February 7, 2009
STEP AWAY FROM THE BLACKBERRY.... Republicans appear anxious to demonstrate their new-found affinity for technology, web apps, and gizmos. A recent debate between candidates for RNC chair featured an argument over who had more friends on Facebook. It's all rather silly, but the minority party wants to demonstrate their ability to embrace new mediums.
Once in a while, this goes a little too far.
A congressional trip to Iraq this weekend was supposed to be a secret.
But the cat's out of the bag now, thanks to a member of the House Intelligence Committee who broke an embargo via Twitter.
A delegation led by House Minority Leader John A. Boehner , R-Ohio, arrived in Iraq earlier today, and because of Rep. Peter Hoekstra , R-Mich., the entire world -- or at least Twitter.com readers -- now know they're there.
"Just landed in Baghdad," messaged Hoekstra, a former chairman of the Intelligence panel and now the ranking member, who is routinely entrusted to keep some of the nation's most closely guarded secrets.
Before the delegation left Washington, they were advised to keep the trip to themselves for security reasons. A few media outlets, including Congressional Quarterly, learned about it, but agreed not to disclose anything until the delegation had left Iraq.
Nobody expected, though, that a lawmaker with such an extensive national security background would be the first to break the silence. And in such a big way.
Remember, Hoekstra chaired the Intelligence Committee. He deals with classified information on a daily basis, and has received extensive instructions on how to keep national security secrets under wraps.
And yet, Hoekstra, who was told not to talk about this trip, not only shared its existence on Twitter, but "included details about their itinerary in updates posted every few hours on his Twitter page."
—Steve Benen 8:50 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (17)
We might as well imagine "what if a Democrat had done that"... and what sort of complaints there'd be from the usual suspects.
Posted by: Neil B ☺ on February 7, 2009 at 8:49 AM | PERMALINK
If it had been a dumbocrap doing this, we would be hearing cries of treason!
This was a rethug - therefore, it is treasonous of Steve to discuss it.
Posted by: SadOldVet on February 7, 2009 at 8:53 AM | PERMALINK
. . . Hoekstra, who was told not to talk about this trip, not only shared its existence on Twitter, but "included details about their itinerary in updates posted every few hours on his Twitter page." -via CQ
I'm tempted to ask, since this seems to be an all-Republican trip, if letting the whole world know about it is a bad thing. After all, they're going to be greeted as liberators . . . .
Posted by: SteveT on February 7, 2009 at 8:55 AM | PERMALINK
Wasn't it Orrin Hatch who decided to tell the press that they had Osama's cell phone number and were tapping it?
There is only one kind of security the Retalibans are actually interested in - their own. And the people they regard as "the enemy" are the rest of America.
Posted by: Avedon on February 7, 2009 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK
Danp, thanks for the link! I was prepared to cut the guy a little slack for not fully understanding a new technolgy, but it's pretty clear from his postings that he understands that his comments are going out to the world. What part of "secret" does Hoekstra not understand? I guess it's the part about not telling anyone. Stunning.
Posted by: AK Liberal on February 7, 2009 at 9:13 AM | PERMALINK
Must have attended the Sandy Berger School Of National Secret Keeping
Posted by: red state mike on February 7, 2009 at 9:20 AM | PERMALINK
Nah, RSM, Twitless the Twitterer is more in the "Forward Observor" role of Geraldo.
Posted by: berttheclock on February 7, 2009 at 9:26 AM | PERMALINK
Yeah, right Mike, cause we all know Sandy Berger was sharing secrets via smoke signals.
Posted by: Danp on February 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM | PERMALINK
AK Liberal - no problem. I only hope Hoekstra doesn't get to call us his "friends" now.
Posted by: Danp on February 7, 2009 at 9:38 AM | PERMALINK
So when does Pete get prosecuted?
Rhetorical question; I know it won't happen. But nemmind a Democrat; what if a crew member had done it? What happens to a soldier who twitters his landing in Iraq?
Posted by: fuyura on February 7, 2009 at 10:02 AM | PERMALINK
Just another twittering twit...hilarious bringing Sandy Berger into this though, pull another name out of your bag of radioactive bullshit, Mike, maybe the next one will have some sort of relevance.
Posted by: Capt Kirk on February 7, 2009 at 10:03 AM | PERMALINK
He really boehned himself there.
Posted by: inkadu on February 7, 2009 at 10:11 AM | PERMALINK
Jingo: Must have attended the Sandy Berger School Of National Secret Keeping
It's going to be a long, rough, bewildered and frustrated eight years for you.
Posted by: shortstop on February 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM | PERMALINK
I don't see the problem. Like, Facebook is totally private, right? So only his friends would see the information he's posted there. Right?
(Close-captioned for the irony-impaired. I work at a Big Ten University, where the kids are surprised that their moms or prospective employers might find their Facebook photos of them them sucking on a beer bong or showing their nipples at a frat party.)
Oh, and shortstop: what with Obama's eagerness to show his bipartisanship by giving the Republicans their way on crucial matters, I wouldn't count on more than two years.
Posted by: Duncan on February 7, 2009 at 11:09 AM | PERMALINK
The simple reason for Hoekstra's fooling around:
- His narcissism is bigger than the interests of ... (you name it: country, congress party, whatever)
- His intellect is no match for the possibilities of today's technology
The confluence of the two is bound to be a disaster.
Posted by: SRW1 on February 7, 2009 at 11:35 AM | PERMALINK
Suicidal idiot. I can hear him now, "I just wasn't thinking." How Rpublican of him.
Posted by: numi on February 8, 2009 at 4:47 PM | PERMALINK