February 24, 2009
CIVIL UNIONS MUST NOT BE CUTTING EDGE.... Last week, RNC Chairman Michael Steele said he's committed to an "off the hook" public relations offensive that will appeal to voters, especially younger Americans, who've rejected Republicans. "We're going beyond cutting-edge," Steele promised.
He added, "[W]e need to uptick our image with everyone, including one-armed midgets."
In Steele's embrace of modernity, gay Americans apparently fall somewhere below one-armed midgets. Here's the Republican National Committee head talking to conservative talk-show host Mike Gallagher yesterday:
GALLAGHER: Is this a time when Republicans ought to consider some sort of alternative to redefining marriage and maybe in the road, down the road to civil unions. Do you favor civil unions?
STEELE: No, no no. What would we do that for? What are you, crazy? No. Why would we backslide on a core, founding value of this country? I mean this isn't something that you just kind of like, "Oh well, today I feel, you know, loosey-goosey on marriage." [...]
GALLAGHER: So no room even for a conversation about civil unions in your mind?
STEELE: What's the difference?
Keep in mind, this represents another step backwards for the Republican Party. After all, both George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have publicly expressed their support for civil unions, as have most Americans, and even conservative governors of very "red" states.
It is an entirely mainstream position. And yet, for the chairman of the RNC, to even ask about Republicans "considering" civil unions is "crazy."
—Steve Benen 9:15 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (34)
I guess according to Steele, some Americans still don't deserve civil rights. How ironic.
Posted by: Allan Snyder on February 24, 2009 at 9:16 AM | PERMALINK
Just keep putting a microphone in front of that guy's face.
Posted by: Steve on February 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM | PERMALINK
And to think people thought electing Obama would put comedians like Stewart and Colbert out of business. Republicans not only don't believe in evolution. They downright defy it.
Posted by: Danp on February 24, 2009 at 9:20 AM | PERMALINK
One armed gay midgets are out then?
Whoever would have guessed that one armed straight midgets were such a desirable demographic? Not that I have anything against one armed midgets, straight or gay. I just don't think they're going to be enough to help the repubs with their image problems.
Posted by: JoeW on February 24, 2009 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK
It is a measure of how out of touch Steele is that he would reference anyone by the term midget.
Posted by: WInknandanod on February 24, 2009 at 9:25 AM | PERMALINK
Steele's some kind of genius. Homophobia is guaranteed to get you in good with the younger generation. Next on the agenda: criminalizing premarital sex.
Just keep putting a microphone in front of that guy's face.
Amen.
Posted by: calling all toasters on February 24, 2009 at 9:26 AM | PERMALINK
"Not that I have anything against one armed midgets, straight or gay. I just don't think they're going to be enough to help the repubs with their image problems."
Sshhhhh. Keep it down. If the Retaliban wants to spend considerable time/money recruiting what I can only guess to be less than .0001% (?) of the population, let's not discourage them.
Posted by: palinoscopy on February 24, 2009 at 9:32 AM | PERMALINK
Steele also might want to check out another "core, founding value" of this country written into the Constitution. It involves the diminishment of his vote, cast by someone else on his behalf.
Posted by: Allan Snyder on February 24, 2009 at 9:33 AM | PERMALINK
including one-armed midgets
Why do I get the impression that Steele just lost the disabled little-people demographic with the comment?
Posted by: Jinchi on February 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM | PERMALINK
Log Cabin Republicans, wouldn't it be simpler to just beat yourself senseless with a cat o' nine tails every night? (Not that I'm judging anyone if he or she is into that; just making a point.)
Posted by: shortstop on February 24, 2009 at 9:43 AM | PERMALINK
Will the outreach toward one-armed midgets depend on whether the arm is a left or a right?
Actually, this makes perfect sense. The repubs don't like bisexuals, they don't do bipartisanship, and now they reject bilateralism.
There will be no outreach, however, for midgets without any arms. The repubs won't risk offending the NRA.
Posted by: Tim H on February 24, 2009 at 9:50 AM | PERMALINK
Steele is the gift that keeps on giving, the gaffe that keeps on gaffing, the goof that keeps on goofing!
Two more microphones for my man, and his own cable channel!
Posted by: Richard Greenslade on February 24, 2009 at 9:53 AM | PERMALINK
Very important: Steele isn't simply saying Republicans won't support full marriage rights for gay couples, which position could at least be defended on the basis of preserving a sort of cultural copyright to "marriage" as a concept, and the religious trappings etc. He said, they aren't even supportive of civil unions. Civil unions are effectively "designed" to permit pragmatic relations between gay couples under legal rights, but still attempt to placate social conservatives by avoiding the term (and perhaps non-technical "trappings") of "marriage." There is little excuse to be against CUs, and for Steels to ridicule the idea of CUs - with the "what are you, crazy?" type talk - shows he is a crank. He is on the cutting edge of the 1800s perhaps. For today's Republican Party, I guess that is "cutting edge".
(PS: I dig the term "Retaliban" per palinoscopy, tho' it's been around per Google ...)
Posted by: Neil B ◙ on February 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM | PERMALINK
Not a big fan of Sean Penn, but to borrow his phrase, Steele's grandchildren are going to be ashamed of him.
Posted by: Franklin on February 24, 2009 at 10:02 AM | PERMALINK
God, I'm almost beginning to feel sorry for the Republicans.
Posted by: selina on February 24, 2009 at 10:06 AM | PERMALINK
Civil unions? Poochie don't play dat.
Posted by: doubtful on February 24, 2009 at 10:13 AM | PERMALINK
He's totally in my face! To the extreme!!
Posted by: Buckethead on February 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK
Oh, and please, Dude - the correct nomenclature is "Little People".
Posted by: Noam Sane on February 24, 2009 at 10:31 AM | PERMALINK
Steele's comments are wrong on so many levels. It is sad, really. Pathetic.
Posted by: independent thinker on February 24, 2009 at 10:42 AM | PERMALINK
Loosey-goosey? Who talks like that?
Posted by: Sue on February 24, 2009 at 10:43 AM | PERMALINK
I don't know what he's in, but it's not *my* face.
Opposition to civil unions is a founding value of this country? I must have missed that volume of the Federalist Papers.
Posted by: Gabriel on February 24, 2009 at 10:47 AM | PERMALINK
Civil unions? Poochie don't play dat.
He's totally in my face! To the extreme!!
LOL. That nickname is perfect.
Posted by: Allan Snyder on February 24, 2009 at 10:49 AM | PERMALINK
That is some dull Steele.
Posted by: The Fabulous Mr. Toad on February 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM | PERMALINK
James Watt in black face could not have outdone him, when describing his Cabinet employees.
Posted by: berttheclock on February 24, 2009 at 11:11 AM | PERMALINK
Steele couldn't have been a better pick to head up the Republican Party had the Democrats been able to make the selection. I wonder what the town of Oblivion is like. The Republicans seem to be on the road to visiting it.
Posted by: sparrow on February 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM | PERMALINK
One-armed midget is Steele's favorite sexual position.
Posted by: Roger Ailes on February 24, 2009 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
This confirms the flaw in the recent NY Times OpEd. The right is as opposed to civil unions as they are to gay marriage.
http://www.tips-q.com/content/ny-times-oped-response-separate-and-unequal
Posted by: David Hart on February 24, 2009 at 11:44 AM | PERMALINK
In politics, beyond the cutting edge is the abyss. It is politics 101. If you are right, you may become a hero in the history books; in your life, if you are lucky, you are only figuratively burned at the stake. Mr. Steele is beyond himself and beside himself. Like Mr. Button, his view of the trend of history is backasswards.
Posted by: Michael7843853 on February 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM | PERMALINK
LOL. That nickname is perfect. -Allan Snyder
Commenter Jon B. deserves the credit. :)
Posted by: doubtful on February 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM | PERMALINK
Neil B.
Aside from the cosmetics there is an enormous legal difference; Full Faith and Credit. That remains even if DOMA dies.
Nevertheless, Dosbon, Perkins and Wildmon won't stand for civil unions and they seem to control the GOP at the moment.
That rustling sound you hear is Barry Goldwater rolling over in his grave. They would be calling him a godless, commie, liberal, pro-homosexual, pro-child-killing agent of the devil.
Posted by: David Hart on February 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM | PERMALINK
Personally I prefer the term "gravitationally enhanced", but I defer to individual preferences on the subject.
Posted by: Curmudgeon on February 24, 2009 at 12:32 PM | PERMALINK
Beyond cutting edge: Marriage is between a man and a woman and the little lady stays home and does the cooking and cleaning.
Posted by: Saint Zak on February 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM | PERMALINK
Personally I prefer the term "gravitationally enhanced"
Vertically challenged? Speaking as someone a tad horizontally challeneged himself . . .
Posted by: rea on February 24, 2009 at 1:48 PM | PERMALINK
Sorry, LCRs. Still no room in the tent, but please do your jobs and continue to shovel the elephant manure as per our ongoing contract.
-best (well, not really)
Poochie
Posted by: BobN on February 24, 2009 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK