Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

March 30, 2009
By: publius

MUCH ADO ABOUT NY-20.... The big news tomorrow will be the special election in NY-20 to replace Senator Gillibrand. As you know by now, the election has become a proxy war for larger national battles over the stimulus. So there will inevitably be a lot of ink spilled on what the election means. Personally though, I think the answer is "not much," regardless of who wins.

The main reason is that the political battle over the stimulus is better understood as long-term positioning, rather than as short-term news cycle battles. What people think today -- or on Wednesday -- about the political success of the stimulus simply doesn't matter that much. What matters is how the economy looks down the road.

Remember that the GOP opposed the stimulus not so much to reap short-term success, but to position themselves for the future. If things don't improve, then the GOP will have drawn a sharp political contrast and can pound the Dems over the head with it. If, however, things get better, the GOP will be in serious trouble for opposing the stimulus pretty much unanimously. (On an aside, it's worth noting that the GOP's rational interests are no longer aligned with the health of the economy -- though I suppose that's true for all minority parties).

Anyway, the NY-20 election will be big news for several days -- and the spin will come fast and furious. But at the end of the day, it won't really affect the long-term picture. The GOP has already made its decision -- and a loss on Tuesday won't help or hurt them in the grand scheme of things.

Plus, the demographics make it hard to draw any strong conclusions one way or the other. If the Republicans win, it's hard to see what the big deal is. It's a Republican district that went for Bush in 2000 and 2004 (average +7.5). If the Democrats win, it's a somewhat bigger deal -- but not much. Obama won the district 51-48, and still has strong popularity as a new president. All in all, the election will signal very little about the battles to come.

Don't get me wrong -- I will clearly enjoy watching the RNC try to spin a loss. But it's worth remembering -- before results start coming in -- that there's little at stake here other than short-term bragging rights (which are admittedly fun to have).

publius 11:42 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (5)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

"no longer aligned with the health of the economy -- though I suppose that's true for all minority parties"

I don't think so. A healthy economy may be a prerequisite for a party to propose new initiatives.
Conversely, a healthy economy can make economic interests lees important to the electorate, so that focus on "cultural war" issues can seem appropriate.

Posted by: Johnny Canuck on March 30, 2009 at 12:05 PM | PERMALINK

I disagree. It will give further evidence, especially if Murphy wins (but even if it is close) just how dead the GOP is in the Northeast.

It'll be fairly meaningless in Washington in regards to the stimulus, but it'll be an important story about how Republicans are now perceived -- I mean Tedisco is a well-regarded, very well-known Republican in the district who doesn't have a particularly scandalous record. But that he's in trouble against an unknown has pretty staggering implications, don't you think?

He's about a good a choice as the GOP can have, in a district where he should win handily. Why is he failing? It can't only be because Obama supports the opposition. It's because the GOP has alienated so many people in the Northeast -- the party's historical home -- that people like Chris Shays and Jim Tedisco will LOSE. Maybe if you are from the area (which includes rural New England as well as upstate NY) you'd realize what this really means.

Posted by: Jay B. on March 30, 2009 at 12:28 PM | PERMALINK

The other important implication has to do with Michael Steele's fate. A GOP loss here could push him out and (potentially) put a new, more effective GOP chairman in place. Or, alternatively, they might put in somebody as bad or worse, meaning the party is headed for oblivion.

One reason the Republicans are as decrepit as they are now is that years of winning have allowed them to avoid reality and keep putting on the ever-more-crazy. At this point they will either have to reshape themselves into something viable, or die as a party. What happens to Steele can help tell us which way they will go.

Posted by: jimBOB on March 30, 2009 at 12:46 PM | PERMALINK

Playing down expectations, are we?

Posted by: Rian Mueller on March 30, 2009 at 4:37 PM | PERMALINK

All I know is no one should vote for Kirsten Gillibrand for NY-20. She's totally in the pocket of big tobacco. Only an idiot would help put her in Congress.

Posted by: SocraticBadfly on March 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs