February 5, 2009
IN DEFENSE OF 'HONEYBEE INSURANCE'.... Congressional Republicans, desperate to find provisions in the economic stimulus package that can be exploited to kill the bill, have taken an interest in "honeybee insurance," a favorite of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)
The LA Times' Michael Hiltzik explains today that GOP lawmakers just aren't "doing their homework."
It turns out that the Senate minority leader took his cue from Neil Cavuto of Fox News, who has been carrying on about the topic for more than a week. Their campaign was joined Tuesday by Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), who stood on the floor of the chamber challenging "any member to come and explain what that provision was."
I'm no senator, but I'm pleased to inform Vitter that it is, in fact, a disaster insurance program for all livestock producers. Beekeepers obviously would be minor beneficiaries next to, say, cattle ranchers, so it's a tad bit dishonest to label the whole program "honeybee insurance."
The provision simply continues a program enacted by Congress last year, overriding a veto by President Bush. In other words, the Senate voted on it twice in 2008 -- once to enact and once to override. Connoisseurs of political comedy will see the punch line coming: McConnell and Vitter voted yea both times.
So it turns out that McConnell isn't really against honeybees. He's only using them to pretend that he's got a principled objection to a stimulus plan aimed at pulling the country out of the most severe recession in decades.
The honeybees, and the rest of us, are merely collateral damage.
I like to think there will come a day when Republican lawmakers will appreciate the gravity of their responsibilities and take public policy seriously. I just have no idea when that day will arrive.
—Steve Benen 4:05 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (31)
...a disaster insurance program for all livestock producers.
Why should we pay for that?
Posted by: Haik Bedrosian on February 5, 2009 at 4:06 PM | PERMALINK
It's nice to see the Republicans doing their best to alienate rural folks who would benefit from such a useful program.
I cannot wait until the Republicans have alienated everyone, everywhere. That might take until Tuesday.
Posted by: freelunch on February 5, 2009 at 4:08 PM | PERMALINK
Q. "I just have no idea when that day will arrive."
A. "In the year 2525,
if man is still alive..."
Posted by: low-tech cyclist on February 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM | PERMALINK
Isn't Vitter the guy who got outed for hiring prostitutes? Does he have the moral authority to challenge anyone on anything? The good people of Louisiana must be proud.
Posted by: Jamobey on February 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM | PERMALINK
Yeah, Drum is on this honeybee stuff too. It's actually good to support honeybees and protect against losses, those tireless insects keep our agricultural system going and it has been touch and go keeping them protected from whatever has been wrecking their hives lately. BTW how is that going?
Posted by: Neil B ☺ on February 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM | PERMALINK
If the Republican congressional leaders insist on bending the political debate their way by obfuscation and deceit while they play out their scenes on the political stage, they better prepare themselves for the final curtain call in 2010 when their entire run as a political party will be canceled and no more performances scheduled for future election engagements! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on February 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM | PERMALINK
American beekeepers have been going out of business due to cheaper foreign imported honey. That means fewer bees to pollinate what's left of American agriculture. American beekeepers need some kind of subsidy to maintain a healthy number of hives for pollination.
http://www.beesource.com/news/article/bell.htm
People should care because cheap honey at the market is going to mean higher food costs, Johnston said. That's because fewer bees means less pollination, which means smaller crops and higher prices, he said.
Paul Hendricks, the editor of Denver-based Bee Notes trade journal, said that a domino effect is just waiting to happen.
As large beekeepers fold, food will cost more, Hendricks said.
For the first time, there's a shortage of almonds in California because of a shortage of bees.
Not to mention scientists are no closer than they were two years ago to figuring out why Europe and America's honeybees are dying at unprecedented rates.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_605674.html
Since Haik asked, and all.
Posted by: Keori on February 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM | PERMALINK
I like to think there will come a day when Republican lawmakers will appreciate the gravity of their responsibilities and take public policy seriously. I just have no idea when that day will arrive.
Really? That's just pure fantasy. When in 1933 and later did the Republican dead enders ever see the light?
They were removed by the voting public or retired which is the only reason they stopped carping. Many were replaced by new people with the same attitudes, but who had no reason to go back and refight already lost battles.
Those people will not change. They have to be removed from office.
Posted by: Rick B on February 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM | PERMALINK
Republicans are the party of mindless destruction. DESTROY.
Posted by: Northern Observer on February 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM | PERMALINK
Pat Buchanan on MSNBC a few minutes ago pretty much said everything you need to know: "The honeymoon's over, and there's a whole lot of wifebeating going on."
Ah, the right....
Posted by: ericfree on February 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM | PERMALINK
The facts surrounding "honeybee insurance" are irrelevant. They have their sound bite...and the "liberal media" will play it ad nauseum.
Where are our talking points? Where are our coordinated messages? Where are our sound bites?
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but many of our fellow Americans are uneducated, misinformed, uninformed, lazy or just plain stupid. As a result, sadly, coordinated talking points, coordinated messages and sound bites work ("death tax" anyone?). The sooner we realize it, the easier it'll be to educate others and get our agenda passed.
Posted by: CJ on February 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM | PERMALINK
Why does Mitch hate the beekeepers?
Posted by: Homer Abernathy on February 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM | PERMALINK
An ignorance of science? Agriculature, polination? You betcha! The Party of Big Ideas.
Posted by: grinning cat on February 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
Steve: "I just have no idea when that day will arrive."
I do. Never.
Posted by: Jim Pharo on February 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
Their campaign was joined Tuesday by Sen. David Vitter (R-La.),
Vitter really shouldn't get his diapers in a twist about this.
Posted by: Stefan on February 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM | PERMALINK
No, it'll happen. After they're voted out of office and their responsibilities consist of trying to score lucrative lobbying gigs.
Posted by: Mahnkenstein on February 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM | PERMALINK
Republicans are the party of mindless destruction. DESTROY.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism - at least they had an ethos.
I'm just curious which of the R Senate contingent is Karl Hungus.
Posted by: kenga on February 5, 2009 at 4:40 PM | PERMALINK
Why should we pay for that? -Haik Bedrosian
First they came for the honeybee, and I said nothing...
Posted by: doubtful on February 5, 2009 at 4:40 PM | PERMALINK
Not to mention scientists are no closer than they were two years ago to figuring out why Europe and America's honeybees are dying at unprecedented rates.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_605674.html
That's a misstatement of the article's information. Scientists don't now have an answer, but they certainly know more.
As to Vitter, I find his ignorance particularly ironic because traditionally the state where the most honey bee queens were reared for stocking honey bee hives around the nation was -
Louisiana........
Posted by: oddjob on February 5, 2009 at 4:41 PM | PERMALINK
I just have no idea when that day will arrive.
I keep a close eye on the weather forecast for the Ninth Circle of South Hades. (I have friends and relations there.) If I notice a cooling trend, I'll let you know.
Posted by: Quaker in a Basement on February 5, 2009 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK
"I like to think there will come a day when Republican lawmakers will appreciate the gravity of their responsibilities and take public policy seriously. I just have no idea when that day will arrive."
The day AFTER the last Republican't is voted out of office.
Posted by: Sarah Barracuda on February 5, 2009 at 7:40 PM | PERMALINK
I, for one, support insurance for honeybees. Seriously, I am not joking. Think about it. Our entire food chain is utterly dependent on food crops being properly polinated. Without polination there is no corn, rice, oats...and without those much of our livestock starves...and us. Honeybees are no joke. There are not enough other beneficial polination helpers to cover a devastating loss of honeybees. This isn't about honey...its about insuring a fundamental link in our food supply.
Posted by: independent thinker on February 5, 2009 at 7:47 PM | PERMALINK
Why should we pay for that?["that" being disaster insurance for livestock producers] -- Haik Bedrosian, @16:06
Don't know about you, but I like my steak. Which I won't be able to get, if my steak-on-the-hoof doesn't get fed, because its food ain't multiplying, due to lack of pollination.
And, even if you're a total vegan... How would you like to say "good bye" to fruit? Or did you think that daddy fruit tree strolls over to mommy fruit tree for a ritual yearly mating, which results in all those little baby fruit?
I wonder if a bee got caught in Vitter's diaper at some point; angry bees can be really mean. They're the suicide bombers of the insect word... :)
Posted by: exlibra on February 5, 2009 at 7:52 PM | PERMALINK
Although it's been forgotten in the mists of time and other crises, one of the many egregious moves Bush made early on was to cut the already-paltry federal funding for researching the honeybee disease problems:
Even commercial beekeepers, who take extraordinary measures to ward off pests and disease, are in trouble. During the winter of 2000-2001, Maryland was among East Coast states hit particularly hard by drought and mite-related causes. While a federal program has helped to restock the hives, winter losses generally remain far higher than in pre-mite times. Wild bees remain scarce; longtime beekeepers are calling it quits, and too few new ones are taking their place.
Which is why beekeepers from California to Virginia are scratching their heads at the Bush administration's proposal to close three of the four Department of Agriculture bee research laboratories, including the first, opened in the 1890s in Chevy Chase and moved to Beltsville in 1939.
To save money and avoid possible duplication, the president has proposed closing the bee labs at Beltsville, Baton Rouge, La., and Tucson. The laboratory at Weslaco, Tex., would remain open. Funding would be reduced from $5.7 million to $2.5 million, and the number of positions cut from 21 to 9.
"It's like cutting all research for mad-cow disease just when an epidemic of the disease reaches its pinnacle and decimates our beef industry," said Laszlo Pentek, an Arlington beekeeper.
http://www.cyberbee.net/news/mites.htm
Indeed. It's almost like Bush has wanted to exacerbate these various crises. Hey, it's only our food supply, right?
Posted by: trex on February 5, 2009 at 7:56 PM | PERMALINK
I would venture to say that honeybees are much more important to this nation than is Senator McConnell.
Posted by: Claimsman on February 5, 2009 at 8:32 PM | PERMALINK
Yes, we need bees for food pollination. Those who make it all about honey really do know nothing. Reminds me of Sarah Palin's mocking of fruit fly genetic research during the campaign.
But hey, mocking something is a lot easier than doing the research. Now can we get a rebuttal from the 4th estate? I'm not holding my breath, except maybe from Keith or Rachel...
Posted by: Bees on February 5, 2009 at 8:57 PM | PERMALINK
Large sectors of American agriculture depend on honeybees. McConnell and other Republicans probably have a plan for farmers to hire desperate workers at below minimum wage to hand-pollinate millions of almond flowers with little paintbrushes, and uncountable other crops.
Posted by: sara on February 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM | PERMALINK
I like to think there will come a day when Republican lawmakers will appreciate the gravity of their responsibilities and take public policy seriously.
===================================
I like to think there will come a day when I win the Super Ultra Mega Gonzo Monster Lottery and become a billionaire philanthropist.
And frankly, I think my chances (although lousy) are better than yours.
With kind regards,
Dog, etc.
searching for home
Posted by: Ghost of Joe Liebling's Dog on February 5, 2009 at 10:24 PM | PERMALINK
If all those arguments about honeybees are true...then the farmers should pay for the honeybee insurance, right? They have the incentive to do so since their business depends on it. At least, the states that are affected should pay for it if it's a real problem.
If General Motors has a machine that keeps on breaking, shouldn't they pay for the insurance on it? (ok, bad example, probably they would try to make the taxpayer pay for it too) Is it the federal government's responsibility to pay for every business that has problems, even those entirely unrelated to our current crisis? If so, I suspect there will not be much money left for other progressive priorities. This sounds like another farm giveaway to me...as if there aren't enough of those already.
Posted by: jamie on February 5, 2009 at 10:54 PM | PERMALINK
I agree with Jamie from the previous comment. Only 10B of this spending is for infrastructure. That's pathetic. We're going to fritter away 90B and only have something to show for 10 of it? The rest is for crap like bee insurance. Stupid! This is deficit spending! No less than 50B should be spent on infrastructure. I want to see decent intercity American rail in my lifetime.
I'm starting to think that's not to bee.
Posted by: Haik Bedrosian on February 5, 2009 at 11:39 PM | PERMALINK
Honey bees are agricultural infrastructure.
From the USDA Agricultural Research Service:
"Bee pollination is responsible for $15 billion in added crop value, particularly for specialty crops such as almonds and other nuts, berries, fruits, and vegetables. About one mouthful in three in the diet directly or indirectly benefits from honey bee pollination. While there are native pollinators (honey bees came from the Old World with European colonists), honey bees are more prolific and the easiest to manage for the large scale pollination that U.S. agriculture requires. In California, the almond crop alone uses 1.3 million colonies of bees, approximately one half of all honey bees in the United States, and this need is projected to grow to 1.5 million colonies by 2010.
"The number of managed honey bee colonies has dropped from 5 million in the1940s to only 2.5 million today. At the same time, the call for hives to supply pollination service has continued to climb. This means honey bee colonies are trucked farther and more often than ever before.
Posted by: Neal Deesit on February 6, 2009 at 4:32 AM | PERMALINK