February 16, 2009
HRC ON BUSH, NK.... Hillary Clinton, en route to Asia, talked about her goal of the "denuclearization of North Korea," but added some important context to the international dispute.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton cast doubt Sunday on a claim by the Bush administration that North Korea had a clandestine program to enrich uranium, and she said she will focus on getting the Pyongyang government to give up its stock of weapons-grade plutonium.
"There is a debate within the intelligence community as to exactly the extent of the highly-enriched-uranium program," Clinton told reporters traveling with her to Asia on her first voyage as the chief U.S. diplomat.
In a slap at her predecessors, Clinton made it clear she believes that the Bush administration's decision to walk away from an agreement negotiated during her husband's administration -- the 1994 Agreed Framework -- helped create the current crisis over North Korea's stash of nuclear weapons.
"The Agreed Framework was torn up on the basis of the concerns about the highly-enriched-uranium program," Clinton said. "There is no debate that, once the Agreed Framework was torn up, the North Koreans began to reprocess plutonium with a vengeance because all bets were off. The result is they now have nuclear weapons, which they did not have before."
The Bush administration, following a policy that never made any sense, let North Korea get far more dangerous. Since Clinton is going to have to help clean up the mess, it's understandable that she call out those responsible for pushing the failed policy in the first place.
—Steve Benen 9:35 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (7)
Cue conservative kvetching about breaking the tradition of not criticizing the previous Administration in 3...2...
Look, the Bush Administration was incompetent, mendacious and corrupt to an unprecedented degree. To whatever extent such a tradition existed, it simply shouldn't apply to the current administration's efforts to fix the previous one's messes. To do so would simply advantage the party that makes the messes over the one that has to keep cleaning them up -- which is, of course, the entire point behind shutting down criticism.
Posted by: Gregory on February 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM | PERMALINK
She's totally right, of course. I love it that she smacked them over the head with it. Screw them.
She also has to do it if she is going to repair the damage. You have to acknowledge that there is an opposing view on an issue if you're going to take the other side.
Although I voted for Obama, I never had a problem with HRC and would have gladly voted for her if she had secured the nomination.
Posted by: bdop4 on February 16, 2009 at 9:56 AM | PERMALINK
All we need now to round out yet another example of Bushylvanianism is Mr. McLame, hurling petty insults at HRC because she "isn't demonstrating a sufficiently-respectful-of-Bush fear of the GOP's invented enemies."
To which I must respectfully ask: How much of that Clydesdale-urine peddled by his trophy-wife as "beer" would the man have to drink in order to die of alcohol poisoning?
Posted by: Steve W. on February 16, 2009 at 9:58 AM | PERMALINK
The Bush administration, following a policy that never made any sense...
It made perfect sense once you consider any of the various iterations of the Bush Doctrine. Once Iraq was renewed in 2003 as a democratic republic in the heart of the Middle East, "a country upon the hill," the US was to engage the other member-states of the Axis of Evil.
We were supposed to invade and transform Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, much of Africa, a few South American nations and any other nation ruled by notions other than American Democracy(TM).
Nothing worked because the progressives/liberals/Ds worked to appease terrorists, viewed Muslims and/or people with dark skin as humans, wanted to reach out and talk about stuff, etc.
It'll take 20 years to clean up the mess created by the Bush administration. I fear it's irreversible, though, like climate change. You can attempt to mitigate the effects, but it's going to get you one way or another.
Igorance has consequences.
Posted by: Gang Green on February 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM | PERMALINK
This was all part of the brilliant neo-con scheme to bluff by calling everyone else's bluff. As long as you act like you hold all the cards, you can bully your way through everything, even if you bully them right into a corner that forces them to take the actions you didn't want them to take. And then you can blame them for doing what you forced them to do and...profit!
Posted by: Doctor Biobrain on February 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM | PERMALINK
When President Clinton left office, as a result of the 1994 'Agreed Framework', the Yongbyon nuclear reactor had been shut down for six years, the two larger nuclear reactors under construction had been abandoned, all of the prior spent fuel that COULD have been reprocessed into weapons grade plutonium had been safely sealed and under 24/7 video surveillance by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) inspectors, all of the graphite reactors were on schedule to be dismantled as soon as the construction of the two light water reactors were completed, and NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS HAD YET BEEN CREATED.
Enter Chimpy, stage Right.
The Bushies VIOLATED the 1994 'Agreed Framework', which the North Koreans had abided by, when they reneged on the delivery of the heavy fuel oil that had been contractually promised to compensate for the loss of energy production from the shutdown of the nuclear power plant, utilizing the excuse that they invented out of thin air: North Korea's supposed HEU program. Nevermind there was NO EVIDENCE of it's existence, and even Christopher Hill has stated that North Korea does not own the level of equipment required for production of Highly-Enriched Uranium.
That's when North Korea kicked the IAEA inspectors of the country, unsealed and reprocessed the spent fuel into weapons grade plutonium, and then CREATED AN ESTIMATED DOZEN NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
Heck of a job, Chimpy !
Posted by: Joe Friday on February 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM | PERMALINK
A Bush administration policy that never made any sense?
The policy made perfect sense. They needed to have an enemy and by declaring the existance of an evil axis, you have options. You give yourself more time by going to war with a country outside of the suppossed axis.
It was thoughtful, not very smart, but thoughtful.
Posted by: TBone on February 16, 2009 at 12:48 PM | PERMALINK