Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

February 24, 2009

TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ BY AUGUST 2010.... The official announcement should come later this week, but in the meantime, the AP has this report:

The United States plans to withdraw most of its troops from Iraq by August 2010, 19 months after President Barack Obama's inauguration, according to administration officials. The withdrawal plan would fulfill one of Obama's central campaign pledges, albeit a little more slowly than he promised. He said he would withdraw troops within 16 months, roughly one brigade a month from the time of his inauguration. [...]

The U.S. military will leave behind a residual force, between 30,000 and 50,000 troops, to continue advising and training Iraqi security forces, the two officials said. Also staying beyond the 19 months will be intelligence and surveillance specialists and their equipment, including unmanned aircraft, they said.

A further withdrawal will take place before December 2011, the period by which the U.S. agreed with Iraq to remove all American troops.

According to the AP report, military commanders and national security advisers differed on strategies, and responded to the president's request with a series of alternatives. The 16-month withdrawal process was weighed against a 23-month timeline. As Obama is often inclined to do, he reportedly chose a 19-month strategy as a compromise.

Joe Klein added, "[T]he situation in Iraq has improved and a fairly rapid draw-down is not only practicable but necessary. The Army and Marines remain over-deployed, there are budgetary considerations and the Af/Pak situation obviously has become a higher military priority. There are still serious problems in Iraq, especially along the Arab-Kurd border in the north, but nothing like the chaos that existed two years ago.... [A] dreadful chapter in the history of American policy -- a bloody war of choice launched thoughtlessly -- seems to be coming to a close."

Steve Benen 4:55 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (16)
 
Comments

19 months ?? jeebus. what a load of horsesh*t.

No residual force - None.

No GD mercenaries anywhere - None.

Close the embassy and turn it over to the Iraqis.

LEAVE THE OIL BEHIND, amerika !!!

YOU CAN DO IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

usa OUT OF IRAQ NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: OUT OF IRAQ NOW on February 24, 2009 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK

And the dingbats will spin like dervishes tonight - they'll go apoplectic. Expect the birth certificate nonsense to take off - "Obama is a traitor!"

Wonder what they'll do when they realize that the US has moved the war to Afghanistan/Pakistan, where Taliban is resurgent and Al Qaeda actually is?

Posted by: SteinL on February 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM | PERMALINK

It would be nice to get out faster, but not at the risk of (re)creating more deadly chaos - which any sudden and drastic change would likely bring to Iraq's fragile stability. We've had plenty of impulsive and reckless foreign policy decisions in the last 8 years. It sounds like Obama is listening his experts, not his gut.

Posted by: JoeW on February 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM | PERMALINK

When did Joke Line grow a brain?

Posted by: Monty on February 24, 2009 at 5:13 PM | PERMALINK

"A dreadful chapter in the history of American policy -- a bloody war of choice launched thoughtlessly"

He says that as if he opposed the war at its inception. Barely anyone in the neo-con media did.

How can you fault Bush for doing something you also advocated? The most you could say is, "Bush's war, OUR noble war, was badly mismanaged"...

Posted by: flubber on February 24, 2009 at 5:18 PM | PERMALINK

Of course, the wingnuts will try to claim this as some sort of validation of Bush's decision to go there in the first place. An effort has to be made to reminde people of their original claims made by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld as to how long the war would last and how much it would cost. Not to mention the horrific mismanagement in the following months where the entire country (other than the oil fields) was allowed to be ransacked.

Posted by: bdop4 on February 24, 2009 at 5:31 PM | PERMALINK

OUT OF IRAQ NOW is absolutely right.

"Combat troops"? Didn't we hear that distinction, oh, back in Vietnam 1965?

But, MSLBs like this one will trumpet this as what Obama promised in the Dem primaries, when he didn't use the "combat troops only" loophole that he did in the general election.

C'mon, Steve, when are MSLBs -- mainstream liberal blogs -- like yours actually going to hold Obama to account on Iraq.

Judis talked about the real left needing to hold Obama's feet to the fire on domestic issues; unfortunately, he overlooked this.

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on February 24, 2009 at 5:43 PM | PERMALINK
It would be nice to get out faster, but not at the risk of (re)creating more deadly chaos

The deadly chaos in Iraq has been created by our presence, not our absence.

Posted by: cmdicely on February 24, 2009 at 5:59 PM | PERMALINK

Close the embassy and turn it over to the Iraqis

So we're not going to have diplomatic relations with the country? That's smart.

Also, as opposed to Bush's unilateral invasion and occupation, this withdrawal strategy is widely supported by the Iraqi government. Finally, even if he "removed" troops starting tomorrow, it would take a substantial amount of time to finish the job -- more time than you'd like, I'm sure. But what do you suggest "LEAVE NOW"? Do you have the logistical chops?

This is basically his campaign promise and he seems to be meeting it just past his first month in office.

Obama's Executive security/privilege policy has been a travesty -- but since this is basically what he said he'd do, I don't really understand why you'd scream at him for doing it.

Posted by: Jay B. on February 24, 2009 at 6:18 PM | PERMALINK

yeah Jay B i do.

you line up every single swingin' richard, and you start marching / loading up. if you f***ing have to, you march all the way to Kuwait. didn't dumsfeld say that Iraq was going to be a 'long hard slog'??

this is how it was done when i served with the 101st from 1984 to 1987 and again in 1989 / 1990 as an 11BPH. we were able to move from Fort Campbell to Fort Lewis to Korea in 24 / 48 hours, from Fort Campbell to Fort Polk to Honduras in 24 / 48 hours, from Fort Campbell to Fort Bragg to Europe / Middle East in 24 / 48 hours etc etc etc. It is not hard to IF YOU REALLY WANT TO and are WILLING TO LEAVE THE OIL BEHIND.

how did you do it when you served your country ?

and closing that $854 Million+ monstrosity that the cheney / bushitheads called an embassy which everybody else sees as the squatting on Iraqi soil by an Imperialist Oil Stealing War Criminal nation is a huge step in the right direction. the usa can have a normal sized embassy just like everybody else.

you assumed that i was saying break off diplomatic relations - note that i did not write that - that's what you get for assuming, Jay B.

Posted by: OUT OF IRAQ NOW on February 24, 2009 at 7:28 PM | PERMALINK

yeah Jay B i do.

you line up every single swingin' richard, and you start marching / loading up. if you f***ing have to, you march all the way to Kuwait.

Boy, you're a moron.

You aren't a Republican troll, are you?

Posted by: gwangung on February 24, 2009 at 8:02 PM | PERMALINK

30-50K is to "residual" forces as 2-3 years is to "surge". It may make centrist sense politically (just as splitting the difference between 16 and 23 months does) but, from a linguistic/reality POV, it's pure, unadulterated, Bush-speak BS.

Posted by: exlibra on February 24, 2009 at 8:20 PM | PERMALINK

you assumed that i was saying break off diplomatic relations - note that i did not write that - that's what you get for assuming, Jay B.

No, instead, i figured you were staking your version of a successful outcome on something incomprehensibly unrealistic -- like "closing the embassy" -- so you can feel sold out when the inevitable doesn't happen.

It's a surefire way to ensure your disappointment in the process, which is the way some people like it.

And sure, I guess in some version of reality an occupying military can bug out en masse, leave everything behind and march to the border, but this also WON'T HAPPEN. And in no way was that EVER on the drawing board -- in fact most of us who opposed Iraq to begin with and wanted an immediate withdrawal, understood that "immediate" meant a number of months (knowing it takes a lot longer to UNFUCK something if you want to UNFUCK it better than you fucked it) -- so it's another perfect solution for you so you can bitch when it inevitably doesn't happen (see? what did I tell you?).

That this withdrawal is happening with the approval of the Iraqi government and is being done under the framework of an agreement between the two countries is also probably problematic somehow.

Posted by: Jay B. on February 24, 2009 at 8:23 PM | PERMALINK

I agree with the general sentiment of this thread, that we have to not only remove troops, but also our perceived presence as an occupier with ulterior motives (oil).

Turn the Green Zone over to the Iraqis and let them control their oil. Fire Blackwater and KBR, I think the Corps of Engineers is perfectly capable of taking care of our own.

Posted by: citizen_pain on February 24, 2009 at 8:25 PM | PERMALINK

Gwangung, et al:

While I don't agree with the "close the embassy" part,

If you think OUT OF IRAQ NOW is a GOP troll, I'll say you're a Kool-Aid drinking Obamiac.

I've seaid it before and will say it again... the combat/noncombat troops distinction... that's back to Vietnam and "advisors."

It's weaselly, and The One knows it.

He's possibly already better than the Slickster at parsing his words, though.

That said? No, I'm not a GOP troll myself. I'm a left-liberal Green voter pointing out the truth about Obama.

Posted by: SocraticGadfly on February 25, 2009 at 1:37 PM | PERMALINK

I'm getting a little tired of the euphemism "war of choice". I wonder when we'll be ready to handle the older term for these, i.e.: "war of aggression"

Posted by: KeepingTrack on February 25, 2009 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK




 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Advertise in College Guide






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals