March 31, 2009
POLLING A POLICY THAT DOESN'T EXIST.... Last week, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Looneyville) convinced herself that U.S. currency is under attack (it isn't) and the threat of a "global currency" is real (it isn't). What sparked the paranoia was a Chinese proposal to replace the dollar as the world's reserve currency, which of course has nothing to do with Bachmann's bizarre ideas.
So, naturally, Rasmussen put a poll in the field to ask Americans how they feel about a policy that exists solely in the twisted imagination of an unhinged House Republican.
Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Americans say it is important for the dollar to remain the currency of the United States, including 70% who say it is Very Important.
Only three percent (3%) say it is not at all important if the dollar remains America's currency, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
China's top government banker and a United Nations panel have both proposed that the dollar be replaced with a new global currency. However, only 21% of American adults believe the proposal is intended primarily to help the global economy.
Forty-nine percent (49%) think the proposal for a new global currency is designed to weaken the economic power of the United States. Most investors (54%) hold that view.
First, I'm quite surprised the majority was only 88%. Second, there's a big difference between "a new global currency," and a new global reserve currency, but Rasmussen's poll fudged the details.
The pollster eventually concedes, "At issue is not replacing the money in Americans' wallets but what currency will be the world standard against which all other monies are measured." The problem, of course, is that the respondents to the Rasmussen poll weren't told about this, making the poll results measuring public opinion about proposals that don't exist rather useless.
It reinforces an observation Matt Yglesias made in February: "Rasmussen is a pretty good pollster whose results are within the range of accuracy one wants from a pollster. But polling is a crowded business. And Rasmussen doesn't also have a daily newspaper or a television network to tout his results. His business, however, requires attention. So how does he get that attention? Well in part he gets it with issue polling that, while basically methodologically sound, has question-wording that's designed to lead to conservative-friendly results. Then the results come out and conservatives tout the results as vindicating their position. It's free PR for Rasmussen, it's a morale booster and message-driver for the right."
Or, as Ali Frick put it today, "The fact that Rasmussen even polled on Bachmann's insane legislation banning the replacement of the dollar with a fictional currency shows just how unconcerned Rasmussen is with truth, accuracy, or intellectual honesty."
—Steve Benen 3:25 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (17)
This is yet another timely example of irrelevancy. At this rate, as our staid institutions become fatuously enthralled with blathering idiocy, I am inclined to believe I am now a resident of the United States of Stupid! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on March 31, 2009 at 3:44 PM | PERMALINK
I'm surprised it was only 88%, too. Apparently, 12% of USians would be okay with the yen or something. Huh.
Posted by: Personal Failure on March 31, 2009 at 3:47 PM | PERMALINK
It's just meant to distract us from the plot to change the name of America to "Bonerland." Despicable.
Posted by: hells littlest angel on March 31, 2009 at 3:48 PM | PERMALINK
Rasmussen is Hannity's prefered pollster if that gives you any indication of the type of work he does.
Posted by: GiggsisGod on March 31, 2009 at 3:55 PM | PERMALINK
he gets it with issue polling that, while basically methodologically sound - Yglesias
I wouldn't concede that. There are any number of ways to manipulate polls, even with fair questions. Why would Yglesias conclude they only used one method to drive results?
Posted by: Danp on March 31, 2009 at 3:56 PM | PERMALINK
Well, there's one thing that is right about the question, creating a new global reserve currency would weaken the US economically. And I think China and the rest of the World would like to weaken us, partly out of punishment during the Bush years and partly out of the clusterf*ck we drove the world into.
Posted by: dervin on March 31, 2009 at 3:57 PM | PERMALINK
I wish Rasmussen would poll the popularity of packing Rep Bachmann and her supporters on barges, ship them down the Mississippi River, out into the Gulf of Mexico and over to Republic of Texas where they would join Co-Heirophants Norris and Cornyn in their newly secedded fatherland created in a bloodless coup due to the seating of Senator Franken.
Posted by: the seal on March 31, 2009 at 4:00 PM | PERMALINK
This would explain the black helicopter I saw outside my local bank branch this morning.
Posted by: atlantic shoo-fly on March 31, 2009 at 4:00 PM | PERMALINK
the seal @ 4:pm - Now that would surely be one Ship of Fools! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on March 31, 2009 at 4:07 PM | PERMALINK
Isn't tomorrow, the 1st of April, a National Holiday for the Republican Party? I think we are supposed to dress up in funny hats and floppy shoes and make lots of noise. I believe I will take the day off and watch the parades up and down the aisles of Congress. Ah, the wheels of Truth grind slowly, but very finely.
I am committed to Oneness through Justice and Transformation
peace,
st john
Posted by: st john on March 31, 2009 at 4:12 PM | PERMALINK
Another equally valid question:
How do you feel about monkeys randomly flying out of your own ass ?
1) Strongly opposed
2) In favor, but physicaly unable due to hemorrhoids
3) Sure, I like monkeys, especially flying ones
4) Not sure, how big of a monkey ?
Posted by: OhNoNotAgain on March 31, 2009 at 4:45 PM | PERMALINK
Looneyville, that would be just west of the Twin Cities. And directly northeast of Steve King country.
Posted by: ericfree on March 31, 2009 at 4:57 PM | PERMALINK
You know, the really Looney part is that these are BLUE states, and not even particularly close. Reps from the Mormon Triangle aren't as nuts as these people. Being in the minority seems to make them fearless rather than more moderate, which would be, well, sane.
Posted by: ericfree on March 31, 2009 at 5:16 PM | PERMALINK
Its hard to explain, but we Minnesotans just like to elect intresting people. That said, MN CD6 was created when there was a partisan divide in the state capitol and Ventura was governor and the redistricting was done by a panel of judges. I suspect there was a compromise, St Paul and Minneapolis each keeping a seprate district, and a strong republican district gerrymandered. We also have a strong enough 3rd party that is capable of tossing a monkey wrench into the gears. My inlaws are as perplexed by my support for Keith Ellison as I am by their support for Bachmann. I will admit though, Bachmann is far more entertaining.
Posted by: the seal on March 31, 2009 at 6:05 PM | PERMALINK
If US companies feel they have to issue commercial bonds in a currency other than the USD to get investors, then the USD as a world currency is dead.
Whether or lot US citizens like that is simply irrelevant.
Posted by: Ian Whitchurch on March 31, 2009 at 6:32 PM | PERMALINK
I love it. A poll asking American voters if China has a right to choose the currencies of its own investments.
If we had continued the budget surplus policies of Clinton-Gore, China wouldn't have even had an opportunity to buy any new debt of ours.
Posted by: JohnJay60 on March 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM | PERMALINK
I'm not sure I really understand all the implications of what changing the global currency are.
And I am sure most American's don't know either. But it doesn't stop them from having an opinion.
Posted by: inkadu on April 1, 2009 at 6:02 AM | PERMALINK