Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

January 12, 2009

STIMULUS CHANGES AFOOT.... Last week, top Obama transition officials met with several senators to go over details on the economic recovery plan, but the lawmakers were far from pleased with what they heard. Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), one of many with concerns, said that Lawrence Summers ended the meeting by saying, "Message received, loud and clear."

Apparently, Summers meant it, and the incoming administration has made some significant changes to the stimulus package.

Emerging from a two-hour meeting in the Capitol with Obama advisers Lawrence Summers and Jason Furman, Senate Democrats praised the President-elect's team for agreeing to make changes to its stimulus proposal based off of concerns senators raised last week at a meeting with the president-elect's senior aides.

The Obama team told about 35 Senate Democrats gathered at Sunday's meeting that it would grow the size of an energy-tax incentive package and modify proposed tax credits for individuals and for businesses that hire new employees, according to meeting attendees. Also, with lawmakers raising concerns that the first half of the $700 billion of the financial rescue law was badly mismanaged, Obama's team signaled it would lay out precisely how it would spend the second half of that package, which Congress is expected to consider as soon as this week.

"It's very clear they've listened, they've heard and that they're moving to respond," said Sen. Kent Conrad, chairman of the Budget Committee, who questioned previously whether the tax credits in the stimulus package were enough to encourage new jobs. "It was very, very healthy. They're not defensive, not arguing back, they're listening, they're attempting to hear and they're responding."

Everyone sounds much happier now. John Kerry's concerns over business tax breaks are leading to changes, while Sens. Barbara Boxer's (D-Calif.) and Maria Cantwell's (D-Wash.) arguments have led Obama to double funds for energy tax credits.

All of this sounds encouraging -- I found the senators' concerns pretty compelling -- but based on media reports on yesterday's meetings, there isn't a sense that the stimulus plan is going to be bigger, only that the money to be allocated will be used more efficiently and effectively. To that end, the transition team appears to be making changes within the $775 billion package, while economists are pushing for a more ambitious approach.

Still, the improvements seem to be a step in the right direction, and demonstrate a flexibility on the part of Obama's team. The president-elect has spoken repeatedly about his openness to new ideas, and he appears to mean it.

As for the calendar, Obama has signaled that he wants the rescue plan on his desk by mid-February, and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) predicted yesterday that Congress should be able to deliver the package by February 13.

Steve Benen 8:00 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (7)
 
Comments

Obama's team signaled it would lay out precisely how it would spend the second half of that package

This statement reflects what frustrates me not only for asking to release the second half of the TARP money, but with the economic recovery plan as well. They may as well be saying, "give me the money, and then I'll explain the plan."

As for the tax cuts, both Obama's team and the Senators need to keep their eye on the ball. The purpose is to revive the economy. Don't just tell us we need tax cuts, because we don't have enough "shovel ready" projects. Tell us specifically how "energy tax incentives" are going to provide immediate relief. I'm going to be really pissed if I just end up with more corn in my gas tank, worse fuel efficiency, and higher prices because they haven't done anything about commodity price manipulation.

Posted by: Danp on January 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM | PERMALINK

"[W]hile economists are pushing for a more ambitious approach." TPM had a great comment yesterday that reflects my opinion on those criticizing that stimulus bill: instead of complaining that it should be more ambitious, why not propose some additional measures? It is clear the Transition Team is open to any suggestions, so nitpicking from the sidelines isn't warranted. Yes, I'm looking at you Paul Krugman.

Posted by: KJ on January 12, 2009 at 8:22 AM | PERMALINK

"it would grow the size of an energy-tax incentive package"

Dear Politico,

Please hire a copyeditor who knows the difference between "grow" and "increase." Just because you're writing for the web doesn't mean English can be so mangled.

Thank you,
Militant Grammarians

Posted by: Trevor J on January 12, 2009 at 8:52 AM | PERMALINK

A. Use the bailout money for things the Republicans don't want.
B. Get more bailout money from Congress by pledging to do more of the things Republicans want.
Rinse and repeat until the stimulus package is big enough and EVERYONE is on board. If it works, everybody gets credit; if it doesn't, everybody shares blame.

Posted by: Jim 7 on January 12, 2009 at 9:24 AM | PERMALINK

Thank you, TrevorJ, for that nostalgic trip back to the dictionaries of the 1890s.

Posted by: berttheclock on January 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM | PERMALINK

I'm becoming concerned that Obama's getting a reputation of being a "guy you can roll."

We've been hearing from GOP leadership that Obama keeps moving toward them; now we're hearing the same thing from the majority.

I hope he isn't going to be a guy who supports the position of the last person he speaks with.

Posted by: howie on January 12, 2009 at 9:51 AM | PERMALINK

I hope we are considering the multiple meanings of efficiency:
(1) Getting the most short term stimulus for a nominal amount of stimulus money.
(2) Getting us into a better longterm position with respect to critical commodities, such as oil.
(3) Getting some return of capital to the government, as in build something we charge for the use of. As in the only way to make the stimulus large enough is to (at least partially) dispell concerns about blowing up the deficit.

I hope we aren't just taking the political path of least resistance instead.

Posted by: bigTom on January 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals