December 29, 2008
WEBB EYES PRISON REFORM.... It's a crowded policy landscape, and it's daunting to consider which challenges to address first, but kudos to Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) for raising the importance of an issue that too often goes overlooked.
This spring, Webb (D-Va.) plans to introduce legislation on a long-standing passion of his: reforming the U.S. prison system. Jails teem with young black men who later struggle to rejoin society, he says. Drug addicts and the mentally ill take up cells that would be better used for violent criminals. And politicians have failed to address this costly problem for fear of being labeled "soft on crime."
"I enjoy grabbing hold of really complex issues and boiling them down in a way that they can be understood by everyone," Webb told the Washington Post. "I think you can be a law-and-order leader and still understand that the criminal justice system as we understand it today is broken, unfair, locking up the wrong people in many cases and not locking up the right person in many cases."
Maybe it takes a decorated Marine veteran who served as Navy secretary under Reagan to avoid the "soft" label.
In speeches and in a book that devotes a chapter to prison issues, Webb describes a U.S. prison system that is deeply flawed in how it targets, punishes and releases those identified as criminals.
With 2.3 million people behind bars, the United States has imprisoned a higher percentage of its population than any other nation, according to the Pew Center on the States and other groups. Although the United States has only 5 percent of the world's population, it has 25 percent of its prison population, Webb says. [...]
Webb aims much of his criticism at enforcement efforts that he says too often target low-level drug offenders and parole violators, rather than those who perpetrate violence, such as gang members. He also blames policies that strip felons of citizenship rights and can hinder their chances of finding a job after release. He says he believes society can be made safer while making the system more humane and cost-effective.
It may be a little while until we see progress on this front. This spring, Webb will introduce legislation to create a national panel on criminal justice reform. If a panel is created, it'll take a while for the members to conduct its research, and will take even more time before members of Congress are prepared to write and pass legislation.
But the process notwithstanding, Webb is not only right to tackle the issue, he's showing political courage in addressing a problem most would prefer to ignore. Good for him.
—Steve Benen 10:20 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (17)
Maybe look at the European model as they have a bit more experience than us. Make the prisons bad places to be and then they will not return instead of making them better places to live than they had outside. Thanks ACLU.
Posted by: SteveA on December 29, 2008 at 10:25 AM | PERMALINK
Re: SteveA: Don't feed the TROLL.
Posted by: CaptJP on December 29, 2008 at 10:48 AM | PERMALINK
I think you are right - the it does take a former Marine to tackle this issue without being labeled a wussy, pot-smoking hippie, bleeding-heart liberal.
Go Webb.
Posted by: ArtEclectic on December 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM | PERMALINK
It would be great to see Webb also raise the issue of prison rape - one of the biggest obscenities of our society. The only thing more obscene than the tens of thousands of rapes annually in our prisons is the fact that it is still socially acceptable to laugh at this - see Leno, Jay. It would be awesome to see liberal bloggers putting some much-needed pressure on Obama to start taking steps to cut out this massive blight on our claim to be a civilized society.
Posted by: macleodcartoons on December 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM | PERMALINK
I'm with you Steve A. Lets do it like the Europeans, who incarcerate a much much smaller percentage and yet have a lower crime rate, especially a lower violent crime rate. That's what you meant wasn't it?
Posted by: vrk on December 29, 2008 at 11:03 AM | PERMALINK
That is what I meant. Rehabilitate those that are not true criminals and also eliminate the death penalty because if a prison is truly a "prison", there is no need for it.
Posted by: SteveA on December 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM | PERMALINK
Speaking as a former corrections officer, THANK YOU, JIM WEBB. Finally someone wants to deal with this disaster.
There are huge numbers of areas to deal with. If anyone is interested, I would be willing to post my list here in another post.
Posted by: Andrew on December 29, 2008 at 11:31 AM | PERMALINK
A high-level federal panel on this subject is a good idea and long overdue. However, we should bear in mind that the great majority of prisoners in the United States are held in state prisons and local jails, not in the federal system, and that the kind of prisoners in the former are often different than the kind in the latter (for example, state prisons often hold a higher proportion of violent offenders; more drug dealers tend to end up in federal prison). Sen. Webb will be aware of this, and the comment is not meant as criticism of his initiative.
Posted by: Zathras on December 29, 2008 at 12:00 PM | PERMALINK
Oh, but prisons are now corporate run businesses with prisoners being the raw material, the government and taxpayers building the physical structures, which when remotely located become 'company towns', and where the only jobs around are 'prison guards'. Overcrowded jails send their raw material to other locations that have empty beds, at a high per diem. Take 'profit' out of this system right away. Release non-violent offenders.
Posted by: slanted tom on December 29, 2008 at 12:01 PM | PERMALINK
As for the "soft" label:
Republicans are "soft" on budget discipline when they want to spend money imprisoning harmless, if annoying, potheads.
They are "soft" on freedom when they decide smoking weed is a jail worthy crime rather than yet another stupid waste of money like alcohol.
They are "soft" on economic growth when you take taxpayers and make them taxmoney sinks by not only removing their tax contributions by taking their jobs away but hire a few babysitters to watch them for 5-20 years.
They are "soft" on crime when police are given credit for cracking down on victimless vice crimes instead of freeing up their time for crimes that actually affect the smooth functioning of society.
Posted by: toowearyforoutrage on December 29, 2008 at 1:14 PM | PERMALINK
This may not be the right time to eliminate prison jobs. We should wait until the economy improves. . . Oh, wait - I forgot about all the Wall Street guys that will be doing time. . .
Posted by: Wisconsin Reader on December 29, 2008 at 1:29 PM | PERMALINK
US policy criminalizes poverty and mental illness, and over one half of ALL inpatient psychiatric care is delivered in prisons. That permanently ostracizes and stigmatizes people with neurophysiological illnesses. Prisons are a booming industry and are one of the very few "growth" industries in the US.
http://www.physorg.com/news149769761.html
Posted by: Annie on December 29, 2008 at 1:39 PM | PERMALINK
We don't need prison reform, we need to eliminate sixty years of prison reform. The countries with much lower recividision (sp) rates then ours use a very effective model...
... the U.S. Prison system of the 1950s.
Let's go back to what works.
Posted by: Lance on December 29, 2008 at 1:41 PM | PERMALINK
I applaud Senator Webb, but I'll tell you who has real political courage. The first national level politico to stand up and admit that the war on drugs does not, has not and never will work.
Posted by: sceptic on December 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM | PERMALINK
Jim Webb is about the only politician in Washington I have any respect for, and the only one with any real intelligence. For ex., instead of just swallowing free trade ideology like the dim witted economists and the Econ 101 crowd, he actually has gone out and studied the issue, finding out how other nations tackle the inherent problems.
Posted by: Luther on December 29, 2008 at 3:55 PM | PERMALINK
This may sound trollish but I'm genuinely curious.
So America has a higher percentage of prisoners than any other nation. But how many of those other nations (if any) have a higher percentage of prisoners killed for crimes for which the American justice system does not command the death penalty?
Again, I Admit I'm coming from a place of ignorance, and I'm wondering what the answer is. It's not meant to imply that American prisons are trouble-free or that Webb's goal is not honorable.
Posted by: slappy magoo on December 29, 2008 at 7:04 PM | PERMALINK
I believe that there are more death penalty cases in the U.S. than in any other developed "western" country. The death penalty is allowed for only a couple of offenses here, and is not used except in countries ruled by despots or communists.
Posted by: Wagner1959 on December 30, 2008 at 12:15 AM | PERMALINK