May 23, 2009
RIGHT MOVIE, WRONG LESSON.... Over the years, the debate over U.S. interrogation policies has featured quite a few references to fictional works, most commonly with the right referencing Jack Bauer and "24." Yesterday, we heard a twist, with the introduction of Col. Jessup and "A Few Good Men."
MSNBC's Joe Scarborough sees a parallel, with President Obama as Kaffee, and Dick Cheney as Jessup. Ryan Powers reported on Scarborough's on-air comments, in which the former Republican lawmaker described the two national-security speeches from Thursday:
"This scene yesterday...I'm serious here, this comes straight out of 'A Few Good Men.' The reason why the closing scene with Jack Nicholson on the stand worked so well, is, of course, we were all rooting for the young attractive Tom Cruise, just like more Americans are probably rooting for President Obama. But at the same time, what was said on that stand by Nicholson...I was struck by that contrast."
The comparison is not, on its face, absurd. If you've seen the movie, you know that Jessup believed the ends justified the means, and that a security-at-all-costs attitude was used to rationalize illegal conduct. It's a belief that sounds rather familiar.
But Scarborough seems to have forgotten the ending. Jessup lied under oath, orchestrated a conspiracy to cover up his crimes, ordered the torture (and accidental death) of a United States Marine, and was eventually arrested to face criminal charges. In other words, the audience wasn't just "rooting for the young attractive Tom Cruise"; the audience was supposed to realize that Col. Jessup was the villain in this story.
Indeed, it worries me a bit that Scarborough would watch "A Few Good Men" and think, "You know, maybe Kaffee really did 'weaken a country' with his efforts."
It's like watching "Bob Roberts" and thinking you'd like to vote for the protagonist.
—Steve Benen 8:00 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (25)
The reason why the closing scene with Jack Nicholson on the stand worked so well, is, of course, we were all rooting for the young attractive Tom Cruise
Not to be too snarky, but this mentality is precisely why Republicans recruit candidates like Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, Eric Cantor, etc. These people won't be asked to think about solutions or consider moral dilemnas. Their only job is to win elections and take orders from the back room.
Posted by: Danp on May 23, 2009 at 8:08 AM | PERMALINK
Fictional characters can still serve as role models. Thank God we still have men like Uncle Duke and Jeff Redfern to defend our interests, and journalists like Roland Hedley to speak truth to power.
Posted by: Al on May 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM | PERMALINK
Yes! I can't be the only one here who always rooted for Darth Vader!
Posted by: Bill Kristol on May 23, 2009 at 8:14 AM | PERMALINK
tho i find much in common between real american society and r crumb comics, i am quite sure that most any literary reference deepens (and distorts) our understandings of the world and our place in it through imaginative and creative allusions, memes, metaphors paradigms and archetypes.
that said, it is the freudian analysis of the lit crit response that is always helpful, too, in determining the paranoid schizophrenics who run our country and whose opinions toxify our media.
so this scarborough dude (not to mention dick cheney -- god damn his shit-filled soul to hell) is obviously a danger to himself and others, and someone near him should alert the authorities.
(just speaking literarily here, of course. Of course.)
Posted by: neill on May 23, 2009 at 8:25 AM | PERMALINK
Am I the only person around sick to death of constant comparisons of life to the 'movies'? It's so juvenile...Chris Matthews does it all the time and it makes him sound like a preteen bore.
Posted by: Marion the Librarian on May 23, 2009 at 8:25 AM | PERMALINK
Sometimes when I watch Morning Joe I wonder if Joe is exhibiting feigned stupidity or genetic stupidity. I find it disheartening when I hear some of the things that out of his mouth which are entirely contrary to reality. Either way, it is a window into the thinking of the conservative mind.
Posted by: Sheridan on May 23, 2009 at 8:31 AM | PERMALINK
joe went on to complain about the ending of The Accused, because obviously, Jodie Foster's character didn't learn where her place is in society, otherwise, why the trial?
Posted by: slappy magoo on May 23, 2009 at 8:37 AM | PERMALINK
It really is a movie begging for a film . The Keystone Cops architecture of the right wing paranoids cuuupled with
The unerring aim of their gutter sniping ,
Nipping at the anal retentive neurosis of inflexible infallibility ,
Jack boots roasting the unsuspecting defenceless on an open hatred fire .
The warm feeling of hatred which like a cleansing angel replaces the need to know with the urine scented glow of fear
If your curious then "Joe" has some frens who are just about always furious
With you
Posted by: FRP on May 23, 2009 at 8:51 AM | PERMALINK
What I see when I watch Cheney's ongoing heckling campaign of Obama is a bitter old man desperate to defend his legacy and his ego.
What is disgusting is watching the MSM gleefully give him a platform to do so, under the absurd auspice that Cheney's motivation has something to do with concerns about national security. Cheney has demonstrated over and over his willingness to say and do anything in order to manipulate the politics of the moment.
Posted by: Del Capslock on May 23, 2009 at 8:57 AM | PERMALINK
Fuuny, considering how much Conservatives love to bash Hollywood and their product, yet they seem to take so many of their ideas for foreign policy from movies and TV, not to mention running candidates wh were former actors!
Posted by: rob! on May 23, 2009 at 9:02 AM | PERMALINK
As a resident of America's heartland, I have to remind our children to always take proper precautions during tornadoes, lest they find themselves stranded in Munchkinland.
Posted by: Unca Paul on May 23, 2009 at 9:04 AM | PERMALINK
I'm glad he brought up the movie because there is no better representation of such a monster IRL. And most people, like Steve said, would never be sympathetic to Jessup if they watched it.
It'd be great to know someone is out there like Kaffee with the balls to push the motherfucker ("god damn his shit-filled soul to hell") into screaming the truth. Like the movie, I suspect it wouldn't take much. The arrogant shit.
PS: neill: you should check out the fan pages of "not have George Bush as president" and "telling Dick Cheney to shut the hell up" on FB. It's almost as fun as throwing actual shoes.
Posted by: MissMudd on May 23, 2009 at 9:08 AM | PERMALINK
"Indeed, it worries me a bit that Scarborough would watch "A Few Good Men" and think, "You know, maybe Kaffee really did 'weaken a country' with his efforts."
These are the same kind of people who watch Return of the Jedi and can't understand what those awful rebels have against that righteous decent Emperor Palpatine.
Posted by: Liam J on May 23, 2009 at 9:10 AM | PERMALINK
Although it is not inconceivable that you could watch A Few Good Men and reach the same conclusions as Scarborough. I know a lot of my friends did.
Posted by: dr sardonicus on May 23, 2009 at 9:46 AM | PERMALINK
But didn't Jessup lose and end up being arrested for, you know, torture/authoring the Code Red?
The final moral lesson of the movie was "We were supposed to fight for the people who couldn't fight for themselves."
(Shakes head)
Posted by: Former Dan on May 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM | PERMALINK
The idiot thinks Jessup screaming "you can't handle the truth" is the end of the movie. Everything is justified in those 5 words.
Daily, Scarborough tells the audience that his sources tell him that torture worked, the FBI agent testimony is wrong, he knows the real truth.
He gives no names; he simply states that he knows what really happens. He is full of shit, piss, vinegar and lies. He is the personification of the mindset that brought us the Iraq war.
Posted by: msw on May 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM | PERMALINK
Excellent. Can we now move to the ending where Jessup (Cheney) is arrested and frog-marched to prison?
Posted by: ckelly on May 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK
It's like watching World War Two and thinking Hitler was right.
Posted by: William Slattery on May 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM | PERMALINK
I've found that a pretty good thumbnail description of a wingnut is "someone who watched A Few Good Men and thought Nicholson was playing the good guy".
Posted by: Thlayli on May 23, 2009 at 10:50 AM | PERMALINK
What Former Dan said.
Also, the two Marines being charged, while found not guilty of murder, were found guilty of conduct unbecoming, for following orders that led to an illegal act.
It's another moral from the movie that I think gets overlooked.
Posted by: 2Manchu on May 23, 2009 at 11:29 AM | PERMALINK
Nobody ever thought that Joe Scarborough was the sharpest knife in the drawer---in fact, in terms of sharpness, he's more like a spoon.
Posted by: Leisureguy on May 23, 2009 at 1:20 PM | PERMALINK
Although it is not inconceivable that you could watch A Few Good Men and reach the same conclusions as Scarborough. I know a lot of my friends did.
Sure-- Kaffee (the Tom Cruise character) was pretty useless from the beginning, and Jessup's observation that Americans don't want to think about the dirty, violent underside of our military might was generally correct, if overstated. But the point is that Kaffee grows into an adult understanding of both American principles and some of the tradeoffs they can require, while Jessup is stuck in a highly limited dual view-- all honor and pageantry on the outside, and an unprincipled, crude, bullying interior. Once that interior's exposed due to his arrogance, he can no longer function or be of use.
It's complicated, which is why it's a damned good story... too bad the right can't quite grasp anything beyond the critical acclaim and jingoism.
Posted by: latts on May 23, 2009 at 1:42 PM | PERMALINK
It's like watching "Bob Roberts" and thinking you'd like to vote for the protagonist.
IIRC, Tim Robbins chose not to release a "Bob Roberts" soundtrack because he was concerned that listeners would identify with the protagonist. The first time I saw the film, I thought Robbins was underestimating his audience's ability to recognize who the bad guy was. But the past 8 years have made me rethink the matter.
Posted by: Jeremy B. on May 24, 2009 at 12:22 AM | PERMALINK
steve: "Indeed, it worries me a bit that Scarborough would watch A Few Good Men and think, You know, maybe Kaffee really did 'weaken a country' with his efforts.' It's like watching Bob Roberts and thinking you'd like to vote for the protagonist."
... Or watching Jack Nicholson's title character in Danny Devito's biopic Hoffa, and wishing that the real-life son and current Teamsters president was more like dear ol' dad.
Posted by: Out & About in the Castro on May 24, 2009 at 3:35 AM | PERMALINK
The real message of the movie wasn't the shouting showdown of Kaffee and Jessup as to who could or couldn't handle the truth.
It was the consequences that devolve from the truth. Not just Jessup, as villain, being taken away but more importantly Dawson and Downey being dishonorably discharged and a fellow marine dead by their actions.
The message of the movie isn't Jessup - it's Dawson. It's not the showy frog march of Jessup; it's the reluctant recognition by both the military court and Dawson that Jessups don't exist without Dawsons and Downeys.
It's a message no one in the Obama camp or the US Congress seems to have ever managed to "get" either. Rework the movie so that it ends with Judge Randolph saying to Jessup, "well, mistakes were made, but we're going to look forward now and how about let's just give amnesty to everyone involved, 'kay?"
That's the reality vs the mythology here.
There is no bitter pill of individual consequences in the reality, and instead there is a worldwide failure of the myth of America.
And that failure will have ongoing consequences that will rot every institution we ever revered.
Posted by: Mary on May 24, 2009 at 12:52 PM | PERMALINK