June 24, 2009
LETTER TO IRAN.... It seems one of the bigger political stories of the day is this Washington Times report about previous outreach efforts towards Iran by the Obama administration. Reading the details, though, this isn't especially shocking.
Prior to this month's disputed presidential election in Iran, the Obama administration sent a letter to the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, calling for an improvement in relations, according to interviews and the leader himself. [...]
U.S. officials declined to discuss the letter on Tuesday.... An Iranian with knowledge of the overture, however, told The Washington Times that the letter was sent between May 4 and May 10 and laid out the prospect of "cooperation in regional and bilateral relations" and a resolution of the dispute over Iran's nuclear program.
This has caused a stir -- predictably, Drudge is all excited -- but there's nothing in the official correspondence that's especially provocative.
Indeed, it's not even particularly new. Iran's regime sent Obama a letter of congratulations last fall, and it's already been reported elsewhere that the State Department has been crafting a response.
What's more, this is entirely consistent with what Obama said he'd do if elected -- reaching out to a foe to explore possibly improving relations and engaging Iran on a possible nuclear deal.
The White House said it would reach out, we knew officials were working on reaching out, and so now we know the White House did reach out. As revelations go, this hardly sends the heart aflutter.
Some of the overly-excited conservative analysis is that the administration's letter was predicated on "the expectation that President Ahmadinejad would win a landslide victory." But there's no evidence to support this -- in fact, it seems backwards. The letter was to Khamenei, the country's supreme leader, not the Iranian president, and there's nothing in the reports pointing to any White House assumptions about the Iranian presidential election.
Indeed, the correspondence seems unrelated to the election, which is why it was sent more than a month before Iranian voters headed to the polls, long before any U.S. officials could have expected the unrest that's shaken Iran so dramatically, and circumventing Ahmadinejad altogether.
I suspect the right will continue to be excited about this; I'm just not sure why.
—Steve Benen 10:45 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (17)
Did anyone watch The Daily Show last night? Jason Jones did a segment about how much Iranian's know about American politics and how little American's know about, well, politics. (And Leno showed, some years ago, that something like 8 out of 10 American's couldn't point to Ohio, let alone Iraq, but I digress.)
Drudge has his panties in a twist because he doesn't seem to understand the political leadership hierarchy in Iran. Most conservatives don't seem to either. Of course they are going to be upset. Obama is STILL president. Oh, and he's still breathing. They hate that.
Posted by: MsJoanne on June 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM | PERMALINK
Correction, sorry:
...something like 8 out of 10 American's couldn't point to Ohio on a map, let alone Iraq...
Posted by: MsJoanne on June 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM | PERMALINK
You ever get the impression that the media has been reduced to an advertising agency trying to figure out a way to market cow chips?
Posted by: Danp on June 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM | PERMALINK
http://worldfocus.org
there's a video to watch about missiles and bombs that are still exploding in Vietnam -- rusty, yet, still explosive.
In the video you will see the kids affected by Agent Orange - crippled...
And this is what the GOP advocates?
Posted by: annjell on June 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK
Whatever Obama does is wrong. If he makes overtures to Iran, then he is wrong. If he doesn't tell Iran how to run their country, he is wrong. At this point, I think that if Obama went crazy and decided to bomb Iran, the Republicans would still say he's wrong, even though that seems to be what they want. They are the party stuck in temper tantrum mode.
Posted by: mlm on June 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM | PERMALINK
I've often thought that the right's excitable, whimsical, and totally unreasonable attitude towards Iran comes from that sick at the pit of the stomach feeling one gets, when one realises how badly one has screwed up.
After 9/11, Iran extended an offer of help to us (in well understood self-interest, but, still...). We responded by telling them to take a flying leap. Which, of course, they did -- straight into intensified uranium enhancement. To which, naturally, our only option was to respond with even harsher propaganda -- McCain's "bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" comes to mind as a sort of "bumper sticker policy" we adopted.
It reminded me of an old Jules Verne novel, where one city built an ever bigger cannon and another an ever thicker wall; there seemed to be no other solution. Obama is trying to break that vicious circle of act/react and, for all the right knows, might be successful. It has to be a hateful proposition to the right. So, they flail, to cove up for that "we know we screwed up, but won't admit it" feeling...
Posted by: exlibra on June 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM | PERMALINK
I suspect the right will continue to be excited about this; I'm just not sure why.
Oh, c'mon now. You know why.
Posted by: kc on June 24, 2009 at 11:08 AM | PERMALINK
I find it amazing that it is now totally cool to undermine the President in foreign relations, and to subtly imply he is little more than a stooge for the Republican/Neocon Enemy of the Day (before it was bowing to the Saudi king, etc.).
From 2001 to January 2009, even daring to question how Bush was carrying out his foreign policy in public caused the entire media and Republican establishment to simultaneously reach for the smelling salts. Remember when Pelosi took a trip overseas? She was a rogue Congressperson TRYING TO STEAL THE PRESIDENT'S JOB. How DARE SHE IMPEDE ON THE PRESIDENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
Amazing. Fucking amazing.
Posted by: Joshua on June 24, 2009 at 11:17 AM | PERMALINK
I suspect the right will continue to be excited about this; I'm just not sure why.
How about......For the same reason the dog licks his balls, because he can.
Posted by: sceptic on June 24, 2009 at 11:20 AM | PERMALINK
Here's my last 2 cents on this issue.
"History will be repeated," if the GOP has their way.
Lil Kim have nukes pointed towards the U.S. right now - 2 journalist in custody.
GOP is quite mum on this
The GOP is focused on Iran, not N. Korea?
Isn't this what happened with 9/11? We went into Afghanistan, then Iraq, now back to Afghanistan.
The GOP should be made to answer why they are committing the same blunders.
Faux News, CNN should be ashamed of themselves for helping spread this rhetoric!
Posted by: annjell on June 24, 2009 at 11:53 AM | PERMALINK
"...I suspect the right will continue to be excited about this; I'm just not sure why."
Sure you are. We all know why. This group want Obama to fail and will demean him in every way possible. They walk around throwing fits every day because they are not in power.
How much did they ever say about the worst, most corrupt Administration ever.
Posted by: bjobotts on June 24, 2009 at 12:25 PM | PERMALINK
Oh please. It's simple behavioral conditioning.
Step 1: call attention to Obama doing something or not doing something. The exact nature of the action / inaction is almost vanishingly unimportant, as is any but the most tenuous connection to fact.
Step 2: shriek wildly about how said action / inaction is wrong and Other (e.g., un-American, socialist, Fascist, Islamic, voodoo), and therefore by extension so is Obama and everyone who supports him. More and louder shrieking is better; there are no countervailing influences.
Repeat every day, using the previous day's issue or a new one (it doesn't matter).
Result: over a period of time, a certain portion of the population is fully conditioned to think of Obama as wrong and Other.
Simple. Like their audience.
Posted by: bleh on June 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM | PERMALINK
It's really rather simple. As a previous poster noted, whatever Obama does will be wrong. No matter what, on any issue.
The republicans are on a precipice; if Obama'sagenda is successful, they are toast and they know it. Therefore, they are gambling everything they have on total opposition. We see this in Iran.
The truth is that republicans are doing everything they can to thwart Obama's initiatives, which enjoy strong support by the majority of Americans.
Isn't it great that we have an opposition party that would rather see our country fail than succeed, based solely on their ideology?
I know I'm speaking to the choir here, but it feels good to say it!
Posted by: citizen_pain on June 24, 2009 at 12:32 PM | PERMALINK
I suspect the right will continue to be excited about this; I'm just not sure why.
As happens so frequently, I think Fred Clark at Slacktivist has figured it out.
Posted by: Mnemosyne on June 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM | PERMALINK
I suspect the right will continue to be excited about this; I'm just not sure why.
It is what the "ready, fire, aim" right does. It is built into their DNA.
Posted by: e henry thripshaw on June 24, 2009 at 1:16 PM | PERMALINK
You're absolutely right, ex libra. The republicans won't acknowlege the cooperation and offers of assistance they received from Iran after 9/11. GWB decided to piss all over them and add them to his axis of evil. Dumb, dumb, dumb. As one who taught high school social studies for over 30 years, I can say that most Americans don't know as much as they should about U.S. and world history, and they pass along to their kids the idea that history is not an important subject. This attitudes is especially pervasive here in the South.
Posted by: maji on June 24, 2009 at 1:52 PM | PERMALINK
I meant attitude.
Posted by: majii on June 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM | PERMALINK