Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

May 3, 2009

THE NCNA GETS TO WORK.... The newly unveiled National Council for a New America officially launched yesterday, hosting a town-hall like forum for 100 people at a strip-mall pizza shop in a D.C. suburb. Leading the discussion were House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.), former Florida governor Jeb Bush (R) and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R). I've read several reports on the event, and I'm still not sure what the point was.

The initiative reflects the emerging consensus of Republican leaders on how to take on Obama and rebuild their party. Worried that the GOP is being portrayed only as the opposition party, prominent Republicans hope to draw attention to their agenda by using well-known figures such as Bush and Romney to tout their ideas. But they don't believe they need to shift their political views to the left or the right to win.

And therein lies part of the problem. This new initiative is intended to be little more than a fresh coat of paint on a car that no longer runs. There's some value in a discussion that focuses more on Republican policy than politics -- the event reportedly featured very little Obama bashing -- but these GOP leaders don't seem to appreciate the fact that their policies failed miserably and aren't popular with voters.

There were two angles to yesterday's event that were of particular interest. First, there were protestors on hand, but they were Republican critics, not Democrats.

[T]he handful of peaceful protesters out front weren't Democrats -- they were conservatives upset over the new group's agenda and leadership. They brandished signs criticizing McCain, calling the NCNA "RINOs" -- Republicans in Name Only -- and urging them to push for stricter immigration enforcement.

Improving the party's image is going to be tricky when the GOP base likes the right-wing reactionary approach just the way it is.

Those were the Republican activists outside. The Republicans inside failed to offer anything in the way of new thoughts. One concerned citizen insisted that "people learn more from listening to Rush Limbaugh than they do in high school or college." The future of the GOP, indeed.

And second, there were some policy-oriented questions from an obviously Republican-friendly crowd, which spoke to a larger truth. One young person asked what the government can do for people who "have aspirations to college" but can't afford it "because college expenses have gone up." Another asked what government can do "to assist small businesses."

So, at a Republican event with a Republican crowd about the future of Republican ideas, those on hand wanted to hear more about what the government can do for them.

Good luck with that rebranding, guys.

Steve Benen 9:20 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (21)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

"people learn more from listening to Rush Limbaugh than they do in high school or college."

Strangely enough, I've heard the same thing on Limbaugh's show.

The 30 secs or so I think I saw on CSAPN yesterday was of Cantor telling the same lie that card check will take away their right to vote.

Posted by: martin on May 3, 2009 at 9:20 AM | PERMALINK

Like everything else Republicans have done in the past 10 years, this is simple minded and lazy. They're just looking for a way to appear to be as Obama is: engaging, accessible, articulate, moderate seeming.

But when youre idea of health care reform is fire some lawyers and your idea of environment policy is to nuclear or nothing, then you lose, even if Obama spoke like George Bush did.

And by the way, Eric Cantor strikes me as a legend in his own mind. Just saying.

Posted by: glutz78 on May 3, 2009 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK

Why is the GOP even wasting its time with this crap?

We all know if Obama fails, they'll be back in power.

If Obama is a success, they'll have no chance at reclaiming the White House.

So why not just sit back, vote "No" on everything, and see what happens?

Posted by: rob! on May 3, 2009 at 9:23 AM | PERMALINK

I haven't seen anything that indicates whether the Repos limited invitees to card carrying, loyalty oath Repos, and whether or not they pre-vetted or pre-wrote the questions.

They tend to do that sort of thing.

Posted by: Marnie on May 3, 2009 at 9:43 AM | PERMALINK


If I was a Republican leader, I would stop trying to compete with Obama on a macro-level. Essentially, this means that they need to work within Obama's policies instead of coming up with alternative ones. The part has exhausted itself in terms of ideas, so all of their BIG alternatives have been laughable. They need to set their sights lower, and build up.

In any event, it seems that these leaders still think that the problem of the Republican party is branding, which essentially is cosmetic. These guys are going to be in the wilderness for a long time.

Posted by: Matt on May 3, 2009 at 9:47 AM | PERMALINK

it was stunning looking at the CBS feed on it without the sound on last night... the pictures from the gathering were so WHITE (and this coming from a WASP) and jarring. You almost didn't have to listen to the lies... er ideas coming from them to see that they have no clue what to do. In some ways, they are worse off than the Democrats were in the 1980s.

Posted by: Chuck on May 3, 2009 at 9:49 AM | PERMALINK

good to see that they went way outside the beltway so they could connect with people in real americans.

Posted by: mellowjohn on May 3, 2009 at 9:55 AM | PERMALINK

Whip Party 2.0 won't be around in 20 years so I hope they enjoyed the pizza.

Posted by: joejoejoe on May 3, 2009 at 9:57 AM | PERMALINK

I was musing this morning while listening to one of the Repub blowhards going on about " what the American People want" They still are unable to come to terms with the fact that the American do in fact know what they want and said so last November 4th. It also concerns me that fat ass Jeb Bush is being put up front as a "New Choice". Having lived under his governorship and watched his back stabbing screw the people attitude like trying to do an end run around a class size amendments voted for overwhelmingly by the voter (Florida 47th in per capita student spending)
He also changed the constitution so that we require a 60% majority to pass any ballot initiatives , thus ensuring none of the petitioned changes to government will ever pass.
Need we mention Terry Schiavo. Watch that MO FO and be afraid that the Repubs will trot him out in 2012.

