December 29, 2008
WHEN OSHA GOT BUSH-IFIED.... The Bush gang? Ignoring the public's interests, politicizing a key federal agency, and advancing corporate interests above all else? You don't say.
In early 2001, an epidemiologist at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration sought to publish a special bulletin warning dental technicians that they could be exposed to dangerous beryllium alloys while grinding fillings. Health studies showed that even a single day's exposure at the agency's permitted level could lead to incurable lung disease.
After the bulletin was drafted, political appointees at the agency gave a copy to a lobbying firm hired by the country's principal beryllium manufacturer, according to internal OSHA documents. The epidemiologist, Peter Infante, incorporated what he considered reasonable changes requested by the company and won approval from key directorates, but he bristled when the private firm complained again.
"In my 24 years at the Agency, I have never experienced such indecision and delay," Infante wrote in an e-mail to the agency's director of standards in March 2002. Eventually, top OSHA officials decided, over what Infante described in an e-mail to his boss as opposition from "the entire OSHA staff working on beryllium issues," to publish the bulletin with a footnote challenging a key recommendation the firm opposed.
Current and former career officials at OSHA say that such sagas were a recurrent feature during the Bush administration, as political appointees ordered the withdrawal of dozens of workplace health regulations, slow-rolled others, and altered the reach of its warnings and rules in response to industry pressure.
In all, under Bush, 86% fewer rules were found economically significant as compared to a similar period during the Clinton years.
By all appearances, this administration barely wants OSHA to even exist, so I suppose it stands to reason that Bush political appointees would gut the agency and turn to lobbyists to help guide OSHA's decision making. Indeed, it's hard to count just how many regulatory agencies have, under this president, effectively been run by the business interests it was supposed to be regulating.
Just another addition to the long list of government departments that Obama is going to have to fix.
—Steve Benen 11:15 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (13)
Perhaps you should supplement this post with a link to today's LAT article in which Elaine Chao boasts of her record as the Secretary of Labor during the last eight years. It almost beats Rice's defense of their foreign policies.
Posted by: gregor on December 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM | PERMALINK
Interesting to note: the OSHA headline in the online WP is "OSHA Less Active Under Bush" while the paper version OSHA headline is "Under Bush, OSHA Mired in Inaction".
Posted by: MattF on December 29, 2008 at 11:40 AM | PERMALINK
If a "single day's exposure" to these beryllium alloys could result in "incurable lung disease," it's got to make one wonder what they're doing as the alloys break down in our mouths (or how about just when we breathe the dust from the griding ourselves?).
Perhaps the Beryllium lobby could weigh in on this? I mean, if OSHA doesn't have an opinion.
Posted by: Shantyhag on December 29, 2008 at 11:41 AM | PERMALINK
Indeed, it's hard to count just how many regulatory agencies have, under this president, effectively been run by the business interests it was supposed to be regulating.
Assume all.
Posted by: martin on December 29, 2008 at 11:47 AM | PERMALINK
So by this lack of safety oversight people will get sick and posibly die just so a few others can profit by it. I defy anyone to argue with me that Bush and his cronies are not criminals that deserve to tried and punished.
Posted by: Gandalf on December 29, 2008 at 11:48 AM | PERMALINK
So by this lack of safety oversight people will get sick and posibly die just so a few others can profit by it.
Culture of Life, baby!
Posted by: jonas on December 29, 2008 at 11:54 AM | PERMALINK
Assume all. - martin
It's called "small government" conservatism. Eliminate barriers to free enterprise. Assume nothing less than all.
Posted by: Danp on December 29, 2008 at 11:56 AM | PERMALINK
During the course of the next four years, Americans had better come to the realization that the Reagan Revolution wasn't a realignment, it was the beginning of a coup. The goal was to dismantle government as we knew it, one brick at a time, rolling back all progress since the early 20th century -- leaving the rich and powerful to run amok without boundaries and the rest of us without recourse.
Modern conservatives are radical beyond the imagination of the average citizen, who's become a willing victim of conservative propaganda that tells them that liberalism is the enemy. We worry about low-probability attacks from foreigners and wars on holidays and who wears a flag on his or her lapel when all the while the government is being hollowed out from within. Then we wonder why we can't deal with a hurricane, why bridges fall, why we can't afford health care, or educate our kids or keep our jobs.
Supermajorities will agree the country is headed in the wrong direction, but they don't connect that with how they voted or the attitudes they've adopted based on lies and misdirection. And don't forget, there's some in that "wrong direction" crowd who think we haven't gone conservative enough.
Obama's election represents a potential step in halting the backslide of the past 30 years, but unless the voters understand that conservatism is hellbent on destroying America as we've known it, it's a tenuous step that could easily be undone.
Posted by: beep52 on December 29, 2008 at 12:04 PM | PERMALINK
Years from now, generations of dental technicians will thank Bush for everything he's done to expose them to beryllium.
[/condi]
Posted by: David Bailey on December 29, 2008 at 12:07 PM | PERMALINK
Nothing that Obama has done (not said) so far suggests that he will not allow the business interests to have just an important a say in these matters for the sake of 'reconcilliation' and 'disagreement without being impolite'.
Posted by: gregor on December 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM | PERMALINK
i agree with gregor.
so far obama's silence is DEAFENING.
he is of the squishy center and has never pretended to be a real liberal. many are soon to have buyer's remorse.
Posted by: nam vet on December 29, 2008 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK
Here is Labor Secretary Elaine Chao speaking to Judy Woodruff in an interview in 2004:
JUDY WOODRUFF'S INSIDE POLITICS
February 6, 2004 - 15:30 ET
WOODRUFF: We are joined now by the Secretary of Labor, Elaine Chao...
I want to cite the one economic analyst with Credit Suisse First Boston. He said, these are his words, quote, "very disappointing; we're not getting the jobs to replace the stimulus in the economy which will fade once the first quarter ends." Another economist said, "It's the weakest job-creation rate relative to economic growth on record."
CHAO: Well, the stock market is, after all, the final arbiter. And the stock market was very strong this morning in reaction to the news that we have just received.
-- Wow, that's rich. A Labor Secretary who says Wall Street is the final arbiter of the state of the economy. Four years after she said these words stock prices have tanked and Wall Street is riven with bankruptcies and illegal financial schemes. Workers' 401K's are being canceled as I type.
If Secretary Chao was so eager to bask in Wall Street's reflected light in 2004 is she willing to shoulder her share of the blame for how things have turned out in 2008?
Posted by: pj in jesusland on December 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM | PERMALINK
Thanks shantyhag
"If a "single day's exposure" to these beryllium alloys could result in "incurable lung disease," it's got to make one wonder what they're doing as the alloys break down in our mouths (or how about just when we breathe the dust from the griding ourselves?)."
Exactly my question:
Posted by: Kurt on December 29, 2008 at 3:18 PM | PERMALINK