 |
 |
Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Gnter Grass still thinks reunification was a bad idea.
By Paul Hockenos
Forty years of writing from Taylor Branch, James Fallows, Katherine Boo, Marjorie Williams, Joshua Micah Marshall, and more.
By the Editors
How a million surveillance cameras in London are proving George Orwell wrong.
By Jamie Malanowski
With help from Washington, the for-profit college industry is loading up millions of low-income students with debt they'll never pay off.
By Stephen Burd
The best recent memoir from republican Washington is a hoax. That should tell you something.
By Joshua Green
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2009
"We Will Bring Our Troops Home"
I find it hard to express how happy this makes me:
"Let me say this as plainly as I can: by August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end.
As we carry out this drawdown, my highest priority will be the safety and security of our troops and civilians in Iraq. We will proceed carefully, and I will consult closely with my military commanders on the ground and with the Iraqi government. There will surely be difficult periods and tactical adjustments. But our enemies should be left with no doubt: this plan gives our military the forces and the flexibility they need to support our Iraqi partners, and to succeed.
After we remove our combat brigades, our mission will change from combat to supporting the Iraqi government and its Security Forces as they take the absolute lead in securing their country. As I have long said, we will retain a transitional force to carry out three distinct functions: training, equipping, and advising Iraqi Security Forces as long as they remain non-sectarian; conducting targeted counter-terrorism missions; and protecting our ongoing civilian and military efforts within Iraq. Initially, this force will likely be made up of 35-50,000 U.S. troops.
Through this period of transition, we will carry out further redeployments. And under the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government, I intend to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. We will complete this transition to Iraqi responsibility, and we will bring our troops home with the honor that they have earned."
It's worth reading the speech in its entirety, because there are other very good things in it. President Obama addressed the people of Iraq directly, and I thought that both what he said and the fact that he spoke to them were very good. I was moved by his words to the men and women who have served in Iraq, and by this promise: "You and your families have done your duty - now a grateful nation must do ours." I was also very glad that he mentioned the nearly five million Iraqi refugees:
"Diplomacy and assistance is also required to help the millions of displaced Iraqis. These men, women and children are a living consequence of this war and a challenge to stability in the region, and they must become a part of Iraq's reconciliation and recovery. America has a strategic interest - and a moral responsibility - to act."
But the announcement of a date certain for the withdrawal both of combat troops and of all troops means more to me than anything. This horrible mistake of a war has cost so many people so much. It should never have been started. It will not be over for the Iraqis in 2011. But it will, at last, be over for us.
—Hilzoy 11:30 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (10)
Interesting how BHO has the inverse of FDR... who had the Great Depression, and then global war.
Ending the Iraq war -- and i hope he will evolve to see regional diplomacy and not drones and killing as the solution to afghanistan -- will leave Barak the task of helping solve the global economic catastrophe.
Global as was FDR's warfare, but economic as was FDR's first crisis.
Posted by: neill on February 28, 2009 at 12:32 AM | PERMALINK
Were not the goals of the preceding hoodlums on the hill to, train, equip, and advise Iraqi Security Forces?
Posted by: JED on February 28, 2009 at 7:03 AM | PERMALINK
...I hope he's right about this. But it sounds a bit like the Bushian/Rovian trick of misdirection by using terms like "combat mission ends" and turning it into a "support role" by "training, equipping, and advising" the Iraqi army. Even though the timeframe is backwards, this is how we got enmeshed in Viet Nam.
Posted by: gordon on February 28, 2009 at 7:22 AM | PERMALINK
And they're NOT coming home. No, no, next they're off to Afghanistan, for THAT neverending conflict. Nobody's comin' home.
Posted by: Helena Montana on February 28, 2009 at 7:39 AM | PERMALINK
love waking up and checking out the garden...
but shit! only two concern trolls today, oh, well...
Posted by: neill on February 28, 2009 at 7:40 AM | PERMALINK
As a veteran of a misbegotten war in southeast Asia, I am pleased that we are getting out of Messopotamia. My preference would be much faster, but I believe that we need to cut Obama some slack on this.
I continue to be concerned about our involvement in Afganistan. Over the centuries, that country has been the graveyard of empires. What I want to see is a plan that specifies what our objectives are and how we plan to end our presence there.
That the Bush administrative did NOT fully pursue Bin Laden is one of the many criminal aspects of that administration. Still, it is necessary for Obama to NOT have an open-ended commitment in Afganistan.
As a war protestor who marched on the capitol in 2003, I will be willing to march again this fall if I do not see goals and an exit strategy for Afganistan.
Posted by: SadOldVet on February 28, 2009 at 8:02 AM | PERMALINK
The sole purpose of the trolls is to deflect the fact that the Iraq Crime --- and it was, is, and will forever be a Crime of the highest order --- will be linked eternally to the name of Bush/Cheney, and the pocket-lining of the Republican Party. Even their oft-times yet ill-invoked deity cannot wash the blood from their hands.
Not even from the hands of the trolls....
Posted by: Steve W. on February 28, 2009 at 8:05 AM | PERMALINK
We also need to hear Bring home the troops from Afghanistan/Pakistan.Another debaucle waiting to happen and to deplete our coffers.
Posted by: mljohnston on February 28, 2009 at 11:57 AM | PERMALINK
i'm not concern trolling here, but folks should take a look at this interview with author tom ricks.....he thinks that obama is indulging in a bush-style pipedream...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-02-27/obamas-wrong-about-iraq/
thoughts?
Posted by: dj spellchecka on February 28, 2009 at 2:22 PM | PERMALINK
Just as the crucifixion was over for Pilate when he washed his hands of it.
I don't disagree with you--except to point out that one of the features of Bush's disastrous policy is that now we cannot escape responsibility for what occurs in Ira, even when our forces are greatly reduced there.
Posted by: Gloomster on February 28, 2009 at 3:46 PM | PERMALINK
|
|
|