May 19, 2009
HOW MAVERICKY.... Even during the 2008 presidential campaign, no matter how far he shifted to the right, John McCain was generally pretty good about acknowledging the climate crisis. "We need a successor to Kyoto, a cap-and-trade system that delivers the necessary environmental impact in an economically responsible manner," McCain said in 2008.
Now, the specifics of McCain's cap-and-trade proposal were pretty absurd -- it was basically cap and trade without the cap -- but at least he'd occasionally talk a good game. Now, the Arizona Republican is poised to help kill a compromise measure that the nation really needs.
Sen. John McCain now appears to oppose climate-change legislation, an abrupt switch that could seriously threaten any movement on such a bill.
"Nearly 1000 page Climate Change legislation -- appears to be a cap & tax bill that I won't support," McCain wrote in a Twitter message Monday, a reversal of the position he took on the Senate floor in March.
Two months ago, McCain and his close friend Sen. Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican, took the floor in strong support of climate-change legislation. This marked a return to form for McCain, who co-sponsored a 2002 climate-change bill with longtime friend Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), but had tamped down his rhetoric during the 2008 presidential campaign.
"Let me just say to my colleagues, I'm proud of my record on climate change," McCain said in March. "I've been all over the world and I've seen climate change, and I know it's real, and I'll be glad to continue this debate with my colleagues and people who don't agree with that."
Keep in mind, while reconciliation rules are in place for health care, center-right Democrats made it so that Republican obstructionism can kill climate-change legislation. To get to 60, Dems are going to need quite a few votes from those handful of Republicans who take science and global warming seriously.
McCain was supposed to be one of them. That now appears unlikely.
McCain had an opportunity to help bolster his tarnished reputation, regaining the stature he enjoyed after the 2000 campaign. Instead, he's throwing the opportunity away. He's gone through a variety of personas over the years, but it now seems he's sticking with the one rejected by the country in 2008.
—Steve Benen 3:45 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (12)
If Congress won't play ball it'll just be done administratively via EPA regulation of CO2 as a pollutant, just as we've already got the new CAFE standards without needing Congressional action. We need legislation on CO2 emissions only to make it harder for a future Republican administration to reverse course, and we can worry about that later when we have a better Senate.
Posted by: Steve LaBonne on May 19, 2009 at 3:50 PM | PERMALINK
Hey you co2 molecules -GET OFF MY LAWN.
Posted by: Im John McCain and I approved this message on May 19, 2009 at 4:16 PM | PERMALINK
Please excuse the capital letters. But,
WHY, OH, WHY DOES EVERY FRAKKING THING THAT GOES THROUGH THE UNITED STATES SENATE NEED SIXTY FRAKKING VOTES TO PASS??????
Posted by: kevin on May 19, 2009 at 4:19 PM | PERMALINK
Bah, John has it on good authority that CO2 is not a carcinogen.
Posted by: doubtful on May 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
John McCain sure is spending a lot of time whining about the GOP's lack of moderates while he does pitch-perfect imitations of a fringe-right freak.
Posted by: shortstop on May 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
What Steve LaBonne said above. EPA regulation can get us started between now and 2011, when a Senate with ~65 Dems can pass a strong cap-and-trade law.
Posted by: low-tech cyclist on May 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM | PERMALINK
WHY, OH, WHY DOES EVERY FRAKKING THING THAT GOES THROUGH THE UNITED STATES SENATE NEED SIXTY FRAKKING VOTES TO PASS??????
Because the conservatives in the senate consider "liberal" government to be illegitimate and anti-American and will rationalize any means or strategem they can think of to keep it from functioning.
If you were an alderman who thought your city government had been taken over by the mob or the street gangs, would you sit around and let them vote the city into corruption and ruin? Of course not.
Next question?
No, it doesn't make any rational sense. Neither did South Carolina seceding from the Union back in 1860. You aren't dealing with rational people, here.
Next?
Posted by: Midland on May 19, 2009 at 4:32 PM | PERMALINK
Lets me fair here. The John McCain we see here is the Real McCain. The "Maverick" was just something he adopted after the Keating scandal to woo the press.
Posted by: DR on May 19, 2009 at 6:34 PM | PERMALINK
Flippity, floppity, flip
Watch John McCain fumble and trip
On climate change he turned
Now his honor is quite burned
An also-ran whose words we skip
Posted by: Kurt on May 19, 2009 at 6:49 PM | PERMALINK
All the more reason that Americans should be soooo very thankful that John McCain is not our president.
McCain's about face about climate change and cap and trade is just the latest in a series of serious fake outs. The most unforgiveable is on the subject of torture. For a man who endured torture and lives with its lasting and limiting physical effects, pretends to oppose torture, and grilled the CIA and DOD on torture in 2005, McCain has made his opinion quite clear that America should simply ignore the Bush Administration's war crimes and move on. He was involved in the savings and loan scandal, and in the years between 2000 and 2008, AIG was a significant donor of soft money to McCain's war chest. There is little question why, last September, McCain suspended his campaign to return to Washington to look out for the banking industry giant. The maverick is and always has been a fraud.
Posted by: CarolA on May 19, 2009 at 10:05 PM | PERMALINK
The true beauty of this moment is that the current version of version of the climate legislation that is bottled up in committee is indistinguishable from climate legislation that McCain sponsored a year ago.
As a policy wonk who prefers legislation that actually walks the walk instead of just talking the walk, and as a climate advocate who is terrified of the consequences of not getting it right, right now, the current iteration of Waxman-Markey is worse than nothing at all. I want this iteration to die, and try again with something real next year. For me, Republican idiots like McCain are manna from heaven. They kill a bill that gives them everything they want, because they can't stand to even *pretend* to do the right thing. They look like blithering idiots, and get all of the blame for standing in the way of doing the right thing. The forces of truth and niceness get another bite of the apple next year, hopefully a little more sadder and wiser in their understanding that the inside game doesn't work - we need to control the message.
Posted by: converger on May 19, 2009 at 11:31 PM | PERMALINK
The forces of truth and niceness get another bite of the apple next year, hopefully a little more sadder and wiser in their understanding that the inside game doesn't work - we need to control the message.
New York will be underwater long before the Dumbocrats learn that lesson.
Posted by: Steve LaBonne on May 20, 2009 at 12:14 AM | PERMALINK