December 29, 2008
LETTING HISTORY BE THE JUDGE.... For quite some time, the president, his aides, and his few remaining political allies have expressed confidence about how Bush's presidency will be perceived -- eventually. To hear them tell it, we Americans, with our petty short-term concerns and what-have-you-done-for-me-lately attitudes, lack the perspective needed to appreciate Bush's greatness. Historians will understand in the future what voters fail to appreciate in the present. The difference between failure and success, when it comes to George W. Bush, is hindsight.
We've heard it enough times for it be quite tiresome, but we nevertheless saw two of the president's biggest supporters pushing this line rather aggressively yesterday.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that despite President Bush's low approval ratings, people will soon "start to thank this president for what he's done."
"So we can sit here and talk about the long record, but what I would say to you is that this president has faced tougher circumstances than perhaps at any time since the end of World War II, and he has delivered policies that are going to stand the test of time," Rice said in an interview that aired on CBS' "Sunday Morning."
Rice added that this administration has been concentrating solely on "lay[ing] a foundation for history's judgment," and that if she were giving the administration's foreign policy a letter grade, she'd give "some" of the policy "an A-plus."
First Lady Laura Bush, appearing on Fox News, struck a similar note. She was asked about those who believe her husband's administration is one of the worst in American history. "I know it's not, and so I don't really feel like I need to respond to people that view it that way," she said. "I think history will judge and we'll see later."
The entire defense seems to boil down to two words: "You'll see." We may be inclined to believe our lying eyes, but, the loyal Bushies tell us, "You'll see." Indeed, Rice went so far as to suggest we'll all be "thanking" Bush for all the great things he's done for us.
It must be comforting for Bush, Rice, and other top officials in the administration to think this way. It's no doubt frustrating to wake up every morning, and go to work knowing that you're reviled by most of the public, here and around the world. If you can convince yourself that you'll be appreciated years from now, it probably takes the edge off.
But that doesn't make it true. Indeed, wishful thinking about history's judgment, in the midst of widespread failures in every aspect of government -- foreign policy, economic policy, constitutional policy, domestic policy, environmental policy -- borders on delusional.
As Digby concluded, Bush and his team "need accept that the best they can hope for is to end up among history's inept clowns instead of history's villains. It's not much, but it's all they've got."
—Steve Benen 8:00 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (41)
Now I know how those ungrateful Iraqis feel.
Posted by: Hoyt Pollard on December 29, 2008 at 8:17 AM | PERMALINK
she'd give "some" of the policy "an A-plus.
Her example for this was that the US was well regarded in China and India. However, the Pew Poll she was asked about showed only 41% favorability for China. Only 30% had confidence in the Bush Administration.
As for India, I am less than interested in the opinion of the guy I spend three hours talking to everytime I need help installing a program or getting a phone bill corrected.
Posted by: Danp on December 29, 2008 at 8:22 AM | PERMALINK
The nightmare will be never be erased or cleansed. Bush mattered ... badly enough to prematurely usher in the long emergency.
Posted by: lou on December 29, 2008 at 8:25 AM | PERMALINK
So who does the WH send out to defend the nitwit? His wife and an otherwise invisable Secretary of State. Where was Karen Hughes? Or did they think 2 skirts were enough to cower behind?
Posted by: JoeW on December 29, 2008 at 8:30 AM | PERMALINK
We will thank Bush for making the wealthiest people richer; for causing a recession with “trickle down economics”; for wasting billions $ in Iraq war; for giving billions more to the war profiteers , Haliburton and its subcontractors; for the dead and wounded military, for allowing the New Orleans debacle by cutting core of engineers funds and neglect while it was happening; for allowing national parks and our ecology to be fouled; for putting us in peril by banning stem cell research, and much more!
Posted by: captain dan on December 29, 2008 at 8:30 AM | PERMALINK
Somehow, I don't think the the actual historical judgments will be made by family or the political incompetents that made up his equally criminal and incompetent coterie
Posted by: grandpajohn on December 29, 2008 at 8:38 AM | PERMALINK
calvin seems to recall similar statements made on behalf of Hitler by his hangers-on and sycophants in the Berlin bunker in 1945.
