK
DYNASTIES.... To reiterate a point from the other day…
Or for more than a century, for those that are of money and power, those born of the Jekyll Island group, the birth place of the American Central Banking System called the Federal Reserve Board, is before us today as the legacy of the greatest Dynasty ever contrived behind closed doors. And, with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, is staring at America in full view playing the largest Ponzi Tax fraud money scheme in front of our eyes. Bail out as much money as you can before the public can do anything about it.
When one takes a good look at the Federal Reserve System, it was not meant to be a free market system. Actually, American tax money is and has been controlled for the rich and powerful for just about a century. Instant title funding one of the appreciated tools of the Federal Reserve by the Republicans for decades.
The Federal Reserve being one of the Quasi Government systems having leader ship picked by the President, worse having foreign influence beyond anything known, is by far the trillion dollar play ground. If held accountable would likely send a huge bulk of today’s politicians and loyal perpetrators domestic and world wide to jail. Which, maybe, maybe just might start happening in today’s transparency in the Internet?
The person of the year could very well be the “Gang of Year” the “Neo-Con’s of the year” or how about “Bush and Company of the year”. It really has to be a Dynasty because it takes a lot of effort to screw up the world economy.
Posted by: Megalomania on December 17, 2008 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK
Chinese director Zhang Yimou
Dictator?
Posted by: skybluewater on December 17, 2008 at 11:32 AM | PERMALINK
The list itself shows:
- the shallowness of the thinking behind it
- the 'winners curse' - you don't want to be 'person of the year'
- the increasing irrelevance of publications like Time, which no longer offer value for money or even a pulse on the zeitgeist
For at least 25 years Time has been getting thinner, and dumber.
Posted by: valuethinker on December 17, 2008 at 11:35 AM | PERMALINK
Sarah Palin Person of the Year?
Why on earth not? After all, I was Person of the Year in 2006. Come to think of it, so were you.
Posted by: chrenson on December 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM | PERMALINK
Time should just rename their award to "Person of Mid-August thru maybe December".
Nonetheless, if Obama actually does what he says he's going to do, I'll give him "Person of the Decade".
Posted by: slag on December 17, 2008 at 12:18 PM | PERMALINK
what about the guy who threw the shoes?
Posted by: benjoya on December 17, 2008 at 12:40 PM | PERMALINK
No one else but Obama could have won it this year, and rightly so. But the Shoe Guy would have been the strongest runner-up, way more than any of those other bozos.
I mean, I like Sarkozy but really.....
Posted by: Curmudgeon on December 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM | PERMALINK
The year isn't even over yet. What if next week Osama bin Laden drops a bomb on the American heartland that turns us all Muslim?
Posted by: jeebus on December 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM | PERMALINK
WHAT?! NO TINA FEY! (rant) (fume) (sulk)
Posted by: PaulW on December 17, 2008 at 2:31 PM | PERMALINK
Sarah Palin? Because so much of the agenda she put forward is being adopted?
On the other hand, I am planning to get rimless glasses soon. Maybe the opticians nominated her. :-)
Posted by: Rachel Q on December 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK
Since all of us were Person of the Year in 2006, doesn't this mean that Barack Obama has now won it twice?
Posted by: chrenson on December 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM | PERMALINK
In my lifetime talented and ambitious African-Americans have been able to work into the upper echelons in all walks of life. Martin Luther King Day and Black Studies Month in 2009 will be an exceptional celebration.
The President of the United States is possibly the most criticized man in the world. Truman said "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." I hope that Obama can stand the heat. The heat will come later. For now, I hope he enjoys being Man of the Year.
Posted by: MatthewRMarler on December 17, 2008 at 7:27 PM | PERMALINK
No respect since they wimped out in 2001 and chose Giuliani instead of bin Laden. Maybe if they'd changed the title to "Newsmaker of the Year" the bozos who objected to the Ayatollah Khomenei being selected in 1979 would have gotten the idea that it's not supposed to be an honour (see: Hitler, Adolf; Stalin,Josef).
Posted by: MikeN on December 17, 2008 at 11:50 PM | PERMALINK
Agree with MikeN. They also wimped out of choosing Hitler as the person of the 20th century, going with Einstein. I think Hitler definitely should have been chosen. They said that Hitler's "negative" impact was why he wasn't, but this violates their own rules of the game--person of the year (or century) doesn't imply goodness or badness, but simply means that someone had the most impact of anyone during the time period in question.
Posted by: Lee on December 18, 2008 at 12:19 AM | PERMALINK