Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

December 17, 2008

K STREET'S DR. EVIL.... Last week, when Senate Republicans blocked a rescue package for the U.S. automotive industry, an internal party memo said it was the "first shot against organized labor."

It seems likely that Rick Berman will fire the second shot. Not that Rick Berman, this Rick Berman.

Meet the fine fellow who will be the number one foe of the big unions as they try to pass their number one legislative priority next year: He's a D.C. cartoon villain business lobbyist who fights efforts to restrict drunk driving, mandate healthier foods, and, of course, to hike the minimum wage.

He's Rick Berman, a notorious and familiar figure in D.C. who has spent years lobbying for business interests, many of them in the food and restaurant industries, and has been called everything from "sleazy" to "Dr. Evil" by his enemies.

We're introducing you to Berman because he is going to be at the center of one of the biggest looming fights in Washington this spring: The battle between business and labor over the Employee Free Choice Act, which would make it easier for unions to organize and is labor's number one legislative goal.

Berman runs a group called the "Center for Union Facts," which bills itself as a union watchdog organization but is described as a front group for business interests by labor officials. The group, which doesn't disclose its donors, will be one of several key business and right-wing groups leading the charge to kill the Employee Free Choice Act.

Berman himself has vowed to raise some $30 million to fund various efforts to battle it. The other day his group took out a full page ad in The New York Times showcasing the new strategy being employed by the Act's opponents: Use the Blagojevich scandal and SEIU's contacts with the Blago camp to smear unions and portray the Act itself as some kind of payoff from Dems being demanded by Big Bad Labor.

If you're thinking this is going to get ugly, we're on the same page.

Steve Benen 3:10 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (9)
 
Comments

It's my impression that labor has already lost this one, with Blanche Lincoln opposing the bill, but maybe they can continue to threaten pushing it in order to get other concessions.

Posted by: David Siegel on December 17, 2008 at 3:28 PM | PERMALINK

Shouldn't groups that don't disclose large donors be excluded from lobbying?

Posted by: Crissa on December 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM | PERMALINK

Decent people laboring on behalf of their communities deserve better than what they've been given up to now! Dignity comes in many forms, yet opposition to that which brings decency to bear is not one of them. Sen. Lincoln and this Berman guy are by no means dignified people should they not give up their untenable perspectives! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on December 17, 2008 at 3:37 PM | PERMALINK

"Center for Union Facts"
How Orwellian, and I bet they are behind the UAW $70/hr non-sense. How anyone can try and take wages away from another who makes less then them is beyond me.

The right is bound and determined to squash blue collar labor and I would think that this is going to have consequences for elections. How many UAW voted republican only to watch those clowns try and force their companies into bankruptcy.

Seems like Big Business has decided to forgo any sense of decency and use the republican party to cash out and move along. Stifling wages impacts their economic future, those are customers, but they aren't in it for the long run. Just want their bonuses and to hell with the rest of the country.

Posted by: ScottW on December 17, 2008 at 4:05 PM | PERMALINK

FWIW, the other Rick Berman is truly reviled in some circles, too.

Qapla!

Posted by: Grumpy on December 17, 2008 at 4:11 PM | PERMALINK

Well, if Republicans dislike the auto unions, unions by de facto MUST be helpful. Over the last few generations, there has been a balance developed between labor and management which has been set into statute after statute and upheld by the federal courts time after time.

Every advance in labor rights, since the early 19th century has been opposed by Republicans -- except for the Progressive Republicans who were destroyed in the last quarter of the 20th century. And in order to have labor rights, ergo people aware they are being exploited, one must have an educated society.

An educated society is something modern day Republcians have constantly opposed because they have constsntly allowed state schools and universities to decline in quality and have succeeded in pushing state tuition beyond the means of the all but the highest levels of income in our society.

Yet they do not understand that without a quality public education system, here would have been little to no American middle class. This system provided the scientests and inventors and technicians who kept America in the technological forefront.

There is now an almost generational gap in educational system which was supposed to train the next generation to develop the people to run our technological society. This will take a generation to fix.

And if we cannot compete, we will decline. So ladies and gentlemen welcome of the Mississsippication of America.

Posted by: Xertruk on December 17, 2008 at 6:11 PM | PERMALINK

Something completely unexpected and unaccounted for will occur that will be like a detour for Mr. Berman. I sense there will be no way to prepare for it either. Bout time.

Posted by: bjobotts on December 17, 2008 at 6:37 PM | PERMALINK

The battle between business and labor over the Employee Free Choice Act, which would make it easier for unions to organize and is labor's number one legislative goal.

The end of the secret ballot will be bad, and promoting the end of the secret ballot will be ugly. If the Emplolyee Free Choice Act passes there will be no "employee free choice": the employees will have to decide whether they prefer to be brutalized by management goons or by labor goons.

And if we cannot compete, we will decline. So ladies and gentlemen welcome of the Mississsippication of America.

Do you prefer the "Detroitization of America"? It looks like that is the direction in which the Obama administration will try to lead us.

Posted by: marketeer on December 17, 2008 at 6:45 PM | PERMALINK

I am trying to support unions while finding some way for it to be possible for employees to decline union membership.

Unions seem to think if even one employee isn't a member, they're sunk.

Maybe it's true, but they've never explained adequately to me why. It sounds fascist. You're a member whether you like it or not. I'm inclined to think union membership is pretty good on balance, but the failure to acknowledge the downsides makes me distrustful. (I'm already plenty distrustful of management, make no mistake.)

Posted by: toowearyforoutrage on December 17, 2008 at 9:46 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals