June 1, 2009
MITCH MCCONNELL'S BUSY SCHEDULE.... Like most top Republican officials, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is aware of some of the ugly vitriol against Sonia Sotomayor coming from his side of the aisle. Yesterday, he did his best to dodge it. (TP has video.)
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN Sunday he disagrees with conservative commentators who have labeled Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist, but said he has better things to do than be "the speech police."
"Look. I've got a big job to do dealing with 40 Senate Republicans and trying to advance the nation's agenda, and better things to do than be the speech police over people who have their views about a very important appointment," McConnell told CNN's John King on State of The Union. "So I'm not going to get into policing everybody's speech."
As it turns out, I'm not sure if he does have "better things to do." The smears coming from prominent Republicans -- some in elected office, some not -- run the risk of doing long-term damage to McConnell's party. Indeed, given last week's vitriol, many are watching to see how GOP leaders deal with this debate. It's not unreasonable to think the a Republican leader would be well served making it clear to the public that he sees lines that shouldn't be crossed.
But McConnell has "better things to do."
What's especially odd about this is that others have been willing to do what McConnell is not. Late last week, Sen. John Cornyn, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, tried to put some distance between the party and the activists trying to smear Sotomayor. RNC Chairman Michael Steele did the same on Friday. Just yesterday, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also kept Limbaugh/Gingrich rhetoric at arm's length. None of them has been "policing everybody's speech," but they nevertheless seem anxious to let voters know they're not entirely comfortable with some of the right's rhetoric of late.
So, why isn't McConnell willing to offer similar rebukes?
—Steve Benen 8:00 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (29)
Cowards with pitchforks,all of them.
Posted by: Danp on June 1, 2009 at 8:13 AM | PERMALINK
he makes Bunning look like a genius and would destroy the repub party in Kentucky, if Kentucky Republicans weren't so ignorant.
Posted by: effluvientOne on June 1, 2009 at 8:13 AM | PERMALINK
Every time I see Mitch McConnell, I think of that last scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark. He always looks like he's melting away to me.
Posted by: rob! on June 1, 2009 at 8:17 AM | PERMALINK
"Look. I've got a big job to do dealing with 40 Senate Republicans and trying to advance the nation's agenda, and better things to do than be the speech police over people who have their views about a very important appointment"
This is quite clever. For a Republican. By using the phrase Speech Police, he conjures up images of the dreaded PC Brigade that stomps around in iron-soled Birkenstocks and stifles freedom of expression with their non-stop scoldkriegs. But Mitch is a RealAmerican gosh dang it and he's not going to tell other RealAmericans to shut up.
Actually, that's so clever I can't believe Mitch did it on purpose. And as you point out, the GOP will still have to deal with the aftermath. Oh well, I guess he didn't want to come out and say that he's afraid of the Wrath of Rush. Jackass.
Posted by: The Answer WAS Orange on June 1, 2009 at 8:19 AM | PERMALINK
Interesting conundrum. The base will demand a racist/sexist witch hunt. The party needs to deliver that, but without coming off as racist/sexist witch hunters to the rest of the voting public. It's a tough to walk that fine line. It will be interesting to see how they go about it.
Posted by: gex on June 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM | PERMALINK
It's one of the increasingly frequent episodes where the demands of the crazy but vital base serve to destroy the future of the Republican party with the saner parts of the electorate. McConnell would like to hide under his desk until this all blows over, but instead he's going to be too busy reorganizing the supply cabinet and trying to fix the office phone bill.
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of conflicted amoral freaks.
Posted by: ericblair on June 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM | PERMALINK
Why is Sen Cornyn willing to speak out but not Sen McConell? What percentage of Kentucky voters are Hispanic? What percentage of Texas voters are Hispanic?
Posted by: JohnMcC on June 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM | PERMALINK
I can't think of an example right now, but I feel certain that Mitch has found a few moments in his packed schedule to "police the speech" of Democrats on various occasions.
What a candyass. Rush might get him. BOO!
Posted by: shortstop on June 1, 2009 at 8:37 AM | PERMALINK
Once again, it's good news. McConnell's refusal to engage the nuts allows them to be the public face of the Republican Party. And the GOP will continue to wonder, wonder, wonder why Americans think the party is racist.
Posted by: Domage on June 1, 2009 at 8:38 AM | PERMALINK
Given an opportunity to halt, or at least put the brakes on the Republican Death Spiral, what does Ol' Mitch Do? "Full speed ahead!"
Posted by: Marko on June 1, 2009 at 8:42 AM | PERMALINK
Whenever anyone starts a conversation or a response with "Look,..." I run the other way. What usually follows is non-substantive, obfuscatory, or both. Dems do it, too, alas.
This particular issue is just so tired. People who represent one side of an issue say inflammatory things, while those who hold lofty political positions (usually) distance themselves from those things, while telling us that there's nothing they can do about it. Rinse, repeat.
Posted by: terraformer on June 1, 2009 at 8:50 AM | PERMALINK
Maybe Newt's doing a fund-raiser for McConnell.
Posted by: hells littlest angel on June 1, 2009 at 8:51 AM | PERMALINK
This is a KY Republican. He agrees with Rush, Newt, and The Big Dick.
Posted by: Bob Johnson on June 1, 2009 at 8:59 AM | PERMALINK
The next time he objects to a statement by a Democrat, somebody will have to point out he's not the speech police.
Posted by: Jose Padilla on June 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM | PERMALINK
Mitch McConnell:"I have better things to do."
Y'know, If I only had a nickel for every time some Republican political coward fell back on that paltry little bit of an excuse, I could (a) move my family to Kentucky, (b) manage to shake the hands of every man, woman, and child in the state of Kentucky, and (c) whip Mitch's ass to the infernal regions and back in a general election, leaving him with less than 30% of the vote.
Posted by: S. Waybright on June 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM | PERMALINK
It's HARD work being a Senator from KY. First, you have to try and get rid of Jim Bunning. Then there are mountaintops to level, Coal mine sludge ponds to allow and tobacco companies to appease.
Who the the hell has time to stop fellow party members from slandering and libeling some Puerto Rican chick?
Posted by: dweb on June 1, 2009 at 9:17 AM | PERMALINK
The exercise and feeling of faith that one experiences in determining the meaning of a member of the paranoid authoritarian clubs sober cant . Hmm ... Exploring "better things to do," free thrills ? Equal to the rapture ?
One imagines the fine people chuckling ever so subtly (yet effusively) over the irony of murdering Ole Doc Tiller . That is if they are not too busy correlating the one to one right wing imaginings to a growing death tax on the sillies who forget the danger of crossing "too busy better things to do" paranoid authoritarian asylums . Those who study in endless complaints about serious metaphysical noodling of ontological determinations . Illustrating plainly and dramatically , so when one unknown unknowable becomes marked by the mercy of their own mark of Cain it brings the desired peace . Verdict to be distributed by lottery , bullets (or both) . No more mistakes like leaving law abiding productive members of society alive will need to be tolerated .
Geez it werks ! I'm already losing the reasoning of why more people being murdered by the loyal ditto community and their passionate hate are not ostracised . Plus I lost five pounds !
Posted by: FRP on June 1, 2009 at 9:23 AM | PERMALINK
Perhaps it is clever, unless and until someone asks him why it is that the distinguished minority leader seems to make time to police the speech of anyone who want to uphold the rule of law (in the form of enforcing anti torture statutes or habeas corpus, e.g.), or someone who might profess pride in being something other than a reactionary, anglo male....
Posted by: jhm on June 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK
This is a KY Republican
I'm sure there is a good joke in there somewhere at McConnell's expense, but I have had enough coffee yet to make it work. . .
Posted by: zeitgeist on June 1, 2009 at 10:05 AM | PERMALINK
dont blame the ignorance on the kentuckians... they're all good people.. they just have the bourbon.
mitchie is the manifestation of a real mean bourbon drunk, exactly as if the demon had climbed up out of the bottle and en-corporated...
Posted by: neill on June 1, 2009 at 10:14 AM | PERMALINK
Yesterday's Sunday morning shows presented a parade of impotent Republican Senators who lacked the balls to condemn Gingrich, Rove, Buchanan, Tancredo, and Limbaugh's statements that Sonia Sotomayor is a racist. When asked directly, Sessions, Mitchell, and others lacked the honor and integrity to respond "yes" or "no" the direct question, "Do you agree with Rush Limbaugh that Sotomayor is a racist?" For the past week, they have been all too happy to have unelected, disgraced former Republicans and media entertainers, political analysts, and pundits do their dirty work for them. Now, back from recess, elected Republican "leadership" contends that they must first "examine her record" before they can make that determination. And where have prominent Republican Senators McCain, Cantor, and Boehner been on this issue? The quiet has been deafening. They're straddling the line between the Hispanic vote and the conservative, white supremacy, anti-immigrant base. What will it take? Will Republicans require proof that Sotomayor is not menstruating before they are able to bring themselves to condemn Gordon Liddy's disgusting, mesogynist remarks? Shameful!
Looks like the Republican Party doesn't care about the women's vote or the Hispanic vote either.
Posted by: Carol A. on June 1, 2009 at 10:35 AM | PERMALINK
So, why isn't McConnell willing to offer similar rebukes?
Because the Muppeteer in charge of making the jaw go up and down didn't have that on the script.
Posted by: GuyFromOhio on June 1, 2009 at 10:43 AM | PERMALINK
When it comes to coordinated manipulation of language and perception the rethugs are anything but dummies. They are damn good at it. The only relevance of the actual content is it's appeal to those stupid enough to fall for it.
This is pure good cop/bad cop/'statesman above the fray only looking out for justice' kabuki.
They are the puppeteers to the media muppets.
Posted by: apthorp on June 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM | PERMALINK
They are the puppeteers to the media muppets.
Good one! I hadn't thought it through that far - every time I see McConnell standing at a podium, he just looks like a big Muppet to me. He's got the dead eyes, the flat voice, the caricature face. The only things he lacks are sticks moving his arms and anything remotely humorous to say.
For Carol:
And where have prominent Republican Senators McCain, Cantor, and Boehner been on this issue? The quiet has been deafening.
I'm picking nits, but Boehner is in the House, and doesn't have a dog in this hunt, procedurally. I'm with you on all else - any political party that lets Liddy and Limbaugh do all the talking deserves to wander in the political wilderness for a couple of decades.
Posted by: GuyFromOhio on June 1, 2009 at 11:01 AM | PERMALINK
"So, why isn't McConnell willing to offer similar rebukes?"
thanks, steve, for asking the EASY questions this morning.
i know the answer to that!
he is a chinless weasel and doesn't have the intelligence of dryer lint!
Posted by: karen marie on June 1, 2009 at 11:03 AM | PERMALINK
wow...40 whole senators to watch over...how did he ever manage when he had, say, 55 to watch over....
maybe he had a play to go to...[just kiddin'...]
Posted by: dj spellchecka on June 1, 2009 at 11:12 AM | PERMALINK
Hmmm. How about "KY Jelly Quivers at the Thought of Confrontation"?
Posted by: The Answer WAS Orange on June 1, 2009 at 11:37 AM | PERMALINK
"KY Jelly Lets Controversial Statements Slide"?
Oops, here comes the guy with the hook.
Posted by: The Answer WAS Orange on June 1, 2009 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
"So, why isn't McConnell willing to offer similar rebukes?"
I see JohnMcC beat me to it, but I too am thinking maybe there aren't enough Hispanics in Kentucky?
Still, as others have pointed out, although earlier in the week Cornyn and Kyl were decrying the "racist" meme, when it came to doing it again on the Sunday gasbags, they passed. Must have heard from Rush in the meantime.
Posted by: Cal Gal on June 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM | PERMALINK