Posted by: John R on May 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM | PERMALINK

Having cranked up the stupid faction of the party for 8 years to "win", the Pubs are now trying to sidestep or unwind them.

Good luck with that.

Posted by: joey giraud on May 3, 2009 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK

Thats it isn't it.This is all they have. The person, and I use the term lightly, that said you learn more listening to Rush than you do in high school or college kind of sums it all up for them. That's all they have left.
After thirty years of republicans pulling a massive swindle by amassing wealth with a small percentage of people they really have nothing left.

Posted by: Gandalf on May 3, 2009 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK

"This new initiative is intended to be little more than a fresh coat of paint on a car that no longer runs."

Actually it's more like giving a serial killer a new name and a facelift.

Posted by: Racer X on May 3, 2009 at 10:40 AM | PERMALINK

God, how pathetic. Let me guess what their primary policy position is: Tax cuts, right?

These sphincters are one-trick ponies who couldn't think logically if their lives depended on it.

Posted by: Sam Simple on May 3, 2009 at 10:40 AM | PERMALINK

"In some ways, they are worse off than the Democrats were in the 1980s." Posted by: Chuck on May 3, 2009 at 9:49 AM

Amen.
Unfortunately, in two of the ways that matter the most, they're still, and likely will be for some time, much better off. They own the mass media, and they own a significant slice of "our" pols.
Or, to be more precise, the corporatocracy that owns the Rethug Party is also the owner and operator of the mass media, and thus largely control the flow of information. We're not quite at the point at which the internet can replace the networks, the cable news channels, talk radio, and the major papers, in shaping public perceptions of reality.
And, as Sen. Durbin recently made very clear, we're even further from the point at which citizen and public-interest-group funding (and control) of politicians will match, let alone overpower, corporate funding.
The realignment that is underway is precarious, and we'll have to work harder than ever to help the Obama Administration to be able to implement the policies whose successes will cement the return to a government of, by, and for the people.
The Rethugs and their corporate masters know they're in a fight to the death. Normal, ordinary Americans need to know this as well, if we're to win this fight.

Posted by: smartalek on May 3, 2009 at 11:25 AM | PERMALINK

The Republican party is as intellectually bankrupt as Cheney/Bush left the nation.
After decades of promising fiscal conservatism while spending us in to debt by confiscating our wealth for the benefit of the very few, promising smaller less intrusive government and delivering policies of torture and wire taps, etc...
the only move left on the political chessboard is to appeal to the haters.
This is why Limbaugh/Hannity/Beck are the defacto leaders of the party. Revenge and retribution is all the Republican party has credibility to deliver, and the pro-torture apologists show us how they plan to deliver it.
It is a pity that Jack Kemp has passed. The Republicans could use his intellectual heft.

Posted by: MikeBoyScout on May 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM | PERMALINK

I wish someone would address an issue for me, regarding the Republican platform and pov. I understand that the Republicans are in favor of "personal responsibility" (unless those individuals are greedy businessmen or torture-enablers). The term "personal responsibility" seems to be an all-encompassing code term to mask a ruthless desire to remove most (if not all) of the help the govt provides those with the most need: the disabled, the "challenged," and those otherwise unable to even come close to getting by. My question is this: what are those people supposed to do? If the Republicans have their way & social programs are gutted, exactly what is left for the most needy sectors of society? I've tried to find an answer to this, but have come up blank. Has any Republican addressed this issue? (Lincoln doesn't count.)

Posted by: zhak on May 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM | PERMALINK

martin.

"The 30 secs or so I think I saw on CSAPN yesterday was of Cantor telling the same lie that card check will take away their right to vote."

At least that was to be expected. What is disheartening is that Bob Schieffer claimed that same falsehood was fact this morning on 'Face the Nation'.

Posted by: Joe Friday on May 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK
people learn more from listening to Rush Limbaugh than they do in high school or college.

I feel like I learn more from watching 5 minutes of the daily show than a whole day of network news.

rob!: If Obama is a success, they'll have no chance at reclaiming the White House. So why not just sit back, vote "No" on everything, and see what happens?

That's effectively what they are doing. This group is more about positioning leaders for the primary run, so they claim they have found a new direction.

smartalek: We're not quite at the point at which the internet can replace the networks, the cable news channels, talk radio, and the major papers, in shaping public perceptions of reality.

And the internet will never take place of push media like radio and televison. First because the internet takes some actual effort, and secondly because the internet is self-reinforcing. That said, as much as I disagree with my internet brethren on the other side, I respect them more than I do the nitwits who suck at the teat of CNN and Tom Brokaw.

Posted by: inkadu on May 3, 2009 at 4:14 PM | PERMALINK

GOP's NCNA= lipstick on a pig

Posted by: Carol A on May 3, 2009 at 4:49 PM | PERMALINK

You say there was little Obama bashing at the NCNA meeting. I, however, found Mitt Romney's comments to be cheap shrill politics. He took every shot he could take at the President. His perfromance included the vitriol spewed in his recent appearance inh the FOXNEWS Hannity show.
Cantor gets the second prize.

Posted by: Double A on May 3, 2009 at 10:58 PM | PERMALINK

When the party goes more to the left i will have to go to a third party.
John macian was to far to the left is why he lost. many Republican,s stayed home.

Posted by: Kenneth W on May 3, 2009 at 11:30 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs