January 23, 2009
FRIDAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP....Today's installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn't generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers.
* Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand's (D) selection as New York's new senator has pushed a whole lot of dominoes in the Empire State and "appears to have thrown the state's political scene into a free-for-all."
* As expected, even before taking office, Gillibrand seems to already be shifting to the left. The first issue is gay rights, on which Gillibrand has been anything but a progressive ally.
* A special three-judge panel rejected Al Franken's request that Norm Coleman's latest lawsuit be dismissed.
* Illinois State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias (D), a close friend to Barack Obama, has begun taking steps toward challenging Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) in a 2010 Democratic primary.
* Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) for president? John McCain raised the possibility last night.
* I knew Obama was popular, but I didn't expect him to have 60% approval ratings in very "red" states like Texas and Tennessee.
—Steve Benen 12:00 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (15)
I'm glad to hear Gillinbrand is inching to the left.
She may prove to be a very good pick.
Posted by: "inching to the left" is fine by me! on January 23, 2009 at 12:04 PM | PERMALINK
"Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) for president? John McCain raised the possibility last night."
Oh please, please, please... Senator Kyl manages to make McCain look steady, rational and high-minded.
Posted by: Ish on January 23, 2009 at 12:07 PM | PERMALINK
Kyl for president? Wow, if there's anything that can save the GOP now, it's running an old white guy for president. Lotta thinkin' Vern.
Posted by: jonas on January 23, 2009 at 12:18 PM | PERMALINK
Kyl would be 71 in 2012 - just what we need another crotchety geezer, just pair him up with Palin and awayaaaa we go
Posted by: John R on January 23, 2009 at 12:27 PM | PERMALINK
"Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand's (D) selection as New York's new senator has pushed a whole lot of dominoes in the Empire State and 'appears to have thrown the state's political scene into a free-for-all.'"
I think the use of the phrase "free-for-all" is hyperbolic. Yes, there are going to be primary challenges. That's a good thing.
Posted by: CJ on January 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM | PERMALINK
Another old white male Senator from Arizona--yeah, that'll be the salvation for Republicans. And even more conservative than McCain, I'm guessing.
Posted by: Allan Snyder on January 23, 2009 at 12:34 PM | PERMALINK
New York is losing a House seat in the next re-districting. Maybe it'll be Gillibrand's, which eliminates one problem.
Posted by: CJColucci on January 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM | PERMALINK
"As expected"? Can you tell me who in the blogosphere has said they expect that?
Your earlier comment was "We'll see". Hardly "expected".
And while it is a change, her earlier position was having a federal law making civil unions legal in all 50 states. That's hardly a conservative position.
Posted by: DR on January 23, 2009 at 12:39 PM | PERMALINK
* Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) for president? John McCain raised the possibility last night.
McCain let this accidently slip? Mr. Puddles suddenly comes to mind.
Posted by: Mick on January 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM | PERMALINK
TPMDC expresses pleased surprise that support for gay marriage would be a political plus, but I think this is two areas -- the other being marijuana leglization -- where the country has gotten ahead of 'conventional liberals.' (In fact, I would expect support for either would be a plus for even Conservative Republicans, if they are running in 'frontier Conservative' states like Arizona and Wyoming (not "Christian" or "Mormon" Conservative ones), where conservatism has always had a tinge of libertarianism -- remember it was Wyoming that was the first state that gave women the right to vote.)
I think there would be considerable support for a bill that
a) declared marriage a 'state issue' (except as modiefied by Loving) and
b) required states to give 'full faith and credence' to any marriage legal in the state performed, whether it was legal for those people to get married in the second state.
(I also think an announcement from AG Holder or Obama that the federal government will accept a state's right to pass -- at first -- 'medical marijuana' laws without interposing federal criminal sanctions would be overwhelmingly accepted, if recent polls I've seen are even slightly accurate.)
Posted by: Prup (aka Jim Benton) on January 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM | PERMALINK
Hillary Clinton's replacement is amazing! She gave a passionate, very Obama-like policy speech at the end of her press conference just now.
Of course the major networks had cut out before this happened, so only C-Span had it.
She seems to have absorbed the Obama approach while sounding authentic. Of course that is the main key to Obama. She talks about faith, family and public service in ways which should scare the hell out of Republicans.
She seems to have the intellect of a Hillary, with the passion of Obama. Today was her version of the Obama 2004 convention speech.
In striking contrast, Chuck Schumer took the stage and remained partisan, ideological and praised her for being a woman from upstate NY, just like Obama is black, giving hope to other blacks. What a jerk.
Posted by: tomj on January 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM | PERMALINK
Jon Kyl?
McCain's just a goofy old guy compared to Kyl. Kyl's a real extremist - thinks a lot like Cheney. Hopefully the nation has had enough of old white guys from this state.
Posted by: AZmando on January 23, 2009 at 2:35 PM | PERMALINK
Hillary Clinton's replacement is amazing!
Yeah, if by "amazing" you mean a pro-gun Blue Dog.
Then, yeah, she's amazing. Whatever.
Posted by: Screamin' Demon on January 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM | PERMALINK
It doesn't surprise me that McCain thinks Kyl would be a good choice for President. After all, he thought Palin was a good choice for Vice President.
Posted by: winddancer on January 23, 2009 at 4:16 PM | PERMALINK
I find it VERY hard to accept the idea that Obama has a 60% approval rating in rock-solid Republican states Texas and Tennessee (and where most registered Democrats are probably DINO, Zell-Miller types).
Posted by: daniel rotter on January 23, 2009 at 9:06 PM | PERMALINK