Posted by: calvinthecat on December 29, 2008 at 8:41 AM | PERMALINK
"In his latest book Bob Woodward quotes you saying, 'we should've liberated Iraq, I'd do it a thousand times again.' Would you really?" Braver asked.
"Absolutely. Because I know that the Middle East with Saddam Hussein in its center was never gonna be a Middle East that was going to change in a way that will sustain American interests, values and security."
So now we've got a Middle East with Iran as its center, and Iraq as a satellite rather than a counterweight. Great geopolitics there.
And of course, Iraq's not exactly a democracy. It seems to be headed towards Maliki being the new strongman, just not as bad as the old strongman.
And its infrastructure is shot - not only is electricity often scarce, but so is clean water. And unemployment is rampant.
Not to mention the hundreds of thousands dead and maimed, and the millions exiled. So this hasn't exactly worked out well for the people of Iraq.
So if the war hasn't exactly been a win for the people of Iraq, and hasn't been a big geopolitical plus for us, then it continues to appear that Iran was the big winner of this war.
I'd give that an F.
Posted by: low-tech cyclist on December 29, 2008 at 8:47 AM | PERMALINK
Its nice to see Bush being defended by his wives. His master, Cheney, was also out there pointing to Bush and what a great job he's done.
Now all president Obama has to do is recind that little executive order that keeps us from seeing the damage the conservative wing of the Republican party has done to the country and we can start the civil and criminal proceedings.
Posted by: madstork123 on December 29, 2008 at 8:48 AM | PERMALINK
"this administration has been concentrating solely on "lay[ing] a foundation for history's judgment,"
ummm. . . shouldn't they have been doing something, anything, to help USians NOW?
Posted by: Personal Failure on December 29, 2008 at 8:48 AM | PERMALINK
the best they can hope for is to end up among history's inept clowns instead of history's villains.
Why can't they be both? They've always seemed like inept, villainous clowns to me.
Posted by: josef on December 29, 2008 at 8:53 AM | PERMALINK
We should all wait to judge him. Preferably until the statue of limitations expires on his war crimes and gross embezzlement of taxpayers funds.
Posted by: SteveA on December 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM | PERMALINK
There is a part of me that is thankful and can see some of the good that President Bush has done for America. His administration managed to create the conditions, domestically, whereby America overwhelmingly elected Barack Obama and could have elected Hillary Clinton--something I thought was still at least a generation away. Even if America was always ready to do so (and I'm starting to suspect I was indeed wrong about the timeline), more importantly Bush created the conditions whereby a massive majority of Democrats felt that Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton could win the election. I think we would have heard a lot more "Now, I'm not saying I'm racist/sexist, I'm just saying that there are a lot of other people who are and maybe if we want to win - and we do - we should just... you know... pick the least unappealing white guy."
If Bush hadn’t overachieved at screwing up so much, I’m not convinced that the situation would have been conducive to the Democratic Party making that final step. So, the Bush administration’s decision to not be one act shy of total incompetence and maintain its rigid purity in the face of all reason and rational thought, is one I will take as a silver lining. Perhaps it is telling that I think the great accomplishment of the Bush administration is in the unintended consequences of its incompetence, but there it is.
Posted by: Anon on December 29, 2008 at 9:00 AM | PERMALINK
By any measure Bush's administration has been a HUGE success.
Now, can I have more of that Kool-aid?
Posted by: Leoguy on December 29, 2008 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK
"borders on delusional"
Ain't no borders here dude...
The joke that I was telling others 6 years ago:
What do you call someone who cannot tell reality from delusion? Answer: Mr. President
Posted by: SadOldVet on December 29, 2008 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK
I expect 'History' will be written the next time a Republican is elected President (or the time after that if the next Republican president doesn't come from the Bushite wing of the party). Until then his dwindling supporters will deny that the critisms written about Boy George II are valid 'History'.
Of course, BGII has so detroyed the reputation of their party that he may in fact not live to see his vindication/whitewashing.
Posted by: Lance on December 29, 2008 at 9:07 AM | PERMALINK
he has delivered policies that are going to stand the test of time
Ms Rice, you say that as though it were a good thing. Yes, what he has enacted is going to affect us for generations. I have a feeling that we aren't even seeing the half of it, yet.
Posted by: jcricket on December 29, 2008 at 9:23 AM | PERMALINK
The Bush clan is probably right. Russia just voted Stalin the 3rd best Russian in history.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7802485.stm
Posted by: Mark on December 29, 2008 at 9:27 AM | PERMALINK
Hey - history called her "Catherine THE GREAT", didn't they?
You just wait - they'll call W, "King George the IV".
Eventually.
/snark
Posted by: Sidewinder on December 29, 2008 at 9:45 AM | PERMALINK
All this spin of how Bush has kept us safe since 9/11 belies the fact he and his security/intelligence team could have done more to prevent 9/11 - and this is what I think historians of the future will focus upon! Bush's vacation in Crawford TX came first in August of 2001, not the urgency of the NIE!
Yes, as we have found out over the last 8 years that Mr. Bush and his WH have given us a crock-o-shit, so too will our great-great grand children come to know him! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on December 29, 2008 at 9:52 AM | PERMALINK
Aren't they the ones that relied, heavily, on our short term "what have you done for me lately" attitude? And now they want that we think long term?
How's that 401K doing now? They could ask that question 10 years from now. For most, the prospects might be back to "normal".
Clowns.
Posted by: pokeybob on December 29, 2008 at 10:14 AM | PERMALINK
From today's WaPo:
"OSHA Less Active Under Bush
Career officials say agency bowed to industry pressure on many workplace health regulations."
Every where one looks, every day in the news are examples of the failures, ineptitude, and corruption of the Bush 2 Administration. He's got a lock on "worst ever": history will simply confirm that judgment.
P.S. And Condi's seriously in the running for one of the lousiest Sec. of States ever. Want proof? Just look at what's going on in Gaza, or Africa, or Iraq ...
Posted by: sjw on December 29, 2008 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK
Yeah, maybe soon there'll be a Nobel Prize for fucking up.
Posted by: posterity on December 29, 2008 at 10:16 AM | PERMALINK
Not so much "You'll see" as "You'll forget". At the end of Reagan's administration, everybody rested easy because they knew that the caregivers were making sure that all the sharp things were well out of reach.
Today, of course, we all know that he tore down the USSR with his own hands, and invented sunlight.
Posted by: Steve Paradis on December 29, 2008 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK
Perhaps the best way to prove a man's utter failure is to trot out his wife to inform the world that, "my husband is not a failure!!! Really, he isn't!!!"
This whole new whitewash campaign is nothing more than the administration remaining consistent in denial of reality. They believed they could deny reality entirely for eight years and they were correct. Now they believe they can tell us what we'll remember and what we'll forget.
The Bush Administration says the shoe throwing incident will be forgotten, but the reality is that about 90% of the world population would like to throw a shoe themselves.
Posted by: Capt Kirk on December 29, 2008 at 10:35 AM | PERMALINK
Indeed, wishful thinking about history's judgment, in the midst of widespread failures in every aspect of government -- foreign policy, economic policy, constitutional policy, domestic policy, environmental policy -- borders on delusional.
They are just dealing with the death of their dreams of glory. Denial is the first stage of that process.
Posted by: cmdicely on December 29, 2008 at 10:54 AM | PERMALINK
I don't know why people are always complaining about the incompetence of the Bush administration. Just think how much more damage they would have done to America if they'd only known how.
Posted by: Mandy Cat on December 29, 2008 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK
Ah, where's a good pair of size 11 loafers when you need one?
-Z
Posted by: Zorro on December 29, 2008 at 11:13 AM | PERMALINK
SHORTER BUSH REGIME: we may have effed everything up, but eventually things will work out after we're gone.
.
Posted by: zoot on December 29, 2008 at 11:17 AM | PERMALINK
Right now, Bush supporters' only hope is to continue their war on public education to the degree that in a few years, most schools won't even be able to afford to teach history and any objective knowledge of the Bush years will gradually slip beneath a veil of sweet oblivion leaving only homeschooled kids weened on conservative talk radio to propagate the idea that the early 2000's were an unrivaled golden age of peace and prosperity.
Posted by: jonas on December 29, 2008 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
It seems to be headed towards Maliki being the new strongman, just not as bad as the old strongman.
Well, not yet, anyway. I have a feeling that a decade or two from now we're going to yet again be in the position of getting rid of our former good buddy who no one would have predicted would become a ruthless dictator once we handed him unlimited power.
Posted by: Mnemosyne on December 29, 2008 at 11:53 AM | PERMALINK
Rice's exact words: "I think generations pretty soon are going to start to thank this president for what he's done."
Anyone have a clue as to how the fuck long "generations pretty soon" is?
Bush and his henchmen seem to think that just blabbering out words somehow creates meaningful sentences.
Posted by: hells littlest angel on December 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM | PERMALINK
I don't know. There is a segment in our society that lionizes Hitler so much that they name their kids after him and get swastikas tatooed on their chests.
I can see perhaps 40 years from now some folks believing that Bush and Cheney were some sort of heroes for killin' up all them eyerackeys and eyerainians.
Posted by: Winkanadanod on December 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM | PERMALINK
If there's ANY plus to the reign of D+ Augustus...
it will be that it got people involved in politics again. That Americans stopped taking their Constitutional rights for granted. That Americans started taking responsibility for their own government, rather than labelling it the enemy. That a new generation of young people were inspired. That American foreign and military policy finally got the examination and debate that had been taboo for so many years of lapel-pin patriotism.
In other words, that Mr. Bush's disastrous term of office led to a revitalizing backlash. Frankly, that's the only "positive" that I can imagine might come out of the Bush years.
Posted by: Zandru on December 29, 2008 at 12:23 PM | PERMALINK
mr. shortstop and I once had dinner in a restaurant with an amazingly obnoxious waiter. Long story short, we stayed and finished our dinner because we were ravenous, but many other folks would have gotten up and walked out. When the check came, the waiter presented me with a rose and a little fake obsequiousness in a vain attempt to salvage his tip.
Condi's just frantically passing out roses instead of shutting the fuck up in mortal shame like any normal person would do in her place.
Posted by: shortstop on December 29, 2008 at 12:35 PM | PERMALINK
I wonder if Presidents Herbert Hoover, Andrew Johnson or James Buchanan were every reconciled to their utter failure in office? I'd be surprised if they were.
Bush seems to have combined the corruption of the Warren Harding administration with the economic incompetence of Herbert Hoover and added his own incompetence, intellectual laziness and indifference to governing to the mix.
Look at his choice of spokespersons. Laura's poor judgment is clear when you look at who she married. Has she ever accomplished anything other than sleeping with and marrying a rich drug and alcohol using playboy? Condi Rice's incompetence was established by her total failure as National Security Adviser to coordinate the various agencies in the Iraq invasion and the ensuing occupation. She has added to that a complete lack of accomplishment as Secretary of State. But they are trying to wind up the right-wing Wurlitzer, and possibly could succeed. It worked for Reagan, who had more of his officials convicted of felonies than any other administration.
I doubt that Karen Hughes would be much of a spokesperson to historians for Bush either. She's another example of how everyone associate with this administration has left with their reputation badly damaged, like Gonzo and Colin Powell.
Posted by: Rick B on December 29, 2008 at 12:47 PM | PERMALINK
she'd give "some" of the policy "an A-plus."
I would truly hate to see what an "F" from Condi Rice looks like.
Posted by: Glen on December 29, 2008 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK
so what did you expect her to say?
"We fucked up royally!"?
unless we have a war crimes commission, these people will never be held accountable.
Posted by: nam vet on December 29, 2008 at 1:52 PM | PERMALINK
also, what would you expect from the worst sec. state ever?
Posted by: nam vet on December 29, 2008 at 1:55 PM | PERMALINK
The WH will shred all documents that show it in anything but the most favorable light. History will judge the shrub by firsthand contemporary accounts and by the archives of other countries. That doesn't bode well for them.
Posted by: CDW on December 29, 2008 at 2:27 PM | PERMALINK
This president virtually guaranteed the "tougher circumstances" that he's had to face, by inviting them.
Posted by: Mark on December 29, 2008 at 7:06 PM | PERMALINK