 |
 |
   Memo: The way forward on health care reform in 2010.
|
   |
|
|
December 30, 2008
TUESDAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP....Today's installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn't generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers. * Rahm Emanuel will formally give up his House seat on Friday. It falls to Rod Blagojevich, of all people, to set a date for a special election. There are as many as 11 Democrats eyeing the race. * As of right now, Al Franken leads Norm Coleman by 50 votes. * The Coleman campaign yesterday offered a list of rejected absentee ballots that they say should be counted, but they're all from Republican strongholds. Coleman's team is also gearing up to go after state election officials. * CNN did a national poll on whether Caroline Kennedy is qualified to serve as a U.S. senator. A 52% majority said she is, while 42% said she isn't. There was a sizable gender gap. * Candidates vying to be the chairman of the Republican National Committee may engage in a "special forum," in which each contender would outline their visions for the party's future. * Hopes that Gov. Kathleen Sebelius might run for the Senate in 2010 would be dashed if she becomes the chancellor of the University of Kansas, as is now rumored. —Steve Benen 12:00 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (10)Comments
Of course Kennedy is qualified. She's old enough. That's the only "qualification" the Constitution lays out. Personally, I'm not so enamored with her. Don't we have enough Kennedys in the US Congress already? But I don't live in New York, so it isn't my decision on any level. And besides, giving that one Senate seat to her probably won't have too much of an effect. So go for it, NY, if you feel like it. Posted by: Shade Tail on December 30, 2008 at 12:02 PM | PERMALINKIt would be awesome if the RNC beauty pageant includes a talent competition so we'd get to watch the candidates trying to outperform each other with their tapdancing blackface karaoke renditions of Barack the Magic Ni**er. Posted by: melior on December 30, 2008 at 12:09 PM | PERMALINKHopes that Gov. Kathleen Sebelius might run for the Senate in 2010 would be dashed if she becomes the chancellor of the University of Kansas, as is now rumored. Why so? 1948--Dwight Eisenhower becomes presdient of Columbia University. Or: 1902--Woodrow Wilson accepts presidency of Princeton University http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2008/12/blagojevich-to-name-burris-to-senate.html Blagojevich to name former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris to replace Obama in the Senate. Posted by: DJ on December 30, 2008 at 12:23 PM | PERMALINK"CNN did a national poll on whether Caroline Kennedy is qualified to serve as a U.S. senator. A 52% majority said she is, while 42% said she isn't. There was a sizable gender gap." Of course Caroline Kennedy is qualified. Despite the media's assertions to the contrary, this question is not the main issue with most of her detractors. The issues are: Is she the most qualified? And all else being equal, is she the most deserving? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding no. Posted by: CJ on December 30, 2008 at 12:39 PM | PERMALINKmelior: too obvious, man. I think they will go back to the classics and see who can do the best Song of the South routine. Posted by: northzax on December 30, 2008 at 12:40 PM | PERMALINKThe issues are: Is she the most qualified? And all else being equal, is she the most deserving? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding no. This has been another edition of "Subjective Answers to Subjective Questions". Every time I read that Caroline Kennedy is not qualified, I look at Ahnold. At least a Senator is not the leader of the fifth biggest economy in the world. Maybe if she took steroids she would be acceptable??? Posted by: jen f on December 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM | PERMALINKjen: That's an interesting non sequitur. What does criticism of Kennedy have to do with the governor of California? Posted by: Shade Tail on December 30, 2008 at 11:19 PM | PERMALINKWhat constitutes qualifications for a woman seems to be much higher than for a man. Posted by: jen f on December 31, 2008 at 9:30 AM | PERMALINK
February 2010
January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 |
|
|
    |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
